Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Procter & Gamble: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Bristol-Myers Squibb reported $48.2B of revenue in FY2025 and $7.1B of net income. Procter & Gamble reported $87B of revenue in FY2026 and $16B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Latest revenue
- $48.2B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $7.1B
- Net margin
- 14.6%
- Revenue growth
- +10.6% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Procter & Gamble
- Latest revenue
- $87B (FY2026)
- Net income
- $16B
- Net margin
- 18.4%
- Revenue growth
- +3.3% a year, FY2017–FY2026
Financial summary
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Revenue grew from $19.4 billion in 2016 to $42.5 billion in 2020 as Celgene's sales were added, and has stayed between $45.0 billion and $48.3 billion since 2021. Net earnings are far less stable because BMS expenses acquired in-process R&D: the $11.4 billion MyoKardia charge produced a $9.0 billion net loss in 2020, and the Karuna charge produced an $8.9 billion loss in 2024. Cash generation is steadier, with free cash flow of about $12.8 billion in 2025. That cash funds a dividend raised for a 17th straight year in February 2026, to $0.63 a quarter, and debt reduction, from $51.2 billion at the end of 2024 to $47.2 billion a year later. On July 30, 2026 BMS raised its 2026 revenue guidance to $49.0 to $50.0 billion, from $46.0 to $47.5 billion, after second-quarter revenue rose 6 percent to $12.97 billion.
Procter & Gamble
P&G's finances are defined by steady sales, high margins and large cash returns rather than fast growth. Net sales rose from $65.1 billion in fiscal 2017 to $87.0 billion in fiscal 2026. In fiscal 2026 diluted EPS was $6.62 (up 2%) and core EPS was $6.89 (up 1%), with core gross and operating margins slipping 40 and 70 basis points as costs rose. The company returned more than $15 billion to shareholders, about $10.2 billion in dividends and $5 billion in buybacks, and has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. For fiscal 2027 it guided to 1%-3% organic sales growth and core EPS of $6.89-$7.11.
Revenue and profit by year
Bristol-Myers Squibb
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $48.2B | $7.1B | 14.6% | -0.2% | Source |
| FY2024 | $48.3B | -$8.9B | -18.5% | +7.3% | Source |
| FY2023 | $45B | $8B | 17.8% | -2.5% | Source |
| FY2022 | $46.2B | $6.3B | 13.7% | -0.5% | Source |
| FY2021 | $46.4B | $7B | 15.1% | +9.1% | Source |
| FY2020 | $42.5B | -$9B | -21.2% | +62.6% | Source |
| FY2019 | $26.1B | $3.4B | 13.2% | +15.9% | Source |
| FY2018 | $22.6B | $4.9B | 21.8% | +8.6% | Source |
| FY2017 | $20.8B | $1B | 4.8% | +6.9% | Source |
| FY2016 | $19.4B | $4.5B | 22.9% | — | Source |
Procter & Gamble
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $87B | $16B | 18.4% | +3.3% | Source |
| FY2025 | $84.3B | $16B | 19.0% | +0.3% | Source |
| FY2024 | $84B | $14.9B | 17.7% | +2.5% | Source |
| FY2023 | $82B | $14.7B | 17.9% | +2.3% | Source |
| FY2022 | $80.2B | $14.7B | 18.4% | +5.3% | Source |
| FY2021 | $76.1B | $14.3B | 18.8% | +7.3% | Source |
| FY2020 | $71B | $13B | 18.4% | +4.8% | Source |
| FY2019 | $67.7B | $3.9B | 5.8% | +1.3% | Source |
| FY2018 | $66.8B | $9.8B | 14.6% | +2.7% | Source |
| FY2017 | $65.1B | $15.3B | 23.6% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Growth Portfolio~55%
$26.4 billion in 2025, up 17%: Opdivo, Opdivo Qvantig, Orencia, Yervoy, Reblozyl, Breyanzi, Opdualag, Camzyos, Sotyktu, Cobenfy, Krazati and other newer brands. It grew another 15% to $7.56 billion in the second quarter of 2026.
- Legacy Portfolio~45%
$21.8 billion in 2025: Eliquis ($14.4 billion), Revlimid ($3.0 billion), Pomalyst/Imnovid ($2.7 billion), Sprycel, Abraxane and other mature brands facing generic competition. Legacy revenue fell 4% in the second quarter of 2026.
Procter & Gamble
- Fabric and Home Care
Largest segment
Laundry, dish care, air care, and household cleaning brands including Tide, Ariel, Dawn, Febreze, and Swiffer.
- Baby, Feminine and Family Care
Major segment
Pampers, Always, Bounty, Charmin, and related baby, feminine, and family-care products.
- Beauty
Major segment
Hair care, skin care, and prestige beauty brands including Head & Shoulders, Pantene, Olay, and SK-II.
- Health Care
Major segment
Oral care and personal health products such as Oral-B, Crest, Vicks, and Metamucil.
- Grooming
Focused segment
Gillette, Venus, Braun, and shaving-related products.
Business model and strategy
Bristol-Myers Squibb
How it makes money
BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals. Net product sales were $46.8 billion of the $48.2 billion total in 2025; alliance, royalty and other revenues made up the remaining $1.4 billion, including royalties from Merck on Winrevair.
Growth strategy
BMS is pursuing growth on three fronts. First, scaling the Growth Portfolio (Opdivo Qvantig, Reblozyl, Camzyos, Breyanzi, Opdualag, Cobenfy and others), which rose 17 percent to $26.4 billion in 2025 and 15 percent to $7.56 billion in the second quarter of 2026.
Competitive advantage
BMS's advantage is its expertise in oncology and its large commercial and regulatory organization. Developing a cancer immunotherapy is complex, and winning approval from regulators and getting doctors to prescribe it requires an established global sales and regulatory team.
Procter & Gamble
How it makes money
P&G makes money by designing, manufacturing and marketing branded household and personal-care products that consumers buy every week, then selling them through retailers, club stores, pharmacies, distributors and e-commerce platforms. Revenue comes from five reportable segments: Fabric & Home Care (Tide, Ariel, Dawn, Downy, Febreze), the largest; Baby, Feminine & Family Care (Pampers, Always, Bounty, Charmin);
Growth strategy
P&G's integrated growth strategy has five parts: a portfolio focused on about ten daily-use categories, superiority across product, packaging, communication, retail execution and value, productivity savings to fund reinvestment, 'constructive disruption' of its own practices, and an agile, accountable organization.
Competitive advantage
P&G's edge is the combination of category leadership and scale. It concentrates on about ten daily-use categories where performance differences are visible to consumers (cleaning, absorbency, shaving, oral care), funds roughly $2 billion a year of R&D to keep those gaps, and uses its size to buy materials, media and logistics more cheaply than smaller rivals.
Questions about Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Procter & Gamble
Which company has higher revenue — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or The Procter & Gamble Company?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported $48.2B (FY2025), while The Procter & Gamble Company reported $87.0B (FY2026). By last reported revenue, The Procter & Gamble Company is the larger business, with Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.
What is the market cap of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs The Procter & Gamble Company?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company's market capitalisation stands at $127.5B, while The Procter & Gamble Company's is $340.0B. The Procter & Gamble Company carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
Which is more financially efficient — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or The Procter & Gamble Company?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company generates $1.48M / employee in revenue per employee, while The Procter & Gamble Company generates $798k / employee. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and The Procter & Gamble Company make money?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and The Procter & Gamble Company generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals. The Procter & Gamble Company: P&G makes money by designing, manufacturing and marketing branded household and personal-care products that consumers buy every week, then selling them through retailers, club stores, pharmacies, distributors and e-commerce platforms.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or The Procter & Gamble Company?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company trades at 2.6x P/S and The Procter & Gamble Company at 3.9x P/S. The Procter & Gamble Company commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Bristol-Myers Squibb Company bigger than The Procter & Gamble Company?
By last reported revenue, The Procter & Gamble Company ($87.0B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company ($48.2B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Procter & Gamble overview