Target vs Xiaomi: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Target reported $104.8B of revenue in FY2025 and $3.7B of net income. Xiaomi reported ~$63.6B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$5.8B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Financial summary
Target
Target's revenue fell three years in a row, from $109.1 billion in fiscal 2022 to $104.8 billion in fiscal 2025, while FY2025 net income was $3.705 billion. Fiscal 2026 has reversed the trend so far. Q2 FY2026 net sales rose 5.3% to $26.5 billion, comparable sales grew 3.8% on a 3.6% traffic gain, and digital comparable sales rose 8.7% with same-day delivery up more than 25%. Q2 GAAP EPS was $4.11 versus $2.05 a year earlier, but $1.65 of that came from $994 million of pretax tariff refunds; excluding refunds, EPS grew about 20%. Management now guides to roughly 5% net sales growth for fiscal 2026 and EPS of $9.90 to $10.90.
Xiaomi
FY2025 was Xiaomi's strongest year: revenue rose 25.0% to ~$63.6B (RMB457.3B), profit attributable to owners was ~$5.78B (RMB41.6B), and adjusted net profit rose 43.8% to ~$5.45B (RMB39.2B). The Smart EV, AI and other new initiatives segment more than tripled to ~$14.7B (RMB106.1B) on 411,082 vehicle deliveries and posted its first full-year operating profit. 2026 has been weaker. Q1 revenue was ~$13.8B (RMB99.1B) (down 10.9%) with adjusted net profit of ~$848M (RMB6.1B) (down 43.1%). Q2 revenue was ~$15.1B (RMB108.9B) (down 6.1%) with adjusted net profit of ~$862M (RMB6.2B) (down 42.6%) and a 19.8% gross margin. In Q2 the EV segment had ~$3.46B (RMB24.9B) of revenue and an operating loss of about $361M (RMB2.6B).
Revenue and profit by year
Target
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $104.8B | $3.7B | 3.5% | -1.7% | Source |
| FY2024 | $106.6B | $4.1B | 3.8% | -0.8% | Source |
| FY2023 | $107.4B | $4.1B | 3.9% | -1.6% | Source |
| FY2022 | $109.1B | $2.8B | 2.5% | +2.9% | Source |
| FY2021 | $106B | $6.9B | 6.6% | +13.3% | Source |
| FY2020 | $93.6B | $4.4B | 4.7% | +19.8% | Source |
| FY2019 | $78.1B | $3.3B | 4.2% | +3.7% | Source |
| FY2018 | $75.4B | $2.9B | 3.9% | +3.6% | Source |
| FY2017 | $72.7B | $2.9B | 4.0% | +3.5% | Source |
| FY2016 | $70.3B | $2.7B | 3.9% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Target
- Stores and digital merchandise
Primary revenue source
Sales of food, essentials, apparel, beauty, home, electronics, toys and seasonal products through stores and digital channels.
- Owned brands
Strategic margin driver
Target-owned and exclusive brands that support margin and differentiation.
- Same-day services and Shipt
Growth and retention stream
Delivery, pickup, Drive Up and Target Circle 360 services that deepen loyalty.
- Roundel retail media
High-margin supplemental stream
Advertising revenue from brands using Target's retail media network.
Xiaomi
- Smartphones
40.8% (FY2025)
~$25.9B (RMB186.4B) from Xiaomi, Redmi and POCO phones.
- IoT, Lifestyle Products and Internet Services
36.0% (FY2025)
Remainder of the Smartphone x AIoT segment, including appliances, TVs, wearables, advertising and games.
- Smart EV, AI and Other New Initiatives
23.2% (FY2025)
~$14.7B (RMB106.1B), mostly from SU7 and YU7 vehicle sales.
Business model and strategy
Target
How it makes money
Target runs a general-merchandise, big-box retail model that pairs low-margin essentials (groceries, household basics) to drive store traffic with higher-margin discretionary categories (apparel, home decor, and private-label brands) to drive profit -- the classic 'basket size' strategy.
Growth strategy
Target is focusing on merchandising authority, guest experience, technology acceleration, team and community strength, stores-as-hubs, same-day fulfillment, retail media and owned-brand renewal.
Competitive advantage
Target's advantage is the mix of curated merchandise, owned brands, convenient stores, same-day fulfillment and a brand position between discount utility and design-led retail.
Xiaomi
How it makes money
Xiaomi sells hardware at relatively thin margins and earns higher margins from internet services delivered through its installed base of devices, including advertising, app distribution and games. Smartphones were the largest single product line in FY2025 at ~$25.9B (RMB186.4B) of revenue. IoT products extend the ecosystem into homes, and many of them are made by ecosystem partner companies Xiaomi has invested in.
Growth strategy
Xiaomi's stated strategy is the Human x Car x Home ecosystem: sell more premium smartphones, add large appliances and other IoT categories, scale the car lineup, and invest in its own AI models and chips, such as the MiMo models and the XRING O1 processor.
Competitive advantage
Xiaomi's advantages are scale in smartphones (top three globally by shipments), a very wide range of connected products under one brand and one operating system, a large device base it can monetize through services, and a fast-growing car business that buyers can connect to the same ecosystem.
Questions about Target vs Xiaomi
Which company has higher revenue — Target Corporation or Xiaomi Corp.?
Target Corporation reported $104.8B (FY2025), while Xiaomi Corp. reported ~$63.6B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Target Corporation is the larger business, with Xiaomi Corp. reporting a smaller revenue base.
What is the market cap of Target Corporation vs Xiaomi Corp.?
Target Corporation's market capitalisation stands at $72.0B, while Xiaomi Corp.'s is $83.0B. Xiaomi Corp. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Target Corporation.
Which is more financially efficient — Target Corporation or Xiaomi Corp.?
Target Corporation generates $252k / employee in revenue per employee, while Xiaomi Corp. generates $1.12M / employee. Xiaomi Corp. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Target Corporation and Xiaomi Corp. make money?
Target Corporation and Xiaomi Corp. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Target Corporation: Target runs a general-merchandise, big-box retail model that pairs low-margin essentials (groceries, household basics) to drive store traffic with higher-margin discretionary categories (apparel, home decor, and private-label brands) to drive profit -- the classic 'basket size' strategy. Xiaomi Corp.: Xiaomi sells hardware at relatively thin margins and earns higher margins from internet services delivered through its installed base of devices, including advertising, app distribution and games.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Target Corporation or Xiaomi Corp.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Target Corporation trades at 0.7x P/S and Xiaomi Corp. at 1.3x P/S. Xiaomi Corp. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Target Corporation. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Target Corporation bigger than Xiaomi Corp.?
By last reported revenue, Target Corporation ($104.8B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Xiaomi Corp. (~$63.6B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Target vs Xiaomi overview