Baker Hughes vs Samsung: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Baker Hughes reported $27.7B of revenue in FY2025 and $2.6B of net income. Samsung reported ~$236.9B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$31.4B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Baker Hughes
- Latest revenue
- $27.7B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $2.6B
- Net margin
- 9.3%
- Revenue growth
- +8.7% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Samsung
- Latest revenue
- ~$236.9B (FY2025)
- Net income
- ~$31.4B
- Net margin
- 13.3%
- Revenue growth
- +4.5% a year, FY2021–FY2025
Financial summary
Baker Hughes
FY2025 revenue was $27,733M, down 0.3% from $27,829M, with attributable net income of $2,588M against $2,979M a year earlier, a 13% decline driven largely by the prior-year release of tax valuation allowances and by $215M of restructuring. Profitability still improved on the measure management targets: adjusted EBITDA reached a record $4,825M, a 17.4% margin against 16.5% in FY2024. The mix did the work, with IET segment EBITDA up 21% to $2,482M while OFSE fell 9% to $2,618M. Cash conversion was the other bright spot, with $3,810M from operations and record free cash flow of $2,732M after $1,078M of net capital spending. The balance sheet ended the year with $3,715M of cash against $5,398M of long-term debt and $689M of current debt, and equity of $19,010M on total assets of $40,881M. Dividends of $910M and $384M of buybacks were paid out during the year, with the quarterly dividend at $0.23 per share. Research and development was $600M and selling, general and administrative expense $2,387M.
Samsung
Samsung's earnings follow the memory cycle. Revenue fell from ~$215 billion (KRW 302.2 trillion) in 2022 to ~$184 billion (KRW 258.9 trillion) in 2023 during a chip downturn, then recovered to ~$214 billion (KRW 300.9 trillion) in 2024 and ~$237 billion (KRW 333.6 trillion) in 2025, when net income reached about $31.5 billion (KRW 44.3 trillion). In 2026, AI server demand created a memory shortage. Q1 operating profit of ~$40.6 billion (KRW 57.2 trillion) exceeded the full-year 2025 total, and Q2 reached ~$63.5 billion (KRW 89.5 trillion) on ~$122 billion (KRW 171.5 trillion) revenue. Higher memory costs also squeezed Samsung's own devices: the MX and Networks unit lost ~$497 million (KRW 0.7 trillion) in Q2 2026 on ~$23.6 billion (KRW 33.2 trillion) revenue.
Revenue and profit by year
Baker Hughes
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $27.7B | $2.6B | 9.3% | -0.3% | Source |
| FY2024 | $27.8B | $3B | 10.7% | +9.1% | Source |
| FY2023 | $25.5B | $1.9B | 7.6% | +20.6% | Source |
| FY2022 | $21.2B | -$601M | -2.8% | +3.2% | Source |
| FY2021 | $20.5B | -$219M | -1.1% | -1.0% | Source |
| FY2020 | $20.7B | -$9.9B | -48.0% | -13.1% | Source |
| FY2019 | $23.8B | $128M | 0.5% | +4.2% | Source |
| FY2018 | $22.9B | $195M | 0.9% | +33.2% | Source |
| FY2017 | $17.2B | -$103M | -0.6% | +31.3% | Source |
| FY2016 | $13.1B | — | 0.0% | — | Source |
Samsung
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | ~$236.9B | ~$31.4B | 13.3% | +10.9% | Source |
| FY2024 | ~$213.6B | ~$23.9B | 11.2% | +16.2% | Source |
| FY2023 | ~$183.8B | ~$10.3B | 5.6% | -14.3% | Source |
| FY2022 | ~$214.6B | ~$38.9B | 18.1% | +8.1% | Source |
| FY2021 | ~$198.5B | ~$27.9B | 14.0% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Baker Hughes
- Oilfield Services and Equipment (OFSE)51.7%
OFSE revenue was $14,324M in FY2025, down 8% from $15,628M in FY2024 as rig counts fell. The split by product line was Production Solutions $3,806M, Completions, Intervention and Measurements $3,750M, Well Construction $3,646M and Subsea and Surface Pressure Systems $3,122M. International revenue was $10,551M and North America $3,773M. Segment EBITDA was $2,618M, an 18.3% margin, on work generally contracted well by well or by project.
- Industrial and Energy Technology (IET)48.3%
IET revenue was $13,409M in FY2025, up 10% from $12,201M, made up of Gas Technology Equipment $6,619M, Gas Technology Services $3,028M, Industrial Products $1,991M, Industrial Solutions $1,123M and Climate Technology Solutions $647M. Segment EBITDA was $2,482M, up 21%, a 18.5% margin. IET held $32.4B of the $35.9B remaining performance obligation at year end, split $11.6B equipment and $16.1B services, so a large share of future revenue is already contracted.
Samsung
- Memory semiconductors
- Foundry and system LSI
- Galaxy smartphones and mobile devices
- Display panels
- TVs and appliances
- Network equipment
- Harman automotive and audio
Business model and strategy
Baker Hughes
How it makes money
Baker Hughes sells engineered equipment and the services that keep it running. In Oilfield Services and Equipment it is paid for jobs and projects: directional drilling, drill bits, completions, pressure pumping, artificial lift, oilfield chemicals and subsea production systems, billed well by well or under multi-year frame agreements with national oil companies and majors.
Growth strategy
The strategy is to shift weight from short-cycle oilfield work toward equipment and lifecycle services with longer contracts. Management describes the 2026 to 2028 period as Horizon Two and frames the aim as a more industrialised energy solutions company with a production-oriented mix and more durable cash flow.
Competitive advantage
The defensible part of Baker Hughes is the installed base of turbomachinery and the service contracts attached to it. Once its gas turbines and refrigerant compressors are inside a liquefaction train or a gas processing plant, the operator buys spare parts, overhauls and remote monitoring from Baker Hughes for the life of the asset, which is why Gas Technology Services alone held $16.1B of remaining performance oblig…
Samsung
How it makes money
Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses. Device Solutions (DS) makes and sells memory (DRAM, HBM, NAND), System LSI chips such as Exynos processors and ISOCELL image sensors, and contract foundry manufacturing.
Growth strategy
Samsung's growth plan centers on AI memory: ramping HBM4 for Nvidia and AMD accelerators, developing HBM4E, and adding DRAM capacity at Pyeongtaek. In foundry it is pursuing 2nm gate-all-around production and building its Taylor, Texas fab to win customers from TSMC. On the device side it relies on Galaxy AI features, foldables and premium TVs to defend share against Apple and Chinese brands.
Competitive advantage
Samsung's edge is manufacturing scale and breadth. It is the largest memory producer and one of only three major DRAM makers, alongside SK hynix and Micron. That lets it capture pricing upswings like the 2026 AI-driven shortage.
Questions about Baker Hughes vs Samsung
Which company has higher revenue — Baker Hughes Company or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Baker Hughes Company reported $27.7B (FY2025), while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. reported ~$236.9B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the larger business, with Baker Hughes Company reporting a smaller revenue base.
What is the market cap of Baker Hughes Company vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Baker Hughes Company's market capitalisation stands at $56.9B, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s is $1.33T. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Baker Hughes Company.
Which is more financially efficient — Baker Hughes Company or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Baker Hughes Company generates $495k / employee in revenue per employee, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generates $914k / employee. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Baker Hughes Company and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. make money?
Baker Hughes Company and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Baker Hughes Company: Baker Hughes sells engineered equipment and the services that keep it running. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Baker Hughes Company or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Baker Hughes Company trades at 2.1x P/S and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. at 5.6x P/S. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Baker Hughes Company. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Baker Hughes Company bigger than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (~$236.9B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Baker Hughes Company ($27.7B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Baker Hughes vs Samsung overview