Top 4 Cloud Computing Companies
4 Cloud Computing companies with latest reported revenue, headquarters and links to their sourced company profiles.
4 of these companies have a latest reported revenue figure, shown on their profiles with its fiscal year and source. This directory does not publish a combined sector revenue, because parent companies and subsidiaries and different revenue measures overlap.
Cloud Computing industry overview
This index covers 4 Cloud Computing companies analyzed through their revenue history, business model mechanics, and competitive positioning. All financial data is sourced from official SEC filings, annual reports, and verified investor relations disclosures. Profiles are reviewed by our editorial team before publication to ensure data accuracy and analytical depth.
This hub currently maps 4 organizations to Cloud Computing. The revenue spotlight uses each company's latest disclosed figure, converts non-US reporting currencies only for approximate ordering, and links to the underlying company profile for fiscal-year and source context.
Top companies in this industry (by latest revenue)
Oracle profile: FY2026 revenue of $67.36B, $664B in contracted backlog, co-CEOs Clay Magouyrk and Mike Sicilia, Larry Ellison's 40% stake, business model and
CoreWeave profile: $5.13B 2025 revenue, $12.4B-$13.2B 2026 guidance, $104B backlog, CEO Michael Intrator, NVIDIA ties, Meta and OpenAI contracts, and rivals.
DigitalOcean (NYSE: DOCN) earned $901M revenue in 2025; Q2 2026 ARR hit $1.125B, up 29%. CEO Paddy Srinivasan, AI-Native Cloud, Droplets, Cloudways, rivals.
Netlify profile: 10M+ developers (Dec 2025), $2B valuation from its 2021 Series D, CEO Mathias Biilmann, credit-based pricing, AI agent tools and Vercel
All 4 companies in this industry (A-Z)
First 4 companies
Suggested company profiles
CoreWeave profile: $5.13B 2025 revenue, $12.4B-$13.2B 2026 guidance, $104B backlog, CEO Michael Intrator, NVIDIA ties, Meta and OpenAI contracts, and rivals.
DigitalOcean (NYSE: DOCN) earned $901M revenue in 2025; Q2 2026 ARR hit $1.125B, up 29%. CEO Paddy Srinivasan, AI-Native Cloud, Droplets, Cloudways, rivals.
Oracle profile: FY2026 revenue of $67.36B, $664B in contracted backlog, co-CEOs Clay Magouyrk and Mike Sicilia, Larry Ellison's 40% stake, business model and
Netlify profile: 10M+ developers (Dec 2025), $2B valuation from its 2021 Series D, CEO Mathias Biilmann, credit-based pricing, AI agent tools and Vercel
Top Cloud Computing Head-to-Head Comparisons
Microsoft vs Oracle
Microsoft is far bigger than Oracle by every major measure: $331.8 billion in revenue and $133.7 billion in net income for fiscal 2026 (ended June 30, 2026), versus Oracle's $67.36 billion in revenue and $17.09 billion in net income for its fiscal 2026 (ended May 31, 2026). Microsoft employed about 223,000 people and was worth roughly $3.83 trillion in market capitalization in late September 2026, compared with Oracle's about 141,000 employees and roughly $393.6 billion market capitalization. Oracle is growing faster in cloud infrastructure, though: its Oracle Cloud Infrastructure revenue grew 121% to $7.4 billion in the quarter ended August 31, 2026, far outpacing Microsoft's overall cloud growth.
Oracle vs Salesforce
Oracle is bigger than Salesforce by every core financial measure: $67.36 billion of revenue and $17.09 billion of net income in fiscal 2026 (ended May 31, 2026), versus Salesforce's $41.525 billion of revenue and $7.457 billion of net income in its fiscal 2026 (ended January 31, 2026). Oracle also carries the larger stock market value, about $393.6 billion as of September 30, 2026, against Salesforce's roughly $185.4 billion as of September 29, 2026. Oracle is led by co-CEOs Clay Magouyrk and Mike Sicilia with chairman Larry Ellison, while Salesforce is still run by founder Marc Benioff. Oracle is also growing faster right now, with revenue up 30% to $19.3 billion in the quarter ended August 31, 2026, compared with Salesforce's 11% growth to $11.345 billion in the quarter ended July 31, 2026.
Oracle vs Sap
Oracle is the larger company overall: it reported $67.36 billion in revenue for fiscal 2026 (ended May 31, 2026) versus SAP's EUR 36.8 billion, roughly $43.2 billion at the 2025 year-end exchange rate, for calendar 2025. Oracle is also more profitable in dollar terms, with $17.09 billion of FY2026 net income against SAP's ~$8.09 billion (EUR 7.16 billion), and carries a larger stock market value, about $418.6 billion versus SAP's $242.7 billion as of October 1, 2026. But in the specific ERP applications market the two are nearly tied, with Oracle's roughly 6.68% global ERP revenue share in 2025 just edging out SAP's 6.60%, the second straight year Oracle has outranked the historically dominant ERP vendor.
Oracle vs Workday
Oracle is far bigger than Workday: $67.36 billion of fiscal 2026 revenue (year ended May 31, 2026) versus Workday's $9.552 billion (year ended January 31, 2026), a gap of roughly 7 to 1. Oracle is also more profitable in relative terms, with a 25.4% net margin ($17.09 billion net income) against Workday's 7.3% margin ($693 million net income). Oracle is led by co-CEOs Clay Magouyrk and Mike Sicilia; Workday is led by co-founder and returning CEO Aneel Bhusri. Within human capital management software specifically, Workday still has a far larger enterprise customer base than Oracle Fusion HCM, even though Oracle's overall business is many times bigger.
Amazon vs Coreweave
Amazon (AWS) is the largest cloud provider on Earth, offering every possible enterprise software service and computing option. CoreWeave is a specialized, fast-growing startup cloud provider that focuses exclusively on providing large clusters of NVIDIA GPUs for training complex Artificial Intelligence models.
Amazon vs Digitalocean
Amazon (AWS) is the world's largest cloud computing provider, offering a vast and complex array of tools designed for large corporate IT infrastructure. DigitalOcean is a smaller, niche cloud provider beloved by solo developers and startups for its simplicity, ease of use, and transparent pricing.
Related industries
Editorial Methodology
We use company filings, annual reports, company statements and press reports, with primary sources preferred where available. Each financial row shows its recorded source. Full-year figures are separated from annualized run-rates, partial periods and forecasts; unaudited figures carry a label. Source detail varies by company, so check the linked material when the reporting basis matters.
Public companies may provide filings and annual reports. Private-company figures may come from statements or press coverage. A missing figure stays missing, and a source link should identify where its number came from.
We organize company records and review claims for strategic context, source quality and clarity. Pages show a review date where one is recorded.
Technical checks flag inconsistent figures and missing links. Editorial review of the underlying source remains necessary for claims those checks cannot verify.
