Top 5 Electronics Companies
5 Electronics companies with latest reported revenue, headquarters and links to their sourced company profiles.
5 of these companies have a latest reported revenue figure, shown on their profiles with its fiscal year and source. This directory does not publish a combined sector revenue, because parent companies and subsidiaries and different revenue measures overlap.
Electronics industry overview
Consumer electronics companies profiled here manufacture devices ranging from smartphones and personal computers to home appliances and audio equipment. Their revenue histories use the sources linked on each profile and may differ in fiscal year, currency and whether a full-year figure is audited.
This hub currently maps 5 organizations to Electronics. The revenue spotlight uses each company's latest disclosed figure, converts non-US reporting currencies only for approximate ordering, and links to the underlying company profile for fiscal-year and source context.
Top companies in this industry (by latest revenue)
Apple history, FY2025 revenue, CEO John Ternus (since Sept. 2026) after Tim Cook, iPhone, Services, Apple Silicon, and strategy.
Sony FY2025 financials: ~$83.6B continuing-operations sales, ~$6.91B continuing net income attributable, and 94,900 employees.
Xiaomi profile: FY2025 revenue of ~$63.6B, Q2 2026 results, Lei Jun's leadership, smartphones, AIoT, internet services, and the SU7 and YU7 EV business.
Garmin profile: $7.25B 2025 revenue, record Q2 2026 results, CEO Cliff Pemble, five segments, owners, competitors and history since 1989.
Fire-Boltt profile: ~₹500 crore FY22 revenue, Savex Technologies link, founders Arnav & Aayushi Kishore, 2025 smartwatch slump and 2026 Boltt smartphone launch.
All 5 companies in this industry (A-Z)
First 5 companies
Suggested company profiles
Sony FY2025 financials: ~$83.6B continuing-operations sales, ~$6.91B continuing net income attributable, and 94,900 employees.
Xiaomi profile: FY2025 revenue of ~$63.6B, Q2 2026 results, Lei Jun's leadership, smartphones, AIoT, internet services, and the SU7 and YU7 EV business.
Garmin profile: $7.25B 2025 revenue, record Q2 2026 results, CEO Cliff Pemble, five segments, owners, competitors and history since 1989.
Fire-Boltt profile: ~₹500 crore FY22 revenue, Savex Technologies link, founders Arnav & Aayushi Kishore, 2025 smartwatch slump and 2026 Boltt smartphone launch.
Apple history, FY2025 revenue, CEO John Ternus (since Sept. 2026) after Tim Cook, iPhone, Services, Apple Silicon, and strategy.
Top Electronics Head-to-Head Comparisons
Apple vs Garmin
Apple is far bigger overall, with $416.2 billion in net sales for fiscal 2025 (year ended September 27, 2025) and a market value near $4.98 trillion as of September 25, 2026, against Garmin's $7.25 billion in fiscal 2025 revenue (year ended December 27, 2025) and roughly $54 billion market capitalization. But in the smartwatch category specifically, the gap is narrowing: Apple held 46% of global smartwatch shipments in the second quarter of 2026, down from 48% a year earlier, while Garmin's share rose to 15% from 11%, pulling it level with Samsung, according to Omdia shipment data reported by Notebookcheck and Android Authority in August 2026. Apple remains the clear market leader; Garmin is the fastest-growing challenger.
Apple vs Xiaomi
Apple is far bigger than Xiaomi by every major financial measure: $416.2 billion in FY2025 net sales versus Xiaomi's RMB457.3 billion (about $63 billion), and $112.0 billion in net income versus Xiaomi's RMB41.6 billion (about $5.8 billion). Apple also outships Xiaomi on phones despite selling at far higher prices, shipping 55.1 million iPhones in Q2 2026 against Xiaomi's 31.2 million smartphones. Xiaomi's advantage is breadth and price: it also builds a growing electric-vehicle business (411,082 vehicles delivered in 2025) that Apple abandoned when it canceled Project Titan in February 2024.
Apple vs Fire Boltt
Apple produces the Apple Watch, an expensive, accurate premium smartwatch deeply integrated into the iPhone ecosystem. Fire-Boltt is an Indian electronics brand that sells large volumes of ultra-cheap, fashionable smartwatches with basic notification and fitness tracking features.
Apple vs Google
Apple is the bigger company by revenue and Alphabet (Google's parent) is the more profitable one. Apple reported $416.2 billion in net sales for fiscal year 2025 (ended September 27, 2025), while Alphabet reported $402.8 billion in revenue for calendar year 2025, about 3% less. Alphabet's net income of $132.2 billion topped Apple's $112.0 billion by roughly $20 billion, giving Alphabet a 32.8% net margin against Apple's 26.9%. By market value, Apple was worth about $4.98 trillion on September 25, 2026, ahead of Alphabet's roughly $4.31 trillion on September 22, 2026.
Apple vs Microsoft
Apple is bigger by revenue and Microsoft is bigger by profit. Apple reported $416.2 billion of net sales for fiscal 2025 (year ended September 27, 2025), while Microsoft reported $331.8 billion of revenue for fiscal 2026 (year ended June 30, 2026). Microsoft's net income was $133.7 billion, compared with Apple's $112.0 billion.
Apple vs Samsung
Apple reported $416.2 billion of net sales and $112.0 billion of net income for fiscal 2025, ending September 27, 2025. Samsung Electronics reported KRW 333.6 trillion of revenue and KRW 44.3 trillion of net income for the calendar year. Apple's net margin was 26.9%, compared with about 13.3% for Samsung, calculated within each reporting currency. These company-wide figures cover different business mixes and do not establish smartphone profitability. A comparison of absolute size across currencies also needs an explicit exchange-rate method.
Related industries
Editorial Methodology
We use company filings, annual reports, company statements and press reports, with primary sources preferred where available. Each financial row shows its recorded source. Full-year figures are separated from annualized run-rates, partial periods and forecasts; unaudited figures carry a label. Source detail varies by company, so check the linked material when the reporting basis matters.
Public companies may provide filings and annual reports. Private-company figures may come from statements or press coverage. A missing figure stays missing, and a source link should identify where its number came from.
We organize company records and review claims for strategic context, source quality and clarity. Pages show a review date where one is recorded.
Technical checks flag inconsistent figures and missing links. Editorial review of the underlying source remains necessary for claims those checks cannot verify.
