Baker Hughes vs Google: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Baker Hughes reported $27.7B of revenue in FY2025 and $2.6B of net income. Google reported $402.8B of revenue in FY2025 and $132.2B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Baker Hughes
- Latest revenue
- $27.7B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $2.6B
- Net margin
- 9.3%
- Revenue growth
- +8.7% a year, FY2016–FY2025
- Latest revenue
- $402.8B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $132.2B
- Net margin
- 32.8%
- Revenue growth
- +18.1% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Financial summary
Baker Hughes
FY2025 revenue was $27,733M, down 0.3% from $27,829M, with attributable net income of $2,588M against $2,979M a year earlier, a 13% decline driven largely by the prior-year release of tax valuation allowances and by $215M of restructuring. Profitability still improved on the measure management targets: adjusted EBITDA reached a record $4,825M, a 17.4% margin against 16.5% in FY2024. The mix did the work, with IET segment EBITDA up 21% to $2,482M while OFSE fell 9% to $2,618M. Cash conversion was the other bright spot, with $3,810M from operations and record free cash flow of $2,732M after $1,078M of net capital spending. The balance sheet ended the year with $3,715M of cash against $5,398M of long-term debt and $689M of current debt, and equity of $19,010M on total assets of $40,881M. Dividends of $910M and $384M of buybacks were paid out during the year, with the quarterly dividend at $0.23 per share. Research and development was $600M and selling, general and administrative expense $2,387M.
Alphabet's FY2025 Form 10-K reported $402.836 billion of revenue and $132.170 billion of net income, making it one of the most profitable companies in the world. Growth accelerated in 2026: Q2 2026 revenue rose 24% year over year to $119.8 billion, operating income rose 30% to $40.8 billion and operating margin reached 34.0%. Reported Q2 net income of $112.1 billion was inflated by a $99.0 billion gain, mostly unrealized gains on equity holdings, so operating income is the cleaner measure. The trade-off is spending: management raised 2026 capital expenditure guidance to $195-205 billion, and analysts flagged negative free cash flow in Q2 2026 as data-center investment outpaced operating cash flow.
Revenue and profit by year
Baker Hughes
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $27.7B | $2.6B | 9.3% | -0.3% | Source |
| FY2024 | $27.8B | $3B | 10.7% | +9.1% | Source |
| FY2023 | $25.5B | $1.9B | 7.6% | +20.6% | Source |
| FY2022 | $21.2B | -$601M | -2.8% | +3.2% | Source |
| FY2021 | $20.5B | -$219M | -1.1% | -1.0% | Source |
| FY2020 | $20.7B | -$9.9B | -48.0% | -13.1% | Source |
| FY2019 | $23.8B | $128M | 0.5% | +4.2% | Source |
| FY2018 | $22.9B | $195M | 0.9% | +33.2% | Source |
| FY2017 | $17.2B | -$103M | -0.6% | +31.3% | Source |
| FY2016 | $13.1B | — | 0.0% | — | Source |
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $402.8B | $132.2B | 32.8% | +15.1% | Source |
| FY2024 | $350B | $100.1B | 28.6% | +13.9% | Source |
| FY2023 | $307.4B | $73.8B | 24.0% | +8.7% | Source |
| FY2022 | $282.8B | $60B | 21.2% | +9.8% | Source |
| FY2021 | $257.6B | $76B | 29.5% | +41.2% | Source |
| FY2020 | $182.5B | $40.3B | 22.1% | +12.8% | Source |
| FY2019 | $161.9B | $34.3B | 21.2% | +18.3% | Source |
| FY2018 | $136.8B | $30.7B | 22.5% | +23.4% | Source |
| FY2017 | $110.9B | $12.7B | 11.4% | +22.8% | Source |
| FY2016 | $90.3B | $19.5B | 21.6% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Baker Hughes
- Oilfield Services and Equipment (OFSE)51.7%
OFSE revenue was $14,324M in FY2025, down 8% from $15,628M in FY2024 as rig counts fell. The split by product line was Production Solutions $3,806M, Completions, Intervention and Measurements $3,750M, Well Construction $3,646M and Subsea and Surface Pressure Systems $3,122M. International revenue was $10,551M and North America $3,773M. Segment EBITDA was $2,618M, an 18.3% margin, on work generally contracted well by well or by project.
- Industrial and Energy Technology (IET)48.3%
IET revenue was $13,409M in FY2025, up 10% from $12,201M, made up of Gas Technology Equipment $6,619M, Gas Technology Services $3,028M, Industrial Products $1,991M, Industrial Solutions $1,123M and Climate Technology Solutions $647M. Segment EBITDA was $2,482M, up 21%, a 18.5% margin. IET held $32.4B of the $35.9B remaining performance obligation at year end, split $11.6B equipment and $16.1B services, so a large share of future revenue is already contracted.
- Google Search advertising~12%
Auction-based text and shopping ads served alongside organic search results, generating approximately $198 billion in FY2024 through cost-per-click and cost-per-impression pricing.
- YouTube advertising~12%
Video advertising across pre-roll, mid-roll, display, and Shorts formats, plus subscription revenue from YouTube Premium, Music, and YouTube TV, totaling approximately $36 billion in ad revenue for FY2024.
- Google Cloud~12%
Infrastructure-as-a-service, platform tools, Vertex AI, BigQuery, Mandiant cybersecurity, and Google Workspace subscriptions, generating significant FY2025 revenue.
- Google Network~12%
Ads placed on third-party websites through AdSense, AdMob, and Google Ad Manager, generating approximately $31 billion in FY2024 with revenue shared with publishers.
- Other Bets~12%
Revenue from Waymo autonomous ride-hailing, Verily health technology, hardware sales (Pixel, Nest, Fitbit), Google Play commissions, and other non-advertising sources.
Business model and strategy
Baker Hughes
How it makes money
Baker Hughes sells engineered equipment and the services that keep it running. In Oilfield Services and Equipment it is paid for jobs and projects: directional drilling, drill bits, completions, pressure pumping, artificial lift, oilfield chemicals and subsea production systems, billed well by well or under multi-year frame agreements with national oil companies and majors.
Growth strategy
The strategy is to shift weight from short-cycle oilfield work toward equipment and lifecycle services with longer contracts. Management describes the 2026 to 2028 period as Horizon Two and frames the aim as a more industrialised energy solutions company with a production-oriented mix and more durable cash flow.
Competitive advantage
The defensible part of Baker Hughes is the installed base of turbomachinery and the service contracts attached to it. Once its gas turbines and refrigerant compressors are inside a liquefaction train or a gas processing plant, the operator buys spare parts, overhauls and remote monitoring from Baker Hughes for the life of the asset, which is why Gas Technology Services alone held $16.1B of remaining performance oblig…
How it makes money
Alphabet makes money mainly by selling ads against user intent and attention. Google Search & other, YouTube ads and the Google Network together account for roughly three quarters of revenue. Advertisers bid in real-time auctions to appear next to queries or videos, and Google charges per click, view or conversion.
Growth strategy
Alphabet's growth plan has four parts: put Gemini into Search (AI Overviews and AI Mode), Workspace, Android and Chrome to keep users and advertisers engaged; sell AI infrastructure, TPUs and Gemini models through Google Cloud, backed by the Wiz security platform acquired in March 2026; grow subscriptions such as YouTube Premium, YouTube TV and Google One AI plans;
Competitive advantage
Alphabet's edge is a stack few rivals own end to end: default distribution through Android and Chrome, the largest pool of search-intent data, YouTube's video audience, its own TPU chips and global data centers, and frontier models from Google DeepMind.
Questions about Baker Hughes vs Google
Which company has higher revenue — Baker Hughes Company or Alphabet Inc.?
Baker Hughes Company reported $27.7B (FY2025), while Alphabet Inc. reported $402.8B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Alphabet Inc. is the larger business, with Baker Hughes Company reporting a smaller revenue base.
What is the market cap of Baker Hughes Company vs Alphabet Inc.?
Baker Hughes Company's market capitalisation stands at $56.9B, while Alphabet Inc.'s is $4.31T. Alphabet Inc. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Baker Hughes Company.
Which is more financially efficient — Baker Hughes Company or Alphabet Inc.?
Baker Hughes Company generates $495k / employee in revenue per employee, while Alphabet Inc. generates $2.11M / employee. Alphabet Inc. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Baker Hughes Company and Alphabet Inc. make money?
Baker Hughes Company and Alphabet Inc. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Baker Hughes Company: Baker Hughes sells engineered equipment and the services that keep it running. Alphabet Inc.: Alphabet makes money mainly by selling ads against user intent and attention.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Baker Hughes Company or Alphabet Inc.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Baker Hughes Company trades at 2.1x P/S and Alphabet Inc. at 10.7x P/S. Alphabet Inc. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Baker Hughes Company. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Baker Hughes Company bigger than Alphabet Inc.?
By last reported revenue, Alphabet Inc. ($402.8B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Baker Hughes Company ($27.7B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Baker Hughes vs Google overview