Skip to main content

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. vs The Procter & Gamble Company: Strategic Comparison

Direct Answer

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. had $6.2B (FY2025), while The Procter & Gamble Company had $87.0B (FY2026). Their fiscal years differ, so the figures are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.

Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.

Share

Key Differences at a Glance

FieldChurch & Dwight Co., Inc.The Procter & Gamble Company
Latest annual revenue$6.2B (FY2025)$87.0B (FY2026)
Founded18461837
Employees5,400109,000
Market Cap$22.6B$340.0B
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
Revenue / Employee$1.15M / employee$798k / employee
Valuation Multiple3.6x P/S3.9x P/S

Strategic Positioning

Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Strategic Vector

FY2025 Revenue Baseline

Church & Dwight's growth plan combines organic growth in its power brands, international expansion, e-commerce (25.5% of consumer sales in Q2 2026) and bolt-on acquisitions.

Productivity: $1.15M / employee

The Procter & Gamble Company Strategic Vector

FY2026 Revenue Baseline

P&G's fiscal 2026 numbers show the limits of pricing. After several years of price-led growth, pricing added only about 1 point and volume was flat, so the company is now pruning weaker brands and forms, cutting overhead and reinvesting in product upgrades and advertising to win volume back.

Productivity: $798k / employee

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. vs The Procter & Gamble Company Market Share

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. market share
Church & Dwight holds leading U.S. positions in several niches: Trojan in condoms, Hero's Mighty Patch in pimple patches, Orajel in oral pain relief, Waterpik in water flossers, and Touchland as the #2 hand sanitizer. In 2025 it gained market share in four of its eight domestic power brands, per the company.
The Procter & Gamble Company market share
The Procter & Gamble Company is one of the premier market leaders in Consumer packaged goods, commanding substantial market share and strong brand equity across its core geographic operating regions.

Quick Stats Comparison

MetricChurch & Dwight Co., Inc.The Procter & Gamble Company
Revenue$6.2B (FY2025)$87.0B (FY2026)
Founded18461837
HeadquartersEwing, New JerseyCincinnati, Ohio, United States
Market Cap$22.6B$340.0B
Employees5,400109,000
Revenue / Employee$1.15M / employee$798k / employee
Valuation Multiple3.6x P/S3.9x P/S

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Revenue vs The Procter & Gamble Company Revenue — Year by Year

YearChurch & Dwight Co., Inc.The Procter & Gamble CompanyHigher reported revenue
2026N/A$87.0BOnly one figure available
2025$6.2B$84.3BThe Procter & Gamble Company (approx. USD)
2024$6.1B$84.0BThe Procter & Gamble Company (approx. USD)
2023$5.9B$82.0BThe Procter & Gamble Company (approx. USD)
2022$5.4B$80.2BThe Procter & Gamble Company (approx. USD)

Business Model Breakdown

Overview: Church & Dwight Co., Inc. vs The Procter & Gamble Company

This in-depth comparison examines Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Church & Dwight Co., Inc. on its own, evaluating The Procter & Gamble Company, or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company is widest.

On the headline numbers, annual revenue is $6.2B (FY2025) for Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and $87.0B (FY2026) for The Procter & Gamble Company, while their respective market capitalizations stand at $22.6B and $340.0B. Both Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company are headquartered in United States. Their local markets and applicable rules may still differ.

Church & Dwight Co., Inc.: Church & Dwight is the New Jersey company behind the yellow box of ARM & HAMMER baking soda. Over 180 years it has stretched that brand across laundry, cat litter and toothpaste, and since 2001 it has bought niche leaders such as Trojan, OxiClean, Waterpik, TheraBreath, Hero and Touchland. With $6.2 billion in 2025 sales it is far smaller than Procter & Gamble or Unilever, so it wins by owning narrow categories rather than broad ones. The company is headquartered in Ewing, New Jersey.

The Procter & Gamble Company: Procter & Gamble is one of the world's largest consumer packaged goods companies, selling everyday brands including Tide, Pampers, Gillette, Crest, Oral-B, Charmin, Bounty, Dawn and Head & Shoulders. Founded in Cincinnati in 1837 and still headquartered there, it reported $87.0 billion in fiscal 2026 net sales, employs roughly 109,000 people and is a component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Its stock trades on the NYSE under PG, with a market value of roughly $340 billion in September 2026. The company is headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. Procter & Gamble was founded in October 1837 in Cincinnati, Ohio, by candlemaker William Procter and soapmaker James Gamble, expanding over nearly two centuries into a global consumer goods powerhouse owning iconic brands like Tide, Pampers, Gillette, Oral-B, and Head & Shoulders.

Business Models: How Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company Make Money

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company.

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. business model: Church & Dwight makes money by selling branded household and personal care products through mass merchants, grocery, drug, club, dollar and e-commerce channels, plus sodium bicarbonate and animal-nutrition products through its Specialty Products division. Its model concentrates marketing and innovation on a short list of 'power brands' that are #1 or #2 in their niches, and it adds growth by acquiring asset-light brands and plugging them into its supply chain and retail relationships. Consumer Domestic produced about 77% of 2024 sales, Consumer International about 18% and Specialty Products about 5%. Online sales reached 25.5% of consumer sales in Q2 2026.

The Procter & Gamble Company business model: P&G makes money by designing, manufacturing and marketing branded household and personal-care products that consumers buy every week, then selling them through retailers, club stores, pharmacies, distributors and e-commerce platforms. Revenue comes from five reportable segments: Fabric & Home Care (Tide, Ariel, Dawn, Downy, Febreze), the largest; Baby, Feminine & Family Care (Pampers, Always, Bounty, Charmin); Beauty (Olay, Pantene, Head & Shoulders, SK-II); Health Care (Crest, Oral-B, Vicks); and Grooming (Gillette, Venus, Braun). Walmart is its largest customer. Profit depends on premium pricing backed by product performance, purchasing and manufacturing scale, and heavy, data-driven advertising.

Competitive Advantage: Church & Dwight Co., Inc. vs The Procter & Gamble Company

The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. stack up against those of The Procter & Gamble Company.

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. competitive advantage: Church & Dwight's advantage rests on two assets: the ARM & HAMMER name, which lets one trusted ingredient (baking soda) carry laundry detergent, cat litter, toothpaste and deodorizers, and a repeatable acquisition-integration machine that takes niche brands like Waterpik, TheraBreath and Hero into mass retail and international markets. It also owns large-scale sodium bicarbonate production, including the Green River, Wyoming plant, which supplies both consumer and industrial customers.

The Procter & Gamble Company competitive advantage: P&G's edge is the combination of category leadership and scale. It concentrates on about ten daily-use categories where performance differences are visible to consumers (cleaning, absorbency, shaving, oral care), funds roughly $2 billion a year of R&D to keep those gaps, and uses its size to buy materials, media and logistics more cheaply than smaller rivals. Its brands are traffic drivers for retailers, which gives P&G strong shelf positioning and joint-planning relationships with chains such as Walmart, Costco and Amazon.

Growth Strategy: Where Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company Are Headed

Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company each plan to expand from here.

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. growth strategy: Church & Dwight's growth plan combines organic growth in its power brands, international expansion, e-commerce (25.5% of consumer sales in Q2 2026) and bolt-on acquisitions. In 2025 it bought Touchland and exited vitamins, Flawless, Spinbrush and Waterpik showerheads, about $118 million of 2025 net sales from exited lines plus the divested vitamin brands. In June 2026 it added MISS MOUTH'S MESSY EATER, which the company calls the #1 stain remover brand on Amazon. Leverage near 1.5x leaves room for further deals.

The Procter & Gamble Company growth strategy: P&G's integrated growth strategy has five parts: a portfolio focused on about ten daily-use categories, superiority across product, packaging, communication, retail execution and value, productivity savings to fund reinvestment, 'constructive disruption' of its own practices, and an agile, accountable organization. In June 2025 the company announced a two-year restructuring that includes exiting some brands and product forms in certain markets and cutting up to 7,000 non-manufacturing roles, about 15% of that workforce. Under Jejurikar the emphasis has shifted toward consumer-first innovation, digital media and faster decision-making.

Financial Picture: Church & Dwight Co., Inc. vs The Procter & Gamble Company

A closer look at the financial trajectory of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company rounds out the comparison.

Church & Dwight Co., Inc.: Church & Dwight grows slowly but steadily. Net sales rose from $4.8958 billion in 2020 to $6.2032 billion in 2025. In 2025 net sales grew 1.6%, organic sales grew 0.7% (held back by the exited vitamin business), adjusted gross margin held at 45.2%, reported EPS was $3.02, adjusted EPS was $3.53 (+2.6%), and cash from operations was $1.215 billion. Momentum improved in 2026: Q2 2026 net sales rose 1.6% to $1,530.0 million, organic sales grew 5.8%, gross margin reached 45.4%, reported EPS was $0.85 and adjusted EPS $0.89. Management raised its 2026 outlook to net sales flat to up 1% and about $1.175 billion in operating cash flow. Church & Dwight Co., Inc. is a major American manufacturer of household products, sustaining a robust market valuation generally over $25 billion.

The Procter & Gamble Company: P&G's finances are defined by steady sales, high margins and large cash returns rather than fast growth. Net sales rose from $65.1 billion in fiscal 2017 to $87.0 billion in fiscal 2026. In fiscal 2026 diluted EPS was $6.62 (up 2%) and core EPS was $6.89 (up 1%), with core gross and operating margins slipping 40 and 70 basis points as costs rose. The company returned more than $15 billion to shareholders, about $10.2 billion in dividends and $5 billion in buybacks, and has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. For fiscal 2027 it guided to 1%-3% organic sales growth and core EPS of $6.89-$7.11. Procter & Gamble (P&G) is a dominant global consumer goods corporation, maintaining a formidable market valuation frequently exceeding $350 billion.

Company-Specific SWOT Notes

Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

Strength

Church & Dwight has repeatedly bought niche #1 or #2 brands (OxiClean, Waterpik, TheraBreath, Hero, Touchland) and expanded them through its supply chain, retail relationships and international subsidiaries.

Strength

ARM & HAMMER extends one trusted ingredient across baking soda, laundry, cat litter and toothpaste, giving the company a low-cost platform for new products.

Weakness

The company's dependence on the ARM & HAMMER brand creates disproportionate financial exposure.

Weakness

The $411.0 million Flawless impairment in 2022 and the $357.1 million vitamin impairment in 2024 showed the model fails in categories with low switching costs.

Opportunity

Touchland, acquired in 2025 with about $130 million in trailing sales at signing and roughly 42% EBITDA margins, and MISS MOUTH'S MESSY EATER, acquired in June 2026, add brands built on social media and Amazon.

Threat

Retailers keep expanding store brands in categories where Church & Dwight competes.

The Procter & Gamble Company

Strength

P&G owns trusted brands in categories consumers buy repeatedly, creating resilient demand and pricing power.

Strength

Because P&G's products (like Tide and Pampers) are considered household essentials, it can push aggressive price increases with minimal loss in consumer volume.

Weakness

Premium brands can lose share if consumers trade down to private label during affordability pressure.

Weakness

The manufacturing of diapers, detergents, and paper products leaves P&G heavily exposed to price shocks in pulp, resin, and petrochemicals.

Opportunity

P&G can use innovation, e-commerce execution, and productivity to support premiumization and market share gains.

Threat

Retailer brands and digital-native challengers can erode share in categories once assumed to be defensible.

Factual Scorecard

CategoryResultWhy
Same-period Revenue ScaleNot comparableChurch & Dwight Co., Inc.: $6.2B (FY2025). The Procter & Gamble Company: $87.0B (FY2026). Different or missing fiscal periods prevent a like-for-like ranking.
Founded EarlierThe Procter & Gamble CompanyChurch & Dwight Co., Inc. was founded in 1846; The Procter & Gamble Company was founded in 1837.
Verdict

Comparison Takeaway: Church & Dwight Co., Inc. vs The Procter & Gamble Company

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. had $6.2B (FY2025), while The Procter & Gamble Company had $87.0B (FY2026). Their fiscal years differ, so the figures are not a like-for-like same-period comparison. Compare the same reporting period and the metric relevant to the question—revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value—rather than treating them as one composite score.

Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.

Frequently Asked Questions: Church & Dwight Co., Inc. vs The Procter & Gamble Company

Which company was founded first, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?

The Procter & Gamble Company was founded in 1837; Church & Dwight Co., Inc. was founded in 1846.

What revenue did Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company report?

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. had $6.2B (FY2025), while The Procter & Gamble Company had $87.0B (FY2026). The fiscal years differ, so these are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.

How do Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company make money?

Church & Dwight Co., Inc.: Church & Dwight makes money by selling branded household and personal care products through mass merchants, grocery, drug, club, dollar and e-commerce channels, plus sodium bicarbonate and animal-nutrition products through its Specialty Products division. The Procter & Gamble Company: P&G makes money by designing, manufacturing and marketing branded household and personal-care products that consumers buy every week, then selling them through retailers, club stores, pharmacies, distributors and e-commerce platforms.

Which is better, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?

There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.

Sources & References

Cite This Page

Automatically generated citations for researchers.

APA Format

CorpDigest. (2026). Church & Dwight Co., Inc. vs The Procter & Gamble Company Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/church-and-dwight-vs-pg

MLA Format

CorpDigest. "Church & Dwight Co., Inc. vs The Procter & Gamble Company Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/church-and-dwight-vs-pg.

Chicago Format

CorpDigest. "Church & Dwight Co., Inc. vs The Procter & Gamble Company Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/church-and-dwight-vs-pg.

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.