Amgen vs Xiaomi: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Amgen reported $36.8B of revenue in FY2025 and $7.7B of net income. Xiaomi reported ~$63.6B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$5.8B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Financial summary
Amgen
Amgen is a cash-generative business with high product gross margins. In fiscal 2025 it reported US$36.8 billion of total revenues, US$7.7 billion of GAAP net income, a 25.8% GAAP operating margin, US$8.1 billion of free cash flow and US$5.1 billion of dividends paid. Its results used to depend on a few large franchises, first Epogen and Aranesp, then Enbrel. As those matured Amgen bought revenue instead: Onyx in 2013, Otezla in 2019 and Horizon Therapeutics for US$27.8 billion in 2023. That last deal is also the main reason for the balance sheet it now carries, with US$54.6 billion of debt outstanding at December 31, 2025, debt leverage of about 3.2 times EBITDA and US$2.8 billion of net interest expense in fiscal 2025.
Xiaomi
FY2025 was Xiaomi's strongest year: revenue rose 25.0% to ~$63.6B (RMB457.3B), profit attributable to owners was ~$5.78B (RMB41.6B), and adjusted net profit rose 43.8% to ~$5.45B (RMB39.2B). The Smart EV, AI and other new initiatives segment more than tripled to ~$14.7B (RMB106.1B) on 411,082 vehicle deliveries and posted its first full-year operating profit. 2026 has been weaker. Q1 revenue was ~$13.8B (RMB99.1B) (down 10.9%) with adjusted net profit of ~$848M (RMB6.1B) (down 43.1%). Q2 revenue was ~$15.1B (RMB108.9B) (down 6.1%) with adjusted net profit of ~$862M (RMB6.2B) (down 42.6%) and a 19.8% gross margin. In Q2 the EV segment had ~$3.46B (RMB24.9B) of revenue and an operating loss of about $361M (RMB2.6B).
Revenue and profit by year
Amgen
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $36.8B | $7.7B | 21.0% | +10.0% | Source |
| FY2024 | $33.4B | $4.1B | 12.2% | +18.6% | Source |
| FY2023 | $28.2B | $6.7B | 23.8% | +7.1% | Source |
| FY2022 | $26.3B | $6.6B | 24.9% | +1.3% | Source |
| FY2021 | $26B | $5.9B | 22.7% | +2.2% | Source |
| FY2020 | $25.4B | $7.3B | 28.6% | +8.8% | Source |
| FY2019 | $23.4B | $7.8B | 33.6% | -1.6% | Source |
| FY2018 | $23.7B | $8.4B | 35.3% | +3.9% | Source |
| FY2017 | $22.8B | $2B | 8.7% | -0.6% | Source |
| FY2016 | $23B | $7.7B | 33.6% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Amgen
- U.S. product sales
~70% of total revenues
United States product sales were US$25.66 billion in fiscal 2025, 73% of the US$35.15 billion product sales total and about 70% of total revenues. The largest domestic contributors were Prolia (US$2.98 billion), Enbrel (US$2.20 billion), Otezla (US$1.84 billion), Tepezza (US$1.76 billion), Repatha (US$1.66 billion), Evenity (US$1.60 billion) and Tezspire (US$1.48 billion). Access depends on formulary placement with the large pharmacy benefit managers and on Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement.
- International product sales
~26% of total revenues
Product sales outside the United States were US$9.49 billion in fiscal 2025, 27% of product sales. The largest were Repatha (US$1.35 billion), Aranesp (US$973 million), XGEVA (US$729 million), Vectibix (US$571 million) and Amgevita (US$549 million). Prices are generally lower than in the United States because of government reference pricing and national formulary negotiation.
- Biosimilars
~8% of total revenues
Biosimilars sit inside product sales and generated about US$3.0 billion in fiscal 2025: Mvasi (bevacizumab) US$771 million, Pavblu (aflibercept) US$700 million, Amjevita and Amgevita (adalimumab) US$597 million, Wezlana and Wezenla (ustekinumab) US$273 million, and US$683 million across the smaller biosimilars reported within other products. Amjevita sales fell 22% year over year, so segment growth now comes from the newer launches.
- Rare disease portfolio acquired with Horizon
~13% of total revenues
Also inside product sales, the medicines acquired with Horizon Therapeutics produced about US$4.6 billion in fiscal 2025: Tepezza US$1.90 billion, Krystexxa US$1.34 billion, Uplizna US$655 million and the ultra-rare products US$719 million. Uplizna grew 73% after approvals in IgG4-related disease and generalized myasthenia gravis, while the ultra-rare group fell 5% as Ravicti met generic competition.
- Other revenues
~4% of total revenues
Other revenues, mainly royalties, license income and corporate partner payments, were US$1.60 billion in fiscal 2025, the difference between US$36.75 billion of total revenues and US$35.15 billion of product sales. The line carries high margins but is not a growth priority.
Xiaomi
- Smartphones
40.8% (FY2025)
~$25.9B (RMB186.4B) from Xiaomi, Redmi and POCO phones.
- IoT, Lifestyle Products and Internet Services
36.0% (FY2025)
Remainder of the Smartphone x AIoT segment, including appliances, TVs, wearables, advertising and games.
- Smart EV, AI and Other New Initiatives
23.2% (FY2025)
~$14.7B (RMB106.1B), mostly from SU7 and YU7 vehicle sales.
Business model and strategy
Amgen
How it makes money
Amgen operates a high-risk, high-reward biopharmaceutical business model. It spends heavily on research to discover and engineer new biologic drugs: US$7.3 billion in fiscal 2025, or 20.7% of product sales. Once a drug is approved by the FDA, Amgen secures a patent, granting them a temporary monopoly to sell the drug at a premium price.
Growth strategy
Amgen's growth plan has two parts: scale the newer medicines and buy what the pipeline does not supply. Recent launches and acquired products drove the 10% revenue growth in fiscal 2025, with Tezspire up 52% to US$1.48 billion, Repatha up 36% to US$3.02 billion, Evenity up 34% to US$2.10 billion, Uplizna up 73% to US$655 million and Imdelltra reaching US$627 million in its second year.
Competitive advantage
Amgen's main competitive advantage is experience making complex biologics at commercial scale, which it has done continuously since Epogen launched in 1989.
Xiaomi
How it makes money
Xiaomi sells hardware at relatively thin margins and earns higher margins from internet services delivered through its installed base of devices, including advertising, app distribution and games. Smartphones were the largest single product line in FY2025 at ~$25.9B (RMB186.4B) of revenue. IoT products extend the ecosystem into homes, and many of them are made by ecosystem partner companies Xiaomi has invested in.
Growth strategy
Xiaomi's stated strategy is the Human x Car x Home ecosystem: sell more premium smartphones, add large appliances and other IoT categories, scale the car lineup, and invest in its own AI models and chips, such as the MiMo models and the XRING O1 processor.
Competitive advantage
Xiaomi's advantages are scale in smartphones (top three globally by shipments), a very wide range of connected products under one brand and one operating system, a large device base it can monetize through services, and a fast-growing car business that buyers can connect to the same ecosystem.
Questions about Amgen vs Xiaomi
Which company has higher revenue — Amgen Inc. or Xiaomi Corp.?
Amgen Inc. reported $36.8B (FY2025), while Xiaomi Corp. reported ~$63.6B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Xiaomi Corp. is the larger business, with Amgen Inc. reporting a smaller revenue base.
What is the market cap of Amgen Inc. vs Xiaomi Corp.?
Amgen Inc.'s market capitalisation stands at $228.2B, while Xiaomi Corp.'s is $83.0B. Amgen Inc. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Xiaomi Corp..
Which is more financially efficient — Amgen Inc. or Xiaomi Corp.?
Amgen Inc. generates $1.17M / employee in revenue per employee, while Xiaomi Corp. generates $1.12M / employee. Amgen Inc. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Amgen Inc. and Xiaomi Corp. make money?
Amgen Inc. and Xiaomi Corp. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Amgen Inc.: Amgen operates a high-risk, high-reward biopharmaceutical business model. Xiaomi Corp.: Xiaomi sells hardware at relatively thin margins and earns higher margins from internet services delivered through its installed base of devices, including advertising, app distribution and games.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Amgen Inc. or Xiaomi Corp.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Amgen Inc. trades at 6.2x P/S and Xiaomi Corp. at 1.3x P/S. Amgen Inc. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Xiaomi Corp.. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Amgen Inc. bigger than Xiaomi Corp.?
By last reported revenue, Xiaomi Corp. (~$63.6B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Amgen Inc. ($36.8B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Amgen vs Xiaomi overview