Skip to main content

Arm Holdings vs Unilever: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

Arm Holdings reported $4.9B of revenue in FY2026 and $904M of net income. Unilever reported ~$57.1B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$10.7B of net income.

Latest financial snapshot

Arm Holdings

Latest revenue
$4.9B (FY2026)
Net income
$904M
Net margin
18.4%
Revenue growth
+19.4% a year, FY2021–FY2026

Unilever

Latest revenue
~$57.1B (FY2025)
Net income
~$10.7B
Net margin
18.7%
Revenue growth
-0.5% a year, FY2016–FY2025

Financial summary

Arm Holdings

Arm makes nearly all of its gross profit from intellectual property, so its cost of sales is small: fiscal 2026 revenue of $4,920 million produced $4,799 million of gross profit, a margin above 97%. Revenue comes in two lines. License and other revenue, $2,307 million in fiscal 2026 and up 25%, is charged upfront or across milestones when a customer takes access to Arm designs. Royalty revenue, $2,613 million and up 21%, is collected per chip once partners ship, which makes it a long tail from designs licensed years earlier. Spending is concentrated in engineering: research and development cost $2,776 million in fiscal 2026, about 56% of revenue, which held operating income to $900 million and net income to $904 million. Arm ended the year with $2,751 million of cash and cash equivalents plus $850 million of short-term investments, and $2,071 million of remaining performance obligations, about 28% of which it expects to recognise as revenue within twelve months. The most recent reported quarter, the three months to June 30, 2026, was a record: revenue rose 22% year over year to $1.29 billion on record first-quarter royalty and licensing revenue, with data center royalties again more than doubling.

Unilever

Unilever's 2025 turnover from continuing operations was ~$57.1 billion (EUR 50.5 billion), down 3.8% in reported terms because of adverse currency moves and disposals, even as underlying sales grew 3.5% with 1.5% from volume. Free cash flow was ~$6.67 billion (EUR 5.9 billion), about $757 million (EUR 670 million) of productivity savings had been delivered by the end of 2025, and the company announced a new ~$1.69 billion (EUR 1.5 billion) share buyback. Momentum improved in 2026: first-half turnover was ~$28.9 billion (EUR 25.6 billion) (up 0.5%), underlying sales grew 4.8% with 4.2% volume, Q2 underlying growth reached 5.8%, and the underlying operating margin was 20.3%. Unilever raised its full-year outlook after the H1 2026 results.

Revenue and profit by year

Arm Holdings

Arm Holdings revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2026$4.9B$904M18.4%+22.8%Source
FY2025$4B$792M19.8%+23.9%Source
FY2024$3.2B$306M9.5%+20.7%Source
FY2023$2.7B$524M19.6%-0.9%Source
FY2022$2.7B$549M20.3%+33.3%Source
FY2021$2B$388M19.1%—Source
Full Arm Holdings financials

Unilever

Unilever revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025~$57.1B~$10.7B18.7%-3.8%Source
FY2024~$59.3B~$6.5B10.9%+1.5%Source
FY2023~$58.4B~$7.3B12.6%-14.0%Source
FY2022~$67.9B~$8.6B12.7%+14.5%Source
FY2021~$59.3B~$6.8B11.5%+3.4%Source
FY2020~$57.3B~$6.3B11.0%-2.4%Source
FY2019~$58.7B~$6.4B10.8%+2.0%Source
FY2018~$57.6B~$10.6B18.4%-5.1%Source
FY2017~$60.7B~$6.8B11.2%+1.9%Source
FY2016~$59.6B~$5.9B9.8%—Source
Full Unilever financials

Where the revenue comes from

Arm Holdings

  • Royalty Revenue53%

    Royalties were $2,613 million of Arm's $4,920 million fiscal 2026 revenue, up 21% year over year. Arm collects a per-unit royalty on substantially every chip its partners ship that uses its designs, so the line reflects designs licensed in earlier years; rates generally step down as unit volumes rise, subject to an agreed minimum per chip. Mobile application processors supplied about 43% of fiscal 2026 royalty revenue, while data center royalties more than doubled year over year. Arm attributes part of the growth to a mix shift toward Armv9 designs, which carry higher rates per chip.

  • License and Other Revenue47%

    License and other revenue was $2,307 million in fiscal 2026, up 25%, and covers licensing, software development tools, design services, training and support. Customers choose among Compute Subsystems, Arm Total Access, which bundles the current portfolio for an annual fee, Arm Flexible Access, which gives cheaper access to older designs with a fee due at tape-out, technology licence agreements and architecture licences. The line is lumpy because a small number of high-value agreements can land in any quarter: revenue from related parties alone rose 141% in fiscal 2026. Remaining performance obligations were $2,071 million at March 31, 2026, about 28% of which Arm expects to recognise within twelve months.

Unilever

  • Power Brands

    78% of 2025 turnover

    Dove, Vaseline, Rexona, Sunsilk, OMO, Knorr and the other Power Brands made up 78% of turnover in 2025.

  • Beauty & Wellbeing

    Not formally reported

    One of four business groups reported after the 2025 Ice Cream demerger; it includes prestige beauty and wellbeing supplements.

  • Personal Care

    Not formally reported

    One of the four business groups reported after the 2025 Ice Cream demerger.

  • Home Care

    Not formally reported

    One of the four business groups reported after the 2025 Ice Cream demerger.

  • Foods

    Not formally reported

    Largely to be combined with McCormick in a pending transaction; it includes Unilever Food Solutions for foodservice.

Business model and strategy

Arm Holdings

How it makes money

Arm licenses intellectual property. It spends heavily on R&D to design power-efficient processor architectures, then licenses the designs to companies such as Apple, Qualcomm and Samsung, which customize them and have them manufactured by a foundry such as TSMC. Arm charges an upfront license fee and an ongoing royalty on each chip shipped.

Growth strategy

With more than 99% of mobile application processors already on its architecture, Arm is pushing into markets where the chip value per unit is higher. Neoverse designs target cloud and AI infrastructure and are the basis of Amazon Graviton, Google Axion, Microsoft Cobalt and Nvidia Grace; Arm says data center royalties more than doubled in fiscal 2026.

Competitive advantage

Arm's moat is the software built around its architecture. iOS, Android and millions of mobile apps are written for the Arm instruction set, so a rival architecture such as Intel's x86 would need developers to rework that software to enter smartphones. Decades of focus on power efficiency, which extends battery life, also give Arm a technical lead in mobile.

Arm Holdings business model in full

Unilever

How it makes money

Unilever makes money by manufacturing and selling branded, repeat-purchase consumer products through supermarkets, convenience stores, pharmacies, small independent shops and e-commerce. After the 2025 Ice Cream demerger it reports four business groups: Beauty & Wellbeing, Personal Care, Home Care and Foods. Its Power Brands, such as Dove, Vaseline, Rexona, Sunsilk, OMO and Knorr, made up 78% of turnover in 2025.

Growth strategy

Under Fernando Fernandez, Unilever is concentrating investment behind about 30 Power Brands, increasing marketing spend through social and influencer channels, rotating the portfolio toward premium beauty and wellbeing (2025 deals included Dr. Squatch, Wild and Minimalist), and separating lower-growth food and ice cream assets.

Competitive advantage

Unilever's advantage is a mix of trusted brands, emerging-market distribution, local manufacturing, repeat-purchase categories, Power Brand marketing scale, and deep category knowledge in personal care, home care, beauty, and foods.

Unilever business model in full

Questions about Arm Holdings vs Unilever

Which company has higher revenue — Arm Holdings or Unilever PLC?

Arm Holdings reported $4.9B (FY2026), while Unilever PLC reported ~$57.1B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Unilever PLC is the larger business, with Arm Holdings reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.

What is the market cap of Arm Holdings vs Unilever PLC?

Arm Holdings's market capitalisation stands at $309.4B, while Unilever PLC's is $132.5B. Arm Holdings carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Unilever PLC.

Which is more financially efficient — Arm Holdings or Unilever PLC?

Arm Holdings generates $513k / employee in revenue per employee, while Unilever PLC generates $594k / employee. Unilever PLC shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.

How do Arm Holdings and Unilever PLC make money?

Arm Holdings and Unilever PLC generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Arm Holdings: Arm licenses intellectual property. Unilever PLC: Unilever makes money by manufacturing and selling branded, repeat-purchase consumer products through supermarkets, convenience stores, pharmacies, small independent shops and e-commerce.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Arm Holdings or Unilever PLC?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Arm Holdings trades at 62.9x P/S and Unilever PLC at 2.3x P/S. Arm Holdings commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Unilever PLC. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is Arm Holdings bigger than Unilever PLC?

By last reported revenue, Unilever PLC (~$57.1B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Arm Holdings ($4.9B (FY2026)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Arm Holdings vs Unilever overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.