Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. vs PROTON Holdings Berhad: Strategic Comparison
Direct Answer
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. had ~$80.5B (FY2026), while PROTON Holdings Berhad had $97.5M (unaudited) (FY2024). Their fiscal years differ, so the figures are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.
Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Field | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | PROTON Holdings Berhad |
|---|---|---|
| Latest annual revenue | ~$80.5B (FY2026) | $97.5M (unaudited) (FY2024) |
| Founded | 1933 | 1983 |
| Employees | 120,079 | N/A |
| Market Cap | $7.0B | N/A |
| Headquarters | Japan | Malaysia |
| Revenue / Employee | $670k / employee | N/A |
| Valuation Multiple | 0.1x P/S | N/A |
Strategic Positioning
Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Strategic Vector
FY2026 Revenue BaselineRe:Nissan, announced in May 2025, is a restructuring plan before it is a growth plan.
PROTON Holdings Berhad Strategic Vector
FY2024 Revenue BaselineProton's turnaround rests on licensing rather than inventing: Geely platforms cut development costs, while Proton keeps the national brand, local supply chain and dealer network. The open question is whether exports and EVs can make it less dependent on Malaysia's roughly 800,000-unit annual market.
Quick Stats Comparison
| Metric | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | PROTON Holdings Berhad |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ~$80.5B (FY2026) | $97.5M (unaudited) (FY2024) |
| Founded | 1933 | 1983 |
| Headquarters | Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan | Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia |
| Market Cap | $7.0B | N/A |
| Employees | 120,079 | — |
| Revenue / Employee | $670k / employee | N/A |
| Valuation Multiple | 0.1x P/S | N/A |
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Revenue vs PROTON Holdings Berhad Revenue — Year by Year
| Year | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | PROTON Holdings Berhad | Higher reported revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | ~$80.5B | N/A | Only one figure available |
| 2025 | ~$84.6B | N/A | Only one figure available |
| 2024 | ~$85B | $97.5M (unaudited) | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (approx. USD) |
| 2023 | ~$71B | $82.0M (unaudited) | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (approx. USD) |
| 2022 | ~$56.4B | $70.0M (unaudited) | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (approx. USD) |
Business Model Breakdown
Overview: Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. vs PROTON Holdings Berhad
This in-depth comparison examines Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and PROTON Holdings Berhad across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. on its own, evaluating PROTON Holdings Berhad, or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and PROTON Holdings Berhad is widest.
On the headline numbers, annual revenue is ~$80.5B (FY2026) for Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and $97.5M (unaudited) (FY2024) for PROTON Holdings Berhad, while their respective market capitalizations stand at $7.0B and N/A. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. is headquartered in Japan and PROTON Holdings Berhad in Malaysia, and those different home markets shape how each company competes.
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.: Nissan is one of Japan's largest and oldest automakers. It built the Datsun brand, popularized the Z and GT-R sports cars, and launched the Leaf in 2010 as one of the first mass-market EVs. Since the 2018 arrest of former chairman Carlos Ghosn, Nissan has been through repeated restructurings. Merger talks with Honda collapsed in February 2025, Ivan Espinosa replaced Makoto Uchida as CEO in April 2025, and the company is now in a cost-cutting turnaround called Re:Nissan while it keeps its alliance ties with Renault and Mitsubishi Motors. The company is headquartered in Yokohama, Japan.
PROTON Holdings Berhad: Proton is the carmaker Malaysia built to industrialise. After years of losses and shrinking share in the 2010s, the 2017 sale of a 49.9% stake to Geely gave it modern platforms, and SUVs such as the X70 and X50 restored its position as Malaysia's No. 2 brand. By 2026 it had consolidated production at Tanjong Malim, launched an all-new Saga designed in-house on its own AMA platform, and become Malaysia's EV sales leader through e.MAS. The company is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. Proton was founded in 1983 in Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia, initiated by Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir Mohamad as the centerpiece of the National Car Project before forming a transformative partnership with Geely in 2017.
Business Models: How Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and PROTON Holdings Berhad Make Money
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and PROTON Holdings Berhad pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and PROTON Holdings Berhad.
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. business model: Nissan makes money in two segments. The automobile business designs, builds and wholesales Nissan, Infiniti and NISMO vehicles (crossovers such as the Rogue/X-Trail, Kicks and Qashqai, sedans such as the Sentra and Altima, pickups such as the Frontier/Navara, and EVs such as the Leaf, Ariya and Sakura) to franchised dealers, and also sells parts. The sales financing segment (for example NMAC in the U.S.) earns interest and lease income from retail loans, leases and dealer floorplan credit. In China, Nissan sells mainly through its 50:50 joint venture with Dongfeng, which is accounted for under the equity method, so those sales are not in reported revenue.
PROTON Holdings Berhad business model: Proton makes money by designing, assembling and selling passenger cars, mostly in Malaysia. Vehicles are built at Tanjong Malim, Perak, and sold through Proton Edar's network of 187 outlets (end-2025), plus a separate network of 48 e.MAS dealerships run by subsidiary PRO-NET. Additional income comes from spare parts and after-sales service, exports through Proton International Corporation (set up in July 2025) and contract assembly of Geely models for Geely's export markets. Proton's revenue and profit are reported inside DRB-HICOM's automotive segment and are not disclosed separately.
Competitive Advantage: Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. vs PROTON Holdings Berhad
The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. stack up against those of PROTON Holdings Berhad.
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. competitive advantage: Nissan's advantage is a global manufacturing footprint and long experience with electric vehicles. It launched the mass-market Leaf in 2010, which gives it more than a decade of data on how batteries perform in everyday use. Its e-POWER system, in which a petrol engine charges the battery and never drives the wheels, offers an option for markets with few EV chargers.
PROTON Holdings Berhad competitive advantage: Proton's edge comes from pairing local scale with Geely technology. It licenses proven Geely platforms, engines and software, which cut development cost and time, while keeping national-car brand loyalty, high local content (RM3.2 billion of parts bought from Malaysian suppliers in 2025) and the country's second-largest dealer network. In EVs, the locally assembled e.MAS 5 and e.MAS 7 give it price and network advantages over imported rivals.
Growth Strategy: Where Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and PROTON Holdings Berhad Are Headed
Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and PROTON Holdings Berhad each plan to expand from here.
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. growth strategy: Re:Nissan, announced in May 2025, is a restructuring plan before it is a growth plan. It targets ~$3.35 billion (¥500 billion) in fixed and variable cost savings against FY2024, about 20,000 job reductions, and cutting vehicle plants from 17 to 10 by FY2027. Vehicle production at Oppama will end in FY2027 and move to Nissan Motor Kyushu. Nissan also agreed to sell its Yokohama headquarters building for ~$650 million (¥97 billion). On the product side, it is focusing on its core markets (the U.S., Japan, China, Mexico, the Middle East and Europe), adding hybrids and plug-in hybrids in the U.S., and leaning on partners such as Honda (software-defined vehicle components), Dongfeng (China NEVs) and Renault and Mitsubishi (shared models) to cut development costs.
PROTON Holdings Berhad growth strategy: Proton's growth levers are electrification, exports and plant utilisation. It opened Malaysia's first dedicated EV assembly plant at Tanjong Malim in September 2025 (20,000 units a year initially, scalable to 45,000), formed Proton International Corporation in July 2025 to run exports, re-entered Singapore with the e.MAS 7 in 2025 and assembles Geely cars for export, which pushed January-August 2026 exports to 6,059 units, already above the full-year 2025 total.
Financial Picture: Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. vs PROTON Holdings Berhad
A closer look at the financial trajectory of Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and PROTON Holdings Berhad rounds out the comparison.
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.: Revenue peaked at ~$85 billion (¥12.69 trillion) in FY2023 (ended March 2024), with net income of ~$2.86 billion (¥426.6 billion). Then weak U.S. pricing, an ageing lineup and share losses in China hit results. FY2024 revenue was ~$84.6 billion (¥12.63 trillion) with a ~$4.5 billion (¥670.9 billion) net loss, driven by impairments and restructuring charges. FY2025 revenue fell 4.9% to ~$80.4 billion (¥12.0 trillion) and the net loss narrowed to ~$3.57 billion (¥533.1 billion), while operating profit stayed positive at ~$389 million (¥58.0 billion) (0.5% margin). Automotive free cash flow was minus ~$3.22 billion (¥480.8 billion) for the year but turned positive (~$750 million (¥112 billion)) in the second half. Nissan ended FY2025 with ~$7.84 billion (¥1.17 trillion) of automotive net cash and ~$24.1 billion (¥3.6 trillion) of total liquidity, and paid no dividend. In Q1 FY2026 (April to June 2026), revenue rose 9.5% to ~$19.9 billion (¥2.964 trillion) and operating profit was ~$522 million (¥77.9 billion), against a ~$530 million (¥79.1 billion) loss a year earlier. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. is a colossal Japanese multinational automobile manufacturer and a core member of the Renault–Nissan–Mitsubishi Alliance, commanding a market valuation generally exceeding $15 billion.
PROTON Holdings Berhad: Proton is privately held, so it does not publish revenue or profit. The best public indicators are volume and share: 150,975 units in 2023, about 153,000 in 2024, 157,976 in 2025 and 141,421 in January-August 2026 (+40.2% year on year). Its results flow into DRB-HICOM's automotive segment; DRB-HICOM as a whole reported FY2025 revenue of about RM17.3 billion, which also includes banking, services, property and other car brands. Management targeted around 200,000 sales for 2026.
Company-Specific SWOT Notes
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
Established multinational manufacturing footprint across Japan, North America, and Europe, with unique 100% electric motor drive e-POWER hybrid technology delivering high fuel efficiency.
Despite massive internal political chaos, the Alliance provides absolutely critical, massive global scale for purchasing parts and sharing highly expensive EV development platforms.
Aging product portfolios in key markets, high promotional dealer incentives in North America, and intense price competition in China eroding consolidated operating profits.
Nissan completely squandered its massive early EV lead (with the LEAF) by failing to update its highly uncompetitive, severely aging vehicle lineup, losing massive market share to Hyundai and Toyota.
Joint software and EV architecture collaboration with Honda and Renault to share multi-billion-dollar R&D costs for next-generation electric vehicles and autonomous software.
Chinese domestic electric vehicle manufacturers capturing market share from legacy Japanese sedans and crossovers with superior software and lower retail pricing.
PROTON Holdings Berhad
More than 40 years as Malaysia's national brand; the Saga alone sold 74,013 units in 2025.
Access to advanced BMA/CMA architectures, turbocharged powertrains, and Level-2 ADAS at fractional R&D costs.
Perodua holds the #1 volume position in Malaysia through its dominance in ultra-budget mini-cars.
Exports were about 6,000 units in 2025, under 4% of total sales.
Positioning Proton City to assemble and export RHD electric and hybrid vehicles across Australia, UK, and ASEAN.
Direct price competition from Chinese pure-EV brands entering the Malaysian market under tax-free EV incentives.
Factual Scorecard
| Category | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Same-period Revenue Scale | Not comparable | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.: ~$80.5B (FY2026). PROTON Holdings Berhad: $97.5M (unaudited) (FY2024). Different or missing fiscal periods prevent a like-for-like ranking. |
| Founded Earlier | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. was founded in 1933; PROTON Holdings Berhad was founded in 1983. |
Comparison Takeaway: Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. vs PROTON Holdings Berhad
Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.
Frequently Asked Questions: Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. vs PROTON Holdings Berhad
Which company was founded first, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. or PROTON Holdings Berhad?
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. was founded in 1933; PROTON Holdings Berhad was founded in 1983.
What revenue did Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and PROTON Holdings Berhad report?
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. had ~$80.5B (FY2026), while PROTON Holdings Berhad had $97.5M (unaudited) (FY2024). The fiscal years differ, so these are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.
How do Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and PROTON Holdings Berhad make money?
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.: Nissan makes money in two segments. PROTON Holdings Berhad: Proton makes money by designing, assembling and selling passenger cars, mostly in Malaysia.
Which is better, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. or PROTON Holdings Berhad?
There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and PROTON Holdings Berhad on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.
Sources & References
- Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Corporate Website
- Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. 2026 revenue figure: Nissan Motor (TYO:7201) annual reports, as compiled by S&P Global (via StockAnalysis)
- canada.nissannews.com
- usa.nissannews.com
- global.nissannews.com
- en.wikipedia.org
- nissan-global.com
- nissan-global.com
- global.honda
- nissan-global.com
- PROTON Holdings Berhad Corporate Website
- PROTON Holdings Berhad 2024 revenue figure: Industry estimate
- proton.com
- proton.com
- proton.com
- proton.com
- proton.com
- finance.yahoo.com
- stockanalysis.com
- en.wikipedia.org
Cite This Page
Automatically generated citations for researchers.
CorpDigest. (2026). Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. vs PROTON Holdings Berhad Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/nissan-vs-proton
CorpDigest. "Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. vs PROTON Holdings Berhad Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/nissan-vs-proton.
CorpDigest. "Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. vs PROTON Holdings Berhad Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/nissan-vs-proton.