Porsche vs Samsung: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Porsche reported ~$41B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$350.3M of net income. Samsung reported ~$236.9B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$31.4B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Financial summary
Porsche
Porsche's financials swung from a record 2023 (~$45.8 billion (EUR40.53 billion) revenue, ~$5.83 billion (EUR5.16 billion) profit after tax) to a sharp reset. In 2025 revenue fell 9.5% to ~$41 billion (EUR36.27 billion), operating profit dropped to ~$467 million (EUR413 million) (1.1% return on sales) and profit after tax was ~$350 million (EUR310 million), hit by costs of reworking the product plan, U.S. tariffs and weak China demand. In the first half of 2026 revenue was ~$19.5 billion (EUR17.23 billion) (prior year ~$20.5 billion (EUR18.16 billion)), operating profit rose 34% to ~$1.53 billion (EUR1.35 billion) and return on sales improved to 7.8%, helped by lower one-off charges.
Samsung
Samsung's earnings follow the memory cycle. Revenue fell from ~$215 billion (KRW 302.2 trillion) in 2022 to ~$184 billion (KRW 258.9 trillion) in 2023 during a chip downturn, then recovered to ~$214 billion (KRW 300.9 trillion) in 2024 and ~$237 billion (KRW 333.6 trillion) in 2025, when net income reached about $31.5 billion (KRW 44.3 trillion). In 2026, AI server demand created a memory shortage. Q1 operating profit of ~$40.6 billion (KRW 57.2 trillion) exceeded the full-year 2025 total, and Q2 reached ~$63.5 billion (KRW 89.5 trillion) on ~$122 billion (KRW 171.5 trillion) revenue. Higher memory costs also squeezed Samsung's own devices: the MX and Networks unit lost ~$497 million (KRW 0.7 trillion) in Q2 2026 on ~$23.6 billion (KRW 33.2 trillion) revenue.
Revenue and profit by year
Porsche
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | ~$41B | ~$350.3M | 0.9% | -9.5% | Source |
| FY2024 | ~$45.3B | ~$4.1B | 9.0% | -1.1% | Source |
| FY2023 | ~$45.8B | ~$5.8B | 12.7% | +7.7% | Source |
| FY2022 | ~$42.5B | ~$5.6B | 13.2% | +13.6% | Source |
| FY2021 | ~$37.4B | ~$4.6B | 12.2% | — | Source |
Samsung
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | ~$236.9B | ~$31.4B | 13.3% | +10.9% | Source |
| FY2024 | ~$213.6B | ~$23.9B | 11.2% | +16.2% | Source |
| FY2023 | ~$183.8B | ~$10.3B | 5.6% | -14.3% | Source |
| FY2022 | ~$214.6B | ~$38.9B | 18.1% | +8.1% | Source |
| FY2021 | ~$198.5B | ~$27.9B | 14.0% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Porsche
- Vehicle sales
Not formally reported
Sales of 911, Cayenne, Macan, Panamera, Taycan, and 718 vehicles.
- Personalization and options
Not formally reported
High-margin customization, trims, performance packages, and limited editions.
- Financial services
Not formally reported
Financing and leasing for Porsche customers.
- Parts, service, and brand
Not formally reported
After-sales, accessories, motorsport-linked products, and brand experiences.
Samsung
- Memory semiconductors
- Foundry and system LSI
- Galaxy smartphones and mobile devices
- Display panels
- TVs and appliances
- Network equipment
- Harman automotive and audio
Business model and strategy
Porsche
How it makes money
Porsche earns most of its money selling premium vehicles at high average prices. SUVs (Cayenne and Macan) supply most of the volume, the 911 anchors the brand and its pricing power, and the Panamera, Taycan and 718 fill out the range. Margin comes from mix and options: personalization through Porsche Exclusive Manufaktur and Sonderwunsch adds high-margin revenue per car.
Growth strategy
After 2025, Porsche moved from an EV-first plan to a flexible powertrain mix. It is extending combustion and hybrid versions of existing lines, adding the T-Hybrid 911, keeping the electric Taycan, Macan and the new Cayenne Electric, and planning a combustion Macan for 2028 after electric Macan sales fell in the first half of 2026.
Competitive advantage
Porsche's edge is a 60-year 911 lineage that few rivals can copy, a reputation for cars that are both track-capable and usable every day, and access to Volkswagen Group platforms and purchasing scale. The Cayenne shares architecture with the Audi Q7 and VW Touareg, and the electric Macan uses the PPE platform co-developed with Audi, which spreads development cost over far more vehicles than Porsche sells alone.
Samsung
How it makes money
Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses. Device Solutions (DS) makes and sells memory (DRAM, HBM, NAND), System LSI chips such as Exynos processors and ISOCELL image sensors, and contract foundry manufacturing.
Growth strategy
Samsung's growth plan centers on AI memory: ramping HBM4 for Nvidia and AMD accelerators, developing HBM4E, and adding DRAM capacity at Pyeongtaek. In foundry it is pursuing 2nm gate-all-around production and building its Taylor, Texas fab to win customers from TSMC. On the device side it relies on Galaxy AI features, foldables and premium TVs to defend share against Apple and Chinese brands.
Competitive advantage
Samsung's edge is manufacturing scale and breadth. It is the largest memory producer and one of only three major DRAM makers, alongside SK hynix and Micron. That lets it capture pricing upswings like the 2026 AI-driven shortage.
Questions about Porsche vs Samsung
Which company has higher revenue — Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG reported ~$41B (FY2025), while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. reported ~$236.9B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the larger business, with Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG reporting a smaller revenue base.
What is the market cap of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG's market capitalisation stands at $41.4B, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s is $1.33T. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
Which is more financially efficient — Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG generates $981k / employee in revenue per employee, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generates $914k / employee. Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. make money?
Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG: Porsche earns most of its money selling premium vehicles at high average prices. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG trades at 1.0x P/S and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. at 5.6x P/S. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG bigger than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (~$236.9B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG (~$41B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Porsche vs Samsung overview