Boeing vs Procter & Gamble: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Boeing reported $89.5B of revenue in FY2025 and $2.2B of net income. Procter & Gamble reported $87B of revenue in FY2026 and $16B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Boeing
- Latest revenue
- $89.5B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $2.2B
- Net margin
- 2.5%
- Revenue growth
- -0.5% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Procter & Gamble
- Latest revenue
- $87B (FY2026)
- Net income
- $16B
- Net margin
- 18.4%
- Revenue growth
- +3.3% a year, FY2017–FY2026
Financial summary
Boeing
Boeing went from record revenue of $101.1 billion and a $10.5 billion profit in 2018 to six straight years of losses after the 737 MAX grounding, the pandemic, the 2024 door-plug blowout and a 53-day machinists' strike. The 2024 loss alone was $11.8 billion. To protect its investment-grade rating, Boeing raised about $24 billion of equity in October 2024 and sold Jeppesen, ForeFlight and other digital aviation assets to Thoma Bravo for $10.55 billion in 2025. FY2025 revenue rose 34% to $89.5 billion and net earnings returned to $2.2 billion, but that profit came from the $9.6 billion sale gain; Commercial Airplanes still lost $7.1 billion. In the first half of 2026 revenue rose 11% to $46.8 billion, the net loss narrowed to $435 million, and consolidated debt fell to $45.9 billion from $54.1 billion at the end of 2025.
Procter & Gamble
P&G's finances are defined by steady sales, high margins and large cash returns rather than fast growth. Net sales rose from $65.1 billion in fiscal 2017 to $87.0 billion in fiscal 2026. In fiscal 2026 diluted EPS was $6.62 (up 2%) and core EPS was $6.89 (up 1%), with core gross and operating margins slipping 40 and 70 basis points as costs rose. The company returned more than $15 billion to shareholders, about $10.2 billion in dividends and $5 billion in buybacks, and has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. For fiscal 2027 it guided to 1%-3% organic sales growth and core EPS of $6.89-$7.11.
Revenue and profit by year
Boeing
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $89.5B | $2.2B | 2.5% | +34.5% | Source |
| FY2024 | $66.5B | -$11.8B | -17.8% | -14.5% | Source |
| FY2023 | $77.8B | -$2.2B | -2.9% | +16.8% | Source |
| FY2022 | $66.6B | -$4.9B | -7.4% | +6.9% | Source |
| FY2021 | $62.3B | -$4.2B | -6.7% | +7.1% | Source |
| FY2020 | $58.2B | -$11.9B | -20.4% | -24.0% | Source |
| FY2019 | $76.6B | -$636M | -0.8% | -24.3% | Source |
| FY2018 | $101.1B | $10.5B | 10.3% | +7.6% | Source |
| FY2017 | $94B | $8.5B | 9.0% | +0.5% | Source |
| FY2016 | $93.5B | $5B | 5.4% | — | Source |
Procter & Gamble
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $87B | $16B | 18.4% | +3.3% | Source |
| FY2025 | $84.3B | $16B | 19.0% | +0.3% | Source |
| FY2024 | $84B | $14.9B | 17.7% | +2.5% | Source |
| FY2023 | $82B | $14.7B | 17.9% | +2.3% | Source |
| FY2022 | $80.2B | $14.7B | 18.4% | +5.3% | Source |
| FY2021 | $76.1B | $14.3B | 18.8% | +7.3% | Source |
| FY2020 | $71B | $13B | 18.4% | +4.8% | Source |
| FY2019 | $67.7B | $3.9B | 5.8% | +1.3% | Source |
| FY2018 | $66.8B | $9.8B | 14.6% | +2.7% | Source |
| FY2017 | $65.1B | $15.3B | 23.6% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Boeing
- Commercial Airplanes
46% ($41.5B in 2025)
737 MAX, 767, 777/777X and 787 sales to airlines and lessors; revenue is recognized mostly at delivery, and the segment lost $7.1B from operations in 2025.
- Defense, Space & Security
30% ($27.2B in 2025)
Military aircraft, weapons, satellites and space systems for the U.S. government and allies, with a record $85B backlog at the end of 2025.
- Global Services
23% ($20.9B in 2025)
Parts, maintenance, modifications and training for commercial and government fleets; Boeing's most profitable segment.
Procter & Gamble
- Fabric and Home Care
Largest segment
Laundry, dish care, air care, and household cleaning brands including Tide, Ariel, Dawn, Febreze, and Swiffer.
- Baby, Feminine and Family Care
Major segment
Pampers, Always, Bounty, Charmin, and related baby, feminine, and family-care products.
- Beauty
Major segment
Hair care, skin care, and prestige beauty brands including Head & Shoulders, Pantene, Olay, and SK-II.
- Health Care
Major segment
Oral care and personal health products such as Oral-B, Crest, Vicks, and Metamucil.
- Grooming
Focused segment
Gillette, Venus, Braun, and shaving-related products.
Business model and strategy
Boeing
How it makes money
Boeing earns money in three segments. Commercial Airplanes (BCA) designs, builds and sells the 737, 767, 777 and 787. Airlines and lessors pay deposits and progress payments over several years, but most of the price arrives at delivery, so revenue moves with delivery volume.
Growth strategy
Under Kelly Ortberg the plan is to stabilize first and grow second. Boeing runs a Safety & Quality Plan with key performance indicators for each factory and raises 737 and 787 rates only when those metrics and the FAA allow it.
Competitive advantage
Boeing's advantages are hard to copy: a century of certification know-how, a global installed fleet that keeps buying parts and services, and a backlog of more than 6,200 commercial airplanes worth $597 billion at June 30, 2026. Only Airbus builds comparable large jets, and with both makers sold out for years, airlines that need aircraft this decade order from both. In defense, Boeing now holds both U.S.
Procter & Gamble
How it makes money
P&G makes money by designing, manufacturing and marketing branded household and personal-care products that consumers buy every week, then selling them through retailers, club stores, pharmacies, distributors and e-commerce platforms. Revenue comes from five reportable segments: Fabric & Home Care (Tide, Ariel, Dawn, Downy, Febreze), the largest; Baby, Feminine & Family Care (Pampers, Always, Bounty, Charmin);
Growth strategy
P&G's integrated growth strategy has five parts: a portfolio focused on about ten daily-use categories, superiority across product, packaging, communication, retail execution and value, productivity savings to fund reinvestment, 'constructive disruption' of its own practices, and an agile, accountable organization.
Competitive advantage
P&G's edge is the combination of category leadership and scale. It concentrates on about ten daily-use categories where performance differences are visible to consumers (cleaning, absorbency, shaving, oral care), funds roughly $2 billion a year of R&D to keep those gaps, and uses its size to buy materials, media and logistics more cheaply than smaller rivals.
Questions about Boeing vs Procter & Gamble
Which company has higher revenue — The Boeing Company or The Procter & Gamble Company?
The Boeing Company reported $89.5B (FY2025), while The Procter & Gamble Company reported $87.0B (FY2026). By last reported revenue, The Boeing Company is the larger business, with The Procter & Gamble Company reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.
What is the market cap of The Boeing Company vs The Procter & Gamble Company?
The Boeing Company's market capitalisation stands at $148.0B, while The Procter & Gamble Company's is $340.0B. The Procter & Gamble Company carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to The Boeing Company.
Which is more financially efficient — The Boeing Company or The Procter & Gamble Company?
The Boeing Company generates $492k / employee in revenue per employee, while The Procter & Gamble Company generates $798k / employee. The Procter & Gamble Company shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do The Boeing Company and The Procter & Gamble Company make money?
The Boeing Company and The Procter & Gamble Company generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. The Boeing Company: Boeing earns money in three segments. The Procter & Gamble Company: P&G makes money by designing, manufacturing and marketing branded household and personal-care products that consumers buy every week, then selling them through retailers, club stores, pharmacies, distributors and e-commerce platforms.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — The Boeing Company or The Procter & Gamble Company?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, The Boeing Company trades at 1.7x P/S and The Procter & Gamble Company at 3.9x P/S. The Procter & Gamble Company commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to The Boeing Company. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is The Boeing Company bigger than The Procter & Gamble Company?
By last reported revenue, The Boeing Company ($89.5B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to The Procter & Gamble Company ($87.0B (FY2026)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Boeing vs Procter & Gamble overview