Skip to main content

Asana, Inc. vs ZoomInfo: Strategic Comparison

Direct Answer

Asana, Inc. had $790.8M (FY2026), while ZoomInfo had $1.2B (FY2025). Their fiscal years differ, so the figures are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.

Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.

Share

Key Differences at a Glance

FieldAsana, Inc.ZoomInfo
Latest annual revenue$790.8M (FY2026)$1.2B (FY2025)
Founded20082007
Employees1,7673,508
Market Cap$2.2B$1.1B
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
Revenue / Employee$448k / employee$356k / employee
Valuation Multiple2.8x P/S0.9x P/S

Strategic Positioning

Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles

Asana, Inc. Strategic Vector

FY2026 Revenue Baseline

Asana grows by moving accounts upmarket and by attaching AI.

Productivity: $448k / employee

ZoomInfo Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

Management is focused on enterprise accounts, data-as-a-service delivery, Copilot and GTM.AI.

Productivity: $356k / employee

Quick Stats Comparison

MetricAsana, Inc.ZoomInfo
Revenue$790.8M (FY2026)$1.2B (FY2025)
Founded20082007
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesVancouver, Washington, United States
Market Cap$2.2B$1.1B
Employees1,7673,508
Revenue / Employee$448k / employee$356k / employee
Valuation Multiple2.8x P/S0.9x P/S

Asana, Inc. Revenue vs ZoomInfo Revenue — Year by Year

YearAsana, Inc.ZoomInfoHigher reported revenue
2026$790.8MN/AOnly one figure available
2025$723.9M$1.2BZoomInfo (approx. USD)
2024$652.5M$1.2BZoomInfo (approx. USD)
2023$547.2M$1.2BZoomInfo (approx. USD)
2022$378.4M$1.1BZoomInfo (approx. USD)

Business Model Breakdown

Overview: Asana, Inc. vs ZoomInfo

This in-depth comparison examines Asana, Inc. and ZoomInfo across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Asana, Inc. on its own, evaluating ZoomInfo, or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Asana, Inc. and ZoomInfo is widest.

On the headline numbers, annual revenue is $790.8M (FY2026) for Asana, Inc. and $1.2B (FY2025) for ZoomInfo, while their respective market capitalizations stand at $2.2B and $1.1B. Both Asana, Inc. and ZoomInfo are headquartered in United States. Their local markets and applicable rules may still differ.

Asana, Inc.: Asana is work management software: projects, tasks, owners, dates and goals in one place, instead of in a chain of emails and spreadsheets. It was founded by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and engineering lead Justin Rosenstein, listed on the New York Stock Exchange by direct listing in September 2020, and reported $790.8 million of revenue for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026. Its buyers are mostly non-engineering departments, marketing, operations, finance, legal and HR, which is the gap it works in between developer tools such as Jira and general-purpose workspaces such as Notion. Since 2025 the company has been run by Dan Rogers and has been rebuilding the product around AI agents that work inside the same plans as employees. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

ZoomInfo: ZoomInfo started in 2007 as DiscoverOrg. Founders Henry Schuck and Kirk Brown put $25,000 on their credit cards while Schuck was still in law school, and they set out to compile accurate org charts and contact details for sales teams. With backing from TA Associates, The Carlyle Group and Great Hill Partners, DiscoverOrg acquired Zoom Information, Inc. in February 2019 and adopted its name. ZoomInfo went public on Nasdaq on June 4, 2020, the first major tech IPO of the COVID-19 period. A series of acquisitions followed, including Chorus.ai and RingLead in 2021. Revenue passed $1 billion in 2022 but has hovered around $1.2-1.25 billion since. In May 2025 the company changed its ticker from ZI to GTM, and it now pitches itself as an AI go-to-market platform. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Washington.

Business Models: How Asana, Inc. and ZoomInfo Make Money

Asana, Inc. and ZoomInfo pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Asana, Inc. and ZoomInfo.

Asana, Inc. business model: Asana sells subscriptions. Its core work management product comes in five tiers, listed in its 10-K as Personal, Starter, Advanced, Enterprise and Enterprise+, priced per seat; Starter lists at $10.99 per user per month billed annually and Advanced at $24.99, while Enterprise and Enterprise+ are quoted by the sales team. Individuals and small teams can use the free Personal tier, and Asana then sells upward when usage spreads: the company describes a hybrid motion that pairs product-led self-serve signups with direct sales and channel partners. Revenue growth in fiscal 2026 came mainly from new paying customers plus a sales mix shift toward Enterprise+. Two newer products break the per-seat pattern. AI Teammates, agents that act like collaborators inside a workflow, and Asana AI Studio, a no-code builder for embedding AI in a workflow, are both billed on consumption, which is how Asana expects to sell outcomes alongside seats.

ZoomInfo business model: ZoomInfo sells subscriptions, mostly annual or multi-year contracts priced by seats, data credits and product modules. Customers use the platform to find companies and contacts, enrich CRM records, track buyer intent and record sales calls (Chorus). Management splits the base into upmarket customers and down-market small businesses. As of June 30, 2026, 76% of annual contract value (ACV) came from upmarket customers and 1,891 customers paid $100,000 or more in ACV. Net revenue retention was 89% in Q2 2026. The data-as-a-service business, which delivers ZoomInfo data straight into customers' warehouses and systems, grew more than 20% in 2025 and made up nearly a fifth of ACV.

Competitive Advantage: Asana, Inc. vs ZoomInfo

The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Asana, Inc. stack up against those of ZoomInfo.

Asana, Inc. competitive advantage: Asana's defensible piece is the Work Graph, the data model it describes in its SEC filings as the institutional memory of the platform. Because work is stored as a network rather than as rows, one task can live in several projects at once with no duplicate copies, so a launch task can appear in the marketing plan, the engineering sprint and the executive portfolio and stay in sync. That structure is what Asana now sells to AI buyers: agents built in AI Studio or deployed as AI Teammates inherit the same context and governance as the humans in the project. The second advantage is reach outside engineering. Jira is the default in software teams, while Asana is bought by marketing, operations, legal, finance and HR groups, which is how it reports customers such as Amazon, Accenture, Anthropic and Suzuki.

ZoomInfo competitive advantage: ZoomInfo's main assets are its large, continuously updated B2B data set, its integrations with CRM and marketing systems, and a base of large enterprise customers that make up most of its contract value.

Growth Strategy: Where Asana, Inc. and ZoomInfo Are Headed

Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Asana, Inc. and ZoomInfo each plan to expand from here.

Asana, Inc. growth strategy: Asana grows by moving accounts upmarket and by attaching AI. The company reports Core customers, those spending $5,000 or more a year, separately because they carried 76% of revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026: there were 25,928 of them at January 31, 2026, and 26,778 by July 31, 2026, while customers spending $100,000 or more grew from 817 to 890 over the same period. Sales mix has shifted toward the Enterprise+ tier, which is what lifted fiscal 2026 revenue alongside new customer additions. The second lever is consumption revenue from AI Studio and AI Teammates, sold into the same accounts. Because AI-driven search has weakened self-serve signups, Asana has also rebuilt discovery around use-case content and a prompt-to-project onboarding flow rather than assuming the old free-trial funnel returns.

ZoomInfo growth strategy: Management is focused on enterprise accounts, data-as-a-service delivery, Copilot and GTM.AI. It is also returning cash to shareholders through buybacks and has been repurchasing senior notes at a discount.

Financial Picture: Asana, Inc. vs ZoomInfo

A closer look at the financial trajectory of Asana, Inc. and ZoomInfo rounds out the comparison.

Asana, Inc.: Asana's fiscal year ends January 31. Revenue grew from $76.8 million in fiscal 2019 to $790.8 million in fiscal 2026, but growth has slowed every year since fiscal 2022, from 66.7% to 9.2%. The trade has been margin for growth: gross profit was $704.0 million in fiscal 2026, an 89% margin, non-GAAP operating income turned positive at $56.7 million against a $40.8 million loss a year earlier, and adjusted free cash flow jumped to $84.5 million from $2.6 million. The GAAP net loss was still $189.0 million, down 26% from fiscal 2025, mostly because of stock-based compensation. Asana held $434.0 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at January 31, 2026, plus an undrawn senior secured credit facility it entered into with Silicon Valley Bank in November 2022. In the second quarter of fiscal 2027, reported September 3, 2026, revenue rose 10% to $216.4 million and non-GAAP operating margin reached about 10%, and the company raised its full-year guidance. Asana, Inc. is a leading enterprise work management platform, commanding a market valuation historically around the multi-billion dollar mark.

ZoomInfo: Revenue climbed from $144.3 million in 2018 to $1,098.0 million in 2022, then levelled off: $1,239.5 million in 2023, $1,214.3 million in 2024 and $1,249.5 million in 2025. FY2025 net income was $124.2 million, with GAAP operating income of $225.7 million, adjusted operating income of $445.9 million (36% margin) and unlevered free cash flow of $454.9 million. ZoomInfo bought back more than $400 million of stock in 2025 and authorized another $1 billion. In Q2 2026, revenue was $310.4 million (up 1.2%), and a $650.5 million goodwill impairment produced a GAAP operating loss of $622.0 million. Adjusted operating income was $110.0 million.

Company-Specific SWOT Notes

Asana, Inc.

Strength

The Work Graph stores work as a network, so one task can sit in several projects without duplication, and Asana's SEC filings call it the platform's institutional memory.

Strength

Asana's highly intuitive design allows it to spread virally within massive organizations without requiring expensive top-down enterprise sales campaigns.

Weakness

Dollar-based net retention was 97% for Core customers and 96% for accounts spending $100,000 or more at January 31, 2026, so existing customers contracted slightly.

Weakness

Despite massive revenue growth, Asana burns through incredible amounts of cash on sales and marketing, relying heavily on CEO Dustin Moskovitz personally buying shares to support the stock.

Opportunity

AI Studio exited fiscal 2026 above $6 million in annual recurring revenue with eight customers paying more than $100,000 a year for it, and AI Teammates moved from a 200-customer beta to general availability.

Threat

Microsoft 365 ships planning tools with the suite, Atlassian and Monday.com compete directly, and investors have questioned whether per-seat software holds up when agents do the work.

ZoomInfo

Strength

FY2025 adjusted operating margin was 36% and unlevered free cash flow was $454.9 million, which funds buybacks and debt reduction.

Weakness

Revenue has stayed between $1.21 billion and $1.25 billion since 2023, net revenue retention was 89% in Q2 2026, and the company took a $650.5 million goodwill impairment.

Weakness

ZoomInfo's growth stalled in 2023 as software companies made large layoffs and aggressively cut their sales tech stack budgets.

Opportunity

Copilot passed 20% of ACV in 2025, and GTM.AI plus integrations with OpenAI, Claude and Zapier could open new uses for ZoomInfo data.

Threat

Low-cost data rivals and AI research tools compete for the same budgets, and lawsuits over how ZoomInfo collects personal data remain a risk.

Factual Scorecard

CategoryResultWhy
Same-period Revenue ScaleNot comparableAsana, Inc.: $790.8M (FY2026). ZoomInfo: $1.2B (FY2025). Different or missing fiscal periods prevent a like-for-like ranking.
Founded EarlierZoomInfoAsana, Inc. was founded in 2008; ZoomInfo was founded in 2007.
Verdict

Comparison Takeaway: Asana, Inc. vs ZoomInfo

Asana, Inc. had $790.8M (FY2026), while ZoomInfo had $1.2B (FY2025). Their fiscal years differ, so the figures are not a like-for-like same-period comparison. Compare the same reporting period and the metric relevant to the question—revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value—rather than treating them as one composite score.

Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.

Frequently Asked Questions: Asana, Inc. vs ZoomInfo

Which company was founded first, Asana, Inc. or ZoomInfo?

ZoomInfo was founded in 2007; Asana, Inc. was founded in 2008.

What revenue did Asana, Inc. and ZoomInfo report?

Asana, Inc. had $790.8M (FY2026), while ZoomInfo had $1.2B (FY2025). The fiscal years differ, so these are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.

How do Asana, Inc. and ZoomInfo make money?

Asana, Inc.: Asana sells subscriptions. ZoomInfo: ZoomInfo sells subscriptions, mostly annual or multi-year contracts priced by seats, data credits and product modules.

Which is better, Asana, Inc. or ZoomInfo?

There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Asana, Inc. and ZoomInfo on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.

Sources & References

Cite This Page

Automatically generated citations for researchers.

APA Format

CorpDigest. (2026). Asana, Inc. vs ZoomInfo Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/asana-vs-zoominfo

MLA Format

CorpDigest. "Asana, Inc. vs ZoomInfo Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/asana-vs-zoominfo.

Chicago Format

CorpDigest. "Asana, Inc. vs ZoomInfo Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/asana-vs-zoominfo.

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.