Baker Hughes vs Meta: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Baker Hughes reported $27.7B of revenue in FY2025 and $2.6B of net income. Meta reported $201B of revenue in FY2025 and $60.5B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Baker Hughes
- Latest revenue
- $27.7B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $2.6B
- Net margin
- 9.3%
- Revenue growth
- +8.7% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Meta
- Latest revenue
- $201B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $60.5B
- Net margin
- 30.1%
- Revenue growth
- +24.7% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Financial summary
Baker Hughes
FY2025 revenue was $27,733M, down 0.3% from $27,829M, with attributable net income of $2,588M against $2,979M a year earlier, a 13% decline driven largely by the prior-year release of tax valuation allowances and by $215M of restructuring. Profitability still improved on the measure management targets: adjusted EBITDA reached a record $4,825M, a 17.4% margin against 16.5% in FY2024. The mix did the work, with IET segment EBITDA up 21% to $2,482M while OFSE fell 9% to $2,618M. Cash conversion was the other bright spot, with $3,810M from operations and record free cash flow of $2,732M after $1,078M of net capital spending. The balance sheet ended the year with $3,715M of cash against $5,398M of long-term debt and $689M of current debt, and equity of $19,010M on total assets of $40,881M. Dividends of $910M and $384M of buybacks were paid out during the year, with the quarterly dividend at $0.23 per share. Research and development was $600M and selling, general and administrative expense $2,387M.
Meta
Meta's revenue grew from $116.609B in 2022 to $200.966B in 2025, and net income rose from $23.2B to $60.458B. FY2025 income from operations was $83.276B. In 2026 the story is spending: Q2 2026 costs rose 55% to $42.03B, the operating margin fell to 31% from 43%, and quarterly capex of $31.08B left free cash flow at $784M. Meta had $90.26B of cash and marketable securities and $83.66B of long-term debt at June 30, 2026. It expects 2026 total expenses of $165-169B and still expects 2026 operating income to exceed 2025.
Revenue and profit by year
Baker Hughes
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $27.7B | $2.6B | 9.3% | -0.3% | Source |
| FY2024 | $27.8B | $3B | 10.7% | +9.1% | Source |
| FY2023 | $25.5B | $1.9B | 7.6% | +20.6% | Source |
| FY2022 | $21.2B | -$601M | -2.8% | +3.2% | Source |
| FY2021 | $20.5B | -$219M | -1.1% | -1.0% | Source |
| FY2020 | $20.7B | -$9.9B | -48.0% | -13.1% | Source |
| FY2019 | $23.8B | $128M | 0.5% | +4.2% | Source |
| FY2018 | $22.9B | $195M | 0.9% | +33.2% | Source |
| FY2017 | $17.2B | -$103M | -0.6% | +31.3% | Source |
| FY2016 | $13.1B | — | 0.0% | — | Source |
Meta
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $201B | $60.5B | 30.1% | +22.2% | Source |
| FY2024 | $164.5B | $62.4B | 37.9% | +21.9% | Source |
| FY2023 | $134.9B | $39.1B | 29.0% | +15.7% | Source |
| FY2022 | $116.6B | $23.2B | 19.9% | -1.1% | Source |
| FY2021 | $117.9B | $39.4B | 33.4% | +37.2% | Source |
| FY2020 | $86B | $29.1B | 33.9% | +21.6% | Source |
| FY2019 | $70.7B | $18.5B | 26.1% | +26.6% | Source |
| FY2018 | $55.8B | $22.1B | 39.6% | +37.4% | Source |
| FY2017 | $40.7B | $15.9B | 39.2% | +47.1% | Source |
| FY2016 | $27.6B | $10.2B | 37.0% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Baker Hughes
- Oilfield Services and Equipment (OFSE)51.7%
OFSE revenue was $14,324M in FY2025, down 8% from $15,628M in FY2024 as rig counts fell. The split by product line was Production Solutions $3,806M, Completions, Intervention and Measurements $3,750M, Well Construction $3,646M and Subsea and Surface Pressure Systems $3,122M. International revenue was $10,551M and North America $3,773M. Segment EBITDA was $2,618M, an 18.3% margin, on work generally contracted well by well or by project.
- Industrial and Energy Technology (IET)48.3%
IET revenue was $13,409M in FY2025, up 10% from $12,201M, made up of Gas Technology Equipment $6,619M, Gas Technology Services $3,028M, Industrial Products $1,991M, Industrial Solutions $1,123M and Climate Technology Solutions $647M. Segment EBITDA was $2,482M, up 21%, a 18.5% margin. IET held $32.4B of the $35.9B remaining performance obligation at year end, split $11.6B equipment and $16.1B services, so a large share of future revenue is already contracted.
Meta
- Advertising
~97.6% (FY2025)
Ads across Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, Threads and WhatsApp; $196.175B in FY2025.
- Other revenue and Reality Labs
~2.4% (FY2025)
WhatsApp Business messaging, Meta Verified subscriptions, Quest headsets and Ray-Ban Meta glasses.
Business model and strategy
Baker Hughes
How it makes money
Baker Hughes sells engineered equipment and the services that keep it running. In Oilfield Services and Equipment it is paid for jobs and projects: directional drilling, drill bits, completions, pressure pumping, artificial lift, oilfield chemicals and subsea production systems, billed well by well or under multi-year frame agreements with national oil companies and majors.
Growth strategy
The strategy is to shift weight from short-cycle oilfield work toward equipment and lifecycle services with longer contracts. Management describes the 2026 to 2028 period as Horizon Two and frames the aim as a more industrialised energy solutions company with a production-oriented mix and more durable cash flow.
Competitive advantage
The defensible part of Baker Hughes is the installed base of turbomachinery and the service contracts attached to it. Once its gas turbines and refrigerant compressors are inside a liquefaction train or a gas processing plant, the operator buys spare parts, overhauls and remote monitoring from Baker Hughes for the life of the asset, which is why Gas Technology Services alone held $16.1B of remaining performance oblig…
Meta
How it makes money
Meta makes money by selling ads. Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, WhatsApp and Threads are free to use, and advertisers pay to reach people in feeds, Stories, Reels and click-to-message formats. Advertising produced $196.175B of Meta's $200.966B FY2025 revenue, about 97.6%. Q2 2026 growth came from 14% more ad impressions and a 12% higher average price per ad.
Growth strategy
Meta's growth plan runs through AI. Better ranking and ad-delivery models raise engagement on Reels and feeds and lift ad prices, which drove the 28% revenue growth in Q2 2026. Meta Superintelligence Labs, led by former Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, released the first Muse Spark model in April 2026, followed by a paid API and the Muse consumer AI agent in September 2026.
Competitive advantage
Meta's moat is distribution plus data. Its apps reach 3.60 billion people every day, so new products such as Threads, Meta AI and Muse can launch to a huge audience at once. Advertisers stay because Meta's AI ad tools such as Advantage+ convert across that audience at a scale only Google matches. Meta also owns its compute, custom MTIA chips and frontier models, which reduces its dependence on outside AI suppliers.
Questions about Baker Hughes vs Meta
Which company has higher revenue — Baker Hughes Company or Meta Platforms, Inc.?
Baker Hughes Company reported $27.7B (FY2025), while Meta Platforms, Inc. reported $201.0B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Meta Platforms, Inc. is the larger business, with Baker Hughes Company reporting a smaller revenue base.
What is the market cap of Baker Hughes Company vs Meta Platforms, Inc.?
Baker Hughes Company's market capitalisation stands at $56.9B, while Meta Platforms, Inc.'s is $1.90T. Meta Platforms, Inc. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Baker Hughes Company.
Which is more financially efficient — Baker Hughes Company or Meta Platforms, Inc.?
Baker Hughes Company generates $495k / employee in revenue per employee, while Meta Platforms, Inc. generates $2.66M / employee. Meta Platforms, Inc. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Baker Hughes Company and Meta Platforms, Inc. make money?
Baker Hughes Company and Meta Platforms, Inc. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Baker Hughes Company: Baker Hughes sells engineered equipment and the services that keep it running. Meta Platforms, Inc.: Meta makes money by selling ads.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Baker Hughes Company or Meta Platforms, Inc.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Baker Hughes Company trades at 2.1x P/S and Meta Platforms, Inc. at 9.5x P/S. Meta Platforms, Inc. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Baker Hughes Company. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Baker Hughes Company bigger than Meta Platforms, Inc.?
By last reported revenue, Meta Platforms, Inc. ($201.0B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Baker Hughes Company ($27.7B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Baker Hughes vs Meta overview