Skip to main content

Ferrari N.V. vs McLaren Automotive: Strategic Comparison

Direct Answer

Ferrari is far bigger and far more profitable: it reported ~$8.07 billion (€7.146 billion) in net revenues and about $1.81 billion (€1.6 billion) in net profit for 2025, versus McLaren Automotive's last disclosed figure of ~$615 million (£465.9 million) in revenue for 2023, with no net income reported since. On the racetrack the picture flips: McLaren's Formula 1 team won the 2024 and 2025 Constructors' Championships, beating Ferrari by just 14 points in 2024, while Ferrari's Scuderia has not won a title since 2008. Ferrari trades publicly as RACE on the NYSE and in Milan, with a market cap of about $84.2 billion (€74.5 billion) in September 2026; McLaren Automotive has been privately owned by Abu Dhabi's CYVN Holdings since April 2025.

Ferrari generates more than 15 times the revenue of McLaren Automotive, yet it is McLaren's Formula 1 team, not Ferrari's, that has won the last two Constructors' Championships. Ferrari, founded in Maranello in 1947 by Enzo Ferrari, reported net revenues of ~$8.07 billion (€7.146 billion) and net profit of about $1.81 billion (€1.6 billion) for 2025 on 13,640 cars shipped, with about 5,718 employees, under CEO Benedetto Vigna. McLaren Automotive, which traces its road-car roots to the racing team Bruce McLaren founded in 1963 and became a standalone carmaker in 2010, last disclosed revenue of ~$615 million (£465.9 million) for 2023, a 25.8% drop from ~$829 million (£627.8 million) in 2022, and employed roughly 2,500 staff as of a September 2026 investment announcement. Nick Collins has run McLaren Group Holdings, which now also owns the Forseven EV startup, since Abu Dhabi's CYVN Holdings completed its takeover of McLaren in April 2025, succeeding Michael Leiters.

Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.

Share

Key Differences at a Glance

FieldFerrari N.V.McLaren Automotive
Latest annual revenue~$8.1B (FY2025)~$615M (FY2023)
Founded19472010
Employees5,435N/A
Market CapN/AN/A
HeadquartersItalyUnited Kingdom
Revenue / Employee$1.49M / employeeN/A
Valuation MultipleN/AN/A

Strategic Positioning

Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles

Ferrari N.V. Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

Ferrari's strategy is 'multi-energy': it sells combustion, plug-in hybrid and now fully electric cars side by side, built in-house at the e-building in Maranello that opened in June 2024.

Productivity: $1.49M / employee

McLaren Automotive Strategic Vector

FY2023 Revenue Baseline

Growth now rests on the CYVN merger.

Comparative Divergence: Ferrari and McLaren have raced against each other in Formula 1 since the 1960s, but their road-car rivalry sharpened after McLaren's 2011 MP4-12C targeted Ferrari's core customer base, and McLaren Automotive's own company profile names Ferrari as its closest benchmark rival. On track, McLaren ended a 16-year title drought by beating Ferrari to the 2024 Constructors' Championship by 14 points, then repeated as champion in 2025, while Ferrari's Scuderia has not won since 2008 despite holding the record 16 titles. Off track the two companies' recent moves diverge sharply: Ferrari unveiled its first fully electric model, the Luce, in May 2026 at about €550,000 with deliveries from Q4 2026, while McLaren spent April 2025 being absorbed into Abu Dhabi's CYVN Holdings alongside EV startup Forseven and, in September 2026, announced a ~$594 million (£450 million) Woking investment to add 1,000 jobs.

Ferrari N.V. vs McLaren Automotive Market Share

McLaren Automotive market share
McLaren does not report market share. It sells far fewer cars than Ferrari or Lamborghini, which each deliver well over 10,000 vehicles a year.

Quick Stats Comparison

MetricFerrari N.V.McLaren Automotive
Revenue~$8.1B (FY2025)~$615M (FY2023)
Founded19472010
HeadquartersMaranello, ItalyWoking, Surrey, England, United Kingdom
Market CapN/AN/A
Employees5,435—
Revenue / Employee$1.49M / employeeN/A
Valuation MultipleN/AN/A

Ferrari N.V. Revenue vs McLaren Automotive Revenue — Year by Year

YearFerrari N.V.McLaren AutomotiveHigher reported revenue
2025~$8.1BN/AOnly one figure available
2024~$7.5BN/AOnly one figure available
2023~$6.7B~$615MFerrari N.V. (approx. USD)
2022~$5.8B~$828.7MFerrari N.V. (approx. USD)
2021~$4.8B~$783.7MFerrari N.V. (approx. USD)

Business Model Breakdown

Overview: Ferrari N.V. vs McLaren Automotive

This in-depth comparison examines Ferrari N.V. and McLaren Automotive across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Ferrari N.V. on its own, evaluating McLaren Automotive, or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Ferrari N.V. and McLaren Automotive is widest.

On the headline numbers, annual revenue is ~$8.1B (FY2025) for Ferrari N.V. and ~$615M (FY2023) for McLaren Automotive, while their respective market capitalizations stand at N/A and N/A. Ferrari N.V. is headquartered in Italy and McLaren Automotive in United Kingdom, and those different home markets shape how each company competes.

Ferrari N.V.: Ferrari is a luxury company that happens to build cars. Based in Maranello, it designs and builds sports cars, GTs, the Purosangue and limited hypercars, races in Formula 1 through Scuderia Ferrari, and sells branded lifestyle products. Exor, the Agnelli family holding company, is the largest shareholder, and Benedetto Vigna has been CEO since September 2021. The company is headquartered in Maranello, Italy.

McLaren Automotive: McLaren Automotive is the road-car arm of the McLaren name, separate from the McLaren F1 team but sharing its Woking campus and heritage. It positions itself as an engineering-led rival to Ferrari, with lightweight carbon chassis, hydraulic suspension and active aerodynamics. Its history since 2010 has mixed acclaimed cars, such as the 720S and Senna, with recurring cash shortages that ended in the 2025 sale to CYVN Holdings. The company is headquartered in Woking, United Kingdom.

Business Models: How Ferrari N.V. and McLaren Automotive Make Money

Ferrari N.V. and McLaren Automotive pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Ferrari N.V. and McLaren Automotive.

Ferrari N.V. business model: Ferrari earns most of its money selling cars and spare parts (about 85% of 2025 net revenues), with the rest coming from sponsorship, commercial and brand income (Formula 1 sponsorships, F1 prize money, lifestyle and licensing) plus a small engines line. It keeps annual shipments around 13,600-13,800 units, allocates limited models to loyal clients, and lifts revenue per car through product mix and personalization rather than volume.

McLaren Automotive business model: McLaren sells hand-assembled cars through a franchised retailer network. Series models (Artura, 750S and the GTS grand tourer) provide most of the volume, while Ultimate Series hypercars such as the 399-unit W1 are sold in small numbers at multi-million-dollar prices. Bespoke options from McLaren Special Operations (MSO), customer GT racing cars, servicing and parts add further income. Unlike Ferrari, Lamborghini and Aston Martin, McLaren has no SUV, which keeps volumes low.

Competitive Advantage: Ferrari N.V. vs McLaren Automotive

The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Ferrari N.V. stack up against those of McLaren Automotive.

Ferrari N.V. competitive advantage: Ferrari's advantage is its brand, which is tied to its history in Formula 1. Ferrari has raced in the championship since it began, and the Prancing Horse badge carries deep meaning for car enthusiasts. Rivals such as McLaren or Pagani can build cars that match or beat it on performance figures, but they cannot reproduce more than 75 years of racing heritage, the sound of its V12 engines or the status the name gives an owner.

McLaren Automotive competitive advantage: Every McLaren road car since the 2011 MP4-12C has used a carbon-fibre tub, a technique the company brought to Formula 1 with the 1981 MP4/1. Tubs for current cars are made at its composites plant in Sheffield, which gives McLaren lighter, stiffer cars than many aluminium-chassis rivals and a clear engineering story linked to its F1 team.

Growth Strategy: Where Ferrari N.V. and McLaren Automotive Are Headed

Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Ferrari N.V. and McLaren Automotive each plan to expand from here.

Ferrari N.V. growth strategy: Ferrari's strategy is 'multi-energy': it sells combustion, plug-in hybrid and now fully electric cars side by side, built in-house at the e-building in Maranello that opened in June 2024. Growth comes from mix (hypercars such as the F80, the Purosangue and special series), personalization, sponsorship and lifestyle income, rather than from big volume increases.

McLaren Automotive growth strategy: Growth now rests on the CYVN merger. Combining McLaren with Forseven gives McLaren access to more engineers and capital for electrified and multi-seat models, while the McLaren Licensing business aims to earn more from the brand. Earlier, Michael Leiters (CEO 2022-2025) focused on fixing Artura quality problems and stabilising production.

Financial Picture: Ferrari N.V. vs McLaren Automotive

A closer look at the financial trajectory of Ferrari N.V. and McLaren Automotive rounds out the comparison.

Ferrari N.V.: Ferrari grew net revenues from ~$3.5 billion (€3.1 billion) in 2016 to ~$8.08 billion (€7.15 billion) in 2025 while shipments rose only from about 8,000 to 13,640 cars. In 2025 revenue rose 7% (8% at constant currency), EBIT margin improved 120 basis points to 29.5%, adjusted EBITDA reached ~$3.13 billion (€2.77 billion) (38.8% margin) and industrial free cash flow exceeded ~$1.69 billion (€1.5 billion). In Q2 2026 net revenues rose 8.4% to ~$2.19 billion (€1.94 billion), EBITDA hit ~$853 million (€755 million) (39.0% margin) and EBIT ~$684 million (€605 million) (31.2%), and management raised 2026 guidance to roughly $8.59 billion (€7.6 billion) of revenue and adjusted EBITDA of at least ~$3.36 billion (€2.97 billion). Ferrari commands a luxury premium in the market, sustaining a valuation well over $70 billion as one of the world's most powerful brands.

McLaren Automotive: McLaren has struggled to fund new models from its own cash. The 2020 pandemic forced job cuts, a ~$224 million (£170 million) sale-and-leaseback of the Woking campus and fresh shareholder funding. In 2023 revenue fell 25.8% to ~$615 million (£465.9 million) as deliveries dropped, and the holding company booked a record loss that included a ~$495 million (£375 million) impairment. Mumtalakat kept the business funded until CYVN Holdings took over in April 2025; CYVN has not published standalone McLaren Automotive figures since.

Company-Specific SWOT Notes

Ferrari N.V.

Strength

The Prancing Horse is globally recognized as the ultimate symbol of wealth, speed, and Italian heritage.

Strength

Inelastic demand allows Ferrari to constantly raise base prices and push lucrative bespoke customization options without ever losing customers.

Weakness

The brand's identity is heavily tied to the sound and visceral feel of internal combustion engines, particularly their V8s and V12s.

Weakness

While a strength, the brand's prestige is tied to F1 success.

Opportunity

Entering the luxury SUV market provides a high-margin revenue stream, capturing clients who want a daily-drivable Ferrari without cannibalizing sports car sales.

Threat

Increasingly stringent global emissions standards threaten the viability of high-displacement combustion engines, forcing R&D spending on electrification.

McLaren Automotive

Strength

Every single model uses a lightweight carbon tub, providing leading torsional rigidity, safety, and power-to-weight ratios.

Strength

Active aero airbrakes and Proactive Chassis Control hydraulic suspension developed from grand prix racing.

Weakness

Lacks a direct competitor to the Ferrari Purosangue, Aston Martin DBX, or Lamborghini Urus that drives volume.

Weakness

Software and electrical sensor delays on early Artura models created initial dealer inventory delivery backlogs.

Opportunity

Monetizing multi-million-dollar collector allocations for the historic successor to the well-known McLaren F1 and P1.

Threat

Ferrari's large brand pricing power and Porsche 911 GT3 RS capturing track-enthusiast market share.

Factual Scorecard

CategoryResultWhy
Same-period Revenue ScaleNot comparableFerrari N.V.: ~$8.1B (FY2025). McLaren Automotive: ~$615M (FY2023). Different or missing fiscal periods prevent a like-for-like ranking.
Founded EarlierFerrari N.V.Ferrari N.V. was founded in 1947; McLaren Automotive was founded in 2010.
Verdict

Comparison Takeaway: Ferrari N.V. vs McLaren Automotive

Ferrari and McLaren Automotive are barely comparable in scale: Ferrari's 2025 revenue is more than 15 times McLaren's last reported 2023 figure, and Ferrari turns a profit (about 22% net margin in 2025) while McLaren's holding company booked a record loss in 2023 that included a ~$495 million (£375 million) impairment charge. The two also run opposite playbooks: Ferrari deliberately caps shipments below demand (13,640 cars in 2025, an order book full through 2027) to protect pricing power, while McLaren has struggled to sell enough cars to cover its costs and still has no SUV to chase the volume that Ferrari's Purosangue, Lamborghini's Urus and Aston Martin's DBX already capture. McLaren's clearest win is on the Formula 1 grid, where back-to-back 2024-2025 Constructors' titles ended a 16-year drought and represent sharper current form than Ferrari's, whose Scuderia has not won a title since 2008 despite an all-time record 16 Constructors' crowns. For a buyer, Ferrari is the financially secure, publicly traded luxury icon with pricing power; McLaren is the smaller, currently loss-making engineering specialist now leaning on fresh Abu Dhabi capital to fund its next generation of cars.

Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.

Frequently Asked Questions: Ferrari N.V. vs McLaren Automotive

Is Ferrari bigger than McLaren Automotive?

Yes, by a wide margin. Ferrari reported ~$8.07 billion (€7.146 billion) in net revenues for 2025 with about 5,718 employees at year end, versus McLaren Automotive's last disclosed figure of ~$615 million (£465.9 million) in revenue for 2023 (down 25.8% from ~$829 million (£627.8 million) in 2022) and roughly 2,500 staff as of September 2026. That makes Ferrari more than 15 times McLaren's size by revenue.

Which is more profitable, Ferrari or McLaren?

Ferrari, clearly. It reported net profit of about $1.81 billion (€1.6 billion) for 2025, a roughly 22% net margin, on an EBITDA margin of 38.8%. McLaren Automotive has not disclosed net income since 2023, when its parent, McLaren Holdings, booked a record loss that included a ~$495 million (£375 million) impairment charge.

Who is the CEO of Ferrari and who runs McLaren Automotive?

Benedetto Vigna has been Ferrari's CEO since September 2021, recruited from the semiconductor industry to manage its electrification push. McLaren Automotive is run by Nick Collins, who became CEO of McLaren Group Holdings in 2025 after Abu Dhabi's CYVN Holdings took over the company and merged it with EV startup Forseven; he succeeded Michael Leiters, CEO from 2022 to 2025.

Has McLaren ever beaten Ferrari in Formula 1?

Yes, recently and decisively. McLaren's Formula 1 team won the 2024 Constructors' Championship by just 14 points over Ferrari, ending a title drought that stretched back to 2008, then won again in 2025. Ferrari still holds the all-time record with 16 Constructors' titles, but its most recent came in 2008.

Which is better, Ferrari or McLaren Automotive?

It depends on what matters to you. Ferrari is the financially stronger, publicly traded company (NYSE and Milan: RACE, about $84.2 billion (€74.5 billion) market cap in September 2026) with an order book full through 2027. McLaren Automotive is privately owned by CYVN Holdings, has no SUV in its lineup, and currently wins on pure racetrack form with back-to-back F1 Constructors' titles in 2024 and 2025.

Which company was founded first, Ferrari N.V. or McLaren Automotive?

Ferrari N.V. was founded in 1947; McLaren Automotive was founded in 2010.

What revenue did Ferrari N.V. and McLaren Automotive report?

Ferrari N.V. had ~$8.1B (FY2025), while McLaren Automotive had ~$615M (FY2023). The fiscal years differ, so these are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.

How do Ferrari N.V. and McLaren Automotive make money?

Ferrari N.V.: Ferrari earns most of its money selling cars and spare parts (about 85% of 2025 net revenues), with the rest coming from sponsorship, commercial and brand income (Formula 1 sponsorships, F1 prize money, lifestyle and licensing) plus a small engines line. McLaren Automotive: McLaren sells hand-assembled cars through a franchised retailer network.

Which is better, Ferrari N.V. or McLaren Automotive?

There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Ferrari N.V. and McLaren Automotive on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.

Sources & References

Quick Answer

Ferrari is far bigger and far more profitable: it reported ~$8.07 billion (€7.146 billion) in net revenues and about $1.81 billion (€1.6 billion) in net profit for 2025, versus McLaren Automotive's last disclosed figure of ~$615 million (£465.9 million) in revenue for 2023, with no net income reported since. On the racetrack the picture flips: McLaren's Formula 1 team won the 2024 and 2025 Constructors' Championships, beating Ferrari by just 14 points in 2024, while Ferrari's Scuderia has not won a title since 2008. Ferrari trades publicly as RACE on the NYSE and in Milan, with a market cap of about $84.2 billion (€74.5 billion) in September 2026; McLaren Automotive has been privately owned by Abu Dhabi's CYVN Holdings since April 2025.

Verdict

Ferrari and McLaren Automotive are barely comparable in scale: Ferrari's 2025 revenue is more than 15 times McLaren's last reported 2023 figure, and Ferrari turns a profit (about 22% net margin in 2025) while McLaren's holding company booked a record loss in 2023 that included a ~$495 million (£375 million) impairment charge. The two also run opposite playbooks: Ferrari deliberately caps shipments below demand (13,640 cars in 2025, an order book full through 2027) to protect pricing power, while McLaren has struggled to sell enough cars to cover its costs and still has no SUV to chase the volume that Ferrari's Purosangue, Lamborghini's Urus and Aston Martin's DBX already capture. McLaren's clearest win is on the Formula 1 grid, where back-to-back 2024-2025 Constructors' titles ended a 16-year drought and represent sharper current form than Ferrari's, whose Scuderia has not won a title since 2008 despite an all-time record 16 Constructors' crowns. For a buyer, Ferrari is the financially secure, publicly traded luxury icon with pricing power; McLaren is the smaller, currently loss-making engineering specialist now leaning on fresh Abu Dhabi capital to fund its next generation of cars.

Cite This Page

Automatically generated citations for researchers.

APA Format

CorpDigest. (2026). Ferrari N.V. vs McLaren Automotive Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/ferrari-vs-mclaren-automotive

MLA Format

CorpDigest. "Ferrari N.V. vs McLaren Automotive Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/ferrari-vs-mclaren-automotive.

Chicago Format

CorpDigest. "Ferrari N.V. vs McLaren Automotive Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/ferrari-vs-mclaren-automotive.

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.