Top 8 Industrial Companies
8 Industrial companies with latest reported revenue, headquarters and links to their sourced company profiles.
8 of these companies have a latest reported revenue figure, shown on their profiles with its fiscal year and source. This directory does not publish a combined sector revenue, because parent companies and subsidiaries and different revenue measures overlap.
Industrial industry overview
This index covers 8 Industrial companies analyzed through their revenue history, business model mechanics, and competitive positioning. All financial data is sourced from official SEC filings, annual reports, and verified investor relations disclosures. Profiles are reviewed by our editorial team before publication to ensure data accuracy and analytical depth.
This hub currently maps 8 organizations to Industrial. The revenue spotlight uses each company's latest disclosed figure, converts non-US reporting currencies only for approximate ordering, and links to the underlying company profile for fiscal-year and source context.
Top companies in this industry (by latest revenue)
Siemens AG profile: FY2025 revenue of ~$89.2B and net income of ~$11.8B, CEO Roland Busch, Q3 FY2026 results, owners and competitors.
Hitachi profile: ~$71B FY2025 revenue, record ~$8.78B adjusted EBITA, CEO Toshiaki Tokunaga, Lumada business model, Hitachi Energy, and competitors.
Caterpillar profile: $67.6B 2025 revenue, record $20.5B Q2 2026, CEO and Chairman Joe Creed, $72B backlog, segments, competitors like Komatsu, and history.
Honeywell Technologies after the 2026 Aerospace spin-off: ~$20B sales guidance, Q2 2026 sales of $5.2B, CEO Vimal Kapur, 50,000+ employees, and key rivals.
3M company profile: FY2025 revenue, founders, CEO William Brown, Post-it, N95 respirators, PFAS settlements, and materials strategy.
TE Connectivity company profile covering history, FY2025 revenue, founders, CEO Terrence R. Curtin, business model, and competitive strategy.
FANUC FY2025 revenue of ¥857.8B, Q1 FY2026 results, CEO Kenji Yamaguchi, how FANUC makes money from CNC, robots and robomachines, and rivals ABB and Yaskawa.
Trimble profile with FY2025 revenue, ARR, CEO Robert G. Painter, founders, business model, competitors, and strategy.
All 8 companies in this industry (A-Z)
First 8 companies
Suggested company profiles
TE Connectivity company profile covering history, FY2025 revenue, founders, CEO Terrence R. Curtin, business model, and competitive strategy.
Caterpillar profile: $67.6B 2025 revenue, record $20.5B Q2 2026, CEO and Chairman Joe Creed, $72B backlog, segments, competitors like Komatsu, and history.
Siemens AG profile: FY2025 revenue of ~$89.2B and net income of ~$11.8B, CEO Roland Busch, Q3 FY2026 results, owners and competitors.
Hitachi profile: ~$71B FY2025 revenue, record ~$8.78B adjusted EBITA, CEO Toshiaki Tokunaga, Lumada business model, Hitachi Energy, and competitors.
Honeywell Technologies after the 2026 Aerospace spin-off: ~$20B sales guidance, Q2 2026 sales of $5.2B, CEO Vimal Kapur, 50,000+ employees, and key rivals.
FANUC FY2025 revenue of ¥857.8B, Q1 FY2026 results, CEO Kenji Yamaguchi, how FANUC makes money from CNC, robots and robomachines, and rivals ABB and Yaskawa.
Trimble profile with FY2025 revenue, ARR, CEO Robert G. Painter, founders, business model, competitors, and strategy.
3M company profile: FY2025 revenue, founders, CEO William Brown, Post-it, N95 respirators, PFAS settlements, and materials strategy.
Top Industrial Head-to-Head Comparisons
Fanuc vs Siemens
Siemens is far bigger: it reported ~$89.2 billion (EUR78.9 billion) of revenue for fiscal 2025 (ended September 30, 2025) versus FANUC's ¥857.8 billion (about $5.7 billion) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, roughly 15 times larger. FANUC is more profitable on a percentage basis, with a 19.4% net margin versus Siemens' 13.2% in each company's latest fiscal year. In the one market where they go head-to-head, CNC controllers for machine tools, FANUC is the global volume leader while Siemens' SINUMERIK line holds a strong number-two position concentrated in Europe and high-end applications.
Amphenol vs Te Connectivity
Amphenol is now the bigger of the two: it reported $23.09 billion in net sales for fiscal year 2025 (ended December 31, 2025), versus TE Connectivity's $17.26 billion for its fiscal year ended September 26, 2025, the first time Amphenol has outsold TE. Amphenol is also more profitable, with $4.27 billion of net income and a record 25.4% GAAP operating margin, compared with TE Connectivity's $1.84 billion of net income. The gap opened because Amphenol's Communications Solutions segment, which covers AI data-center interconnects, grew 91% in fiscal 2025 to about $12.1 billion, while TE Connectivity's larger automotive business, Transportation Solutions, grew more slowly and still made up about 54% of its FY2025 sales.
Fanuc vs Keyence
Keyence is the bigger and far more profitable company: it reported ~$7.83 billion (JPY 1.169 trillion) in net sales and ~$2.98 billion (JPY 445.2 billion) in net income for the fiscal year ended March 20, 2026, an operating margin near 51%. FANUC, the maker of CNC controls and industrial robots, reported ~$5.75 billion (JPY 857.8 billion) in net sales and ~$1.12 billion (JPY 166.5 billion) in net income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, an operating margin of about 21%. Keyence's market capitalization was about $122.6 billion on September 30, 2026, roughly 3.5 times FANUC's market value of about JPY 5.53 trillion (around $35 billion) on September 4, 2026.
Related industries
Editorial Methodology
We use company filings, annual reports, company statements and press reports, with primary sources preferred where available. Each financial row shows its recorded source. Full-year figures are separated from annualized run-rates, partial periods and forecasts; unaudited figures carry a label. Source detail varies by company, so check the linked material when the reporting basis matters.
Public companies may provide filings and annual reports. Private-company figures may come from statements or press coverage. A missing figure stays missing, and a source link should identify where its number came from.
We organize company records and review claims for strategic context, source quality and clarity. Pages show a review date where one is recorded.
Technical checks flag inconsistent figures and missing links. Editorial review of the underlying source remains necessary for claims those checks cannot verify.
