Skip to main content
Market Intelligence Hub

Top 3 Enterprise SaaS Companies

Research methodology by Swet Parvadiya. Company revenue periods vary and are labelled on profile pages.

3 Enterprise SaaS companies with latest reported revenue, headquarters and links to their sourced company profiles.

3 of these companies have a latest reported revenue figure, shown on their profiles with its fiscal year and source. This directory does not publish a combined sector revenue, because parent companies and subsidiaries and different revenue measures overlap.

Enterprise SaaS industry overview

This index covers 3 Enterprise SaaS companies analyzed through their revenue history, business model mechanics, and competitive positioning. All financial data is sourced from official SEC filings, annual reports, and verified investor relations disclosures. Profiles are reviewed by our editorial team before publication to ensure data accuracy and analytical depth.

This hub currently maps 3 organizations to Enterprise SaaS. The revenue spotlight uses each company's latest disclosed figure, converts non-US reporting currencies only for approximate ordering, and links to the underlying company profile for fiscal-year and source context.

Companies profiled
3
With revenue data
3
Top by latest revenue

ServiceTitan, Inc.

$961M (FY2026)

Top companies in this industry (by latest revenue)

All 3 companies in this industry (A-Z)

First 3 companies

Showing 3 of 3

Suggested company profiles

Freshworks Inc.

Freshworks profile: $838.8M 2025 revenue, 2026 outlook near $965M, CEO Dennis Woodside, Freshservice ITSM, Freddy AI and rivals ServiceNow and Zendesk.

ServiceTitan, Inc.

ServiceTitan revenue hit $961M in FY2026 with $82.1B GTV. See how ServiceTitan makes money, who owns it, CEO Ara Mahdessian, and its competitors.

Asana, Inc.

Asana profile: fiscal 2026 revenue of $790.8 million, 180,000 paying customers, CEO Dan Rogers, the Work Graph data model and the StackAI deal.

Competitive Battles

Top Enterprise SaaS Head-to-Head Comparisons

All comparisons
Face-OffVS

Asana vs Linear

Asana is far bigger by revenue: $790.8 million in fiscal 2026 (year ended January 31, 2026) versus Linear's self-reported $100 million-plus in annual recurring revenue as of August 2026. Linear is valued higher relative to its size, reaching a $2.5 billion valuation in an August 2026 employee tender offer (a roughly 25x revenue multiple) versus Asana's public market capitalization of about $2.18 billion on roughly $790.8 million of revenue. Asana serves broad cross-functional teams (marketing, operations, HR) with more than 180,000 paying customers; Linear serves software engineering teams specifically, with over 40,000 paying companies and 177% net revenue retention in 2026.

Compare Analysis
Face-OffVS

Asana vs Monday Com

monday.com is bigger and more profitable than Asana. monday.com reported $1.232 billion of revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 31, 2025) and GAAP net income of $233.6 million, while Asana reported $790.8 million of revenue for fiscal 2026 (year ended January 31, 2026) and a GAAP net loss of $189.0 million. By market capitalization, monday.com was worth about $3.6 billion on September 18, 2026, versus Asana's $2.18 billion on the same date.

Compare Analysis
Face-OffVS

Asana vs Notion

Asana is bigger by revenue and Notion is valued far higher. Asana reported $790.8 million of revenue for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026, versus Notion's self-reported $500 million-plus in annualized revenue as of September 2025, but Asana trades on the NYSE at a market capitalization of about $2.18 billion while a December 2025 employee tender offer valued privately held Notion at $11 billion. Asana posted a GAAP net loss of $189.0 million in fiscal 2026; Notion, which is private, does not disclose profit or loss figures. Dan Rogers has led Asana since July 2025, and Ivan Zhao has led Notion since co-founding it in 2013.

Compare Analysis
Face-OffVS

Freshworks vs Hubspot

HubSpot is the far bigger company by revenue, reporting $3.13 billion for fiscal 2025 against Freshworks' $838.8 million, a roughly 3.7-times gap. Freshworks was the more profitable one on paper, posting $183.7 million of GAAP net income (helped by a fourth-quarter tax benefit) versus HubSpot's $45.9 million, even though Freshworks' revenue is a fraction of HubSpot's. By market value, HubSpot was worth about $11.2 billion as of September 24, 2026, compared with Freshworks at roughly $3.3 billion. On non-GAAP operating margin the two were close in their most recent quarters: HubSpot at 20.3% and Freshworks at 24% in Q2 2026.

Compare Analysis
Face-OffVS

Asana vs Atlassian

Asana is a user-friendly, flexible project management tool designed for general business teams (marketing, operations, design). Atlassian (Jira) is a complex, deeply integrated issue-tracking tool built explicitly for software engineers and product managers using Agile methodologies.

Compare Analysis
Face-OffVS

Asana vs Clickup

Asana is a clean, focused, reliable project management tool that relies on integrations for peripheral tasks. ClickUp is an ambitious, customizable 'all-in-one' workspace designed to eliminate the need for any other productivity apps.

Compare Analysis

Editorial Methodology

Company Research

We use company filings, annual reports, company statements and press reports, with primary sources preferred where available. Each financial row shows its recorded source. Full-year figures are separated from annualized run-rates, partial periods and forecasts; unaudited figures carry a label. Source detail varies by company, so check the linked material when the reporting basis matters.

1. Primary Sources

Public companies may provide filings and annual reports. Private-company figures may come from statements or press coverage. A missing figure stays missing, and a source link should identify where its number came from.

2. Expert Curation

We organize company records and review claims for strategic context, source quality and clarity. Pages show a review date where one is recorded.

3. Multi-Pass Audit

Technical checks flag inconsistent figures and missing links. Editorial review of the underlying source remains necessary for claims those checks cannot verify.

Swet Parvadiya
SEC filings & public records methodology
Sourced from public financial records
Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.