Skip to main content

Tesla vs Xiaomi: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

Tesla reported $94.8B of revenue in FY2025 and $3.8B of net income. Xiaomi reported ~$63.6B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$5.8B of net income.

Latest financial snapshot

Tesla

Latest revenue
$94.8B (FY2025)
Net income
$3.8B
Net margin
4.0%
Revenue growth
+33.6% a year, FY2016–FY2025

Xiaomi

Latest revenue
~$63.6B (FY2025)
Net income
~$5.8B
Net margin
9.1%
Revenue growth
+8.6% a year, FY2021–FY2025

Financial summary

Tesla

Tesla's revenue peaked at $97.69 billion in 2024 and slipped 2.9% to $94.83 billion in FY2025, while net income fell from $7.09 billion to $3.79 billion as vehicle prices and regulatory-credit income declined. The second quarter of 2026 reversed the top-line trend: revenue rose 26% to a record $28.24 billion, with automotive up 23% to $20.52 billion, services and other up 50% to $4.58 billion, and energy up 13% to $3.14 billion. Profit did not follow. GAAP net income fell 5% to $1.11 billion and adjusted EPS of $0.33 missed estimates because of higher R&D and AI infrastructure spending.

Xiaomi

FY2025 was Xiaomi's strongest year: revenue rose 25.0% to ~$63.6B (RMB457.3B), profit attributable to owners was ~$5.78B (RMB41.6B), and adjusted net profit rose 43.8% to ~$5.45B (RMB39.2B). The Smart EV, AI and other new initiatives segment more than tripled to ~$14.7B (RMB106.1B) on 411,082 vehicle deliveries and posted its first full-year operating profit. 2026 has been weaker. Q1 revenue was ~$13.8B (RMB99.1B) (down 10.9%) with adjusted net profit of ~$848M (RMB6.1B) (down 43.1%). Q2 revenue was ~$15.1B (RMB108.9B) (down 6.1%) with adjusted net profit of ~$862M (RMB6.2B) (down 42.6%) and a 19.8% gross margin. In Q2 the EV segment had ~$3.46B (RMB24.9B) of revenue and an operating loss of about $361M (RMB2.6B).

Revenue and profit by year

Tesla

Tesla revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025$94.8B$3.8B4.0%-2.9%Source
FY2024$97.7B$7.1B7.3%+0.9%Source
FY2023$96.8B$15B15.5%+18.8%Source
FY2022$81.5B$12.6B15.4%+51.4%Source
FY2021$53.8B$5.5B10.3%+70.7%Source
FY2020$31.5B$721M2.3%+28.3%Source
FY2019$24.6B-$862M-3.5%+14.5%Source
FY2018$21.5B-$976M-4.5%+82.5%Source
FY2017$11.8B-$2B-16.7%+68.0%Source
FY2016$7B-$674.9M-9.6%—Source
Full Tesla financials

Xiaomi

Xiaomi revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025~$63.6B~$5.8B9.1%+25.0%Source
FY2024~$50.9B~$3.3B6.5%+35.0%Source
FY2023~$37.7B~$2.4B6.4%-3.2%Source
FY2022~$38.9B~$343.9M0.9%-14.7%Source
FY2021~$45.6B~$2.7B5.9%—Source
Full Xiaomi financials

Where the revenue comes from

Tesla

  • Automotive sales and leasing~73%

    Model 3, Model Y, Cybertruck and remaining other models, plus regulatory credits. $20.52B in Q2 2026.

  • Services and other~16%

    Supercharging, FSD and connectivity software, service, used cars, insurance and parts. $4.58B in Q2 2026, up 50%.

  • Energy generation and storage~11%

    Megapack, Powerwall and solar. $3.14B in Q2 2026, up 13%.

Xiaomi

  • Smartphones

    40.8% (FY2025)

    ~$25.9B (RMB186.4B) from Xiaomi, Redmi and POCO phones.

  • IoT, Lifestyle Products and Internet Services

    36.0% (FY2025)

    Remainder of the Smartphone x AIoT segment, including appliances, TVs, wearables, advertising and games.

  • Smart EV, AI and Other New Initiatives

    23.2% (FY2025)

    ~$14.7B (RMB106.1B), mostly from SU7 and YU7 vehicle sales.

Business model and strategy

Tesla

How it makes money

Tesla operates a vertically integrated electric vehicle, clean energy generation, and software ecosystem model. The company generates revenue across four primary pillars: First, Automotive Sales and Leasing, selling mass-market electric vehicles (Model Y, Model 3) and premium models (Model S, Model X, Cybertruck) directly to consumers without franchised dealers.

Growth strategy

Tesla's growth plan rests on four bets. First, regain vehicle volume: deliveries fell 8.6% to 1.64 million in 2025, then rebounded to a record 480,126 in Q2 2026, up 25% year over year. Second, autonomy: Tesla runs a paid robotaxi service in several U.S. cities and is building the steering-wheel-free Cybercab, though the Q2 2026 shareholder letter dropped the target of volume production in 2026.

Competitive advantage

Tesla's advantage comes from brand strength, direct sales, software updates, charging infrastructure, battery and powertrain know-how, manufacturing scale, data, and energy-storage growth.

Tesla business model in full

Xiaomi

How it makes money

Xiaomi sells hardware at relatively thin margins and earns higher margins from internet services delivered through its installed base of devices, including advertising, app distribution and games. Smartphones were the largest single product line in FY2025 at ~$25.9B (RMB186.4B) of revenue. IoT products extend the ecosystem into homes, and many of them are made by ecosystem partner companies Xiaomi has invested in.

Growth strategy

Xiaomi's stated strategy is the Human x Car x Home ecosystem: sell more premium smartphones, add large appliances and other IoT categories, scale the car lineup, and invest in its own AI models and chips, such as the MiMo models and the XRING O1 processor.

Competitive advantage

Xiaomi's advantages are scale in smartphones (top three globally by shipments), a very wide range of connected products under one brand and one operating system, a large device base it can monetize through services, and a fast-growing car business that buyers can connect to the same ecosystem.

Xiaomi business model in full

Questions about Tesla vs Xiaomi

Which company has higher revenue — Tesla, Inc. or Xiaomi Corp.?

Tesla, Inc. reported $94.8B (FY2025), while Xiaomi Corp. reported ~$63.6B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Tesla, Inc. is the larger business, with Xiaomi Corp. reporting a smaller revenue base.

What is the market cap of Tesla, Inc. vs Xiaomi Corp.?

Tesla, Inc.'s market capitalisation stands at $1.49T, while Xiaomi Corp.'s is $83.0B. Tesla, Inc. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Xiaomi Corp..

Which is more financially efficient — Tesla, Inc. or Xiaomi Corp.?

Tesla, Inc. generates $704k / employee in revenue per employee, while Xiaomi Corp. generates $1.12M / employee. Xiaomi Corp. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.

How do Tesla, Inc. and Xiaomi Corp. make money?

Tesla, Inc. and Xiaomi Corp. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Tesla, Inc.: Tesla operates a vertically integrated electric vehicle, clean energy generation, and software ecosystem model. Xiaomi Corp.: Xiaomi sells hardware at relatively thin margins and earns higher margins from internet services delivered through its installed base of devices, including advertising, app distribution and games.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Tesla, Inc. or Xiaomi Corp.?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Tesla, Inc. trades at 15.7x P/S and Xiaomi Corp. at 1.3x P/S. Tesla, Inc. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Xiaomi Corp.. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is Tesla, Inc. bigger than Xiaomi Corp.?

By last reported revenue, Tesla, Inc. ($94.8B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Xiaomi Corp. (~$63.6B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Tesla vs Xiaomi overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.