Nike vs Visa: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Nike reported $46.4B of revenue in FY2026 and $3.1B of net income. Visa reported $40B of revenue in FY2025 and $20.1B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Financial summary
Nike
Nike's revenue peaked at $51.4B in FY2024, then fell almost 10% to $46.3B in FY2025 as the company cleared old inventory and cut supply of lifestyle franchises. FY2026 was flat at $46.4B, with net income of $3.108B versus $5.7B two years earlier. Gross margin was 42.9%, below 44.6% in FY2024, as discounts and tariffs weighed on profit. Fourth-quarter FY2026 revenue was about $11.0B, down 1% reported and 4% currency-neutral. Nike scheduled first-quarter fiscal 2027 results for October 1, 2026, with analysts expecting roughly $11.3B in revenue, a decline of about 3%.
Visa
Visa's fiscal year ends September 30. Fiscal 2025 net revenue was USD 40.0 billion, up 11% from USD 35.9 billion in fiscal 2024, and GAAP net income was USD 20.1 billion. Growth continued in fiscal 2026: in the third quarter (April to June 2026) net revenue rose 14% to USD 11.6 billion, quarterly payments volume passed USD 4 trillion for the first time, and Visa returned USD 6.2 billion to shareholders through buybacks and dividends. Fiscal 2026 full-year results are due in late October 2026.
Revenue and profit by year
Nike
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $46.4B | $3.1B | 6.7% | +0.2% | Source |
| FY2025 | $46.3B | $3.2B | 7.0% | -9.8% | Source |
| FY2024 | $51.4B | $5.7B | 11.1% | +0.3% | Source |
| FY2023 | $51.2B | $5.1B | 9.9% | +9.6% | Source |
| FY2022 | $46.7B | $6B | 12.9% | +4.9% | Source |
| FY2021 | $44.5B | $5.7B | 12.9% | +19.1% | Source |
| FY2020 | $37.4B | $2.5B | 6.8% | -4.4% | Source |
| FY2019 | $39.1B | $4B | 10.3% | +7.5% | Source |
| FY2018 | $36.4B | $1.9B | 5.3% | +6.0% | Source |
| FY2017 | $34.4B | $4.2B | 12.3% | — | Source |
Visa
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $40B | $20.1B | 50.1% | +11.3% | Source |
| FY2024 | $35.9B | $19.7B | 55.0% | +10.0% | Source |
| FY2023 | $32.7B | $17.3B | 52.9% | +11.4% | Source |
| FY2022 | $29.3B | $15B | 51.0% | +21.6% | Source |
| FY2021 | $24.1B | $12.3B | 51.1% | +10.3% | Source |
| FY2020 | $21.8B | $10.9B | 49.7% | -4.9% | Source |
| FY2019 | $23B | $12.1B | 52.6% | +11.5% | Source |
| FY2018 | $20.6B | $10.3B | 50.0% | +12.3% | Source |
| FY2017 | $18.4B | $6.7B | 36.5% | +21.7% | Source |
| FY2016 | $15.1B | $6B | 39.7% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Nike
- Footwear~64%
NIKE Brand footwear revenue was $29.525B in FY2026.
- Apparel~29%
NIKE Brand apparel revenue was $13.449B in FY2026.
- Equipment~5%
NIKE Brand equipment revenue was $2.199B in FY2026.
- Converse~3%
Converse revenue was $1.174B in FY2026, down 31% year over year.
Visa
- Service revenue
- Data processing revenue
- International transaction revenue
- Value-added services
- Visa Direct
- Fraud and risk tools
Business model and strategy
Nike
How it makes money
Nike designs, markets, and distributes athletic footwear, apparel, and equipment but does not own the factories that make them; independent contract manufacturers, mostly in Vietnam, Indonesia, and China, produce nearly all of its products. In FY2026, NIKE Brand footwear brought in $29.5B (about 64% of revenue), apparel $13.4B (about 29%), equipment $2.2B (about 5%), and Converse $1.2B.
Growth strategy
Under Elliott Hill, Nike's plan, branded internally as "Win Now," reorganizes the company around sports such as running, basketball, football, and training rather than broad gender and consumer segments. Three practical moves stand out. First, Nike is returning to wholesale: it rebuilt ties with Foot Locker and Dick's and resumed selling on Amazon, which helped wholesale revenue grow 6% in FY2026.
Competitive advantage
Nike's edge is scale combined with athlete relationships. No rival matches its $4.75B annual demand-creation budget or its roster across basketball (LeBron James, the Jordan Brand), football (club and federation kits), running, and women's sport (Caitlin Clark, Sabrina Ionescu). That scale also gives Nike purchasing leverage with contract factories and space with the biggest global retailers.
Visa
How it makes money
Visa earns fees from the banks and other clients that use its network, not interest from cardholders. Its reported revenue lines are service revenue (based on payments volume), data processing revenue (based on transactions authorized, cleared and settled over VisaNet), international transaction revenue (cross-border and currency conversion activity) and other revenue, including value-added services such as fraud and…
Growth strategy
Visa's growth strategy is to expand credentials, increase digital acceptance, grow cross-border and e-commerce volume, sell more value-added services, scale Visa Direct, support tap-to-pay and tokenized commerce, and embed Visa capabilities inside fintech and banking platforms.
Competitive advantage
Visa's moat is a three-sided network effect. Consumers use Visa because merchants accept it, merchants accept Visa because consumers carry it, and banks issue Visa credentials because both sides already participate. The company also has fraud data, global rules, brand trust, dispute standards, token infrastructure, and bank relationships built across decades. A competitor cannot simply copy the software;
Questions about Nike vs Visa
Which company has higher revenue — NIKE, Inc. or Visa Inc.?
NIKE, Inc. reported $46.4B (FY2026), while Visa Inc. reported $40.0B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, NIKE, Inc. is the larger business, with Visa Inc. reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.
What is the market cap of NIKE, Inc. vs Visa Inc.?
NIKE, Inc.'s market capitalisation stands at $53.4B, while Visa Inc.'s is $676.0B. Visa Inc. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to NIKE, Inc..
Which is more financially efficient — NIKE, Inc. or Visa Inc.?
NIKE, Inc. generates $636k / employee in revenue per employee, while Visa Inc. generates $1.17M / employee. Visa Inc. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do NIKE, Inc. and Visa Inc. make money?
NIKE, Inc. and Visa Inc. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. NIKE, Inc.: Nike designs, markets, and distributes athletic footwear, apparel, and equipment but does not own the factories that make them; independent contract manufacturers, mostly in Vietnam, Indonesia, and China, produce nearly all of its products. Visa Inc.: Visa earns fees from the banks and other clients that use its network, not interest from cardholders.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — NIKE, Inc. or Visa Inc.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, NIKE, Inc. trades at 1.2x P/S and Visa Inc. at 16.9x P/S. Visa Inc. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to NIKE, Inc.. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is NIKE, Inc. bigger than Visa Inc.?
By last reported revenue, NIKE, Inc. ($46.4B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to Visa Inc. ($40.0B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Nike vs Visa overview