Skip to main content

Microsoft vs SpaceX: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

Microsoft reported $331.8B of revenue in FY2026 and $133.7B of net income. SpaceX reported $18.7B of revenue in FY2025 and a net loss of $4.9B.

Latest financial snapshot

Microsoft

Latest revenue
$331.8B (FY2026)
Net income
$133.7B
Net margin
40.3%
Revenue growth
+14.7% a year, FY2017–FY2026

SpaceX

Latest revenue
$18.7B (FY2025)
Net income
-$4.9B
Net margin
-26.4%
Revenue growth
+34.1% a year, FY2023–FY2025

Financial summary

Microsoft

Microsoft's FY2026 revenue rose 17.8% to $331.8 billion, operating income rose 21% to $155.2 billion, and GAAP net income rose 31% to $133.7 billion. Fourth-quarter revenue was $90.0 billion (up 18%) with net income of $35.8 billion, helped by a $3.2 billion gain on its Anthropic investment. Microsoft Cloud revenue reached $59.3 billion in Q4, up 27%. The main pressure point is capital intensity: AI data center spending has pushed free cash flow growth well below earnings growth.

SpaceX

SpaceX revenue grew from $10.387 billion in 2023 to $14.015 billion in 2024 and $18.674 billion in 2025, but heavy Starship, Starlink, and AI spending produced a $4.937 billion FY2025 net loss. In Q2 2026, its first quarter reported as a public company, revenue was $7.8 billion (up 92%), adjusted EBITDA was $3.5 billion, net loss was $541 million, and backlog was $47.5 billion. The IPO raised $85.7 billion and a $25 billion bond sale added more liquidity. In late September 2026 the stock traded near $145, for a market capitalization around $1.9 trillion.

Revenue and profit by year

Microsoft

Microsoft revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2026$331.8B$133.7B40.3%+17.8%Source
FY2025$281.7B$101.8B36.1%+14.9%Source
FY2024$245.1B$88.1B36.0%+15.7%Source
FY2023$211.9B$72.4B34.1%+6.9%Source
FY2022$198.3B$72.7B36.7%+18.0%Source
FY2021$168.1B$61.3B36.5%+17.5%Source
FY2020$143B$44.3B31.0%+13.6%Source
FY2019$125.8B$39.2B31.2%+14.0%Source
FY2018$110.4B$16.6B15.0%+14.3%Source
FY2017$96.6B$25.5B26.4%—Source
Full Microsoft financials

SpaceX

SpaceX revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025$18.7B-$4.9B-26.4%+33.2%Source
FY2024$14B$18M0.1%+34.9%Source
FY2023$10.4B-$4.6B-44.6%—Source
Full SpaceX financials

Where the revenue comes from

Microsoft

  • Productivity And Business ProcessesMajor

    Office, Microsoft 365, LinkedIn, Dynamics, and related cloud services.

  • Intelligent CloudMajor

    Azure, server products, enterprise services, and cloud infrastructure.

  • More Personal ComputingMajor

    Windows, devices, gaming, search, and advertising.

  • AI Services And CopilotsGrowth

    AI features and model-powered services embedded across Azure, Microsoft 365, GitHub, security, and developer tools.

SpaceX

  • Launch services

    Not formally reported

    Commercial, civil, and national-security launches priced by rocket, payload, orbit, and service type.

  • Starlink consumer broadband

    Not formally reported

    Monthly subscriptions and terminals for residential and mobile broadband.

  • Enterprise and government connectivity

    Not formally reported

    Starlink enterprise, aviation, maritime, backup connectivity, Starshield, and government services.

  • AI infrastructure

    Not formally reported

    Compute and cloud services from SpaceX's AI segment, formed through the xAI combination; $2.6B revenue in Q2 2026.

Business model and strategy

Microsoft

How it makes money

Microsoft reports three segments. Intelligent Cloud covers Azure, SQL Server, Windows Server, GitHub, Nuance, and enterprise services; server products and cloud services alone brought in $129.4 billion in FY2026, and Azure passed $100 billion in annual revenue for the first time.

Growth strategy

Microsoft's growth plan centers on AI capacity and AI subscriptions. It is spending heavily on data centers and chips to meet Azure demand that management says remains capacity constrained, and it is selling Microsoft 365 Copilot as a paid add-on, which passed 30 million paid seats by the end of FY2026.

Competitive advantage

Microsoft's main advantage is distribution inside enterprises. Identity (Entra), email and documents (Microsoft 365), collaboration (Teams), developer tools (GitHub, Visual Studio), and cloud infrastructure (Azure) are often bought together, which raises switching costs and lets Microsoft attach new products such as Copilot to existing contracts.

Microsoft business model in full

SpaceX

How it makes money

SpaceX earns money in three segments. Space sells launches on Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, plus Dragon cargo and crew missions for NASA, the U.S. government, and commercial customers ($962 million in Q2 2026).

Growth strategy

SpaceX's growth plan has four parts: add Starlink subscribers and raise enterprise, aviation, and mobile revenue; launch higher-capacity Starlink V3 satellites on Starship; expand national-security work through Starshield and launch contracts (over $6 billion in U.S. government awards in Q2 2026); and scale AI compute capacity, which grew from 400 megawatts a year earlier to 1.4 gigawatts at the end of Q2 2026.

Competitive advantage

SpaceX's advantage is reusability combined with vertical integration. It builds its own engines, avionics, rockets, and satellites, and reflies Falcon 9 boosters many times, which lowers its marginal launch cost below rivals that still expend most hardware. Being its own largest launch customer lets it deploy Starlink at a cadence no other operator has matched, and Starlink revenue then funds Starship.

SpaceX business model in full

Questions about Microsoft vs SpaceX

Which company has higher revenue — Microsoft Corporation or SpaceX?

Microsoft Corporation reported $331.8B (FY2026), while SpaceX reported $18.7B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Microsoft Corporation is the larger business, with SpaceX reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.

What is the market cap of Microsoft Corporation vs SpaceX?

Microsoft Corporation's market capitalisation stands at $3.83T, while SpaceX's is $1.92T. Microsoft Corporation carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to SpaceX.

Which is more financially efficient — Microsoft Corporation or SpaceX?

Microsoft Corporation generates $1.49M / employee in revenue per employee, while SpaceX generates $826k / employee. Microsoft Corporation shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.

How do Microsoft Corporation and SpaceX make money?

Microsoft Corporation and SpaceX generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft reports three segments. SpaceX: SpaceX earns money in three segments.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Microsoft Corporation or SpaceX?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Microsoft Corporation trades at 11.5x P/S and SpaceX at 102.8x P/S. SpaceX commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Microsoft Corporation. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is Microsoft Corporation bigger than SpaceX?

By last reported revenue, Microsoft Corporation ($331.8B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to SpaceX ($18.7B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Microsoft vs SpaceX overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.