Skip to main content

Arm Holdings vs Honda: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

Arm Holdings reported $4.9B of revenue in FY2026 and $904M of net income. Honda reported ~$146B of revenue in FY2026 and a net loss of ~$2.8B.

Latest financial snapshot

Arm Holdings

Latest revenue
$4.9B (FY2026)
Net income
$904M
Net margin
18.4%
Revenue growth
+19.4% a year, FY2021–FY2026

Honda

Latest revenue
~$146B (FY2026)
Net income
~-$2.8B
Net margin
-1.9%
Revenue growth
+4.1% a year, FY2016–FY2026

Financial summary

Arm Holdings

Arm makes nearly all of its gross profit from intellectual property, so its cost of sales is small: fiscal 2026 revenue of $4,920 million produced $4,799 million of gross profit, a margin above 97%. Revenue comes in two lines. License and other revenue, $2,307 million in fiscal 2026 and up 25%, is charged upfront or across milestones when a customer takes access to Arm designs. Royalty revenue, $2,613 million and up 21%, is collected per chip once partners ship, which makes it a long tail from designs licensed years earlier. Spending is concentrated in engineering: research and development cost $2,776 million in fiscal 2026, about 56% of revenue, which held operating income to $900 million and net income to $904 million. Arm ended the year with $2,751 million of cash and cash equivalents plus $850 million of short-term investments, and $2,071 million of remaining performance obligations, about 28% of which it expects to recognise as revenue within twelve months. The most recent reported quarter, the three months to June 30, 2026, was a record: revenue rose 22% year over year to $1.29 billion on record first-quarter royalty and licensing revenue, with data center royalties again more than doubling.

Honda

Honda's revenue rose from ~$97.5 billion (JPY 14.55 trillion) in FY2022 to ~$145 billion (JPY 21.69 trillion) in FY2025 as a weaker yen and strong US hybrid demand lifted results. FY2026 revenue edged up to $146 billion (JPY 21.80 trillion), but EV charges of ~$10.6 billion (JPY 1.58 trillion) produced a ~$2.78 billion (JPY 414.3 billion) operating loss and a ~$2.84 billion (JPY 423.9 billion) net loss. Without those charges, adjusted operating profit was ~$6.97 billion (JPY 1.04 trillion). In Q1 FY2027 (April to June 2026) operating profit hit a record ~$3.56 billion (JPY 530.7 billion) and net profit was ~$3.02 billion (JPY 450.9 billion), and Honda raised its FY2027 net profit forecast to ~$2.68 billion (JPY 400 billion).

Revenue and profit by year

Arm Holdings

Arm Holdings revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2026$4.9B$904M18.4%+22.8%Source
FY2025$4B$792M19.8%+23.9%Source
FY2024$3.2B$306M9.5%+20.7%Source
FY2023$2.7B$524M19.6%-0.9%Source
FY2022$2.7B$549M20.3%+33.3%Source
FY2021$2B$388M19.1%—Source
Full Arm Holdings financials

Honda

Honda revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2026~$146B~-$2.8B-1.9%+0.5%Source
FY2025~$145.3B~$5.6B3.9%+6.2%Source
FY2024~$136.9B~$7.4B5.4%+20.8%Source
FY2023~$113.3B~$4.4B3.9%+16.2%Source
FY2022~$97.5B~$4.7B4.9%+10.5%Source
FY2021~$88.2B~$4.4B5.0%-11.8%Source
FY2020~$100B~$3.1B3.1%-6.0%Source
FY2019~$106.5B~$4.1B3.8%+3.4%Source
FY2018~$102.9B~$7.1B6.9%+9.7%Source
FY2017~$93.8B~$4.1B4.4%-4.1%Source
FY2016~$97.8B~$2.3B2.4%—Source
Full Honda financials

Where the revenue comes from

Arm Holdings

  • Royalty Revenue53%

    Royalties were $2,613 million of Arm's $4,920 million fiscal 2026 revenue, up 21% year over year. Arm collects a per-unit royalty on substantially every chip its partners ship that uses its designs, so the line reflects designs licensed in earlier years; rates generally step down as unit volumes rise, subject to an agreed minimum per chip. Mobile application processors supplied about 43% of fiscal 2026 royalty revenue, while data center royalties more than doubled year over year. Arm attributes part of the growth to a mix shift toward Armv9 designs, which carry higher rates per chip.

  • License and Other Revenue47%

    License and other revenue was $2,307 million in fiscal 2026, up 25%, and covers licensing, software development tools, design services, training and support. Customers choose among Compute Subsystems, Arm Total Access, which bundles the current portfolio for an annual fee, Arm Flexible Access, which gives cheaper access to older designs with a fee due at tape-out, technology licence agreements and architecture licences. The line is lumpy because a small number of high-value agreements can land in any quarter: revenue from related parties alone rose 141% in fiscal 2026. Remaining performance obligations were $2,071 million at March 31, 2026, about 28% of which Arm expects to recognise within twelve months.

Honda

  • Automobiles~65%

    Passenger vehicles, hybrids, EVs, SUVs, parts, accessories, and related service revenue sold through global dealer networks.

  • Motorcycles~17%

    Motorcycles, scooters, parts, and related products sold globally, especially in Asia and other high-volume mobility markets.

  • Financial Services~16%

    Vehicle loans, leases, dealer financing, and related finance products that support automobile and motorcycle demand.

  • Power Products and Other~2%

    Power equipment, marine engines, aircraft-related activity, and other mobility-adjacent operations.

Business model and strategy

Arm Holdings

How it makes money

Arm licenses intellectual property. It spends heavily on R&D to design power-efficient processor architectures, then licenses the designs to companies such as Apple, Qualcomm and Samsung, which customize them and have them manufactured by a foundry such as TSMC. Arm charges an upfront license fee and an ongoing royalty on each chip shipped.

Growth strategy

With more than 99% of mobile application processors already on its architecture, Arm is pushing into markets where the chip value per unit is higher. Neoverse designs target cloud and AI infrastructure and are the basis of Amazon Graviton, Google Axion, Microsoft Cobalt and Nvidia Grace; Arm says data center royalties more than doubled in fiscal 2026.

Competitive advantage

Arm's moat is the software built around its architecture. iOS, Android and millions of mobile apps are written for the Arm instruction set, so a rival architecture such as Intel's x86 would need developers to rework that software to enter smartphones. Decades of focus on power efficiency, which extends battery life, also give Arm a technical lead in mobile.

Arm Holdings business model in full

Honda

How it makes money

Honda earns money in four reportable segments. Automobiles (Honda and Acura cars and light trucks, led by the CR-V, Civic, Accord and hybrid e:HEV models) generate most revenue, with North America the largest profit market. Motorcycles generate high-volume, high-margin sales, especially in India, Indonesia, Vietnam and Brazil, and posted record profit in FY2026.

Growth strategy

Honda reset its electrification plan in 2026. In March it cancelled the US-built Honda 0 SUV, 0 Saloon and Acura RSX EVs, and in May it scrapped its 2030 and 2040 EV sales targets, including the goal of selling only battery-electric and fuel-cell vehicles by 2040. The new plan leans on hybrids, a next-generation e:HEV system, motorcycles in emerging markets, and more flexible EV timing.

Competitive advantage

Honda's edge comes from three things. It leads the global motorcycle market with roughly 40% unit share, which gives it a profit base most automakers lack. Its two-motor hybrid system is competitive in the markets where hybrid demand is growing fastest, especially the US.

Honda business model in full

Questions about Arm Holdings vs Honda

Which company has higher revenue — Arm Holdings or Honda Motor Co., Ltd.?

Arm Holdings reported $4.9B (FY2026), while Honda Motor Co., Ltd. reported ~$146B (FY2026). By last reported revenue, Honda Motor Co., Ltd. is the larger business, with Arm Holdings reporting a smaller revenue base.

What is the market cap of Arm Holdings vs Honda Motor Co., Ltd.?

Arm Holdings's market capitalisation stands at $309.4B, while Honda Motor Co., Ltd.'s is $50.3B. Arm Holdings carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Honda Motor Co., Ltd..

Which is more financially efficient — Arm Holdings or Honda Motor Co., Ltd.?

Arm Holdings generates $513k / employee in revenue per employee, while Honda Motor Co., Ltd. generates $748k / employee. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.

How do Arm Holdings and Honda Motor Co., Ltd. make money?

Arm Holdings and Honda Motor Co., Ltd. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Arm Holdings: Arm licenses intellectual property. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.: Honda earns money in four reportable segments.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Arm Holdings or Honda Motor Co., Ltd.?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Arm Holdings trades at 62.9x P/S and Honda Motor Co., Ltd. at 0.3x P/S. Arm Holdings commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Honda Motor Co., Ltd.. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is Arm Holdings bigger than Honda Motor Co., Ltd.?

By last reported revenue, Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (~$146B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to Arm Holdings ($4.9B (FY2026)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Arm Holdings vs Honda overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.