Skip to main content

Oracle vs SpaceX: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

Oracle reported $67.4B of revenue in FY2026 and $17.1B of net income. SpaceX reported $18.7B of revenue in FY2025 and a net loss of $4.9B.

Latest financial snapshot

Oracle

Latest revenue
$67.4B (FY2026)
Net income
$17.1B
Net margin
25.4%
Revenue growth
+6.6% a year, FY2017–FY2026

SpaceX

Latest revenue
$18.7B (FY2025)
Net income
-$4.9B
Net margin
-26.4%
Revenue growth
+34.1% a year, FY2023–FY2025

Financial summary

Oracle

Oracle's revenue grew from $39.1 billion in FY2020 to $57.4 billion in FY2025 and $67.36 billion in FY2026, when net income was $17.09 billion. Growth is now driven by cloud: Q1 FY2027 cloud revenue (IaaS plus SaaS) was $11.6 billion, up 62%, and operating cash flow was a record $23 billion for the quarter. The other side of the ledger is capex. FY2026 capital spending of $55.7 billion pushed free cash flow negative, and Oracle has funded the gap with bond issuance and equity sales. Management guides to at least $90 billion of FY2027 revenue and non-GAAP EPS of $8.10.

SpaceX

SpaceX revenue grew from $10.387 billion in 2023 to $14.015 billion in 2024 and $18.674 billion in 2025, but heavy Starship, Starlink, and AI spending produced a $4.937 billion FY2025 net loss. In Q2 2026, its first quarter reported as a public company, revenue was $7.8 billion (up 92%), adjusted EBITDA was $3.5 billion, net loss was $541 million, and backlog was $47.5 billion. The IPO raised $85.7 billion and a $25 billion bond sale added more liquidity. In late September 2026 the stock traded near $145, for a market capitalization around $1.9 trillion.

Revenue and profit by year

Oracle

Oracle revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2026$67.4B$17.1B25.4%+17.3%Source
FY2025$57.4B$12.4B21.7%+8.4%Source
FY2024$53B$10.5B19.8%+6.0%Source
FY2023$50B$8.5B17.0%+17.7%Source
FY2022$42.4B$6.7B15.8%+4.8%Source
FY2021$40.5B$13.7B34.0%+3.6%Source
FY2020$39.1B$10.1B25.9%-1.1%Source
FY2019$39.5B$11.1B28.1%+0.3%Source
FY2018$39.4B$3.6B9.1%+4.2%Source
FY2017$37.8B$9.5B25.0%—Source
Full Oracle financials

SpaceX

SpaceX revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025$18.7B-$4.9B-26.4%+33.2%Source
FY2024$14B$18M0.1%+34.9%Source
FY2023$10.4B-$4.6B-44.6%—Source
Full SpaceX financials

Where the revenue comes from

Oracle

  • Cloud Services and License SupportLargest

    OCI, SaaS, database services, and recurring support revenue.

  • Cloud License and On-Premise LicenseMaterial

    New licenses and cloud license rights for enterprise software.

  • ServicesMaterial

    Consulting, support, and implementation work.

  • HardwareSmaller

    Exadata, engineered systems, and related hardware products.

SpaceX

  • Launch services

    Not formally reported

    Commercial, civil, and national-security launches priced by rocket, payload, orbit, and service type.

  • Starlink consumer broadband

    Not formally reported

    Monthly subscriptions and terminals for residential and mobile broadband.

  • Enterprise and government connectivity

    Not formally reported

    Starlink enterprise, aviation, maritime, backup connectivity, Starshield, and government services.

  • AI infrastructure

    Not formally reported

    Compute and cloud services from SpaceX's AI segment, formed through the xAI combination; $2.6B revenue in Q2 2026.

Business model and strategy

Oracle

How it makes money

Oracle sells to businesses and governments, not consumers. Its largest revenue line is cloud services and license support: customers pay recurring fees for OCI compute, storage, GPUs and database services, for Fusion Cloud ERP, HCM, SCM and NetSuite subscriptions, and for annual support on licensed Oracle Database and middleware.

Growth strategy

Oracle's growth plan rests on renting AI training and inference capacity at very large scale. It is building data centers for OpenAI under the Stargate program (a partnership OpenAI describes as over $300 billion across five years and up to 4.5 gigawatts), and it also serves xAI, Meta, NVIDIA and AMD workloads.

Competitive advantage

Oracle's edge comes from its installed base. Oracle Database runs core financial, telecom and government systems, and moving those workloads is slow, expensive and risky, which keeps support revenue recurring. OCI adds a price-performance pitch built on bare-metal servers and RDMA networking for large GPU clusters, and Oracle can offer the same database inside rival clouds.

Oracle business model in full

SpaceX

How it makes money

SpaceX earns money in three segments. Space sells launches on Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, plus Dragon cargo and crew missions for NASA, the U.S. government, and commercial customers ($962 million in Q2 2026).

Growth strategy

SpaceX's growth plan has four parts: add Starlink subscribers and raise enterprise, aviation, and mobile revenue; launch higher-capacity Starlink V3 satellites on Starship; expand national-security work through Starshield and launch contracts (over $6 billion in U.S. government awards in Q2 2026); and scale AI compute capacity, which grew from 400 megawatts a year earlier to 1.4 gigawatts at the end of Q2 2026.

Competitive advantage

SpaceX's advantage is reusability combined with vertical integration. It builds its own engines, avionics, rockets, and satellites, and reflies Falcon 9 boosters many times, which lowers its marginal launch cost below rivals that still expend most hardware. Being its own largest launch customer lets it deploy Starlink at a cadence no other operator has matched, and Starlink revenue then funds Starship.

SpaceX business model in full

Questions about Oracle vs SpaceX

Which company has higher revenue — Oracle Corporation or SpaceX?

Oracle Corporation reported $67.4B (FY2026), while SpaceX reported $18.7B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Oracle Corporation is the larger business, with SpaceX reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.

What is the market cap of Oracle Corporation vs SpaceX?

Oracle Corporation's market capitalisation stands at $393.6B, while SpaceX's is $1.92T. SpaceX carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Oracle Corporation.

Which is more financially efficient — Oracle Corporation or SpaceX?

Oracle Corporation generates $478k / employee in revenue per employee, while SpaceX generates $826k / employee. SpaceX shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.

How do Oracle Corporation and SpaceX make money?

Oracle Corporation and SpaceX generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Oracle Corporation: Oracle sells to businesses and governments, not consumers. SpaceX: SpaceX earns money in three segments.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Oracle Corporation or SpaceX?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Oracle Corporation trades at 5.8x P/S and SpaceX at 102.8x P/S. SpaceX commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Oracle Corporation. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is Oracle Corporation bigger than SpaceX?

By last reported revenue, Oracle Corporation ($67.4B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to SpaceX ($18.7B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Oracle vs SpaceX overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.