Baker Hughes vs SpaceX: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Baker Hughes reported $27.7B of revenue in FY2025 and $2.6B of net income. SpaceX reported $18.7B of revenue in FY2025 and a net loss of $4.9B.
Latest financial snapshot
Baker Hughes
- Latest revenue
- $27.7B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $2.6B
- Net margin
- 9.3%
- Revenue growth
- +8.7% a year, FY2016–FY2025
SpaceX
- Latest revenue
- $18.7B (FY2025)
- Net income
- -$4.9B
- Net margin
- -26.4%
- Revenue growth
- +34.1% a year, FY2023–FY2025
Financial summary
Baker Hughes
FY2025 revenue was $27,733M, down 0.3% from $27,829M, with attributable net income of $2,588M against $2,979M a year earlier, a 13% decline driven largely by the prior-year release of tax valuation allowances and by $215M of restructuring. Profitability still improved on the measure management targets: adjusted EBITDA reached a record $4,825M, a 17.4% margin against 16.5% in FY2024. The mix did the work, with IET segment EBITDA up 21% to $2,482M while OFSE fell 9% to $2,618M. Cash conversion was the other bright spot, with $3,810M from operations and record free cash flow of $2,732M after $1,078M of net capital spending. The balance sheet ended the year with $3,715M of cash against $5,398M of long-term debt and $689M of current debt, and equity of $19,010M on total assets of $40,881M. Dividends of $910M and $384M of buybacks were paid out during the year, with the quarterly dividend at $0.23 per share. Research and development was $600M and selling, general and administrative expense $2,387M.
SpaceX
SpaceX revenue grew from $10.387 billion in 2023 to $14.015 billion in 2024 and $18.674 billion in 2025, but heavy Starship, Starlink, and AI spending produced a $4.937 billion FY2025 net loss. In Q2 2026, its first quarter reported as a public company, revenue was $7.8 billion (up 92%), adjusted EBITDA was $3.5 billion, net loss was $541 million, and backlog was $47.5 billion. The IPO raised $85.7 billion and a $25 billion bond sale added more liquidity. In late September 2026 the stock traded near $145, for a market capitalization around $1.9 trillion.
Revenue and profit by year
Baker Hughes
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $27.7B | $2.6B | 9.3% | -0.3% | Source |
| FY2024 | $27.8B | $3B | 10.7% | +9.1% | Source |
| FY2023 | $25.5B | $1.9B | 7.6% | +20.6% | Source |
| FY2022 | $21.2B | -$601M | -2.8% | +3.2% | Source |
| FY2021 | $20.5B | -$219M | -1.1% | -1.0% | Source |
| FY2020 | $20.7B | -$9.9B | -48.0% | -13.1% | Source |
| FY2019 | $23.8B | $128M | 0.5% | +4.2% | Source |
| FY2018 | $22.9B | $195M | 0.9% | +33.2% | Source |
| FY2017 | $17.2B | -$103M | -0.6% | +31.3% | Source |
| FY2016 | $13.1B | — | 0.0% | — | Source |
SpaceX
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $18.7B | -$4.9B | -26.4% | +33.2% | Source |
| FY2024 | $14B | $18M | 0.1% | +34.9% | Source |
| FY2023 | $10.4B | -$4.6B | -44.6% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Baker Hughes
- Oilfield Services and Equipment (OFSE)51.7%
OFSE revenue was $14,324M in FY2025, down 8% from $15,628M in FY2024 as rig counts fell. The split by product line was Production Solutions $3,806M, Completions, Intervention and Measurements $3,750M, Well Construction $3,646M and Subsea and Surface Pressure Systems $3,122M. International revenue was $10,551M and North America $3,773M. Segment EBITDA was $2,618M, an 18.3% margin, on work generally contracted well by well or by project.
- Industrial and Energy Technology (IET)48.3%
IET revenue was $13,409M in FY2025, up 10% from $12,201M, made up of Gas Technology Equipment $6,619M, Gas Technology Services $3,028M, Industrial Products $1,991M, Industrial Solutions $1,123M and Climate Technology Solutions $647M. Segment EBITDA was $2,482M, up 21%, a 18.5% margin. IET held $32.4B of the $35.9B remaining performance obligation at year end, split $11.6B equipment and $16.1B services, so a large share of future revenue is already contracted.
SpaceX
- Launch services
Not formally reported
Commercial, civil, and national-security launches priced by rocket, payload, orbit, and service type.
- Starlink consumer broadband
Not formally reported
Monthly subscriptions and terminals for residential and mobile broadband.
- Enterprise and government connectivity
Not formally reported
Starlink enterprise, aviation, maritime, backup connectivity, Starshield, and government services.
- AI infrastructure
Not formally reported
Compute and cloud services from SpaceX's AI segment, formed through the xAI combination; $2.6B revenue in Q2 2026.
Business model and strategy
Baker Hughes
How it makes money
Baker Hughes sells engineered equipment and the services that keep it running. In Oilfield Services and Equipment it is paid for jobs and projects: directional drilling, drill bits, completions, pressure pumping, artificial lift, oilfield chemicals and subsea production systems, billed well by well or under multi-year frame agreements with national oil companies and majors.
Growth strategy
The strategy is to shift weight from short-cycle oilfield work toward equipment and lifecycle services with longer contracts. Management describes the 2026 to 2028 period as Horizon Two and frames the aim as a more industrialised energy solutions company with a production-oriented mix and more durable cash flow.
Competitive advantage
The defensible part of Baker Hughes is the installed base of turbomachinery and the service contracts attached to it. Once its gas turbines and refrigerant compressors are inside a liquefaction train or a gas processing plant, the operator buys spare parts, overhauls and remote monitoring from Baker Hughes for the life of the asset, which is why Gas Technology Services alone held $16.1B of remaining performance oblig…
SpaceX
How it makes money
SpaceX earns money in three segments. Space sells launches on Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, plus Dragon cargo and crew missions for NASA, the U.S. government, and commercial customers ($962 million in Q2 2026).
Growth strategy
SpaceX's growth plan has four parts: add Starlink subscribers and raise enterprise, aviation, and mobile revenue; launch higher-capacity Starlink V3 satellites on Starship; expand national-security work through Starshield and launch contracts (over $6 billion in U.S. government awards in Q2 2026); and scale AI compute capacity, which grew from 400 megawatts a year earlier to 1.4 gigawatts at the end of Q2 2026.
Competitive advantage
SpaceX's advantage is reusability combined with vertical integration. It builds its own engines, avionics, rockets, and satellites, and reflies Falcon 9 boosters many times, which lowers its marginal launch cost below rivals that still expend most hardware. Being its own largest launch customer lets it deploy Starlink at a cadence no other operator has matched, and Starlink revenue then funds Starship.
Questions about Baker Hughes vs SpaceX
Which company has higher revenue — Baker Hughes Company or SpaceX?
Baker Hughes Company reported $27.7B (FY2025), while SpaceX reported $18.7B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Baker Hughes Company is the larger business, with SpaceX reporting a smaller revenue base.
What is the market cap of Baker Hughes Company vs SpaceX?
Baker Hughes Company's market capitalisation stands at $56.9B, while SpaceX's is $1.92T. SpaceX carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Baker Hughes Company.
Which is more financially efficient — Baker Hughes Company or SpaceX?
Baker Hughes Company generates $495k / employee in revenue per employee, while SpaceX generates $826k / employee. SpaceX shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Baker Hughes Company and SpaceX make money?
Baker Hughes Company and SpaceX generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Baker Hughes Company: Baker Hughes sells engineered equipment and the services that keep it running. SpaceX: SpaceX earns money in three segments.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Baker Hughes Company or SpaceX?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Baker Hughes Company trades at 2.1x P/S and SpaceX at 102.8x P/S. SpaceX commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Baker Hughes Company. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Baker Hughes Company bigger than SpaceX?
By last reported revenue, Baker Hughes Company ($27.7B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to SpaceX ($18.7B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Baker Hughes vs SpaceX overview