Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Burlington: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Bristol-Myers Squibb reported $48.2B of revenue in FY2025 and $7.1B of net income. Burlington reported $11.6B of revenue in FY2025 and $610.2M of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Latest revenue
- $48.2B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $7.1B
- Net margin
- 14.6%
- Revenue growth
- +10.6% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Burlington
- Latest revenue
- $11.6B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $610.2M
- Net margin
- 5.3%
- Revenue growth
- +8.4% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Financial summary
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Revenue grew from $19.4 billion in 2016 to $42.5 billion in 2020 as Celgene's sales were added, and has stayed between $45.0 billion and $48.3 billion since 2021. Net earnings are far less stable because BMS expenses acquired in-process R&D: the $11.4 billion MyoKardia charge produced a $9.0 billion net loss in 2020, and the Karuna charge produced an $8.9 billion loss in 2024. Cash generation is steadier, with free cash flow of about $12.8 billion in 2025. That cash funds a dividend raised for a 17th straight year in February 2026, to $0.63 a quarter, and debt reduction, from $51.2 billion at the end of 2024 to $47.2 billion a year later. On July 30, 2026 BMS raised its 2026 revenue guidance to $49.0 to $50.0 billion, from $46.0 to $47.5 billion, after second-quarter revenue rose 6 percent to $12.97 billion.
Burlington
Burlington's total revenue roughly doubled from $5.59 billion in fiscal 2016 to $11.57 billion in fiscal 2025. The exception was fiscal 2020, when pandemic store closures cut revenue to $5.76 billion and produced a $216.5 million net loss. Profit has since grown faster than sales: net income went from $230.1 million in fiscal 2022 to $339.6 million, $503.6 million and $610.2 million over the next three years. Heavy store investment limits free cash flow, which was about $172 million in fiscal 2025 after roughly $1.06 billion of capital spending. In the second quarter of fiscal 2026 (to August 1, 2026), total sales rose 11 percent to $2.998 billion and net income was $184 million, including a $41 million after-tax benefit from tariff refunds. The company raised its full-year adjusted EPS guidance to $11.77 to $11.97.
Revenue and profit by year
Bristol-Myers Squibb
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $48.2B | $7.1B | 14.6% | -0.2% | Source |
| FY2024 | $48.3B | -$8.9B | -18.5% | +7.3% | Source |
| FY2023 | $45B | $8B | 17.8% | -2.5% | Source |
| FY2022 | $46.2B | $6.3B | 13.7% | -0.5% | Source |
| FY2021 | $46.4B | $7B | 15.1% | +9.1% | Source |
| FY2020 | $42.5B | -$9B | -21.2% | +62.6% | Source |
| FY2019 | $26.1B | $3.4B | 13.2% | +15.9% | Source |
| FY2018 | $22.6B | $4.9B | 21.8% | +8.6% | Source |
| FY2017 | $20.8B | $1B | 4.8% | +6.9% | Source |
| FY2016 | $19.4B | $4.5B | 22.9% | — | Source |
Burlington
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $11.6B | $610.2M | 5.3% | +8.8% | Source |
| FY2024 | $10.6B | $503.6M | 4.7% | +9.3% | Source |
| FY2023 | $9.7B | $339.6M | 3.5% | +11.8% | Source |
| FY2022 | $8.7B | $230.1M | 2.6% | -6.6% | Source |
| FY2021 | $9.3B | $408.8M | 4.4% | +61.7% | Source |
| FY2020 | $5.8B | -$216.5M | -3.8% | -20.9% | Source |
| FY2019 | $7.3B | $465.1M | 6.4% | +9.3% | Source |
| FY2018 | $6.7B | $414.7M | 6.2% | +9.1% | Source |
| FY2017 | $6.1B | $384.9M | 6.3% | +9.3% | Source |
| FY2016 | $5.6B | $215.9M | 3.9% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Growth Portfolio~55%
$26.4 billion in 2025, up 17%: Opdivo, Opdivo Qvantig, Orencia, Yervoy, Reblozyl, Breyanzi, Opdualag, Camzyos, Sotyktu, Cobenfy, Krazati and other newer brands. It grew another 15% to $7.56 billion in the second quarter of 2026.
- Legacy Portfolio~45%
$21.8 billion in 2025: Eliquis ($14.4 billion), Revlimid ($3.0 billion), Pomalyst/Imnovid ($2.7 billion), Sprycel, Abraxane and other mature brands facing generic competition. Legacy revenue fell 4% in the second quarter of 2026.
Burlington
- In-store net sales99.85%
Net sales of $11.55B in fiscal 2025 from merchandise sold in Burlington stores. There has been no e-commerce channel since March 2020.
- Other revenue0.15%
About $17.3M in fiscal 2025 from sources such as rental income and service fees.
Business model and strategy
Bristol-Myers Squibb
How it makes money
BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals. Net product sales were $46.8 billion of the $48.2 billion total in 2025; alliance, royalty and other revenues made up the remaining $1.4 billion, including royalties from Merck on Winrevair.
Growth strategy
BMS is pursuing growth on three fronts. First, scaling the Growth Portfolio (Opdivo Qvantig, Reblozyl, Camzyos, Breyanzi, Opdualag, Cobenfy and others), which rose 17 percent to $26.4 billion in 2025 and 15 percent to $7.56 billion in the second quarter of 2026.
Competitive advantage
BMS's advantage is its expertise in oncology and its large commercial and regulatory organization. Developing a cancer immunotherapy is complex, and winning approval from regulators and getting doctors to prescribe it requires an established global sales and regulatory team.
Burlington
How it makes money
Burlington makes nearly all of its money from merchandise sold in its stores. Net sales were $11.55 billion of its $11.57 billion fiscal 2025 total revenue; the remaining $17 million of other revenue comes from sources such as rental income and service fees.
Growth strategy
Burlington grows mainly by opening stores. It added 178 gross and 149 net new stores in the 12 months to August 1, 2026, and plans about 115 net openings in fiscal 2026. New stores use a smaller prototype of about 25,000 square feet instead of the very large boxes of the Coat Factory era, which lowers rent and labor per store.
Competitive advantage
Burlington's edge is cost and flexibility. Because it does not commit to full seasonal assortments months ahead, its buyers can take excess branded inventory when it becomes available and price it below department stores. Selling only in stores, with no e-commerce since March 2020, keeps parcel shipping and online returns out of the cost base.
Questions about Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Burlington
Which company has higher revenue — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Burlington Stores, Inc.?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported $48.2B (FY2025), while Burlington Stores, Inc. reported $11.6B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is the larger business, with Burlington Stores, Inc. reporting a smaller revenue base.
What is the market cap of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Burlington Stores, Inc.?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company's market capitalisation stands at $127.5B, while Burlington Stores, Inc.'s is $16.8B. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Burlington Stores, Inc..
Which is more financially efficient — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Burlington Stores, Inc.?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company generates $1.48M / employee in revenue per employee, while Burlington Stores, Inc. generates $139k / employee. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Burlington Stores, Inc. make money?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Burlington Stores, Inc. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals. Burlington Stores, Inc.: Burlington makes nearly all of its money from merchandise sold in its stores.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Burlington Stores, Inc.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company trades at 2.6x P/S and Burlington Stores, Inc. at 1.5x P/S. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Burlington Stores, Inc.. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Bristol-Myers Squibb Company bigger than Burlington Stores, Inc.?
By last reported revenue, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company ($48.2B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Burlington Stores, Inc. ($11.6B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Burlington overview