Skip to main content

Amphenol vs Procter & Gamble: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

Amphenol reported $23.1B of revenue in FY2025 and $4.3B of net income. Procter & Gamble reported $87B of revenue in FY2026 and $16B of net income.

Latest financial snapshot

Amphenol

Latest revenue
$23.1B (FY2025)
Net income
$4.3B
Net margin
18.5%
Revenue growth
+15.6% a year, FY2016–FY2025

Procter & Gamble

Latest revenue
$87B (FY2026)
Net income
$16B
Net margin
18.4%
Revenue growth
+3.3% a year, FY2017–FY2026

Financial summary

Amphenol

Amphenol compounds through acquisition in a fragmented industry. Net sales rose from $12.55 billion in 2023 to $15.22 billion in 2024 and $23.09 billion in 2025, and net income rose from $1.93 billion to $2.42 billion and then $4.27 billion across the same three years. Fiscal 2025 produced a 25.4% GAAP operating margin, $5.4 billion of operating cash flow and $4.4 billion of free cash flow, and the company returned nearly $1.5 billion to shareholders while completing five acquisitions. The pattern is consistent: buy niche connector, cable and sensor makers, leave their management and brands in place, add purchasing scale, and fund the next deal from cash flow and investment grade debt.

Procter & Gamble

P&G's finances are defined by steady sales, high margins and large cash returns rather than fast growth. Net sales rose from $65.1 billion in fiscal 2017 to $87.0 billion in fiscal 2026. In fiscal 2026 diluted EPS was $6.62 (up 2%) and core EPS was $6.89 (up 1%), with core gross and operating margins slipping 40 and 70 basis points as costs rose. The company returned more than $15 billion to shareholders, about $10.2 billion in dividends and $5 billion in buybacks, and has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. For fiscal 2027 it guided to 1%-3% organic sales growth and core EPS of $6.89-$7.11.

Revenue and profit by year

Amphenol

Amphenol revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025$23.1B$4.3B18.5%+51.7%Source
FY2024$15.2B$2.4B15.9%+21.3%Source
FY2023$12.6B$1.9B15.4%-0.5%Source
FY2022$12.6B$1.9B15.1%+16.1%Source
FY2021$10.9B$1.6B14.6%+26.5%Source
FY2020$8.6B$1.2B14.0%+4.5%Source
FY2019$8.2B$1.2B14.0%+0.3%Source
FY2018$8.2B$1.2B14.7%+17.0%Source
FY2017$7B$650.5M9.3%+11.5%Source
FY2016$6.3B$822.9M13.1%—Source
Full Amphenol financials

Procter & Gamble

Procter & Gamble revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2026$87B$16B18.4%+3.3%Source
FY2025$84.3B$16B19.0%+0.3%Source
FY2024$84B$14.9B17.7%+2.5%Source
FY2023$82B$14.7B17.9%+2.3%Source
FY2022$80.2B$14.7B18.4%+5.3%Source
FY2021$76.1B$14.3B18.8%+7.3%Source
FY2020$71B$13B18.4%+4.8%Source
FY2019$67.7B$3.9B5.8%+1.3%Source
FY2018$66.8B$9.8B14.6%+2.7%Source
FY2017$65.1B$15.3B23.6%—Source
Full Procter & Gamble financials

Where the revenue comes from

Amphenol

  • Communications Solutions~52%

    High-speed board-to-board and backplane connectors, fiber optic interconnects, RF and microwave connectors, antennas, and cable assemblies for IT datacom, mobile networks, mobile devices, automotive, and broadband communications. FY2025 revenue of $12.1 billion, up 91% YoY, driven by $4.6 billion in incremental AI datacom sales.

  • Harsh Environment Solutions~25%

    Ruggedized connectors, cable assemblies, and interconnect systems for defense, commercial aerospace, industrial, and automotive applications that must withstand extreme temperatures, vibration, moisture, and electromagnetic interference. FY2025 revenue of $5.9 billion, up 33% YoY, with significant contributions from the Carlisle Interconnect Technologies acquisition.

  • Interconnect and Sensor Systems~22%

    Sensor technologies, value-added cable assemblies, and specialized interconnect products for automotive, industrial, IT datacom, and medical applications. FY2025 revenue of $5.2 billion, up 15% YoY, with growth in industrial sensors and the August 2025 acquisition of Rochester Sensors.

Procter & Gamble

  • Fabric and Home Care

    Largest segment

    Laundry, dish care, air care, and household cleaning brands including Tide, Ariel, Dawn, Febreze, and Swiffer.

  • Baby, Feminine and Family Care

    Major segment

    Pampers, Always, Bounty, Charmin, and related baby, feminine, and family-care products.

  • Beauty

    Major segment

    Hair care, skin care, and prestige beauty brands including Head & Shoulders, Pantene, Olay, and SK-II.

  • Health Care

    Major segment

    Oral care and personal health products such as Oral-B, Crest, Vicks, and Metamucil.

  • Grooming

    Focused segment

    Gillette, Venus, Braun, and shaving-related products.

Business model and strategy

Amphenol

How it makes money

The business model is high volume, highly specialized B2B component manufacturing. Amphenol sells hundreds of thousands of connector, cable, antenna and sensor variants to thousands of customers, and no single end market dominates: in 2025, data centers and information technology accounted for 36% of sales, industrial 19%, automotive 15%, communications networks 10%, defense 9%, mobile devices 6% and commercial aeros…

Growth strategy

Amphenol's growth strategy has two parts: sell into secular demand and buy specialized suppliers. On the first, it builds high speed copper and optical interconnects for AI clusters, including the Celerity mezzanine connector family rated to 224 Gb/s PAM4 and XtremePass co-packaged copper interconnects aimed at 448G class links, plus high voltage connectors and sensors for electric vehicles, which carry more wiring a…

Competitive advantage

Amphenol's competitive advantage rests on switching costs and the cost of failure. A connector may cost a few cents, but if it fails the aircraft, satellite or server rack around it stops working, so buyers qualify suppliers rather than shop on price.

Amphenol business model in full

Procter & Gamble

How it makes money

P&G makes money by designing, manufacturing and marketing branded household and personal-care products that consumers buy every week, then selling them through retailers, club stores, pharmacies, distributors and e-commerce platforms. Revenue comes from five reportable segments: Fabric & Home Care (Tide, Ariel, Dawn, Downy, Febreze), the largest; Baby, Feminine & Family Care (Pampers, Always, Bounty, Charmin);

Growth strategy

P&G's integrated growth strategy has five parts: a portfolio focused on about ten daily-use categories, superiority across product, packaging, communication, retail execution and value, productivity savings to fund reinvestment, 'constructive disruption' of its own practices, and an agile, accountable organization.

Competitive advantage

P&G's edge is the combination of category leadership and scale. It concentrates on about ten daily-use categories where performance differences are visible to consumers (cleaning, absorbency, shaving, oral care), funds roughly $2 billion a year of R&D to keep those gaps, and uses its size to buy materials, media and logistics more cheaply than smaller rivals.

Procter & Gamble business model in full

Questions about Amphenol vs Procter & Gamble

Which company has higher revenue — Amphenol Corporation or The Procter & Gamble Company?

Amphenol Corporation reported $23.1B (FY2025), while The Procter & Gamble Company reported $87.0B (FY2026). By last reported revenue, The Procter & Gamble Company is the larger business, with Amphenol Corporation reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.

What is the market cap of Amphenol Corporation vs The Procter & Gamble Company?

Amphenol Corporation's market capitalisation stands at $208.6B, while The Procter & Gamble Company's is $340.0B. The Procter & Gamble Company carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Amphenol Corporation.

Which is more financially efficient — Amphenol Corporation or The Procter & Gamble Company?

Amphenol Corporation generates $136k / employee in revenue per employee, while The Procter & Gamble Company generates $798k / employee. The Procter & Gamble Company shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.

How do Amphenol Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company make money?

Amphenol Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Amphenol Corporation: The business model is high volume, highly specialized B2B component manufacturing. The Procter & Gamble Company: P&G makes money by designing, manufacturing and marketing branded household and personal-care products that consumers buy every week, then selling them through retailers, club stores, pharmacies, distributors and e-commerce platforms.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Amphenol Corporation or The Procter & Gamble Company?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Amphenol Corporation trades at 9.0x P/S and The Procter & Gamble Company at 3.9x P/S. Amphenol Corporation commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to The Procter & Gamble Company. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is Amphenol Corporation bigger than The Procter & Gamble Company?

By last reported revenue, The Procter & Gamble Company ($87.0B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to Amphenol Corporation ($23.1B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Amphenol vs Procter & Gamble overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.