Restaurant Brands International Inc.
CorpDigest
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
Annual Revenue
Last reviewed: 2025-07-15 · By Swet Parvadiya
FY2024 Revenue
$4.0B
▲ 6.6% vs FY2023 ($3.8B)
Net Income: $1.1B
Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported $4.0B in revenue for fiscal year 2024. This represents a growth of 6.6% compared to the 2023 figure of $3.8B.
Corporate revenue of $4.05 billion in 2024 — up from $3.63 billion in 2022 and $3.8 billion in 2023 — grew at roughly 6 percent annually, which understates the actual scale expansion because system-wide sales of $40.5 billion represent the full economic activity the royalty base sits on top of. Net income of $1.15 billion on $4.05 billion in corporate revenue produces a 28.4 percent net margin, which is higher than most consumer staples companies and reflects the absence of restaurant operating costs from the corporate income statement. The 38.5 percent operating margin is the most important structural metric. It is achievable because the franchisee bears every variable cost — food, labor, rent, utilities — while the corporate entity collects a percentage of the top line regardless of unit-level profitability. In a high-inflation environment where food and labor costs spike, the franchisee absorbs the margin compression while RBI's royalty income continues to scale with nominal sales. The digital penetration figure of 30 percent of system-wide sales through loyalty and mobile channels is strategically important because it represents a direct customer data asset. A franchisee model traditionally means the corporate entity has limited visibility into individual customer behavior; when 30 percent of $40.5 billion in sales flows through branded apps, the corporate entity accumulates transaction data that enables targeted marketing, personalization, and product development at a scale independent restaurant operators cannot match. The franchisee dispute over 'Reclaim the Flame' remodeling costs in 2023 illustrates the inherent tension in the asset-light model: when franchisees disagree with capital expenditure requirements, the corporate entity lacks the direct control to enforce compliance without risking franchisee defections or litigation that can damage brand consistency more than aging store interiors do.
Source: SEC EDGAR filings, annual earnings releases, and verified financial disclosures.