MongoDB, Inc. vs Redis, Inc.: Strategic Comparison
Direct Answer
MongoDB is a document-based NoSQL database used as a primary data store for complex, flexible applications. Redis is a lightning-fast, in-memory key-value store used primarily as a cache to speed up applications by storing frequently accessed data in RAM.
MongoDB and Redis are the two most famous NoSQL databases in the world, but they are used for opposite reasons. MongoDB ($25B+ market cap) is a 'Document Database'. It is designed to be a primary source of truth. If you are building a large e-commerce site, you store all the complex user profiles, order histories, and product descriptions permanently on a hard drive using MongoDB. Redis is a 'Key-Value Store' that lives in RAM (memory). Reading from RAM is fast, but RAM is expensive and volatile. Therefore, Redis is almost never used as a primary database; it is used as a 'Cache'. Redis holds small pieces of requested data (like the top 10 scores on a video game leaderboard) so the app can fetch it in 1 millisecond without bothering MongoDB.
Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Field | MongoDB, Inc. | Redis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Latest annual revenue | $2.5B (FY2026) | N/A |
| Founded | 2007 | 2011 |
| Employees | 5,636 | 1,300 |
| Market Cap | $30.1B | N/A |
| Headquarters | United States | United States |
| Revenue / Employee | $437k / employee | N/A |
| Valuation Multiple | 12.2x P/S | N/A |
Strategic Positioning
Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles
MongoDB, Inc. Strategic Vector
FY2026 Revenue BaselineUnder CEO CJ Desai, MongoDB is positioning itself as a data platform for AI applications: Atlas Vector Search, Voyage AI embedding and reranking models (acquired in 2025), and tooling that connects coding agents to operational data.
Redis, Inc. Strategic Vector
Growth rests on moving customers from free Redis to Redis Cloud, expanding large accounts (50+ spend over $1M a year), and selling AI features such as vector search, semantic caching and feature stores.
Quick Stats Comparison
| Metric | MongoDB, Inc. | Redis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B (FY2026) | N/A |
| Founded | 2007 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | New York, New York, United States | Mountain View, California, United States |
| Market Cap | $30.1B | N/A |
| Employees | 5,636 | 1,300 |
| Revenue / Employee | $437k / employee | N/A |
| Valuation Multiple | 12.2x P/S | N/A |
MongoDB, Inc. Revenue vs Redis, Inc. Revenue — Year by Year
| Year | MongoDB, Inc. | Redis, Inc. | Higher reported revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $2.5B | N/A | Only one figure available |
| 2025 | $2.0B | N/A | Only one figure available |
| 2024 | $1.7B | N/A | Only one figure available |
| 2023 | $1.3B | N/A | Only one figure available |
| 2022 | $873.8M | N/A | Only one figure available |
Business Model Breakdown
Overview: MongoDB, Inc. vs Redis, Inc.
This in-depth comparison examines MongoDB, Inc. and Redis, Inc. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching MongoDB, Inc. on its own, evaluating Redis, Inc., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between MongoDB, Inc. and Redis, Inc. is widest.
On the headline numbers, annual revenue is $2.5B (FY2026) for MongoDB, Inc. and N/A for Redis, Inc., while their respective market capitalizations stand at $30.1B and N/A. Both MongoDB, Inc. and Redis, Inc. are headquartered in United States. Their local markets and applicable rules may still differ.
MongoDB, Inc.: MongoDB, Inc. is a New York-based database software company best known for MongoDB, a document database that stores data as flexible JSON-like (BSON) documents instead of rows and columns. Its managed service, MongoDB Atlas, runs on AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure and accounts for most revenue. The company had 5,636 employees at January 31, 2026 and more than 70,600 customers at July 31, 2026. The company is headquartered in New York City, New York. The database revolution pioneer was founded in 2007 in New York City by Dwight Merriman, Eliot Horowitz, and Kevin Ryan under the name 10gen, fundamentally transforming data architectures by replacing rigid relational tables with flexible JSON-like documents.
Redis, Inc.: Redis is a real-time data platform best known as the cache that sits in front of slower databases. Because data lives in RAM, reads and writes typically complete in under a millisecond, which is why Redis is used for session storage, leaderboards, rate limiting, queues and, more recently, vector search for AI applications. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California. Redis was founded in 2011 in Tel Aviv, Israel, by Ofer Bengal and Yiftach Shoolman as Garantia Data (later Redis Labs), commercializing the legendary in-memory open-source data structure store created by Salvatore Sanfilippo into a global real-time data platform.
Business Models: How MongoDB, Inc. and Redis, Inc. Make Money
MongoDB, Inc. and Redis, Inc. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between MongoDB, Inc. and Redis, Inc..
MongoDB, Inc. business model: MongoDB runs a developer-led, open-core model. The free Community Server (source-available under the SSPL since 2018) drives adoption. Revenue comes from MongoDB Atlas, a fully managed service on AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure billed on consumption of compute, storage, and data transfer; from MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, a self-managed subscription with security, management tooling, and support; and from services. Subscription revenue was about 97% of total revenue in fiscal 2026. In Q2 fiscal 2027, Atlas generated $565.9M (up 29%) and Enterprise Advanced and other subscription revenue $181.2M (up 36%).
Redis, Inc. business model: Redis follows an open-core model. The Redis engine is free to download, while the company charges for Redis Cloud, a managed database service billed by memory, throughput and features on AWS, Google Cloud and Azure, and for Redis Software, a self-managed subscription for on-premises and private-cloud deployments. Paid tiers add Active-Active geo-replication, high availability, Redis Flex (RAM plus SSD storage), security controls and enterprise support. AI products such as vector search, LangCache and Redis Feature Form are sold on top of the same platform.
Competitive Advantage: MongoDB, Inc. vs Redis, Inc.
The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of MongoDB, Inc. stack up against those of Redis, Inc..
MongoDB, Inc. competitive advantage: MongoDB's advantage rests on developer familiarity with the document model, the ability to run the same database self-managed or on any of the three largest clouds, integrated search and vector search inside Atlas, and high switching costs once applications are built on it. Its customer base grew from about 54,500 in January 2025 to more than 70,600 in July 2026.
Redis, Inc. competitive advantage: Redis's advantages are developer familiarity built over 15+ years, sub-millisecond in-memory performance, a broad set of data structures in one engine (strings, hashes, streams, JSON, search, vectors), and paid features the community edition lacks, such as Active-Active replication based on CRDTs and Redis Flex tiering. Its January 2026 customer base of 12,000+ paying accounts, including roughly a third of the Fortune 100, gives it a large installed base for upselling AI features.
Growth Strategy: Where MongoDB, Inc. and Redis, Inc. Are Headed
Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how MongoDB, Inc. and Redis, Inc. each plan to expand from here.
MongoDB, Inc. growth strategy: Under CEO CJ Desai, MongoDB is positioning itself as a data platform for AI applications: Atlas Vector Search, Voyage AI embedding and reranking models (acquired in 2025), and tooling that connects coding agents to operational data. It also pursues migrations off relational databases and sells a 'run anywhere' approach spanning self-managed Enterprise Advanced and multi-cloud Atlas.
Redis, Inc. growth strategy: Growth rests on moving customers from free Redis to Redis Cloud, expanding large accounts (50+ spend over $1M a year), and selling AI features such as vector search, semantic caching and feature stores. Cloud marketplace listings on AWS, Google Cloud and Azure let enterprises buy Redis against existing cloud commitments.
Financial Picture: MongoDB, Inc. vs Redis, Inc.
A closer look at the financial trajectory of MongoDB, Inc. and Redis, Inc. rounds out the comparison.
MongoDB, Inc.: MongoDB grew revenue from $114.8M in fiscal 2017 to $2.464B in fiscal 2026 while narrowing GAAP losses from a peak of $345.4M in fiscal 2023 to $71.2M in fiscal 2026. Profitability improved further in fiscal 2027: Q2 revenue reached $771.8M (up 30%), GAAP operating income was $28.4M, non-GAAP operating margin hit 24%, and free cash flow nearly doubled to $137.6M. The company held $2.4B in cash and investments at July 31, 2026 and raised full-year fiscal 2027 revenue guidance to $2.99B to $3.03B. MongoDB, Inc. is a massive American software company that develops a leading NoSQL database program, commanding a market valuation typically exceeding $25 billion.
Redis, Inc.: Redis is private and does not publish audited results, so ARR disclosures are the main financial signal. The company said in January 2026 that ARR had passed $300 million and that its count of $1M+ customers had grown more than 20% year over year. Its last priced funding round was a $110 million Series G in April 2021 at a valuation above $2 billion, led by Tiger Global with SoftBank Vision Fund 2 participating. Profitability, cash flow and revenue by product have not been disclosed.
Company-Specific SWOT Notes
MongoDB, Inc.
More than 70,600 customers at July 31, 2026, with Atlas revenue of $565.9M in Q2 fiscal 2027, up 29%.
The same database runs self-managed via Enterprise Advanced or managed on AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure.
Fiscal 2026 still ended with a $71.2M GAAP net loss, largely due to stock-based compensation.
Despite massive updates, traditional relational databases (like Oracle or PostgreSQL) remain fundamentally superior and significantly safer for highly complex, multi-table financial transactions.
Vector search and Voyage AI embeddings let MongoDB capture retrieval and agent workloads alongside operational data.
Amazon DocumentDB, Azure Cosmos DB, and PostgreSQL with JSONB and pgvector compete for the same workloads.
Redis, Inc.
World's most popular in-memory key-value data structure store, delivering sub-millisecond latency for caching, session management, and real-time gaming leaderboards across millions of applications.
Because Redis runs entirely in-memory (RAM) rather than on slow hard drives, it is universally acknowledged as the absolute fastest database on Earth, making it irreplaceable for real-time applications.
Moving from BSD open-source to dual source-available licensing (RSALv2 and SSPLv1) prompted community fork initiatives (Valkey under the Linux Foundation).
Because the core Redis code was historically completely free, thousands of massive companies simply ran it themselves, refusing to pay Redis Inc. for expensive enterprise licenses.
Positioning Redis as the ultra-fast semantic cache and in-memory vector database for generative AI applications, slashing LLM API latency and token costs.
Hyperscalers (AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle) backing open-source fork Valkey as their primary managed in-memory caching service, bypassing commercial Redis Enterprise licensing.
Factual Scorecard
| Category | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Same-period Revenue Scale | Not comparable | MongoDB, Inc.: $2.5B (FY2026). Redis, Inc.: N/A. Different or missing fiscal periods prevent a like-for-like ranking. |
| Founded Earlier | MongoDB, Inc. | MongoDB, Inc. was founded in 2007; Redis, Inc. was founded in 2011. |
Comparison Takeaway: MongoDB, Inc. vs Redis, Inc.
Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.
Frequently Asked Questions: MongoDB, Inc. vs Redis, Inc.
Why is Redis faster than MongoDB?
Physics. Redis stores its data in Random Access Memory (RAM). Reading data from RAM is exponentially faster than reading data from a Solid State Drive (SSD), which is where MongoDB typically stores its data to ensure permanence.
Can I use Redis as my only database?
Technically yes, but it is risky. Because RAM is volatile, if a Redis server loses power, you can lose data. While Redis offers 'persistence' (saving to a disk periodically), most developers don't trust it for critical primary data.
What is NoSQL?
Both MongoDB and Redis are 'NoSQL'. Traditional databases (like PostgreSQL) force data into rigid, Excel-like tables. NoSQL databases are much more flexible, allowing developers to store messy, unstructured data (like JSON documents) easily.
Why did Redis change its open-source license?
Like MongoDB before it, Redis realized large cloud providers (like Amazon AWS) were taking the free Redis code, offering it as a paid service, and giving Redis zero revenue. Redis changed its license to force AWS to pay them.
What is MongoDB Atlas?
Atlas is MongoDB's large 'Cloud' product. Instead of a company having to buy their own physical servers and manually install MongoDB, Atlas allows them to rent MongoDB instances hosted on AWS or Azure with a single click.
Which company was founded first, MongoDB, Inc. or Redis, Inc.?
MongoDB, Inc. was founded in 2007; Redis, Inc. was founded in 2011.
What revenue did MongoDB, Inc. and Redis, Inc. report?
MongoDB, Inc. had $2.5B (FY2026). A comparable annual revenue row is unavailable for Redis, Inc..
How do MongoDB, Inc. and Redis, Inc. make money?
MongoDB, Inc.: MongoDB runs a developer-led, open-core model. Redis, Inc.: Redis follows an open-core model.
Which is better, MongoDB, Inc. or Redis, Inc.?
There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare MongoDB, Inc. and Redis, Inc. on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.
Sources & References
- SEC EDGAR: MongoDB, Inc. filings search (10-K, 8-K)
- MongoDB, Inc. Corporate Website
- MongoDB, Inc. 2026 revenue figure: MONGODB, INC. annual report (Form 10-K, SEC EDGAR, filed 2026-03-11)
- sec.gov
- investors.mongodb.com
- prnewswire.com
- data.sec.gov
- investors.mongodb.com
- mongodb.com
- stockanalysis.com
- prnewswire.com
- fool.com
- macrotrends.net
- stockanalysis.com
- Redis, Inc. Corporate Website
- Redis, Inc. 2026 revenue figure: Redis
- redis.io
- redis.io
- redis.io
- timesofisrael.com
- sacra.com
Quick Answer
MongoDB is a document-based NoSQL database used as a primary data store for complex, flexible applications. Redis is a lightning-fast, in-memory key-value store used primarily as a cache to speed up applications by storing frequently accessed data in RAM.
Verdict
They do not compete; they are best friends. MongoDB wins on primary data permanence and complex querying. If your server crashes, MongoDB's hard drives ensure you don't lose a million user profiles. Redis wins on raw speed. If a million users request the exact same weather forecast at the exact same second, querying MongoDB a million times will crash the server; querying Redis a million times takes a fraction of a second.
Cite This Page
Automatically generated citations for researchers.
CorpDigest. (2026). MongoDB, Inc. vs Redis, Inc. Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/mongodb-vs-redis
CorpDigest. "MongoDB, Inc. vs Redis, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/mongodb-vs-redis.
CorpDigest. "MongoDB, Inc. vs Redis, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/mongodb-vs-redis.