Nu Holdings Ltd. vs PepsiCo, Inc.: Strategic Comparison
Direct Answer
Nu Holdings Ltd. reported $15.8B (FY2025), while PepsiCo, Inc. reported $93.9B (FY2025). Revenue describes scale, not an overall winner.
Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Field | Nu Holdings Ltd. | PepsiCo, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Latest reported revenue | $15.8B (FY2025) | $93.9B (FY2025) |
| Founded | 2013 | 1965 |
| Employees | 10,027 | 306,000 |
| Market Cap | $66.3B | $175.0B |
| Headquarters | Brazil | United States |
| Revenue / Employee | $1.57M / employee | $307k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 4.2x P/S | 1.9x P/S |
Strategic Positioning
Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles
Nu Holdings Ltd. Strategic Vector
FY2025 Revenue BaselineNubank's growth now comes less from adding Brazilians and more from earning more per customer (ARPAC hit about $15 in Q4 2025) and from repeating its playbook abroad. The Mexican bank launch in 2026 and the US launch through Lead Bank, ahead of its own OCC charter, are the two bets that will decide whether it becomes a global consumer bank or remains a Latin American one.
PepsiCo, Inc. Strategic Vector
FY2025 Revenue BaselinePepsiCo's current growth strategy has four parts: affordability (price cuts of up to 15% on Lay's, Tostitos, Doritos and Cheetos in February 2026), portfolio shift toward better-for-you and functional brands through acquisitions such as Siete (2025), poppi ($1.95 billion, closed May 2025) and Sabra, cost reduction (three US plant closures, SKU rationalization and a review of North American supply chain and go-to-market), and international expansion in snacks and energy drinks, including its Celsius partnership.
Quick Stats Comparison
| Metric | Nu Holdings Ltd. | PepsiCo, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.8B (FY2025) | $93.9B (FY2025) |
| Founded | 2013 | 1965 |
| Headquarters | Sao Paulo, Brazil | Purchase, New York, United States |
| Market Cap | $66.3B | $175.0B |
| Employees | 10,027 | 306,000 |
| Revenue / Employee | $1.57M / employee | $307k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 4.2x P/S | 1.9x P/S |
Nu Holdings Ltd. Revenue vs PepsiCo, Inc. Revenue — Year by Year
| Year | Nu Holdings Ltd. | PepsiCo, Inc. | Higher reported revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $15.8B | $93.9B | PepsiCo, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2024 | $11.5B | $91.9B | PepsiCo, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2023 | $8.0B | $91.5B | PepsiCo, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2022 | $4.8B | $86.4B | PepsiCo, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2021 | $1.7B | $79.5B | PepsiCo, Inc. (approx. USD) |
Business Model Breakdown
Overview: Nu Holdings Ltd. vs PepsiCo, Inc.
This in-depth comparison examines Nu Holdings Ltd. and PepsiCo, Inc. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Nu Holdings Ltd. on its own, evaluating PepsiCo, Inc., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Nu Holdings Ltd. and PepsiCo, Inc. is widest.
On the headline numbers, Nu Holdings Ltd. reports annual revenue of $15.8B against $93.9B for PepsiCo, Inc., while their respective market capitalizations stand at $66.3B and $175.0B. Nu Holdings Ltd. is headquartered in Brazil and PepsiCo, Inc. in United States, and those different home markets shape how each company competes.
Nu Holdings Ltd.: Nu Holdings is a Cayman Islands-incorporated holding company headquartered in São Paulo that runs Nubank, Latin America's largest digital bank by customers. It ended Q2 2026 with 139 million customers, almost 118 million of them in Brazil, and said it had become the largest digital bank in Mexico with 16 million customers after launching its Mexican bank in August 2026. Its shares trade on the NYSE as NU, with BDRs on Brazil's B3 as ROXO34.
PepsiCo, Inc.: PepsiCo is often seen as a soda company, but convenient foods supply more than half of its revenue. Frito-Lay, Quaker and international snack brands such as Walkers, Sabritas and Kurkure sit alongside Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Gatorade, Aquafina and SodaStream. The company sells in more than 200 countries and territories, with North America generating about 60% of net revenue. Since 2025 it has been under pressure from Elliott Investment Management, which disclosed a roughly $4 billion stake, to improve North American performance.
Business Models: How Nu Holdings Ltd. and PepsiCo, Inc. Make Money
Nu Holdings Ltd. and PepsiCo, Inc. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Nu Holdings Ltd. and PepsiCo, Inc..
Nu Holdings Ltd. business model: Nubank earns revenue mainly from interest on credit card balances, personal loans, payroll and secured loans, and from yield on the securities it buys with customer deposits. Fee and commission income adds interchange on card spending, late fees, and commissions from insurance, investments and marketplace sales. The model depends on acquiring customers cheaply (largely by word of mouth), serving them through an app at a low monthly cost, and then raising average revenue per active customer (ARPAC, about $15 a month in Q4 2025) by cross-selling credit, savings, investment and insurance products.
PepsiCo, Inc. business model: PepsiCo makes money by manufacturing and selling branded snacks, packaged foods and beverages to retailers, foodservice operators and independent bottlers. It reports through regional segments: PepsiCo Foods North America (Frito-Lay and Quaker, combined in 2025), PepsiCo Beverages North America (PBNA), Latin America, Europe, Africa/Middle East/South Asia (AMESA) and Asia Pacific. In North America it runs its own plants and a direct-store-delivery (DSD) system, so its employees deliver and stock shelves. Internationally, much of the beverage business sells concentrate to franchise bottlers such as Varun Beverages, while snacks are largely made and distributed by PepsiCo itself. Volume, pricing and pack-size mix (revenue growth management) drive revenue; advertising and the DSD network sustain shelf presence.
Competitive Advantage: Nu Holdings Ltd. vs PepsiCo, Inc.
The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Nu Holdings Ltd. stack up against those of PepsiCo, Inc..
Nu Holdings Ltd. competitive advantage: Nubank's edge is cost and scale. It runs without branches, reported a cost to serve below $1 per active customer per month and a record efficiency ratio of 19.9% in Q4 2025, and gains most new customers through referrals. Transaction and deposit data from more than 130 million customers feed its underwriting models, and that data advantage grows as more Brazilians use Nubank as their primary account.
PepsiCo, Inc. competitive advantage: PepsiCo's advantage is scale in savory snacks combined with a large beverage business and a direct-store-delivery network. Frito-Lay brands such as Lay's, Doritos and Cheetos lead the US salty snack aisle, and DSD lets PepsiCo control merchandising and restocking in grocery, mass and convenience stores. Owning both snacks and drinks gives it leverage in joint promotions with retailers, something pure-play beverage rivals cannot offer.
Growth Strategy: Where Nu Holdings Ltd. and PepsiCo, Inc. Are Headed
Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Nu Holdings Ltd. and PepsiCo, Inc. each plan to expand from here.
Nu Holdings Ltd. growth strategy: Nubank is growing by deepening products for existing customers (secured and payroll loans, investments, insurance, small-business banking), scaling Mexico after its 2026 bank launch and Colombia, and entering the US through a sponsor bank while its national bank charter is finalized.
PepsiCo, Inc. growth strategy: PepsiCo's current growth strategy has four parts: affordability (price cuts of up to 15% on Lay's, Tostitos, Doritos and Cheetos in February 2026), portfolio shift toward better-for-you and functional brands through acquisitions such as Siete (2025), poppi ($1.95 billion, closed May 2025) and Sabra, cost reduction (three US plant closures, SKU rationalization and a review of North American supply chain and go-to-market), and international expansion in snacks and energy drinks, including its Celsius partnership.
Financial Picture: Nu Holdings Ltd. vs PepsiCo, Inc.
A closer look at the financial trajectory of Nu Holdings Ltd. and PepsiCo, Inc. rounds out the comparison.
Nu Holdings Ltd.: Nubank turned its first annual profit in 2023 ($1.03 billion on $8.03 billion revenue) and has scaled fast since. Under IFRS it reported FY2024 revenue of $11.52 billion and net income of $1.97 billion, then FY2025 revenue of $15.77 billion and net income of $2.87 billion. Using its newer managerial P&L, it reported Q4 2025 revenue of $4.9 billion and net income of $895 million with a 33% ROE. In Q2 2026, gross revenue rose 39% to $5.88 billion and net income reached $1.061 billion, up 49% FX-neutral, with a record 33% return on equity.
PepsiCo, Inc.: PepsiCo grew net revenue from $62.8 billion in 2016 to $93.9 billion in 2025, but growth slowed to 0.4% in 2024 and 2.3% in 2025 (1.7% organic) as North American snack volumes declined. Fiscal 2025 net income was $8.24 billion, down 14%, reflecting a roughly $2 billion impairment mainly on Rockstar. In 2026 the picture improved on the top line: Q1 net revenue rose 8.5% and Q2 rose 6.4% to $24.18 billion, helped by acquisitions, currency and international volume. Q2 2026 net income was $2.98 billion versus $1.26 billion a year earlier. For full-year 2026 PepsiCo guided to 2-4% organic revenue growth and 4-6% core constant-currency EPS growth.
Company-Specific SWOT Notes
Nu Holdings Ltd.
Nubank acquires and serves customers through a mobile-first model with fewer legacy branch costs.
Nubank completely destroyed legacy bank monopolies by acquiring over 90 million customers with practically zero marketing spend, relying entirely on massive viral word-of-mouth due to its zero-fee structure.
Fast consumer-lending growth can amplify losses if underwriting or macro conditions deteriorate.
Because Nubank primarily serves lower-income and middle-class populations that traditional banks ignored, it struggles to generate the massive, highly lucrative wealth management fees enjoyed by legacy rivals.
Mexico, Colombia, savings, investments, insurance, payroll, and secured lending can deepen revenue per customer.
Incumbent banks, wallets, fintech lenders, regulation, and funding-cost swings can pressure margins.
PepsiCo, Inc.
Lay's, Doritos, Cheetos and Tostitos give Frito-Lay leading positions in the US salty snack aisle and historically higher margins than PepsiCo's beverage units.
Direct store delivery truck fleet servicing millions of retail stores weekly, giving PepsiCo leading shelf space dominance.
Operating capital-intensive company-owned bottling plants reduces corporate margins compared to Coca-Cola's refranchised model.
Rising consumer adoption of GLP-1 weight-loss medications potentially dampening high-calorie snack consumption.
Low per-capita snack consumption in emerging markets offering large runway for packaged savory snacks.
Coca-Cola deploying large marketing budgets to defend cold-drink fountain and retail dominance.
Factual Scorecard
| Category | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Same-period Revenue Scale | PepsiCo, Inc. | $15.8B (FY2025) versus $93.9B (FY2025); the higher figure is identified after approximate USD conversion. |
| Founded Earlier | PepsiCo, Inc. | Nu Holdings Ltd. was founded in 2013; PepsiCo, Inc. was founded in 1965. |
Comparison Takeaway: Nu Holdings Ltd. vs PepsiCo, Inc.
Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.
Frequently Asked Questions: Nu Holdings Ltd. vs PepsiCo, Inc.
Which company was founded first, Nu Holdings Ltd. or PepsiCo, Inc.?
PepsiCo, Inc. was founded in 1965; Nu Holdings Ltd. was founded in 2013.
What revenue did Nu Holdings Ltd. and PepsiCo, Inc. report?
Nu Holdings Ltd. reported $15.8B (FY2025), while PepsiCo, Inc. reported $93.9B (FY2025). These figures describe reported scale; they do not by themselves determine an overall winner.
How do Nu Holdings Ltd. and PepsiCo, Inc. make money?
Nu Holdings Ltd.: Nubank earns revenue mainly from interest on credit card balances, personal loans, payroll and secured loans, and from yield on the securities it buys with customer deposits. PepsiCo, Inc.: PepsiCo makes money by manufacturing and selling branded snacks, packaged foods and beverages to retailers, foodservice operators and independent bottlers.
Which is better, Nu Holdings Ltd. or PepsiCo, Inc.?
There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Nu Holdings Ltd. and PepsiCo, Inc. on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.
Sources & References
- Nu Holdings Ltd. Corporate Website
- Nu Holdings Ltd. 2025 revenue figure: sec.gov
- ir.nubank.com.br
- en.wikipedia.org
- businesswire.com
- nasdaq.com
- secure.businesswire.com
- stocktitan.net
- SEC EDGAR: PepsiCo, Inc. filings search (10-K, 8-K)
- PepsiCo, Inc. Corporate Website
- PepsiCo, Inc. 2025 revenue figure: PepsiCo, Inc. annual report (Form 10-K, SEC EDGAR, filed 2026-02-03)
- sec.gov
- investors.pepsico.com
- pepsico.com
- cnbc.com
- prnewswire.com
- stockanalysis.com
- en.wikipedia.org
Cite This Page
Automatically generated citations for researchers.
CorpDigest. (2026). Nu Holdings Ltd. vs PepsiCo, Inc. Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/nubank-vs-pepsi
CorpDigest. "Nu Holdings Ltd. vs PepsiCo, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/nubank-vs-pepsi.
CorpDigest. "Nu Holdings Ltd. vs PepsiCo, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/nubank-vs-pepsi.