Amphenol Corporation vs Burlington Stores, Inc.: Strategic Comparison

This in-depth comparison examines Amphenol Corporation and Burlington Stores, Inc. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Amphenol Corporation on its own, evaluating Burlington Stores, Inc., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Amphenol Corporation and Burlington Stores, Inc. is widest.

On the headline numbers, Amphenol Corporation reports annual revenue of $23.1B against $11.6B for Burlington Stores, Inc., while their respective market capitalizations stand at $208.6B and $16.8B. Both Amphenol Corporation and Burlington Stores, Inc. are headquartered in United States, so they compete in a shared home market and regulatory environment.

Amphenol Corporation: Amphenol makes the physical connections inside electronic systems rather than the systems themselves: connectors, cable assemblies, antennas, sensors and specialty cable. Its parts sit in hyperscale data center racks, vehicle wiring and battery systems, military aircraft and satellites, industrial equipment and mobile devices. In fiscal 2025 the company reported $23.09 billion of net sales and $4.27 billion of net income, with data centers and information technology its largest end market at 36% of sales, and it employed approximately 170,000 people at the end of the year.

Burlington Stores, Inc.: Burlington, known as Burlington Coat Factory until 2013, is one of the three big U.S. off-price chains alongside TJX and Ross Stores. Shoppers come for branded women's, men's and children's clothing, shoes, accessories, baby gear in the Baby Depot department, beauty, toys and home decor, all priced below department stores. Stock changes constantly because it is bought from whatever surplus brands and retailers have, so the store works as a treasure hunt: an item on the rack this week may be gone the next. Coats remain a signature category inside a year-round assortment.

Amphenol Corporation and Burlington Stores, Inc. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Amphenol Corporation and Burlington Stores, Inc..

Amphenol Corporation business model: The business model is high volume, highly specialized B2B component manufacturing. Amphenol sells hundreds of thousands of connector, cable, antenna and sensor variants to thousands of customers, and no single end market dominates: in 2025, data centers and information technology accounted for 36% of sales, industrial 19%, automotive 15%, communications networks 10%, defense 9%, mobile devices 6% and commercial aerospace 5%. That spread is deliberate. Because the company sells critical components into almost every electronics end market, a downturn in one market is usually offset by demand in another, and parts are designed into customer platforms that stay in production for years.

Burlington Stores, Inc. business model: Burlington makes nearly all of its money from merchandise sold in its stores. Net sales were $11.55 billion of its $11.57 billion fiscal 2025 total revenue; the remaining $17 million of other revenue comes from sources such as rental income and service fees. Its merchants buy branded goods when manufacturers or other retailers have excess stock, cancelled orders or closeouts, which lets Burlington price items below department stores. Some buys are held back as packaway inventory and released to stores later in the season or the following year. Under the Burlington 2.0 plan introduced by CEO Michael O'Sullivan, stores carry less inventory and buyers keep more money open to purchase closer to the selling season, so they can react to what is selling. The company has sold only through stores since it announced the end of its e-commerce business in March 2020, judging the small online operation unprofitable for low-priced off-price merchandise.

The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Amphenol Corporation stack up against those of Burlington Stores, Inc..

Amphenol Corporation competitive advantage: Amphenol's competitive advantage rests on switching costs and the cost of failure. A connector may cost a few cents, but if it fails the aircraft, satellite or server rack around it stops working, so buyers qualify suppliers rather than shop on price. Qualification is slow: military programs can take two to three years, automotive platforms are designed in for five to ten years, and data center server designs require extensive signal integrity testing. Once Amphenol is designed into a platform it normally stays there for the life of that platform, which is a large part of why the company held a 25.4% GAAP operating margin on $23.09 billion of fiscal 2025 sales.

Burlington Stores, Inc. competitive advantage: Burlington's edge is cost and flexibility. Because it does not commit to full seasonal assortments months ahead, its buyers can take excess branded inventory when it becomes available and price it below department stores. Selling only in stores, with no e-commerce since March 2020, keeps parcel shipping and online returns out of the cost base. Its real estate approach adds a further advantage: it has repeatedly taken over leases from bankrupt chains, including 62 former Bed Bath & Beyond sites in 2023 and 45 Joann sites in 2025, which gives it ready-built stores in established shopping centers.

Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Amphenol Corporation and Burlington Stores, Inc. each plan to expand from here.

Amphenol Corporation growth strategy: Amphenol's growth strategy has two parts: sell into secular demand and buy specialized suppliers. On the first, it builds high speed copper and optical interconnects for AI clusters, including the Celerity mezzanine connector family rated to 224 Gb/s PAM4 and XtremePass co-packaged copper interconnects aimed at 448G class links, plus high voltage connectors and sensors for electric vehicles, which carry more wiring and sensing content than combustion vehicles. On the second, it completed five acquisitions in 2025, including Rochester Sensors in August and Trexon in November, and closed the $10.5 billion CommScope Connectivity and Cable Solutions purchase in January 2026. Cash generated by the datacom business funds the next set of deals.

Burlington Stores, Inc. growth strategy: Burlington grows mainly by opening stores. It added 178 gross and 149 net new stores in the 12 months to August 1, 2026, and plans about 115 net openings in fiscal 2026. New stores use a smaller prototype of about 25,000 square feet instead of the very large boxes of the Coat Factory era, which lowers rent and labor per store. Many sites come from retailer bankruptcies: Burlington took on 62 Bed Bath & Beyond leases in 2023 and 45 Joann leases in 2025, and the Joann sites feed a large share of its 2026 openings. Inside existing stores, the Burlington 2.0 plan focuses on leaner inventory, faster turns and buying closer to need.

A closer look at the financial trajectory of Amphenol Corporation and Burlington Stores, Inc. rounds out the comparison.

Amphenol Corporation: Amphenol compounds through acquisition in a fragmented industry. Net sales rose from $12.55 billion in 2023 to $15.22 billion in 2024 and $23.09 billion in 2025, and net income rose from $1.93 billion to $2.42 billion and then $4.27 billion across the same three years. Fiscal 2025 produced a 25.4% GAAP operating margin, $5.4 billion of operating cash flow and $4.4 billion of free cash flow, and the company returned nearly $1.5 billion to shareholders while completing five acquisitions. The pattern is consistent: buy niche connector, cable and sensor makers, leave their management and brands in place, add purchasing scale, and fund the next deal from cash flow and investment grade debt.

Burlington Stores, Inc.: Burlington's total revenue roughly doubled from $5.59 billion in fiscal 2016 to $11.57 billion in fiscal 2025. The exception was fiscal 2020, when pandemic store closures cut revenue to $5.76 billion and produced a $216.5 million net loss. Profit has since grown faster than sales: net income went from $230.1 million in fiscal 2022 to $339.6 million, $503.6 million and $610.2 million over the next three years. Heavy store investment limits free cash flow, which was about $172 million in fiscal 2025 after roughly $1.06 billion of capital spending. In the second quarter of fiscal 2026 (to August 1, 2026), total sales rose 11 percent to $2.998 billion and net income was $184 million, including a $41 million after-tax benefit from tariff refunds. The company raised its full-year adjusted EPS guidance to $11.77 to $11.97.