Skip to main content

Samsung vs Uber: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

Samsung reported ~$236.9B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$31.4B of net income. Uber reported $52B of revenue in FY2025 and $10.1B of net income.

Latest financial snapshot

Samsung

Latest revenue
~$236.9B (FY2025)
Net income
~$31.4B
Net margin
13.3%
Revenue growth
+4.5% a year, FY2021–FY2025

Uber

Latest revenue
$52B (FY2025)
Net income
$10.1B
Net margin
19.3%
Revenue growth
+26.5% a year, FY2017–FY2025

Financial summary

Samsung

Samsung's earnings follow the memory cycle. Revenue fell from ~$215 billion (KRW 302.2 trillion) in 2022 to ~$184 billion (KRW 258.9 trillion) in 2023 during a chip downturn, then recovered to ~$214 billion (KRW 300.9 trillion) in 2024 and ~$237 billion (KRW 333.6 trillion) in 2025, when net income reached about $31.5 billion (KRW 44.3 trillion). In 2026, AI server demand created a memory shortage. Q1 operating profit of ~$40.6 billion (KRW 57.2 trillion) exceeded the full-year 2025 total, and Q2 reached ~$63.5 billion (KRW 89.5 trillion) on ~$122 billion (KRW 171.5 trillion) revenue. Higher memory costs also squeezed Samsung's own devices: the MX and Networks unit lost ~$497 million (KRW 0.7 trillion) in Q2 2026 on ~$23.6 billion (KRW 33.2 trillion) revenue.

Uber

Uber moved from years of heavy losses to steady profitability. Revenue grew from $37.3 billion in FY2023 to $44.0 billion in FY2024 and $52.0 billion in FY2025, while net income attributable to Uber was $10.053 billion in FY2025 (FY2024's $9.856 billion included a large tax valuation allowance release). Growth continued into 2026: Q2 2026 gross bookings rose 24% year over year to $58.0 billion and revenue rose about 12% to roughly $14.2 billion, and trailing twelve-month free cash flow passed $10 billion. The pending Delivery Hero deal, valued at $14.8 billion in equity, would be Uber's largest acquisition.

Revenue and profit by year

Samsung

Samsung revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025~$236.9B~$31.4B13.3%+10.9%Source
FY2024~$213.6B~$23.9B11.2%+16.2%Source
FY2023~$183.8B~$10.3B5.6%-14.3%Source
FY2022~$214.6B~$38.9B18.1%+8.1%Source
FY2021~$198.5B~$27.9B14.0%—Source
Full Samsung financials

Uber

Uber revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025$52B$10.1B19.3%+18.3%Source
FY2024$44B$9.9B22.4%+18.0%Source
FY2023$37.3B$1.9B5.1%+17.0%Source
FY2022$31.9B-$9.1B-28.7%+82.6%Source
FY2021$17.5B-$496M-2.8%+56.7%Source
FY2020$11.1B-$6.8B-60.8%-14.3%Source
FY2019$13B-$8.5B-65.4%+24.6%Source
FY2018$10.4B$997M9.6%+31.5%Source
FY2017$7.9B-$4B-50.8%—Source
Full Uber financials

Where the revenue comes from

Samsung

  • Memory semiconductors
  • Foundry and system LSI
  • Galaxy smartphones and mobile devices
  • Display panels
  • TVs and appliances
  • Network equipment
  • Harman automotive and audio

Uber

  • Mobility

    ~52% (Q2 2026)

    Fees from ride-hailing trips, including UberX, Uber Black, taxis and autonomous rides on partner vehicles. About $7.36B of Q2 2026 revenue.

  • Delivery

    ~37% (Q2 2026)

    Fees from Uber Eats restaurant, grocery and retail orders, plus delivery advertising. About $5.25B of Q2 2026 revenue.

  • Freight

    ~11% (Q2 2026)

    Uber Freight brokerage and managed transportation services for shippers.

Business model and strategy

Samsung

How it makes money

Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses. Device Solutions (DS) makes and sells memory (DRAM, HBM, NAND), System LSI chips such as Exynos processors and ISOCELL image sensors, and contract foundry manufacturing.

Growth strategy

Samsung's growth plan centers on AI memory: ramping HBM4 for Nvidia and AMD accelerators, developing HBM4E, and adding DRAM capacity at Pyeongtaek. In foundry it is pursuing 2nm gate-all-around production and building its Taylor, Texas fab to win customers from TSMC. On the device side it relies on Galaxy AI features, foldables and premium TVs to defend share against Apple and Chinese brands.

Competitive advantage

Samsung's edge is manufacturing scale and breadth. It is the largest memory producer and one of only three major DRAM makers, alongside SK hynix and Micron. That lets it capture pricing upswings like the 2026 AI-driven shortage.

Samsung business model in full

Uber

How it makes money

Uber does not own most of the cars, restaurants or trucks on its platform. It matches riders with independent drivers (Mobility), consumers with restaurants, grocers and couriers (Delivery), and shippers with carriers (Freight), and keeps a share of each transaction as revenue.

Growth strategy

Uber's growth strategy centers on cross-platform engagement between Mobility and Delivery, Uber One membership, advertising, autonomous-vehicle partnerships, and international delivery scale. The €41.50-per-share Delivery Hero tender, launched September 18, 2026 after Delivery Hero's boards recommended it on September 2, would extend delivery density; Uber expects closing in the second half of 2027.

Competitive advantage

Uber's advantage comes from local marketplace liquidity, brand recognition, routing data, payments, driver and courier networks, merchant relationships, subscriptions, and cross-sell between Mobility and Delivery.

Uber business model in full

Questions about Samsung vs Uber

Which company has higher revenue — Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. or Uber Technologies, Inc.?

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. reported ~$236.9B (FY2025), while Uber Technologies, Inc. reported $52.0B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the larger business, with Uber Technologies, Inc. reporting a smaller revenue base.

What is the market cap of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. vs Uber Technologies, Inc.?

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s market capitalisation stands at $1.33T, while Uber Technologies, Inc.'s is $142.0B. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Uber Technologies, Inc..

Which is more financially efficient — Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. or Uber Technologies, Inc.?

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generates $914k / employee in revenue per employee, while Uber Technologies, Inc. generates $1.53M / employee. Uber Technologies, Inc. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.

How do Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Uber Technologies, Inc. make money?

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Uber Technologies, Inc. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses. Uber Technologies, Inc.: Uber does not own most of the cars, restaurants or trucks on its platform.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. or Uber Technologies, Inc.?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. trades at 5.6x P/S and Uber Technologies, Inc. at 2.7x P/S. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Uber Technologies, Inc.. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. bigger than Uber Technologies, Inc.?

By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (~$236.9B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Uber Technologies, Inc. ($52.0B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Samsung vs Uber overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.