Microsoft Corporation vs Nu Holdings Ltd.: Strategic Comparison
Direct Answer
Microsoft Corporation reported $331.8B (FY2026), while Nu Holdings Ltd. reported $15.8B (FY2025). Their fiscal years differ, so the figures are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.
Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Field | Microsoft Corporation | Nu Holdings Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Latest reported revenue | $331.8B (FY2026) | $15.8B (FY2025) |
| Founded | 1975 | 2013 |
| Employees | 223,000 | 10,027 |
| Market Cap | $3.83T | $66.3B |
| Headquarters | United States | Brazil |
| Revenue / Employee | $1.49M / employee | $1.57M / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 11.5x P/S | 4.2x P/S |
Strategic Positioning
Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles
Microsoft Corporation Strategic Vector
FY2026 Revenue BaselineMicrosoft's growth plan centers on AI capacity and AI subscriptions.
Nu Holdings Ltd. Strategic Vector
FY2025 Revenue BaselineNubank's growth now comes less from adding Brazilians and more from earning more per customer (ARPAC hit about $15 in Q4 2025) and from repeating its playbook abroad. The Mexican bank launch in 2026 and the US launch through Lead Bank, ahead of its own OCC charter, are the two bets that will decide whether it becomes a global consumer bank or remains a Latin American one.
Quick Stats Comparison
| Metric | Microsoft Corporation | Nu Holdings Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $331.8B (FY2026) | $15.8B (FY2025) |
| Founded | 1975 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Redmond, Washington, United States | Sao Paulo, Brazil |
| Market Cap | $3.83T | $66.3B |
| Employees | 223,000 | 10,027 |
| Revenue / Employee | $1.49M / employee | $1.57M / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 11.5x P/S | 4.2x P/S |
Microsoft Corporation Revenue vs Nu Holdings Ltd. Revenue — Year by Year
| Year | Microsoft Corporation | Nu Holdings Ltd. | Higher reported revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $331.8B | N/A | Only one figure available |
| 2025 | $281.7B | $15.8B | Microsoft Corporation (approx. USD) |
| 2024 | $245.1B | $11.5B | Microsoft Corporation (approx. USD) |
| 2023 | $211.9B | $8.0B | Microsoft Corporation (approx. USD) |
| 2022 | $198.3B | $4.8B | Microsoft Corporation (approx. USD) |
Business Model Breakdown
Overview: Microsoft Corporation vs Nu Holdings Ltd.
This in-depth comparison examines Microsoft Corporation and Nu Holdings Ltd. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Microsoft Corporation on its own, evaluating Nu Holdings Ltd., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Microsoft Corporation and Nu Holdings Ltd. is widest.
On the headline numbers, Microsoft Corporation reports annual revenue of $331.8B against $15.8B for Nu Holdings Ltd., while their respective market capitalizations stand at $3.83T and $66.3B. Microsoft Corporation is headquartered in United States and Nu Holdings Ltd. in Brazil, and those different home markets shape how each company competes.
Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft Corporation is one of the largest companies in the world by market value, at about $3.8 trillion in late September 2026. Under CEO Satya Nadella, who took over in February 2014, it shifted from a Windows-centered licensing business to cloud subscriptions and consumption-based Azure services. In FY2026 it had about 223,000 full-time employees and reported $331.8 billion of revenue, with Azure surpassing $100 billion for the first time.
Nu Holdings Ltd.: Nu Holdings is a Cayman Islands-incorporated holding company headquartered in São Paulo that runs Nubank, Latin America's largest digital bank by customers. It ended Q2 2026 with 139 million customers, almost 118 million of them in Brazil, and said it had become the largest digital bank in Mexico with 16 million customers after launching its Mexican bank in August 2026. Its shares trade on the NYSE as NU, with BDRs on Brazil's B3 as ROXO34.
Business Models: How Microsoft Corporation and Nu Holdings Ltd. Make Money
Microsoft Corporation and Nu Holdings Ltd. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Microsoft Corporation and Nu Holdings Ltd..
Microsoft Corporation business model: Microsoft reports three segments. Intelligent Cloud covers Azure, SQL Server, Windows Server, GitHub, Nuance, and enterprise services; server products and cloud services alone brought in $129.4 billion in FY2026, and Azure passed $100 billion in annual revenue for the first time. Productivity and Business Processes covers Microsoft 365 Commercial (about $102 billion in FY2026), Microsoft 365 Consumer, LinkedIn, and Dynamics. More Personal Computing covers Windows OEM licensing, Surface devices, Xbox content and services, and search and news advertising. Most revenue is recurring subscription or consumption-based cloud revenue sold to businesses.
Nu Holdings Ltd. business model: Nubank earns revenue mainly from interest on credit card balances, personal loans, payroll and secured loans, and from yield on the securities it buys with customer deposits. Fee and commission income adds interchange on card spending, late fees, and commissions from insurance, investments and marketplace sales. The model depends on acquiring customers cheaply (largely by word of mouth), serving them through an app at a low monthly cost, and then raising average revenue per active customer (ARPAC, about $15 a month in Q4 2025) by cross-selling credit, savings, investment and insurance products.
Competitive Advantage: Microsoft Corporation vs Nu Holdings Ltd.
The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Microsoft Corporation stack up against those of Nu Holdings Ltd..
Microsoft Corporation competitive advantage: Microsoft's main advantage is distribution inside enterprises. Identity (Entra), email and documents (Microsoft 365), collaboration (Teams), developer tools (GitHub, Visual Studio), and cloud infrastructure (Azure) are often bought together, which raises switching costs and lets Microsoft attach new products such as Copilot to existing contracts. Its OpenAI relationship adds another layer: after OpenAI's 2025 recapitalization Microsoft holds roughly 27% of OpenAI Group PBC, and it recorded $24.1 billion of FY2026 revenue from commercial arrangements with OpenAI, although the partnership is no longer exclusive after the April 2026 revision.
Nu Holdings Ltd. competitive advantage: Nubank's edge is cost and scale. It runs without branches, reported a cost to serve below $1 per active customer per month and a record efficiency ratio of 19.9% in Q4 2025, and gains most new customers through referrals. Transaction and deposit data from more than 130 million customers feed its underwriting models, and that data advantage grows as more Brazilians use Nubank as their primary account.
Growth Strategy: Where Microsoft Corporation and Nu Holdings Ltd. Are Headed
Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Microsoft Corporation and Nu Holdings Ltd. each plan to expand from here.
Microsoft Corporation growth strategy: Microsoft's growth plan centers on AI capacity and AI subscriptions. It is spending heavily on data centers and chips to meet Azure demand that management says remains capacity constrained, and it is selling Microsoft 365 Copilot as a paid add-on, which passed 30 million paid seats by the end of FY2026. It is also broadening its model supply beyond OpenAI, including an investment in Anthropic, while cutting costs elsewhere through layoffs, a first-ever voluntary retirement program, and a roughly 20% reduction in Xbox staff in July 2026.
Nu Holdings Ltd. growth strategy: Nubank is growing by deepening products for existing customers (secured and payroll loans, investments, insurance, small-business banking), scaling Mexico after its 2026 bank launch and Colombia, and entering the US through a sponsor bank while its national bank charter is finalized.
Financial Picture: Microsoft Corporation vs Nu Holdings Ltd.
A closer look at the financial trajectory of Microsoft Corporation and Nu Holdings Ltd. rounds out the comparison.
Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft's FY2026 revenue rose 17.8% to $331.8 billion, operating income rose 21% to $155.2 billion, and GAAP net income rose 31% to $133.7 billion. Fourth-quarter revenue was $90.0 billion (up 18%) with net income of $35.8 billion, helped by a $3.2 billion gain on its Anthropic investment. Microsoft Cloud revenue reached $59.3 billion in Q4, up 27%. The main pressure point is capital intensity: AI data center spending has pushed free cash flow growth well below earnings growth.
Nu Holdings Ltd.: Nubank turned its first annual profit in 2023 ($1.03 billion on $8.03 billion revenue) and has scaled fast since. Under IFRS it reported FY2024 revenue of $11.52 billion and net income of $1.97 billion, then FY2025 revenue of $15.77 billion and net income of $2.87 billion. Using its newer managerial P&L, it reported Q4 2025 revenue of $4.9 billion and net income of $895 million with a 33% ROE. In Q2 2026, gross revenue rose 39% to $5.88 billion and net income reached $1.061 billion, up 49% FX-neutral, with a record 33% return on equity.
Company-Specific SWOT Notes
Microsoft Corporation
Microsoft reported FY2026 revenue of $331.8 billion, with Azure cloud revenue surpassing $100 billion and Microsoft 365 Copilot reaching 30 million paid seats.
Operating income rose 21% to $155.2 billion in FY2026, providing cash generation to self-fund major AI infrastructure buildouts.
Capital expenditures surged past $55 billion in FY2026 for AI data centers and hardware, causing free cash flow growth to lag net income growth.
Microsoft cut roughly 20% of its Xbox division staff in 2026 amid flat console hardware demand following the $68.7 billion Activision Blizzard acquisition.
Commercial agreements related to OpenAI contributed $24.1 billion to FY2026 revenue, creating upsell potential across GitHub and Office enterprise tiers.
Regulators in the European Union and the United States initiated formal inquiries in 2024 and 2025 into Azure cloud software licensing and Teams bundling.
Nu Holdings Ltd.
Nubank acquires and serves customers through a mobile-first model with fewer legacy branch costs.
Nubank completely destroyed legacy bank monopolies by acquiring over 90 million customers with practically zero marketing spend, relying entirely on massive viral word-of-mouth due to its zero-fee structure.
Fast consumer-lending growth can amplify losses if underwriting or macro conditions deteriorate.
Because Nubank primarily serves lower-income and middle-class populations that traditional banks ignored, it struggles to generate the massive, highly lucrative wealth management fees enjoyed by legacy rivals.
Mexico, Colombia, savings, investments, insurance, payroll, and secured lending can deepen revenue per customer.
Incumbent banks, wallets, fintech lenders, regulation, and funding-cost swings can pressure margins.
Factual Scorecard
| Category | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Same-period Revenue Scale | Not comparable | Microsoft Corporation: $331.8B (FY2026). Nu Holdings Ltd.: $15.8B (FY2025). Different or missing fiscal periods prevent a like-for-like ranking. |
| Founded Earlier | Microsoft Corporation | Microsoft Corporation was founded in 1975; Nu Holdings Ltd. was founded in 2013. |
Comparison Takeaway: Microsoft Corporation vs Nu Holdings Ltd.
Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.
Frequently Asked Questions: Microsoft Corporation vs Nu Holdings Ltd.
Which company was founded first, Microsoft Corporation or Nu Holdings Ltd.?
Microsoft Corporation was founded in 1975; Nu Holdings Ltd. was founded in 2013.
What revenue did Microsoft Corporation and Nu Holdings Ltd. report?
Microsoft Corporation reported $331.8B (FY2026), while Nu Holdings Ltd. reported $15.8B (FY2025). The fiscal years differ, so these are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.
How do Microsoft Corporation and Nu Holdings Ltd. make money?
Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft reports three segments. Nu Holdings Ltd.: Nubank earns revenue mainly from interest on credit card balances, personal loans, payroll and secured loans, and from yield on the securities it buys with customer deposits.
Which is better, Microsoft Corporation or Nu Holdings Ltd.?
There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Microsoft Corporation and Nu Holdings Ltd. on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.
Sources & References
- SEC EDGAR: Microsoft Corporation filings search (10-K, 8-K)
- Microsoft Corporation Corporate Website
- Microsoft Corporation 2026 revenue figure: MICROSOFT CORPORATION annual report (Form 10-K, SEC EDGAR, filed 2026-07-29)
- microsoft.com
- sec.gov
- microsoft.com
- microsoft.com
- learn.microsoft.com
- news.microsoft.com
- blogs.microsoft.com
- Nu Holdings Ltd. Corporate Website
- Nu Holdings Ltd. 2025 revenue figure: sec.gov
- ir.nubank.com.br
- en.wikipedia.org
- businesswire.com
- nasdaq.com
- secure.businesswire.com
- stocktitan.net
Cite This Page
Automatically generated citations for researchers.
CorpDigest. (2026). Microsoft Corporation vs Nu Holdings Ltd. Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/microsoft-vs-nubank
CorpDigest. "Microsoft Corporation vs Nu Holdings Ltd. Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/microsoft-vs-nubank.
CorpDigest. "Microsoft Corporation vs Nu Holdings Ltd. Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/microsoft-vs-nubank.