Mastercard vs Procter & Gamble: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Mastercard reported $32.8B of revenue in FY2025 and $15B of net income. Procter & Gamble reported $87B of revenue in FY2026 and $16B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Mastercard
- Latest revenue
- $32.8B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $15B
- Net margin
- 45.6%
- Revenue growth
- +13.2% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Procter & Gamble
- Latest revenue
- $87B (FY2026)
- Net income
- $16B
- Net margin
- 18.4%
- Revenue growth
- +3.3% a year, FY2017–FY2026
Financial summary
Mastercard
Mastercard's net revenue grew from $10.8 billion in 2016 to $32.8 billion in FY2025, with net income of $14.97 billion in FY2025, a net margin near 46%. Growth continued in 2026: second-quarter net revenue rose 14% to $9.28 billion and net income reached $4.39 billion, with a GAAP operating margin of 60.2%. Because incremental transactions cost little to process, most of that cash goes to share buybacks, dividends and acquisitions such as Recorded Future ($2.65 billion, 2024) and BVNK (up to $1.8 billion, 2026).
Procter & Gamble
P&G's finances are defined by steady sales, high margins and large cash returns rather than fast growth. Net sales rose from $65.1 billion in fiscal 2017 to $87.0 billion in fiscal 2026. In fiscal 2026 diluted EPS was $6.62 (up 2%) and core EPS was $6.89 (up 1%), with core gross and operating margins slipping 40 and 70 basis points as costs rose. The company returned more than $15 billion to shareholders, about $10.2 billion in dividends and $5 billion in buybacks, and has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. For fiscal 2027 it guided to 1%-3% organic sales growth and core EPS of $6.89-$7.11.
Revenue and profit by year
Mastercard
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $32.8B | $15B | 45.6% | +16.4% | Source |
| FY2024 | $28.2B | $12.9B | 45.7% | +12.2% | Source |
| FY2023 | $25.1B | $11.2B | 44.6% | +12.9% | Source |
| FY2022 | $22.2B | $9.9B | 44.7% | +17.8% | Source |
| FY2021 | $18.9B | $8.7B | 46.0% | +23.4% | Source |
| FY2020 | $15.3B | $6.4B | 41.9% | -9.4% | Source |
| FY2019 | $16.9B | $8.1B | 48.1% | +12.9% | Source |
| FY2018 | $14.9B | $5.9B | 39.2% | +19.6% | Source |
| FY2017 | $12.5B | $3.9B | 31.3% | +16.0% | Source |
| FY2016 | $10.8B | $4.1B | 37.7% | — | Source |
Procter & Gamble
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $87B | $16B | 18.4% | +3.3% | Source |
| FY2025 | $84.3B | $16B | 19.0% | +0.3% | Source |
| FY2024 | $84B | $14.9B | 17.7% | +2.5% | Source |
| FY2023 | $82B | $14.7B | 17.9% | +2.3% | Source |
| FY2022 | $80.2B | $14.7B | 18.4% | +5.3% | Source |
| FY2021 | $76.1B | $14.3B | 18.8% | +7.3% | Source |
| FY2020 | $71B | $13B | 18.4% | +4.8% | Source |
| FY2019 | $67.7B | $3.9B | 5.8% | +1.3% | Source |
| FY2018 | $66.8B | $9.8B | 14.6% | +2.7% | Source |
| FY2017 | $65.1B | $15.3B | 23.6% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Mastercard
- Payment network~59%
Assessments on gross dollar volume, transaction switching fees and cross-border fees, net of customer incentives. About $19.48 billion in FY2025.
- Value-added services and solutions~41%
Fraud and security, cyber and threat intelligence, data analytics, consulting, loyalty, open banking and processing services. Grew 23% in FY2025 to about $13.3 billion.
Procter & Gamble
- Fabric and Home Care
Largest segment
Laundry, dish care, air care, and household cleaning brands including Tide, Ariel, Dawn, Febreze, and Swiffer.
- Baby, Feminine and Family Care
Major segment
Pampers, Always, Bounty, Charmin, and related baby, feminine, and family-care products.
- Beauty
Major segment
Hair care, skin care, and prestige beauty brands including Head & Shoulders, Pantene, Olay, and SK-II.
- Health Care
Major segment
Oral care and personal health products such as Oral-B, Crest, Vicks, and Metamucil.
- Grooming
Focused segment
Gillette, Venus, Braun, and shaving-related products.
Business model and strategy
Mastercard
How it makes money
Mastercard earns money in two ways. Payment network revenue ($19.48 billion in FY2025, about 59% of net revenue) comes from assessments based on gross dollar volume, fees for switching transactions, and higher-yield cross-border fees, reduced by incentives paid to issuers and merchants.
Growth strategy
Mastercard's growth plan rests on three levers: moving more consumer spending from cash to cards and tokenized digital wallets, capturing new flows such as B2B payments, disbursements and cross-border remittances, and selling more services that are not tied to card volume. Services grew 23% in FY2025, faster than the network.
Competitive advantage
Mastercard's advantage is a two-sided network that took decades to build: about 3.7 billion Mastercard and Maestro cards issued by partners and acceptance at tens of millions of merchant locations worldwide. A new rival would need both sides at once. That scale also feeds its fraud models, tokenization service and data products, which makes the services business harder to copy.
Procter & Gamble
How it makes money
P&G makes money by designing, manufacturing and marketing branded household and personal-care products that consumers buy every week, then selling them through retailers, club stores, pharmacies, distributors and e-commerce platforms. Revenue comes from five reportable segments: Fabric & Home Care (Tide, Ariel, Dawn, Downy, Febreze), the largest; Baby, Feminine & Family Care (Pampers, Always, Bounty, Charmin);
Growth strategy
P&G's integrated growth strategy has five parts: a portfolio focused on about ten daily-use categories, superiority across product, packaging, communication, retail execution and value, productivity savings to fund reinvestment, 'constructive disruption' of its own practices, and an agile, accountable organization.
Competitive advantage
P&G's edge is the combination of category leadership and scale. It concentrates on about ten daily-use categories where performance differences are visible to consumers (cleaning, absorbency, shaving, oral care), funds roughly $2 billion a year of R&D to keep those gaps, and uses its size to buy materials, media and logistics more cheaply than smaller rivals.
Questions about Mastercard vs Procter & Gamble
Which company has higher revenue — Mastercard Incorporated or The Procter & Gamble Company?
Mastercard Incorporated reported $32.8B (FY2025), while The Procter & Gamble Company reported $87.0B (FY2026). By last reported revenue, The Procter & Gamble Company is the larger business, with Mastercard Incorporated reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.
What is the market cap of Mastercard Incorporated vs The Procter & Gamble Company?
Mastercard Incorporated's market capitalisation stands at $495.4B, while The Procter & Gamble Company's is $340.0B. Mastercard Incorporated carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to The Procter & Gamble Company.
Which is more financially efficient — Mastercard Incorporated or The Procter & Gamble Company?
Mastercard Incorporated generates $824k / employee in revenue per employee, while The Procter & Gamble Company generates $798k / employee. Mastercard Incorporated shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Mastercard Incorporated and The Procter & Gamble Company make money?
Mastercard Incorporated and The Procter & Gamble Company generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Mastercard Incorporated: Mastercard earns money in two ways. The Procter & Gamble Company: P&G makes money by designing, manufacturing and marketing branded household and personal-care products that consumers buy every week, then selling them through retailers, club stores, pharmacies, distributors and e-commerce platforms.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Mastercard Incorporated or The Procter & Gamble Company?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Mastercard Incorporated trades at 15.1x P/S and The Procter & Gamble Company at 3.9x P/S. Mastercard Incorporated commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to The Procter & Gamble Company. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Mastercard Incorporated bigger than The Procter & Gamble Company?
By last reported revenue, The Procter & Gamble Company ($87.0B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to Mastercard Incorporated ($32.8B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Mastercard vs Procter & Gamble overview