Microsoft vs TotalEnergies: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Microsoft reported $331.8B of revenue in FY2026 and $133.7B of net income. TotalEnergies reported $201.2B of revenue in FY2025 and $13.1B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Microsoft
- Latest revenue
- $331.8B (FY2026)
- Net income
- $133.7B
- Net margin
- 40.3%
- Revenue growth
- +14.7% a year, FY2017–FY2026
TotalEnergies
- Latest revenue
- $201.2B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $13.1B
- Net margin
- 6.5%
- Revenue growth
- +5.2% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Financial summary
Microsoft
Microsoft's FY2026 revenue rose 17.8% to $331.8 billion, operating income rose 21% to $155.2 billion, and GAAP net income rose 31% to $133.7 billion. Fourth-quarter revenue was $90.0 billion (up 18%) with net income of $35.8 billion, helped by a $3.2 billion gain on its Anthropic investment. Microsoft Cloud revenue reached $59.3 billion in Q4, up 27%. The main pressure point is capital intensity: AI data center spending has pushed free cash flow growth well below earnings growth.
TotalEnergies
TotalEnergies' 2025 results showed how much its earnings still track oil prices. Revenues from sales fell to $182.344 billion (total revenues including excise taxes of $201.2 billion), adjusted net income dropped 15% to $15.6 billion and IFRS net income attributable to shareholders was $13.1 billion. Cash flow slipped only 7% to nearly $28 billion because upstream production grew about 4%. Gearing ended 2025 at 15%, ROACE was 12.6% and the 2025 dividend rose 5.6% to €3.40 per share. In 2026, higher crude prices linked to the Middle East conflict reversed the trend: second-quarter adjusted net income reached $6.0 billion, cash flow $9.8 billion and first-half adjusted net income about $11.4 billion.
Revenue and profit by year
Microsoft
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $331.8B | $133.7B | 40.3% | +17.8% | Source |
| FY2025 | $281.7B | $101.8B | 36.1% | +14.9% | Source |
| FY2024 | $245.1B | $88.1B | 36.0% | +15.7% | Source |
| FY2023 | $211.9B | $72.4B | 34.1% | +6.9% | Source |
| FY2022 | $198.3B | $72.7B | 36.7% | +18.0% | Source |
| FY2021 | $168.1B | $61.3B | 36.5% | +17.5% | Source |
| FY2020 | $143B | $44.3B | 31.0% | +13.6% | Source |
| FY2019 | $125.8B | $39.2B | 31.2% | +14.0% | Source |
| FY2018 | $110.4B | $16.6B | 15.0% | +14.3% | Source |
| FY2017 | $96.6B | $25.5B | 26.4% | — | Source |
TotalEnergies
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $201.2B | $13.1B | 6.5% | -6.2% | Source |
| FY2024 | $214.6B | $15.8B | 7.3% | -9.5% | Source |
| FY2023 | $237.1B | $21.4B | 9.0% | -15.6% | Source |
| FY2022 | $281B | $20.5B | 7.3% | +36.5% | Source |
| FY2021 | $205.9B | $16B | 7.8% | +46.3% | Source |
| FY2020 | $140.7B | -$7.2B | -5.1% | -29.8% | Source |
| FY2019 | $200.3B | $11.3B | 5.6% | -4.3% | Source |
| FY2018 | $209.4B | $11.4B | 5.5% | +40.4% | Source |
| FY2017 | $149.1B | $8.6B | 5.8% | +16.6% | Source |
| FY2016 | $127.9B | $6.2B | 4.8% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Microsoft
- Productivity And Business ProcessesMajor
Office, Microsoft 365, LinkedIn, Dynamics, and related cloud services.
- Intelligent CloudMajor
Azure, server products, enterprise services, and cloud infrastructure.
- More Personal ComputingMajor
Windows, devices, gaming, search, and advertising.
- AI Services And CopilotsGrowth
AI features and model-powered services embedded across Azure, Microsoft 365, GitHub, security, and developer tools.
TotalEnergies
- Exploration & Production
Not disclosed here
Sales of crude oil and gas from about 2.5 million boe per day of 2025 production.
- Integrated LNG
Not disclosed here
Liquefaction, shipping, trading and sale of LNG and gas under long-term and spot contracts.
- Integrated Power
Not disclosed here
Wholesale and retail electricity from renewables, gas-fired plants and storage, plus retail gas supply.
- Refining & Chemicals
Not disclosed here
Refined fuels, polymers and petrochemicals from integrated industrial platforms.
- Marketing & Services
Not disclosed here
Retail and B2B sales of fuels, lubricants, aviation fuel and EV charging.
Business model and strategy
Microsoft
How it makes money
Microsoft reports three segments. Intelligent Cloud covers Azure, SQL Server, Windows Server, GitHub, Nuance, and enterprise services; server products and cloud services alone brought in $129.4 billion in FY2026, and Azure passed $100 billion in annual revenue for the first time.
Growth strategy
Microsoft's growth plan centers on AI capacity and AI subscriptions. It is spending heavily on data centers and chips to meet Azure demand that management says remains capacity constrained, and it is selling Microsoft 365 Copilot as a paid add-on, which passed 30 million paid seats by the end of FY2026.
Competitive advantage
Microsoft's main advantage is distribution inside enterprises. Identity (Entra), email and documents (Microsoft 365), collaboration (Teams), developer tools (GitHub, Visual Studio), and cloud infrastructure (Azure) are often bought together, which raises switching costs and lets Microsoft attach new products such as Copilot to existing contracts.
TotalEnergies
How it makes money
TotalEnergies makes money across five reporting segments. Exploration & Production sells crude oil and gas from about 2.5 million barrels of oil equivalent per day of output. Integrated LNG liquefies, ships, trades and sells gas from projects in Qatar, the U.S., Nigeria, Australia, Papua New Guinea and elsewhere.
Growth strategy
TotalEnergies' strategy centers on low-cost oil and gas production, LNG integration, disciplined downstream operations, renewable power capacity, electricity customers, and cash returns to shareholders.
Competitive advantage
TotalEnergies has an integrated LNG platform, upstream assets across multiple basins, downstream and marketing positions, and a growing power portfolio. Its advantage is breadth across molecules, refined products, and electrons.
Questions about Microsoft vs TotalEnergies
Which company has higher revenue — Microsoft Corporation or TotalEnergies SE?
Microsoft Corporation reported $331.8B (FY2026), while TotalEnergies SE reported $201.2B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Microsoft Corporation is the larger business, with TotalEnergies SE reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.
What is the market cap of Microsoft Corporation vs TotalEnergies SE?
Microsoft Corporation's market capitalisation stands at $3.83T, while TotalEnergies SE's is $205.0B. Microsoft Corporation carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to TotalEnergies SE.
Which is more financially efficient — Microsoft Corporation or TotalEnergies SE?
Microsoft Corporation generates $1.49M / employee in revenue per employee, while TotalEnergies SE generates $2.01M / employee. TotalEnergies SE shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Microsoft Corporation and TotalEnergies SE make money?
Microsoft Corporation and TotalEnergies SE generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft reports three segments. TotalEnergies SE: TotalEnergies makes money across five reporting segments.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Microsoft Corporation or TotalEnergies SE?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Microsoft Corporation trades at 11.5x P/S and TotalEnergies SE at 1.0x P/S. Microsoft Corporation commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to TotalEnergies SE. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Microsoft Corporation bigger than TotalEnergies SE?
By last reported revenue, Microsoft Corporation ($331.8B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to TotalEnergies SE ($201.2B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Microsoft vs TotalEnergies overview