FANUC Corporation vs Keyence Corporation: Strategic Comparison
Direct Answer
Keyence is the bigger and far more profitable company: it reported ~$7.83 billion (JPY 1.169 trillion) in net sales and ~$2.98 billion (JPY 445.2 billion) in net income for the fiscal year ended March 20, 2026, an operating margin near 51%. FANUC, the maker of CNC controls and industrial robots, reported ~$5.75 billion (JPY 857.8 billion) in net sales and ~$1.12 billion (JPY 166.5 billion) in net income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, an operating margin of about 21%. Keyence's market capitalization was about $122.6 billion on September 30, 2026, roughly 3.5 times FANUC's market value of about JPY 5.53 trillion (around $35 billion) on September 4, 2026.
Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Field | FANUC Corporation | Keyence Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Latest reported revenue | ~$5.7B (FY2025) | ~$7.8B (FY2026) |
| Founded | 1972 | 1974 |
| Employees | 10,040 | 12,784 |
| Market Cap | N/A | $122.6B |
| Headquarters | Japan | Japan |
| Revenue / Employee | $572k / employee | $613k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | N/A | 15.6x P/S |
Strategic Positioning
Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles
FANUC Corporation Strategic Vector
FY2025 Revenue BaselineFANUC's 2026 move to partner with NVIDIA and Google is a shift for a company long known for closed, in-house technology. It keeps control of the hardware and controllers while letting outside AI platforms make its robots easier to program.
Keyence Corporation Strategic Vector
FY2026 Revenue BaselineKeyence does not own factories and does not use distributors, so nearly all of its spending goes into product design and the engineers who sell on the factory floor. That is why its margin looks closer to a software company than a hardware maker, and why demand swings in semiconductor and electronics capex hit its sales but rarely its profitability.
Quick Stats Comparison
| Metric | FANUC Corporation | Keyence Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ~$5.7B (FY2025) | ~$7.8B (FY2026) |
| Founded | 1972 | 1974 |
| Headquarters | Oshino, Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan | Osaka, Japan |
| Market Cap | N/A | $122.6B |
| Employees | 10,040 | 12,784 |
| Revenue / Employee | $572k / employee | $613k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | N/A | 15.6x P/S |
FANUC Corporation Revenue vs Keyence Corporation Revenue — Year by Year
| Year | FANUC Corporation | Keyence Corporation | Higher reported revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | N/A | ~$7.8B | Only one figure available |
| 2025 | ~$5.7B | ~$7.1B | Keyence Corporation (approx. USD) |
| 2024 | ~$5.3B | ~$6.5B | Keyence Corporation (approx. USD) |
| 2023 | ~$5.3B | ~$6.2B | Keyence Corporation (approx. USD) |
| 2022 | ~$5.7B | ~$5.1B | FANUC Corporation (approx. USD) |
Business Model Breakdown
Overview: FANUC Corporation vs Keyence Corporation
This in-depth comparison examines FANUC Corporation and Keyence Corporation across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching FANUC Corporation on its own, evaluating Keyence Corporation, or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between FANUC Corporation and Keyence Corporation is widest.
On the headline numbers, FANUC Corporation reports annual revenue of ~$5.7B against ~$7.8B for Keyence Corporation, while their respective market capitalizations stand at N/A and $122.6B. FANUC Corporation is headquartered in Japan and Keyence Corporation operates from Japan, and those different home markets shape how each company competes.
FANUC Corporation: FANUC is a Japanese industrial automation manufacturer headquartered in Oshino, Yamanashi Prefecture, near Mount Fuji. It does not sell consumer products. Instead it builds the CNC controls, servo systems, robots, and compact machines that other manufacturers use to cut metal, mold plastic, weld car bodies, and move parts. Its bright yellow robots and controllers are found in automotive, electronics, aerospace, medical-device, and logistics plants worldwide.
Keyence Corporation: Keyence Corporation, headquartered in Osaka and listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange (6861), supplies the sensors, vision systems, and measuring tools that let automated production lines check parts and catch defects. Its customers range from semiconductor and electronics makers to automotive, food, pharmaceutical, and logistics companies. Keyence employed 12,784 people on a consolidated basis as of March 20, 2026.
Business Models: How FANUC Corporation and Keyence Corporation Make Money
FANUC Corporation and Keyence Corporation pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between FANUC Corporation and Keyence Corporation.
FANUC Corporation business model: FANUC makes money by selling factory automation hardware and then supporting it for decades. Revenue comes from three product groups plus service: FA (CNC controls, servo motors, amplifiers, and lasers sold mainly to machine-tool builders), Robot (industrial robots and CRX collaborative robots sold to automakers, electronics makers, logistics firms, and integrators), and Robomachine (ROBODRILL machining centers, ROBOSHOT electric injection molding machines, and ROBOCUT wire EDM). FANUC designs and builds most core components in-house, including motors, drives, and controllers, and produces them in highly automated Japanese plants. A lifetime maintenance commitment, spare parts, training, and software such as ROBOGUIDE simulation keep customers on the platform long after the initial sale.
Keyence Corporation business model: Keyence makes money by selling high-value factory automation hardware directly to manufacturers. Products include photoelectric and laser sensors, machine vision systems, measuring instruments, digital microscopes, laser markers, barcode readers, and PLC-related controls. Keyence designs the products and outsources physical production to contract manufacturers, which keeps capital spending and fixed costs low. It sells only through its own technical sales engineers, who visit plants, test customer parts, and propose a specific fix for a quality or productivity problem. Keyence keeps standard products in stock for fast shipping and does not break out sales by product line.
Competitive Advantage: FANUC Corporation vs Keyence Corporation
The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of FANUC Corporation stack up against those of Keyence Corporation.
FANUC Corporation competitive advantage: FANUC's advantage is a large installed base combined with in-house engineering. Machinists and maintenance teams worldwide are trained on FANUC CNC programming and robot controllers, so switching platforms means retraining staff, rewriting programs, and re-stocking spare parts. FANUC's commitment to maintain products for as long as customers use them, and its backward-compatible control generations, make that switching cost even higher.
Keyence Corporation competitive advantage: Keyence's advantage comes from combining a direct, engineer-led sales force with fabless production. Sales engineers see customer problems first-hand and feed them back to product planning, which lets Keyence launch specialized products and price them on the value they create rather than on cost. Because there is no distributor margin and no factory base to fill, the company has reported operating margins around 50% for years, including about 51% in FY2026.
Growth Strategy: Where FANUC Corporation and Keyence Corporation Are Headed
Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how FANUC Corporation and Keyence Corporation each plan to expand from here.
FANUC Corporation growth strategy: FANUC's growth plan pushes automation into general industry such as food, logistics, and pharmaceuticals using CRX collaborative robots that are programmed through a tablet. In 2026 it opened up its platform to Physical AI: a March 2026 collaboration uses NVIDIA Jetson, Isaac Sim, and Omniverse with FANUC robots and ROBOGUIDE, a May 2026 collaboration with Google applies Google's AI models to robot systems, and in July 2026 CEO Kenji Yamaguchi joined NVIDIA's Japanese robotics initiative alongside Fujitsu, Yaskawa, and Kawasaki Heavy Industries.
Keyence Corporation growth strategy: Keyence grows by opening more overseas sales offices, hiring and training more local sales engineers, and launching new products in categories where it can solve a problem better than existing tools. Sales outside Japan are now the majority of revenue. Recent product work focuses on AI-assisted image inspection, 3D measurement, and easier-to-configure vision systems that factory staff can set up without writing code.
Financial Picture: FANUC Corporation vs Keyence Corporation
A closer look at the financial trajectory of FANUC Corporation and Keyence Corporation rounds out the comparison.
FANUC Corporation: FANUC is consistently profitable for a capital-equipment maker. In FY2025 (ended March 2026) it earned ~$1.23 billion (¥183.8 billion) of operating income on ~$5.75 billion (¥857.8 billion) of sales, a margin of about 21%, and ordinary income of ~$1.52 billion (¥227.5 billion), helped by interest and investment income on its large cash holdings. The April 2026 plan called for FY2026 sales of ~$6.09 billion (¥909.6 billion) and operating income of ~$1.42 billion (¥212.2 billion); after Q1 sales of ~$1.55 billion (¥231.0 billion) and operating income of ~$358 million (¥53.5 billion) (about a 23% margin), FANUC raised sales guidance by 4.2% and operating-profit guidance by 2.7%.
Keyence Corporation: Keyence's net sales rose from ~$5.06 billion (JPY 755.2 billion) in FY2022 (year ended March 2022) to ~$7.83 billion (JPY 1.169 trillion) in FY2026, a gain of about 55% in four years. FY2026 operating income was ~$3.99 billion (JPY 595.8 billion) and net income ~$2.98 billion (JPY 445.2 billion). Growth sped up at the start of FY2027: for the quarter ended June 20, 2026, net sales rose 32.8% year on year to ~$2.32 billion (JPY 346.6 billion) and net income rose 51.0% to ~$932 million (JPY 139.1 billion). The company carries essentially no interest-bearing debt and holds large cash and securities balances. Its market value was about $122.6 billion at the end of September 2026.
Company-Specific SWOT Notes
FANUC Corporation
FANUC equipment is widely embedded in machine tools and production lines, creating switching costs through programming, service, parts, and training routines.
Orders can weaken quickly when machine-tool, automotive, electronics, or semiconductor customers delay factory investment.
More manufacturers need robots, predictive maintenance, and connected automation to manage labor shortages, quality, and uptime.
Chinese and regional competitors can pressure midrange robot and CNC pricing, especially when customers prioritize upfront cost.
Keyence Corporation
Keyence's fabless strategy allows it to maintain gross margins consistently above 80%, while its 100% direct sales force of application engineers creates large switching costs and provides real-time R&D feedback, ensuring rapid, hyper-specialized product devel
Keyence depends on manufacturing capital spending.
The aggressive integration of advanced AI into machine vision platforms and the geographic expansion of its direct sales force in North America and Europe target the influx of capital into supply chain nearshoring and new semiconductor/EV facilities.
A new wave of software-first startups leveraging open-source machine learning frameworks and low-cost, commodity hardware threatens to commoditize the lower end of the machine vision market, potentially forcing Keyence to lower its premium pricing.
Factual Scorecard
| Category | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Same-period Revenue Scale | Not comparable | FANUC Corporation: ~$5.7B (FY2025). Keyence Corporation: ~$7.8B (FY2026). Different or missing fiscal periods prevent a like-for-like ranking. |
| Founded Earlier | FANUC Corporation | FANUC Corporation was founded in 1972; Keyence Corporation was founded in 1974. |
Comparison Takeaway: FANUC Corporation vs Keyence Corporation
Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.
Frequently Asked Questions: FANUC Corporation vs Keyence Corporation
Which company is bigger, FANUC or Keyence?
Keyence is bigger by revenue and profit. It reported ~$7.83 billion (JPY 1.169 trillion) of net sales for the fiscal year ended March 20, 2026, about 36% more than FANUC's ~$5.75 billion (JPY 857.8 billion) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026. Keyence's net income of ~$2.98 billion (JPY 445.2 billion) was also about 2.7 times FANUC's ~$1.12 billion (JPY 166.5 billion).
Why is Keyence's profit margin so much higher than FANUC's?
Keyence outsources all manufacturing and sells only through its own engineers, with no distributor markup, which produced an operating margin near 51% in the fiscal year ended March 20, 2026. FANUC builds its own motors, drives, controllers and robots in Japanese factories and sells partly through machine-tool builders and integrators, which is part of why its operating margin was about 21% in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026.
Who runs FANUC and who runs Keyence?
Kenji Yamaguchi has been FANUC's representative director, president and CEO since 2019. Tetsuya Nakano has been Keyence's president and representative director since December 22, 2025, when he succeeded Yu Nakata, who had led Keyence since 2019 and is now director and special advisor.
Is FANUC or Keyence more exposed to China's manufacturing slowdown?
FANUC is more exposed. In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, about 27% of FANUC's ~$5.75 billion (JPY 857.8 billion) in net sales came from China alone and about 41% from Asia excluding Japan, by customer location, versus Keyence's more geographically spread overseas sales, where the Americas and Asia each grew in the double digits in the December 2025 quarter. That makes FANUC's order book swing more with Chinese capital-spending cycles, and China's Estun Automation overtook FANUC in first-half 2025 industrial robot unit sales within China.
Should you look at FANUC or Keyence as the better automation stock?
Neither is simply better - they are different trade-offs. Keyence had the larger market value, about $122.6 billion on September 30, 2026 versus about JPY 5.53 trillion (around $35 billion) for FANUC on September 4, 2026, plus the steadier, higher-margin business. FANUC posted faster recent order growth, with first-quarter fiscal 2026 orders up 36.9% to ~$1.89 billion (JPY 281.9 billion), making it more of a cyclical bet on a factory-automation and robotics upswing.
Which company was founded first, FANUC Corporation or Keyence Corporation?
FANUC Corporation was founded in 1972; Keyence Corporation was founded in 1974.
What revenue did FANUC Corporation and Keyence Corporation report?
FANUC Corporation reported ~$5.7B (FY2025), while Keyence Corporation reported ~$7.8B (FY2026). The fiscal years differ, so these are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.
How do FANUC Corporation and Keyence Corporation make money?
FANUC Corporation: FANUC makes money by selling factory automation hardware and then supporting it for decades. Keyence Corporation: Keyence makes money by selling high-value factory automation hardware directly to manufacturers.
Which is better, FANUC Corporation or Keyence Corporation?
There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare FANUC Corporation and Keyence Corporation on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.
Sources & References
- FANUC Corporation Corporate Website
- FANUC Corporation Annual Report 2025 - Revenue and Financial Data
- fanuc.co.jp
- fanuc.co.jp
- fanuc.co.jp
- fanuc.co.jp
- fanucamerica.com
- fanuc.co.jp
- morningstar.com
- taipeitimes.com
- Keyence Corporation Corporate Website
- Keyence Corporation Annual Report 2026 - Revenue and Financial Data
- keyence.co.jp
- keyence.com
- en.wikipedia.org
- keyence.co.jp
- keyence.co.jp
- tipranks.com
Quick Answer
Keyence is the bigger and far more profitable company: it reported ~$7.83 billion (JPY 1.169 trillion) in net sales and ~$2.98 billion (JPY 445.2 billion) in net income for the fiscal year ended March 20, 2026, an operating margin near 51%. FANUC, the maker of CNC controls and industrial robots, reported ~$5.75 billion (JPY 857.8 billion) in net sales and ~$1.12 billion (JPY 166.5 billion) in net income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, an operating margin of about 21%. Keyence's market capitalization was about $122.6 billion on September 30, 2026, roughly 3.5 times FANUC's market value of about JPY 5.53 trillion (around $35 billion) on September 4, 2026.
Verdict
Keyence wins on nearly every profitability measure because it owns no factories and sells only through its own engineers, which let it convert roughly half of its FY2026 net sales into operating income versus about a fifth for FANUC. FANUC's lower margin reflects a more capital-intensive, vertically integrated model: it builds its own motors, drives and controllers in Japanese plants and ships CNC systems, robots and ROBOMACHINE equipment whose order book swings with machine-tool and China capital-spending cycles. FANUC is nonetheless the business with more recent momentum: its first quarter of fiscal 2026 (April-June 2026) brought record orders of ~$1.89 billion (JPY 281.9 billion), up 36.9%, even though the stock fell about 15% afterward on worries FANUC could not convert that backlog into shipments quickly enough. Keyence is also growing fast from a larger base: its first quarter of fiscal 2027 (April-June 2026) saw net sales rise 32.8% to ~$2.32 billion (JPY 346.6 billion) and net income rise 51.0% to ~$932 million (JPY 139.1 billion). For a buyer or investor, Keyence looks like the steadier, higher-margin compounder, while FANUC looks like the higher-torque play on a factory-automation and robotics upswing.
Cite This Page
Automatically generated citations for researchers.
CorpDigest. (2026). FANUC Corporation vs Keyence Corporation Comparison. Retrieved , from
CorpDigest. "FANUC Corporation vs Keyence Corporation Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, . Accessed .
CorpDigest. "FANUC Corporation vs Keyence Corporation Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. Accessed . .