Skip to main content

Mastercard vs Xiaomi: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

Mastercard reported $32.8B of revenue in FY2025 and $15B of net income. Xiaomi reported ~$63.6B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$5.8B of net income.

Latest financial snapshot

Mastercard

Latest revenue
$32.8B (FY2025)
Net income
$15B
Net margin
45.6%
Revenue growth
+13.2% a year, FY2016–FY2025

Xiaomi

Latest revenue
~$63.6B (FY2025)
Net income
~$5.8B
Net margin
9.1%
Revenue growth
+8.6% a year, FY2021–FY2025

Financial summary

Mastercard

Mastercard's net revenue grew from $10.8 billion in 2016 to $32.8 billion in FY2025, with net income of $14.97 billion in FY2025, a net margin near 46%. Growth continued in 2026: second-quarter net revenue rose 14% to $9.28 billion and net income reached $4.39 billion, with a GAAP operating margin of 60.2%. Because incremental transactions cost little to process, most of that cash goes to share buybacks, dividends and acquisitions such as Recorded Future ($2.65 billion, 2024) and BVNK (up to $1.8 billion, 2026).

Xiaomi

FY2025 was Xiaomi's strongest year: revenue rose 25.0% to ~$63.6B (RMB457.3B), profit attributable to owners was ~$5.78B (RMB41.6B), and adjusted net profit rose 43.8% to ~$5.45B (RMB39.2B). The Smart EV, AI and other new initiatives segment more than tripled to ~$14.7B (RMB106.1B) on 411,082 vehicle deliveries and posted its first full-year operating profit. 2026 has been weaker. Q1 revenue was ~$13.8B (RMB99.1B) (down 10.9%) with adjusted net profit of ~$848M (RMB6.1B) (down 43.1%). Q2 revenue was ~$15.1B (RMB108.9B) (down 6.1%) with adjusted net profit of ~$862M (RMB6.2B) (down 42.6%) and a 19.8% gross margin. In Q2 the EV segment had ~$3.46B (RMB24.9B) of revenue and an operating loss of about $361M (RMB2.6B).

Revenue and profit by year

Mastercard

Mastercard revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025$32.8B$15B45.6%+16.4%Source
FY2024$28.2B$12.9B45.7%+12.2%Source
FY2023$25.1B$11.2B44.6%+12.9%Source
FY2022$22.2B$9.9B44.7%+17.8%Source
FY2021$18.9B$8.7B46.0%+23.4%Source
FY2020$15.3B$6.4B41.9%-9.4%Source
FY2019$16.9B$8.1B48.1%+12.9%Source
FY2018$14.9B$5.9B39.2%+19.6%Source
FY2017$12.5B$3.9B31.3%+16.0%Source
FY2016$10.8B$4.1B37.7%—Source
Full Mastercard financials

Xiaomi

Xiaomi revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025~$63.6B~$5.8B9.1%+25.0%Source
FY2024~$50.9B~$3.3B6.5%+35.0%Source
FY2023~$37.7B~$2.4B6.4%-3.2%Source
FY2022~$38.9B~$343.9M0.9%-14.7%Source
FY2021~$45.6B~$2.7B5.9%—Source
Full Xiaomi financials

Where the revenue comes from

Mastercard

  • Payment network~59%

    Assessments on gross dollar volume, transaction switching fees and cross-border fees, net of customer incentives. About $19.48 billion in FY2025.

  • Value-added services and solutions~41%

    Fraud and security, cyber and threat intelligence, data analytics, consulting, loyalty, open banking and processing services. Grew 23% in FY2025 to about $13.3 billion.

Xiaomi

  • Smartphones

    40.8% (FY2025)

    ~$25.9B (RMB186.4B) from Xiaomi, Redmi and POCO phones.

  • IoT, Lifestyle Products and Internet Services

    36.0% (FY2025)

    Remainder of the Smartphone x AIoT segment, including appliances, TVs, wearables, advertising and games.

  • Smart EV, AI and Other New Initiatives

    23.2% (FY2025)

    ~$14.7B (RMB106.1B), mostly from SU7 and YU7 vehicle sales.

Business model and strategy

Mastercard

How it makes money

Mastercard earns money in two ways. Payment network revenue ($19.48 billion in FY2025, about 59% of net revenue) comes from assessments based on gross dollar volume, fees for switching transactions, and higher-yield cross-border fees, reduced by incentives paid to issuers and merchants.

Growth strategy

Mastercard's growth plan rests on three levers: moving more consumer spending from cash to cards and tokenized digital wallets, capturing new flows such as B2B payments, disbursements and cross-border remittances, and selling more services that are not tied to card volume. Services grew 23% in FY2025, faster than the network.

Competitive advantage

Mastercard's advantage is a two-sided network that took decades to build: about 3.7 billion Mastercard and Maestro cards issued by partners and acceptance at tens of millions of merchant locations worldwide. A new rival would need both sides at once. That scale also feeds its fraud models, tokenization service and data products, which makes the services business harder to copy.

Mastercard business model in full

Xiaomi

How it makes money

Xiaomi sells hardware at relatively thin margins and earns higher margins from internet services delivered through its installed base of devices, including advertising, app distribution and games. Smartphones were the largest single product line in FY2025 at ~$25.9B (RMB186.4B) of revenue. IoT products extend the ecosystem into homes, and many of them are made by ecosystem partner companies Xiaomi has invested in.

Growth strategy

Xiaomi's stated strategy is the Human x Car x Home ecosystem: sell more premium smartphones, add large appliances and other IoT categories, scale the car lineup, and invest in its own AI models and chips, such as the MiMo models and the XRING O1 processor.

Competitive advantage

Xiaomi's advantages are scale in smartphones (top three globally by shipments), a very wide range of connected products under one brand and one operating system, a large device base it can monetize through services, and a fast-growing car business that buyers can connect to the same ecosystem.

Xiaomi business model in full

Questions about Mastercard vs Xiaomi

Which company has higher revenue — Mastercard Incorporated or Xiaomi Corp.?

Mastercard Incorporated reported $32.8B (FY2025), while Xiaomi Corp. reported ~$63.6B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Xiaomi Corp. is the larger business, with Mastercard Incorporated reporting a smaller revenue base.

What is the market cap of Mastercard Incorporated vs Xiaomi Corp.?

Mastercard Incorporated's market capitalisation stands at $495.4B, while Xiaomi Corp.'s is $83.0B. Mastercard Incorporated carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Xiaomi Corp..

Which is more financially efficient — Mastercard Incorporated or Xiaomi Corp.?

Mastercard Incorporated generates $824k / employee in revenue per employee, while Xiaomi Corp. generates $1.12M / employee. Xiaomi Corp. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.

How do Mastercard Incorporated and Xiaomi Corp. make money?

Mastercard Incorporated and Xiaomi Corp. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Mastercard Incorporated: Mastercard earns money in two ways. Xiaomi Corp.: Xiaomi sells hardware at relatively thin margins and earns higher margins from internet services delivered through its installed base of devices, including advertising, app distribution and games.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Mastercard Incorporated or Xiaomi Corp.?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Mastercard Incorporated trades at 15.1x P/S and Xiaomi Corp. at 1.3x P/S. Mastercard Incorporated commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Xiaomi Corp.. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is Mastercard Incorporated bigger than Xiaomi Corp.?

By last reported revenue, Xiaomi Corp. (~$63.6B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Mastercard Incorporated ($32.8B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Mastercard vs Xiaomi overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.