Procter & Gamble vs Samsung: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Procter & Gamble reported $87B of revenue in FY2026 and $16B of net income. Samsung reported ~$236.9B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$31.4B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Procter & Gamble
- Latest revenue
- $87B (FY2026)
- Net income
- $16B
- Net margin
- 18.4%
- Revenue growth
- +3.3% a year, FY2017–FY2026
Samsung
- Latest revenue
- ~$236.9B (FY2025)
- Net income
- ~$31.4B
- Net margin
- 13.3%
- Revenue growth
- +4.5% a year, FY2021–FY2025
Financial summary
Procter & Gamble
P&G's finances are defined by steady sales, high margins and large cash returns rather than fast growth. Net sales rose from $65.1 billion in fiscal 2017 to $87.0 billion in fiscal 2026. In fiscal 2026 diluted EPS was $6.62 (up 2%) and core EPS was $6.89 (up 1%), with core gross and operating margins slipping 40 and 70 basis points as costs rose. The company returned more than $15 billion to shareholders, about $10.2 billion in dividends and $5 billion in buybacks, and has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. For fiscal 2027 it guided to 1%-3% organic sales growth and core EPS of $6.89-$7.11.
Samsung
Samsung's earnings follow the memory cycle. Revenue fell from ~$215 billion (KRW 302.2 trillion) in 2022 to ~$184 billion (KRW 258.9 trillion) in 2023 during a chip downturn, then recovered to ~$214 billion (KRW 300.9 trillion) in 2024 and ~$237 billion (KRW 333.6 trillion) in 2025, when net income reached about $31.5 billion (KRW 44.3 trillion). In 2026, AI server demand created a memory shortage. Q1 operating profit of ~$40.6 billion (KRW 57.2 trillion) exceeded the full-year 2025 total, and Q2 reached ~$63.5 billion (KRW 89.5 trillion) on ~$122 billion (KRW 171.5 trillion) revenue. Higher memory costs also squeezed Samsung's own devices: the MX and Networks unit lost ~$497 million (KRW 0.7 trillion) in Q2 2026 on ~$23.6 billion (KRW 33.2 trillion) revenue.
Revenue and profit by year
Procter & Gamble
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $87B | $16B | 18.4% | +3.3% | Source |
| FY2025 | $84.3B | $16B | 19.0% | +0.3% | Source |
| FY2024 | $84B | $14.9B | 17.7% | +2.5% | Source |
| FY2023 | $82B | $14.7B | 17.9% | +2.3% | Source |
| FY2022 | $80.2B | $14.7B | 18.4% | +5.3% | Source |
| FY2021 | $76.1B | $14.3B | 18.8% | +7.3% | Source |
| FY2020 | $71B | $13B | 18.4% | +4.8% | Source |
| FY2019 | $67.7B | $3.9B | 5.8% | +1.3% | Source |
| FY2018 | $66.8B | $9.8B | 14.6% | +2.7% | Source |
| FY2017 | $65.1B | $15.3B | 23.6% | — | Source |
Samsung
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | ~$236.9B | ~$31.4B | 13.3% | +10.9% | Source |
| FY2024 | ~$213.6B | ~$23.9B | 11.2% | +16.2% | Source |
| FY2023 | ~$183.8B | ~$10.3B | 5.6% | -14.3% | Source |
| FY2022 | ~$214.6B | ~$38.9B | 18.1% | +8.1% | Source |
| FY2021 | ~$198.5B | ~$27.9B | 14.0% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Procter & Gamble
- Fabric and Home Care
Largest segment
Laundry, dish care, air care, and household cleaning brands including Tide, Ariel, Dawn, Febreze, and Swiffer.
- Baby, Feminine and Family Care
Major segment
Pampers, Always, Bounty, Charmin, and related baby, feminine, and family-care products.
- Beauty
Major segment
Hair care, skin care, and prestige beauty brands including Head & Shoulders, Pantene, Olay, and SK-II.
- Health Care
Major segment
Oral care and personal health products such as Oral-B, Crest, Vicks, and Metamucil.
- Grooming
Focused segment
Gillette, Venus, Braun, and shaving-related products.
Samsung
- Memory semiconductors
- Foundry and system LSI
- Galaxy smartphones and mobile devices
- Display panels
- TVs and appliances
- Network equipment
- Harman automotive and audio
Business model and strategy
Procter & Gamble
How it makes money
P&G makes money by designing, manufacturing and marketing branded household and personal-care products that consumers buy every week, then selling them through retailers, club stores, pharmacies, distributors and e-commerce platforms. Revenue comes from five reportable segments: Fabric & Home Care (Tide, Ariel, Dawn, Downy, Febreze), the largest; Baby, Feminine & Family Care (Pampers, Always, Bounty, Charmin);
Growth strategy
P&G's integrated growth strategy has five parts: a portfolio focused on about ten daily-use categories, superiority across product, packaging, communication, retail execution and value, productivity savings to fund reinvestment, 'constructive disruption' of its own practices, and an agile, accountable organization.
Competitive advantage
P&G's edge is the combination of category leadership and scale. It concentrates on about ten daily-use categories where performance differences are visible to consumers (cleaning, absorbency, shaving, oral care), funds roughly $2 billion a year of R&D to keep those gaps, and uses its size to buy materials, media and logistics more cheaply than smaller rivals.
Samsung
How it makes money
Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses. Device Solutions (DS) makes and sells memory (DRAM, HBM, NAND), System LSI chips such as Exynos processors and ISOCELL image sensors, and contract foundry manufacturing.
Growth strategy
Samsung's growth plan centers on AI memory: ramping HBM4 for Nvidia and AMD accelerators, developing HBM4E, and adding DRAM capacity at Pyeongtaek. In foundry it is pursuing 2nm gate-all-around production and building its Taylor, Texas fab to win customers from TSMC. On the device side it relies on Galaxy AI features, foldables and premium TVs to defend share against Apple and Chinese brands.
Competitive advantage
Samsung's edge is manufacturing scale and breadth. It is the largest memory producer and one of only three major DRAM makers, alongside SK hynix and Micron. That lets it capture pricing upswings like the 2026 AI-driven shortage.
Questions about Procter & Gamble vs Samsung
Which company has higher revenue — The Procter & Gamble Company or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
The Procter & Gamble Company reported $87.0B (FY2026), while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. reported ~$236.9B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the larger business, with The Procter & Gamble Company reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.
What is the market cap of The Procter & Gamble Company vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
The Procter & Gamble Company's market capitalisation stands at $340.0B, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s is $1.33T. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to The Procter & Gamble Company.
Which is more financially efficient — The Procter & Gamble Company or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
The Procter & Gamble Company generates $798k / employee in revenue per employee, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generates $914k / employee. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do The Procter & Gamble Company and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. make money?
The Procter & Gamble Company and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. The Procter & Gamble Company: P&G makes money by designing, manufacturing and marketing branded household and personal-care products that consumers buy every week, then selling them through retailers, club stores, pharmacies, distributors and e-commerce platforms. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — The Procter & Gamble Company or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, The Procter & Gamble Company trades at 3.9x P/S and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. at 5.6x P/S. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to The Procter & Gamble Company. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is The Procter & Gamble Company bigger than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (~$236.9B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to The Procter & Gamble Company ($87.0B (FY2026)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Procter & Gamble vs Samsung overview