Skip to main content

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) vs Notion Labs, Inc.: Strategic Comparison

Direct Answer

Miro is an infinite digital whiteboard tool used heavily for visual brainstorming, flowcharts, and agile planning with sticky notes. Notion is an all-in-one structured workspace used for writing text documents, building interconnected databases, and managing project wikis.

Miro and Notion are the two ultimate 'COVID Darlings' of remote work, but they serve two different cognitive states. Miro ($17B+ valuation) is for the messy beginning. It is an infinite, spatial whiteboard. When a remote team needs to map out a large, confusing user journey or brainstorm with 100 virtual sticky notes, they use Miro. It is unstructured, right-brain creativity. Notion ($10B+ valuation) is for the organized execution. Notion is the left brain. Once the messy Miro brainstorm is over, the team moves to Notion to write the actual product spec, assign database tags to tasks, and build the structured company wiki.

Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.

Share

Key Differences at a Glance

FieldMiro (RealtimeBoard Inc.)Notion Labs, Inc.
Latest annual revenueN/AN/A
Founded20112013
Employees1,6001,000
Market CapN/AN/A
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
Revenue / EmployeeN/AN/A
Valuation MultipleN/AN/A

Strategic Positioning

Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) Strategic Vector

Miro's sale shows how far private SaaS valuations reset between 2022 and 2026: a company with about $600 million in ARR and a dominant brand in its category sold for roughly 2.3 times ARR, as investors grew wary that AI tools could erode per-seat collaboration software.

Notion Labs, Inc. Strategic Vector

Notion's shift from a $10 AI add-on to bundling AI in its $20 Business plan in 2025 turned AI from an optional upsell into the main reason to upgrade, and CNBC reports half of Business and Enterprise customers now pay for AI features.

Comparative Divergence: Both companies are actively using AI to encroach on each other. Miro launched 'Miro Assist' to automatically summarize messy sticky notes into clean text documents (trying to do Notion's job). Notion launched advanced databases to map out workflows (trying to organize data visually like Miro).

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) vs Notion Labs, Inc. Market Share

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) market share
Miro is one of the most widely used online whiteboards, with more than 100 million users and 250,000 customers, but no reliable independent market-share figure is published. Main rivals include FigJam, Microsoft Whiteboard, Lucidspark and Mural.
Notion Labs, Inc. market share
Notion does not disclose market share, and no reliable independent share figure exists for the all-in-one workspace category. Scale indicators include 100 million+ users and use at more than half of Fortune 500 companies (CNBC, 2026).

Quick Stats Comparison

MetricMiro (RealtimeBoard Inc.)Notion Labs, Inc.
RevenueN/AN/A
Founded20112013
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United States & Amsterdam, NetherlandsSan Francisco, California, United States
Market CapN/AN/A
Employees1,6001,000
Revenue / EmployeeN/AN/A
Valuation MultipleN/AN/A

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) Revenue vs Notion Labs, Inc. Revenue — Year by Year

YearMiro (RealtimeBoard Inc.)Notion Labs, Inc.Higher reported revenue

Business Model Breakdown

Overview: Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) vs Notion Labs, Inc.

This in-depth comparison examines Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and Notion Labs, Inc. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) on its own, evaluating Notion Labs, Inc., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and Notion Labs, Inc. is widest.

On the headline numbers, annual revenue is N/A for Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and N/A for Notion Labs, Inc., while their respective market capitalizations stand at N/A and N/A. Both Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and Notion Labs, Inc. are headquartered in United States. Their local markets and applicable rules may still differ.

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.): Miro turned the office whiteboard into a browser-based infinite canvas where many people can add sticky notes, draw diagrams, run workshops and plan sprints at the same time. Remote and hybrid work after 2020 made it a default tool in many companies, and it is now widely used for agile ceremonies, customer journey maps, system diagrams and strategy sessions. In 2026 it is a mature, mostly enterprise SaaS business with about $600 million in ARR that is being sold to Bending Spoons. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California. The visual collaboration pioneer was founded in 2011 in Perm, Russia, as RealtimeBoard by Andrey Khusid and Oleg Shardin before moving global headquarters to Amsterdam and San Francisco and rebranding to Miro in 2019.

Notion Labs, Inc.: Notion is a connected workspace where pages, databases and wikis are built from interchangeable blocks. A team can keep its handbook, product roadmap, meeting notes and project tracker in one place, link them with relational databases, and now ask AI agents to search, summarize or update them. Starting with students, startups and creators, Notion has grown into a tool used by companies such as OpenAI and Cursor. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California. Notion was founded in 2013 in San Francisco, California, by Ivan Zhao and Simon Last; after a complete codebase rewrite while living in Kyoto, Japan, they relaunched Notion 2.0 to create the iconic all-in-one connected workspace used by over 100 million people worldwide.

Business Models: How Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and Notion Labs, Inc. Make Money

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and Notion Labs, Inc. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and Notion Labs, Inc..

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) business model: Miro makes money from software subscriptions. Anyone can use a free plan with a limited number of editable boards; teams then pay per member for Starter and Business plans, and large organizations sign annual Enterprise contracts that add security controls, admin tools, data residency and support. Growth is product-led: boards are shared by link, so invited colleagues become new users and usage spreads inside a company until IT buys a company-wide license. By 2026 nearly 90% of Miro's roughly $600 million in ARR came from business and enterprise customers, and more than 750 customers paid over $100,000 a year. AI features (Miro AI and canvas-based AI workflows) are packaged into paid plans with usage credits.

Notion Labs, Inc. business model: Notion uses a freemium subscription model. Individuals can use a Free plan; teams pay per member per month for Plus (about $10 billed annually), Business (about $20, which since May 2025 includes full Notion AI such as agents, AI Meeting Notes and Enterprise Search) or custom-priced Enterprise contracts with SSO, audit logs and admin controls. Revenue grows as free users bring Notion into their employers and teams upgrade to higher tiers. The former standalone Notion AI add-on was retired for new buyers in 2025 when AI moved into the Business plan.

Competitive Advantage: Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) vs Notion Labs, Inc.

The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) stack up against those of Notion Labs, Inc..

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) competitive advantage: Miro's edge is breadth of adoption and workflow depth. Because it is used across product, engineering, design, consulting and operations teams rather than one department, it tends to become the shared canvas for workshops, agile planning and diagramming. Its integrations with Jira, Confluence, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Zoom and Google Workspace, a large library of community templates (Miroverse), and enterprise security features make it harder to replace than a basic bundled whiteboard.

Notion Labs, Inc. competitive advantage: Notion's edge is a flexible block-and-database model that lets non-engineers build their own wikis, trackers and lightweight apps, plus a large creator and template community that drives organic sign-ups. Bottom-up adoption means many enterprise deals start with employees who already use Notion personally. Bundling AI agents, email, calendar and meeting notes into one workspace raises switching costs as more work lives inside Notion.

Growth Strategy: Where Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and Notion Labs, Inc. Are Headed

Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and Notion Labs, Inc. each plan to expand from here.

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) growth strategy: After pandemic-era growth slowed, Miro focused on enterprise accounts, cost discipline and AI. It cut about 7% of staff (119 people) in January 2023 and about 275 roles in late 2024, repositioned itself as an 'AI Innovation Workspace', and pushed AI features such as AI-generated diagrams, summaries and canvas-based workflows. Acquisitions of Around (video, 2022) and Uizard (AI design prototyping, 2024) added product capabilities. In 2026 the company chose a sale to Bending Spoons over an IPO.

Notion Labs, Inc. growth strategy: Notion's growth plan has three parts: move AI into higher-priced plans (full Notion AI now sits in Business and Enterprise), expand the workspace into adjacent apps (Notion Calendar, Notion Mail, Sites, Forms, AI meeting notes), and sell upmarket to large enterprises with connectors to Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, Gmail and Slack plus Enterprise Search across those tools.

Financial Picture: Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) vs Notion Labs, Inc.

A closer look at the financial trajectory of Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and Notion Labs, Inc. rounds out the comparison.

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.): Miro is private and does not publish financial statements, so the most reliable figures come from deal disclosures. It raised $25 million in a 2018 Series A led by Accel, $50 million in a 2020 Series B led by ICONIQ Growth, and $400 million in a January 2022 Series C led by ICONIQ Growth at a $17.5 billion valuation. When Bending Spoons agreed to buy it on September 10, 2026, it said Miro had grown to around $600 million in ARR. The $1.355 billion enterprise value (about 2.3 times ARR, per Forbes) plus Miro's net cash implies an equity value of about $1.79 billion. Certain Miro shareholders agreed to reinvest $295 million of their proceeds in new Bending Spoons equity.

Notion Labs, Inc.: Notion does not publish audited financials. Its key disclosed figure is annualized revenue of more than $500 million, stated to CNBC in September 2025 alongside the launch of Notion AI agents. CNBC later reported that half of Notion's Business and Enterprise customers pay for AI features, up from 10-20% a year earlier. Notion has raised roughly $330 million in total, most of it the $275 million Series C at a $10 billion valuation in October 2021, and has since used secondary tender offers rather than new primary rounds; the latest, at an $11 billion valuation, gave employees and early investors liquidity. Third-party estimates (e.g. Sacra) put 2026 ARR well above $500 million, but these are not company-confirmed.

Company-Specific SWOT Notes

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.)

Strength

More than 100 million users, 250,000 customers and nearly 90% of ~$600M ARR from business and enterprise customers.

Strength

Miroverse templates and integrations with Jira, Teams, Slack and Zoom embed Miro in daily workflows.

Weakness

Facing fierce competition from Figma's FigJam within core UI/UX product design teams who prefer keeping whiteboarding inside Figma.

Weakness

Generous free tier offering 3 editable boards can satisfy the basic requirements of casual users without converting them to paid plans.

Opportunity

Automatically generating complete system architecture diagrams, user journey flows, and retrospective summaries from simple text prompts.

Threat

Figma discounting or bundling FigJam into its enterprise design contracts represents persistent resistance to Miro's expansion in tech teams.

Notion Labs, Inc.

Strength

A large worldwide ecosystem of template creators and influencers drives viral top-of-funnel customer acquisition with near-zero marketing spend.

Strength

Notion reached $500M+ annualized revenue with about 1,000 employees and no primary funding raised since 2021.

Weakness

While simple notes are intuitive, setting up complex multi-table relational databases and rollups can overwhelm non-technical enterprise users.

Weakness

Agents, mail, calendar and workflow features risk diluting the simplicity that made Notion popular, as CNBC has noted.

Opportunity

Displacing legacy Atlassian Confluence and SharePoint across large enterprise IT departments unlocks multi-million-dollar software contracts.

Threat

Microsoft Loop and Copilot in Microsoft 365, and Gemini in Google Workspace, come with suites enterprises already pay for.

Factual Scorecard

CategoryResultWhy
Same-period Revenue ScaleNot comparableMiro (RealtimeBoard Inc.): N/A. Notion Labs, Inc.: N/A. Different or missing fiscal periods prevent a like-for-like ranking.
Founded EarlierMiro (RealtimeBoard Inc.)Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) was founded in 2011; Notion Labs, Inc. was founded in 2013.
Verdict

Comparison Takeaway: Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) vs Notion Labs, Inc.

They are symbiotic, and most major tech companies pay for both. Miro wins on visual, spatial collaboration. You cannot build a complex architecture flowchart in Notion; you need the spatial freedom of Miro. Notion wins on searchable, structured knowledge retention. A Miro board is a terrible place to store your company's official 'HR Leave Policy'; that text belongs in an organized, searchable Notion database.

Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.

Frequently Asked Questions: Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) vs Notion Labs, Inc.

Can I embed a Miro board inside Notion?

Yes! This is the most common workflow. You do the messy brainstorming in Miro, and then you paste the Miro link directly into your structured Notion document. The Miro board remains fully visible and interactive directly inside the Notion page.

Why is Miro valued at $17 Billion?

Enterprise penetration. While Notion is popular with startups, Miro successfully sold to large legacy Fortune 500 companies (banks, manufacturing) during the pandemic as the ultimate remote-work replacement for the office whiteboard.

Does Notion have a whiteboard feature?

No, Notion remains a text and block-based platform. If a team specifically wants an integrated whiteboard, they usually turn to Figma (which offers FigJam) or use the Miro integration.

What is 'Agile Planning' and why does Miro dominate it?

Agile is how software engineers work (using 'Sprints' and 'Kanban'). In the physical world, they used a whiteboard with sticky notes. Miro digitized this exact physical workflow, making it mandatory software for remote engineering managers.

Are Miro and Notion public companies?

No. Both are valued private 'Decacorns' (startups valued over $10 Billion). They have avoided IPOs by raising large amounts of private venture capital during the peak of the 2021 tech boom.

Which company was founded first, Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) or Notion Labs, Inc.?

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) was founded in 2011; Notion Labs, Inc. was founded in 2013.

What revenue did Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and Notion Labs, Inc. report?

Comparable verified revenue rows are unavailable for Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and Notion Labs, Inc..

How do Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and Notion Labs, Inc. make money?

Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.): Miro makes money from software subscriptions. Notion Labs, Inc.: Notion uses a freemium subscription model.

Which is better, Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) or Notion Labs, Inc.?

There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) and Notion Labs, Inc. on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.

Sources & References

Quick Answer

Miro is an infinite digital whiteboard tool used heavily for visual brainstorming, flowcharts, and agile planning with sticky notes. Notion is an all-in-one structured workspace used for writing text documents, building interconnected databases, and managing project wikis.

Verdict

They are symbiotic, and most major tech companies pay for both. Miro wins on visual, spatial collaboration. You cannot build a complex architecture flowchart in Notion; you need the spatial freedom of Miro. Notion wins on searchable, structured knowledge retention. A Miro board is a terrible place to store your company's official 'HR Leave Policy'; that text belongs in an organized, searchable Notion database.

Cite This Page

Automatically generated citations for researchers.

APA Format

CorpDigest. (2026). Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) vs Notion Labs, Inc. Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/miro-vs-notion

MLA Format

CorpDigest. "Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) vs Notion Labs, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/miro-vs-notion.

Chicago Format

CorpDigest. "Miro (RealtimeBoard Inc.) vs Notion Labs, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/miro-vs-notion.

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.