Starling Bank vs Toast, Inc.: Strategic Comparison
Direct Answer
Starling Bank had ~$1.2B (FY2026), while Toast, Inc. had $6.2B (FY2025). Their fiscal years differ, so the figures are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.
Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Field | Starling Bank | Toast, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Latest annual revenue | ~$1.2B (FY2026) | $6.2B (FY2025) |
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
| Employees | 3,500 | 6,500 |
| Market Cap | N/A | $17.0B |
| Headquarters | United Kingdom | United States |
| Revenue / Employee | $335k / employee | $947k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | N/A | 2.8x P/S |
Strategic Positioning
Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles
Starling Bank Strategic Vector
FY2026 Revenue BaselineStarling is growing through software sales and lending rather than by opening consumer banks in new countries, which is expensive and heavily regulated.
Toast, Inc. Strategic Vector
FY2025 Revenue BaselineToast's growth strategy has four parts: keep adding small and mid-sized US restaurants through local field sales; win enterprise chains; expand into adjacent food and beverage verticals and international markets (Canada, the UK and Ireland); and raise revenue per location by attaching more software modules, including AI-driven marketing and analytics under the Toast IQ brand.
Quick Stats Comparison
| Metric | Starling Bank | Toast, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ~$1.2B (FY2026) | $6.2B (FY2025) |
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | London, England, United Kingdom | Boston, Massachusetts, United States |
| Market Cap | N/A | $17.0B |
| Employees | 3,500 | 6,500 |
| Revenue / Employee | $335k / employee | $947k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | N/A | 2.8x P/S |
Starling Bank Revenue vs Toast, Inc. Revenue — Year by Year
| Year | Starling Bank | Toast, Inc. | Higher reported revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | ~$1.2B | N/A | Only one figure available |
| 2025 | ~$942.5M | $6.2B | Toast, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2024 | ~$900.5M | $5.0B | Toast, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2023 | ~$597.7M | $3.9B | Toast, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2022 | N/A | $2.7B | Only one figure available |
Business Model Breakdown
Overview: Starling Bank vs Toast, Inc.
This in-depth comparison examines Starling Bank and Toast, Inc. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Starling Bank on its own, evaluating Toast, Inc., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Starling Bank and Toast, Inc. is widest.
On the headline numbers, annual revenue is ~$1.2B (FY2026) for Starling Bank and $6.2B (FY2025) for Toast, Inc., while their respective market capitalizations stand at N/A and $17.0B. Starling Bank is headquartered in United Kingdom and Toast, Inc. in United States, and those different home markets shape how each company competes.
Starling Bank: Starling Bank is a profitable UK digital bank based in London. Rather than expanding quickly across countries and products, as its rival Revolut did, it built a fully licensed UK bank focused on current accounts for consumers and small businesses, delivered through a mobile app. In FY26 it reported revenue of about $1.17 billion (GBP 887.4 million) and pre-tax profit of about $287 million (GBP 217.1 million). The company is headquartered in London, United Kingdom.
Toast, Inc.: Toast, Inc. (NYSE: TOST) builds the operating software and payment rails for restaurants. Founded in 2011 by Aman Narang, Steve Fredette and Jonathan Grimm, who had worked together at enterprise search firm Endeca, it replaced server-based legacy POS systems with Android terminals connected to the cloud. Toast reported $6.15 billion in revenue and $342 million in net income for 2025, served about 180,000 locations by June 2026 and is led by CEO Aman Narang and CFO Elena Gomez. The company is headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.
Business Models: How Starling Bank and Toast, Inc. Make Money
Starling Bank and Toast, Inc. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Starling Bank and Toast, Inc..
Starling Bank business model: Starling earns money in three ways. Retail banking offers free personal current accounts, which bring in customers and deposits. Business banking serves British small and medium-sized businesses and is its main source of profit. Engine by Starling licenses the cloud banking software Starling built for itself to other banks as a service, and it had about $92.4 million (GBP 70 million) of committed annual recurring revenue.
Toast, Inc. business model: Toast sells restaurants a bundled platform and monetizes it in three ways. Financial technology solutions, mainly card processing on the gross payment volume that runs through Toast terminals and online ordering, make up the large majority of revenue (roughly four-fifths in recent filings), though payments carry thinner margins than software. Subscription services, charged per location or per module for POS software, kitchen display, online ordering, payroll, scheduling, inventory and marketing tools, form a smaller but high-margin share. Hardware and professional services (terminals, Toast Go handhelds, installation) are sold near or below cost to win accounts. Toast also offers Toast Capital working-capital loans through a partner bank. Management tracks 'recurring gross profit' from subscriptions and fintech, which grew 33% in 2025 and 28% in Q2 2026.
Competitive Advantage: Starling Bank vs Toast, Inc.
The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Starling Bank stack up against those of Toast, Inc..
Starling Bank competitive advantage: Starling's advantage is its own core banking software. It built its banking infrastructure in the cloud from the start, while older banks run on decades-old mainframe systems that cost far more to maintain. That keeps Starling's cost per account low. Its founder, Anne Boden, came from traditional banking, which helped the company work through UK banking regulation and obtain a full licence.
Toast, Inc. competitive advantage: Toast's advantages are its restaurant-only focus, a single platform that ties POS, kitchen display, online ordering, payroll and payments to one data set, field sales density in major US metro areas, and switching costs once staff, menus, kitchens and payroll run on Toast. Its offline mode lets terminals keep taking orders during internet outages.
Growth Strategy: Where Starling Bank and Toast, Inc. Are Headed
Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Starling Bank and Toast, Inc. each plan to expand from here.
Starling Bank growth strategy: Starling is growing through software sales and lending rather than by opening consumer banks in new countries, which is expensive and heavily regulated. It sells its Engine platform to existing banks, including in Asia and the Middle East, and it is expanding mortgage and commercial lending in the UK, funded by its deposit base of about $16.8 billion (GBP 12.7 billion).
Toast, Inc. growth strategy: Toast's growth strategy has four parts: keep adding small and mid-sized US restaurants through local field sales; win enterprise chains; expand into adjacent food and beverage verticals and international markets (Canada, the UK and Ireland); and raise revenue per location by attaching more software modules, including AI-driven marketing and analytics under the Toast IQ brand.
Financial Picture: Starling Bank vs Toast, Inc.
A closer look at the financial trajectory of Starling Bank and Toast, Inc. rounds out the comparison.
Starling Bank: Starling's profits come mainly from net interest income: it funds mortgages and SME loans with low-cost deposits. That made it a big winner from higher UK interest rates, with pre-tax profit peaking at ~$397M (£301.1M) in FY24. As rates eased, profit settled at ~$295M (£223.4M) in FY25 and ~$287M (£217.1M) in FY26, and reported revenue slipped from ~$1.24B (£940.0M) to ~$1.17B (£887.4M). Deposits still grew to ~$16.8B (£12.7B), and Engine by Starling's revenue rose 25% in FY26, adding a fee-based line that depends less on interest rates. Starling Bank is a highly disruptive, digital-only challenger bank in the UK, maintaining a massive private market valuation estimated over $3 billion.
Toast, Inc.: Toast's revenue rose from $665 million in 2019 to $1.71 billion in 2021, the year of its NYSE IPO, $3.87 billion in 2023, $4.96 billion in 2024 and $6.15 billion in 2025. It reported its first full year of GAAP net income in 2024 ($19 million) and earned $342 million in 2025, with adjusted EBITDA of $633 million. In Q2 2026, revenue grew 23% to $1.91 billion, net income was $154 million, GAAP operating margin reached 26% and the company raised its full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance. Market capitalization was roughly $16-18 billion in September 2026, with shares down about 20% over the prior year.
Company-Specific SWOT Notes
Starling Bank
Built on an in-house cloud-native core banking platform, Starling became the first major UK digital challenger bank to achieve sustained profitability with industry-leading cost-to-income ratios.
Unlike legacy banks that rely on heavily patched, 40-year-old mainframe mainframes, Starling's absolutely core advantage is its bespoke, cloud-native technology stack that allows for incredibly fast feature deployment.
Business operations are almost entirely concentrated in the UK retail and SME banking sectors, making balance sheet growth dependent on British macroeconomic conditions.
Because Starling aggressively expanded into small and medium enterprise (SME) lending to drive profitability, it is highly exposed to massive default rates if the UK economy enters a severe recession.
Licensing its proprietary core banking software 'Engine by Starling' to established financial institutions across Asia-Pacific, North America, and Europe seeking legacy IT modernization.
Barclays, Lloyds, and NatWest modernizing digital banking apps while offering aggressive mortgage rates to recapture corporate and retail deposits.
Toast, Inc.
Scale across US restaurants supports payments revenue, product data and brand recognition.
Ruggedized hardware engineered for greasy kitchens, tableside payments, and offline mode provides leading operational stickiness.
Financial technology solutions make up roughly four-fifths of revenue, so results depend on card volume and payment margins.
Independent restaurants naturally experience high failure rates during economic downturns, requiring constant top-of-funnel replacement.
Expanding into drive-thru quick-service chains via Delphi Display Systems and AI automated voice ordering.
Fintech rivals offering subsidized hardware and aggressive payment processing take-rates targeting price-sensitive restaurant owners.
Factual Scorecard
| Category | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Same-period Revenue Scale | Not comparable | Starling Bank: ~$1.2B (FY2026). Toast, Inc.: $6.2B (FY2025). Different or missing fiscal periods prevent a like-for-like ranking. |
| Founded Earlier | Toast, Inc. | Starling Bank was founded in 2014; Toast, Inc. was founded in 2011. |
Comparison Takeaway: Starling Bank vs Toast, Inc.
Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.
Frequently Asked Questions: Starling Bank vs Toast, Inc.
Which company was founded first, Starling Bank or Toast, Inc.?
Toast, Inc. was founded in 2011; Starling Bank was founded in 2014.
What revenue did Starling Bank and Toast, Inc. report?
Starling Bank had ~$1.2B (FY2026), while Toast, Inc. had $6.2B (FY2025). The fiscal years differ, so these are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.
How do Starling Bank and Toast, Inc. make money?
Starling Bank: Starling earns money in three ways. Toast, Inc.: Toast sells restaurants a bundled platform and monetizes it in three ways.
Which is better, Starling Bank or Toast, Inc.?
There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Starling Bank and Toast, Inc. on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.
Sources & References
- Starling Bank Corporate Website
- Starling Bank 2026 revenue figure: Starling Group FY26 results
- starlingbank.com
- starlingbank.com
- en.wikipedia.org
- starlingbank.com
- retailbankerinternational.com
- SEC EDGAR: Toast, Inc. filings search (10-K, 8-K)
- Toast, Inc. Corporate Website
- Toast, Inc. 2025 revenue figure: Toast, Inc. annual report (Form 10-K, SEC EDGAR, filed 2026-02-18)
- businesswire.com
- businesswire.com
- sec.gov
- pos.toasttab.com
- en.wikipedia.org
Cite This Page
Automatically generated citations for researchers.
CorpDigest. (2026). Starling Bank vs Toast, Inc. Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/starling-bank-vs-toast
CorpDigest. "Starling Bank vs Toast, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/starling-bank-vs-toast.
CorpDigest. "Starling Bank vs Toast, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/starling-bank-vs-toast.