Microsoft vs Target: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Microsoft reported $331.8B of revenue in FY2026 and $133.7B of net income. Target reported $104.8B of revenue in FY2025 and $3.7B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Financial summary
Microsoft
Microsoft's FY2026 revenue rose 17.8% to $331.8 billion, operating income rose 21% to $155.2 billion, and GAAP net income rose 31% to $133.7 billion. Fourth-quarter revenue was $90.0 billion (up 18%) with net income of $35.8 billion, helped by a $3.2 billion gain on its Anthropic investment. Microsoft Cloud revenue reached $59.3 billion in Q4, up 27%. The main pressure point is capital intensity: AI data center spending has pushed free cash flow growth well below earnings growth.
Target
Target's revenue fell three years in a row, from $109.1 billion in fiscal 2022 to $104.8 billion in fiscal 2025, while FY2025 net income was $3.705 billion. Fiscal 2026 has reversed the trend so far. Q2 FY2026 net sales rose 5.3% to $26.5 billion, comparable sales grew 3.8% on a 3.6% traffic gain, and digital comparable sales rose 8.7% with same-day delivery up more than 25%. Q2 GAAP EPS was $4.11 versus $2.05 a year earlier, but $1.65 of that came from $994 million of pretax tariff refunds; excluding refunds, EPS grew about 20%. Management now guides to roughly 5% net sales growth for fiscal 2026 and EPS of $9.90 to $10.90.
Revenue and profit by year
Microsoft
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $331.8B | $133.7B | 40.3% | +17.8% | Source |
| FY2025 | $281.7B | $101.8B | 36.1% | +14.9% | Source |
| FY2024 | $245.1B | $88.1B | 36.0% | +15.7% | Source |
| FY2023 | $211.9B | $72.4B | 34.1% | +6.9% | Source |
| FY2022 | $198.3B | $72.7B | 36.7% | +18.0% | Source |
| FY2021 | $168.1B | $61.3B | 36.5% | +17.5% | Source |
| FY2020 | $143B | $44.3B | 31.0% | +13.6% | Source |
| FY2019 | $125.8B | $39.2B | 31.2% | +14.0% | Source |
| FY2018 | $110.4B | $16.6B | 15.0% | +14.3% | Source |
| FY2017 | $96.6B | $25.5B | 26.4% | — | Source |
Target
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $104.8B | $3.7B | 3.5% | -1.7% | Source |
| FY2024 | $106.6B | $4.1B | 3.8% | -0.8% | Source |
| FY2023 | $107.4B | $4.1B | 3.9% | -1.6% | Source |
| FY2022 | $109.1B | $2.8B | 2.5% | +2.9% | Source |
| FY2021 | $106B | $6.9B | 6.6% | +13.3% | Source |
| FY2020 | $93.6B | $4.4B | 4.7% | +19.8% | Source |
| FY2019 | $78.1B | $3.3B | 4.2% | +3.7% | Source |
| FY2018 | $75.4B | $2.9B | 3.9% | +3.6% | Source |
| FY2017 | $72.7B | $2.9B | 4.0% | +3.5% | Source |
| FY2016 | $70.3B | $2.7B | 3.9% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Microsoft
- Productivity And Business ProcessesMajor
Office, Microsoft 365, LinkedIn, Dynamics, and related cloud services.
- Intelligent CloudMajor
Azure, server products, enterprise services, and cloud infrastructure.
- More Personal ComputingMajor
Windows, devices, gaming, search, and advertising.
- AI Services And CopilotsGrowth
AI features and model-powered services embedded across Azure, Microsoft 365, GitHub, security, and developer tools.
Target
- Stores and digital merchandise
Primary revenue source
Sales of food, essentials, apparel, beauty, home, electronics, toys and seasonal products through stores and digital channels.
- Owned brands
Strategic margin driver
Target-owned and exclusive brands that support margin and differentiation.
- Same-day services and Shipt
Growth and retention stream
Delivery, pickup, Drive Up and Target Circle 360 services that deepen loyalty.
- Roundel retail media
High-margin supplemental stream
Advertising revenue from brands using Target's retail media network.
Business model and strategy
Microsoft
How it makes money
Microsoft reports three segments. Intelligent Cloud covers Azure, SQL Server, Windows Server, GitHub, Nuance, and enterprise services; server products and cloud services alone brought in $129.4 billion in FY2026, and Azure passed $100 billion in annual revenue for the first time.
Growth strategy
Microsoft's growth plan centers on AI capacity and AI subscriptions. It is spending heavily on data centers and chips to meet Azure demand that management says remains capacity constrained, and it is selling Microsoft 365 Copilot as a paid add-on, which passed 30 million paid seats by the end of FY2026.
Competitive advantage
Microsoft's main advantage is distribution inside enterprises. Identity (Entra), email and documents (Microsoft 365), collaboration (Teams), developer tools (GitHub, Visual Studio), and cloud infrastructure (Azure) are often bought together, which raises switching costs and lets Microsoft attach new products such as Copilot to existing contracts.
Target
How it makes money
Target runs a general-merchandise, big-box retail model that pairs low-margin essentials (groceries, household basics) to drive store traffic with higher-margin discretionary categories (apparel, home decor, and private-label brands) to drive profit -- the classic 'basket size' strategy.
Growth strategy
Target is focusing on merchandising authority, guest experience, technology acceleration, team and community strength, stores-as-hubs, same-day fulfillment, retail media and owned-brand renewal.
Competitive advantage
Target's advantage is the mix of curated merchandise, owned brands, convenient stores, same-day fulfillment and a brand position between discount utility and design-led retail.
Questions about Microsoft vs Target
Which company has higher revenue — Microsoft Corporation or Target Corporation?
Microsoft Corporation reported $331.8B (FY2026), while Target Corporation reported $104.8B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Microsoft Corporation is the larger business, with Target Corporation reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.
What is the market cap of Microsoft Corporation vs Target Corporation?
Microsoft Corporation's market capitalisation stands at $3.83T, while Target Corporation's is $72.0B. Microsoft Corporation carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Target Corporation.
Which is more financially efficient — Microsoft Corporation or Target Corporation?
Microsoft Corporation generates $1.49M / employee in revenue per employee, while Target Corporation generates $252k / employee. Microsoft Corporation shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Microsoft Corporation and Target Corporation make money?
Microsoft Corporation and Target Corporation generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft reports three segments. Target Corporation: Target runs a general-merchandise, big-box retail model that pairs low-margin essentials (groceries, household basics) to drive store traffic with higher-margin discretionary categories (apparel, home decor, and private-label brands) to drive profit -- the classic 'basket size' strategy.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Microsoft Corporation or Target Corporation?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Microsoft Corporation trades at 11.5x P/S and Target Corporation at 0.7x P/S. Microsoft Corporation commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Target Corporation. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Microsoft Corporation bigger than Target Corporation?
By last reported revenue, Microsoft Corporation ($331.8B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to Target Corporation ($104.8B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Microsoft vs Target overview