Baker Hughes vs TCS: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Baker Hughes reported $27.7B of revenue in FY2025 and $2.6B of net income. TCS reported ~$31B of revenue in FY2026 and ~$5.7B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Baker Hughes
- Latest revenue
- $27.7B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $2.6B
- Net margin
- 9.3%
- Revenue growth
- +8.7% a year, FY2016–FY2025
TCS
- Latest revenue
- ~$31B (FY2026)
- Net income
- ~$5.7B
- Net margin
- 18.4%
- Revenue growth
- +8.6% a year, FY2022–FY2026
Financial summary
Baker Hughes
FY2025 revenue was $27,733M, down 0.3% from $27,829M, with attributable net income of $2,588M against $2,979M a year earlier, a 13% decline driven largely by the prior-year release of tax valuation allowances and by $215M of restructuring. Profitability still improved on the measure management targets: adjusted EBITDA reached a record $4,825M, a 17.4% margin against 16.5% in FY2024. The mix did the work, with IET segment EBITDA up 21% to $2,482M while OFSE fell 9% to $2,618M. Cash conversion was the other bright spot, with $3,810M from operations and record free cash flow of $2,732M after $1,078M of net capital spending. The balance sheet ended the year with $3,715M of cash against $5,398M of long-term debt and $689M of current debt, and equity of $19,010M on total assets of $40,881M. Dividends of $910M and $384M of buybacks were paid out during the year, with the quarterly dividend at $0.23 per share. Research and development was $600M and selling, general and administrative expense $2,387M.
TCS
TCS reported FY2026 revenue of ₹2,67,021 crore ($30.017 billion), up 4.6% in rupees but down about 0.5% in dollars, with net income of about $5.71 billion (₹49,210 crore) and a 19.8% net margin. Q1 FY2027 revenue was ₹72,275 crore ($7.624 billion), up 13.9% in rupees and 2.7% in dollars year over year, with an operating margin of about 24% and net profit of ~$1.55 billion (₹13,349 crore). The growth story now rests on AI: TCS put its annualized AI services revenue at $1.8 billion in Q3 FY2026 and $2.6 billion in Q1 FY2027, while total contract value held at $9.5 billion for the quarter.
Revenue and profit by year
Baker Hughes
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $27.7B | $2.6B | 9.3% | -0.3% | Source |
| FY2024 | $27.8B | $3B | 10.7% | +9.1% | Source |
| FY2023 | $25.5B | $1.9B | 7.6% | +20.6% | Source |
| FY2022 | $21.2B | -$601M | -2.8% | +3.2% | Source |
| FY2021 | $20.5B | -$219M | -1.1% | -1.0% | Source |
| FY2020 | $20.7B | -$9.9B | -48.0% | -13.1% | Source |
| FY2019 | $23.8B | $128M | 0.5% | +4.2% | Source |
| FY2018 | $22.9B | $195M | 0.9% | +33.2% | Source |
| FY2017 | $17.2B | -$103M | -0.6% | +31.3% | Source |
| FY2016 | $13.1B | — | 0.0% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Baker Hughes
- Oilfield Services and Equipment (OFSE)51.7%
OFSE revenue was $14,324M in FY2025, down 8% from $15,628M in FY2024 as rig counts fell. The split by product line was Production Solutions $3,806M, Completions, Intervention and Measurements $3,750M, Well Construction $3,646M and Subsea and Surface Pressure Systems $3,122M. International revenue was $10,551M and North America $3,773M. Segment EBITDA was $2,618M, an 18.3% margin, on work generally contracted well by well or by project.
- Industrial and Energy Technology (IET)48.3%
IET revenue was $13,409M in FY2025, up 10% from $12,201M, made up of Gas Technology Equipment $6,619M, Gas Technology Services $3,028M, Industrial Products $1,991M, Industrial Solutions $1,123M and Climate Technology Solutions $647M. Segment EBITDA was $2,482M, up 21%, a 18.5% margin. IET held $32.4B of the $35.9B remaining performance obligation at year end, split $11.6B equipment and $16.1B services, so a large share of future revenue is already contracted.
TCS
- IT services
Primary revenue source
Application development, maintenance, modernization and managed technology services.
- Consulting and transformation
Strategic growth stream
Business and technology transformation programs for large enterprises.
- Cloud, AI and cybersecurity
Fast-changing growth area
Cloud migration, AI, data, automation, cybersecurity and platform simplification.
- Business process services
Recurring enterprise stream
Technology-enabled operations and business process services.
- Platforms
Differentiated platform stream
Industry platforms such as TCS BaNCS and related software-led offerings.
Business model and strategy
Baker Hughes
How it makes money
Baker Hughes sells engineered equipment and the services that keep it running. In Oilfield Services and Equipment it is paid for jobs and projects: directional drilling, drill bits, completions, pressure pumping, artificial lift, oilfield chemicals and subsea production systems, billed well by well or under multi-year frame agreements with national oil companies and majors.
Growth strategy
The strategy is to shift weight from short-cycle oilfield work toward equipment and lifecycle services with longer contracts. Management describes the 2026 to 2028 period as Horizon Two and frames the aim as a more industrialised energy solutions company with a production-oriented mix and more durable cash flow.
Competitive advantage
The defensible part of Baker Hughes is the installed base of turbomachinery and the service contracts attached to it. Once its gas turbines and refrigerant compressors are inside a liquefaction train or a gas processing plant, the operator buys spare parts, overhauls and remote monitoring from Baker Hughes for the life of the asset, which is why Gas Technology Services alone held $16.1B of remaining performance oblig…
TCS
How it makes money
TCS earns revenue through global IT services and consulting, built around eight industry verticals and geographic diversification.
Growth strategy
TCS is growing through AI, cloud modernization, cybersecurity, data, engineering services, platforms, large transformation deals, partnerships and deeper penetration of existing enterprise accounts.
Competitive advantage
TCS' advantage is delivery scale, Tata trust, large-account depth, industry domain expertise, training infrastructure, strong margins and a reputation for mission-critical execution.
Questions about Baker Hughes vs TCS
Which company has higher revenue — Baker Hughes Company or Tata Consultancy Services Limited?
Baker Hughes Company reported $27.7B (FY2025), while Tata Consultancy Services Limited reported ~$31B (FY2026). By last reported revenue, Tata Consultancy Services Limited is the larger business, with Baker Hughes Company reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.
What is the market cap of Baker Hughes Company vs Tata Consultancy Services Limited?
Baker Hughes Company's market capitalisation stands at $56.9B, while Tata Consultancy Services Limited's is $84.0B. Tata Consultancy Services Limited carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Baker Hughes Company.
Which is more financially efficient — Baker Hughes Company or Tata Consultancy Services Limited?
Baker Hughes Company generates $495k / employee in revenue per employee, while Tata Consultancy Services Limited generates $52k / employee. Baker Hughes Company shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Baker Hughes Company and Tata Consultancy Services Limited make money?
Baker Hughes Company and Tata Consultancy Services Limited generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Baker Hughes Company: Baker Hughes sells engineered equipment and the services that keep it running. Tata Consultancy Services Limited: TCS earns revenue through global IT services and consulting, built around eight industry verticals and geographic diversification.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Baker Hughes Company or Tata Consultancy Services Limited?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Baker Hughes Company trades at 2.1x P/S and Tata Consultancy Services Limited at 2.7x P/S. Tata Consultancy Services Limited commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Baker Hughes Company. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Baker Hughes Company bigger than Tata Consultancy Services Limited?
By last reported revenue, Tata Consultancy Services Limited (~$31B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to Baker Hughes Company ($27.7B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Baker Hughes vs TCS overview