Skip to main content

Microsoft vs Smartsheet: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

Microsoft had $331.8B of annual revenue in FY2026 and $133.7B of net income. Smartsheet had $958.3M of annual revenue in FY2024 and a net loss of $104.6M.

Latest financial snapshot

Microsoft

Latest annual revenue
$331.8B (FY2026)
Net income
$133.7B
Net margin
40.3%
Revenue growth
+14.7% a year, FY2017–FY2026

Smartsheet

Latest annual revenue
$958.3M (FY2024)
Net income
-$104.6M
Net margin
-10.9%
Revenue growth
+46.3% a year, FY2017–FY2024

Financial summary

Microsoft

Microsoft's FY2026 revenue rose 17.8% to $331.8 billion, operating income rose 21% to $155.2 billion, and GAAP net income rose 31% to $133.7 billion. Fourth-quarter revenue was $90.0 billion (up 18%) with net income of $35.8 billion, helped by a $3.2 billion gain on its Anthropic investment. Microsoft Cloud revenue reached $59.3 billion in Q4, up 27%. The main pressure point is capital intensity: AI data center spending has pushed free cash flow growth well below earnings growth. Microsoft crossed the $3 trillion market valuation threshold in 2024, driven by its leadership in cloud computing and artificial intelligence.

Smartsheet

Smartsheet grew revenue from $67.0 million in fiscal 2017 to $958.3 million in fiscal 2024 (year ended January 31, 2024), a 25% increase that year, while the GAAP net loss narrowed from $215.6 million in fiscal 2023 to $104.6 million. In its last reported quarter as a public company, Q3 fiscal 2025, revenue rose 17% to $286.9 million, ARR grew 15% and the company posted $1.3 million of GAAP net income. As a private company since January 2025, it no longer publishes results. Smartsheet Inc. is a major American enterprise software company providing cloud-based work management and collaboration tools, sustaining a market valuation typically over $8 billion.

Revenue and profit by year

Microsoft

Microsoft revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2026$331.8B$133.7B40.3%+17.8%Source
FY2025$281.7B$101.8B36.1%+14.9%Source
FY2024$245.1B$88.1B36.0%+15.7%Source
FY2023$211.9B$72.4B34.1%+6.9%Source
FY2022$198.3B$72.7B36.7%+18.0%Source
FY2021$168.1B$61.3B36.5%+17.5%Source
FY2020$143B$44.3B31.0%+13.6%Source
FY2019$125.8B$39.2B31.2%+14.0%Source
FY2018$110.4B$16.6B15.0%+14.3%Source
FY2017$96.6B$25.5B26.4%—Source
Full Microsoft financials

Smartsheet

Smartsheet revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2024$958.3M-$104.6M-10.9%+25.0%Source
FY2023$766.9M-$215.6M-28.1%+39.2%Source
FY2022$550.8M-$171.1M-31.1%+42.9%Source
FY2021$385.5M-$115M-29.8%+42.3%Source
FY2020$270.9M-$95.9M-35.4%+52.4%Source
FY2019$177.7M-$53.9M-30.3%+59.7%Source
FY2018$111.3M-$49.1M-44.1%+66.1%Source
FY2017$67M-$15.2M-22.7%—Source
Full Smartsheet financials

Where the revenue comes from

Microsoft

  • Productivity And Business ProcessesMajor

    Office, Microsoft 365, LinkedIn, Dynamics, and related cloud services.

  • Intelligent CloudMajor

    Azure, server products, enterprise services, and cloud infrastructure.

  • More Personal ComputingMajor

    Windows, devices, gaming, search, and advertising.

  • AI Services And CopilotsGrowth

    AI features and model-powered services embedded across Azure, Microsoft 365, GitHub, security, and developer tools.

Smartsheet

  • Subscriptions95

    Per-user plans plus premium add-ons such as Control Center, Data Shuttle, Dynamic View, Resource Management and Brandfolder ($273.7M of $286.9M revenue in Q3 fiscal 2025).

  • Professional services5

    Implementation, consulting and training ($13.2M in Q3 fiscal 2025).

Business model and strategy

Microsoft

How it makes money

Microsoft reports three segments. Intelligent Cloud covers Azure, SQL Server, Windows Server, GitHub, Nuance, and enterprise services; server products and cloud services alone brought in $129.4 billion in FY2026, and Azure passed $100 billion in annual revenue for the first time.

Growth strategy

Microsoft's growth plan centers on AI capacity and AI subscriptions. It is spending heavily on data centers and chips to meet Azure demand that management says remains capacity constrained, and it is selling Microsoft 365 Copilot as a paid add-on, which passed 30 million paid seats by the end of FY2026.

Competitive advantage

Microsoft's main advantage is distribution inside enterprises. Identity (Entra), email and documents (Microsoft 365), collaboration (Teams), developer tools (GitHub, Visual Studio), and cloud infrastructure (Azure) are often bought together, which raises switching costs and lets Microsoft attach new products such as Copilot to existing contracts.

Microsoft business model in full

Smartsheet

How it makes money

Smartsheet sells software subscriptions. Customers pay per user on tiered plans (Pro, Business, Enterprise) and can add premium capabilities such as Control Center, Dynamic View, Data Shuttle, Bridge, Resource Management and Brandfolder digital asset management.

Growth strategy

Under CEO Rajeev Singh, Smartsheet is focusing on enterprise AI: the November 2025 ENGAGE launch added AI agents and data features to the platform. It has also cut costs through two rounds of layoffs, rebuilt its executive team and revamped its partner program in 2026 to lean more on channel sales.

Competitive advantage

Smartsheet's main advantage is a familiar grid interface that lets non-technical business users start quickly, paired with enterprise controls (Control Center for portfolio provisioning, Dynamic View for restricted sharing, admin governance) and a FedRAMP-authorized Smartsheet Gov environment for public-sector buyers.

Smartsheet business model in full

Questions about Microsoft vs Smartsheet

Which company has higher revenue — Microsoft Corporation or Smartsheet?

Microsoft Corporation had $331.8B (FY2026), while Smartsheet had $958.3M (FY2024). By latest annual revenue, Microsoft Corporation is the larger business, with Smartsheet showing a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.

What is the market cap of Microsoft Corporation vs Smartsheet?

Microsoft Corporation's market capitalisation stands at $3.83T, while Smartsheet's is $8.4B. Microsoft Corporation carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Smartsheet.

How does revenue per employee compare for Microsoft Corporation and Smartsheet?

Microsoft Corporation has $1.49M / employee in revenue per employee, while Smartsheet has $290k / employee. Headcounts may use different dates, so the ratio alone does not establish which business operates more efficiently.

How do Microsoft Corporation and Smartsheet make money?

Microsoft Corporation and Smartsheet generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft reports three segments. Smartsheet: Smartsheet sells software subscriptions.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Microsoft Corporation or Smartsheet?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Microsoft Corporation trades at 11.5x P/S and Smartsheet at 8.8x P/S. Microsoft Corporation commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Smartsheet. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is Microsoft Corporation bigger than Smartsheet?

By last reported revenue, Microsoft Corporation ($331.8B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to Smartsheet ($958.3M (FY2024)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Microsoft vs Smartsheet overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.