Skip to main content

Meta vs Tesla: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

Meta reported $201B of revenue in FY2025 and $60.5B of net income. Tesla reported $94.8B of revenue in FY2025 and $3.8B of net income.

Latest financial snapshot

Meta

Latest revenue
$201B (FY2025)
Net income
$60.5B
Net margin
30.1%
Revenue growth
+24.7% a year, FY2016–FY2025

Tesla

Latest revenue
$94.8B (FY2025)
Net income
$3.8B
Net margin
4.0%
Revenue growth
+33.6% a year, FY2016–FY2025

Financial summary

Meta

Meta's revenue grew from $116.609B in 2022 to $200.966B in 2025, and net income rose from $23.2B to $60.458B. FY2025 income from operations was $83.276B. In 2026 the story is spending: Q2 2026 costs rose 55% to $42.03B, the operating margin fell to 31% from 43%, and quarterly capex of $31.08B left free cash flow at $784M. Meta had $90.26B of cash and marketable securities and $83.66B of long-term debt at June 30, 2026. It expects 2026 total expenses of $165-169B and still expects 2026 operating income to exceed 2025.

Tesla

Tesla's revenue peaked at $97.69 billion in 2024 and slipped 2.9% to $94.83 billion in FY2025, while net income fell from $7.09 billion to $3.79 billion as vehicle prices and regulatory-credit income declined. The second quarter of 2026 reversed the top-line trend: revenue rose 26% to a record $28.24 billion, with automotive up 23% to $20.52 billion, services and other up 50% to $4.58 billion, and energy up 13% to $3.14 billion. Profit did not follow. GAAP net income fell 5% to $1.11 billion and adjusted EPS of $0.33 missed estimates because of higher R&D and AI infrastructure spending.

Revenue and profit by year

Meta

Meta revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025$201B$60.5B30.1%+22.2%Source
FY2024$164.5B$62.4B37.9%+21.9%Source
FY2023$134.9B$39.1B29.0%+15.7%Source
FY2022$116.6B$23.2B19.9%-1.1%Source
FY2021$117.9B$39.4B33.4%+37.2%Source
FY2020$86B$29.1B33.9%+21.6%Source
FY2019$70.7B$18.5B26.1%+26.6%Source
FY2018$55.8B$22.1B39.6%+37.4%Source
FY2017$40.7B$15.9B39.2%+47.1%Source
FY2016$27.6B$10.2B37.0%—Source
Full Meta financials

Tesla

Tesla revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025$94.8B$3.8B4.0%-2.9%Source
FY2024$97.7B$7.1B7.3%+0.9%Source
FY2023$96.8B$15B15.5%+18.8%Source
FY2022$81.5B$12.6B15.4%+51.4%Source
FY2021$53.8B$5.5B10.3%+70.7%Source
FY2020$31.5B$721M2.3%+28.3%Source
FY2019$24.6B-$862M-3.5%+14.5%Source
FY2018$21.5B-$976M-4.5%+82.5%Source
FY2017$11.8B-$2B-16.7%+68.0%Source
FY2016$7B-$674.9M-9.6%—Source
Full Tesla financials

Where the revenue comes from

Meta

  • Advertising

    ~97.6% (FY2025)

    Ads across Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, Threads and WhatsApp; $196.175B in FY2025.

  • Other revenue and Reality Labs

    ~2.4% (FY2025)

    WhatsApp Business messaging, Meta Verified subscriptions, Quest headsets and Ray-Ban Meta glasses.

Tesla

  • Automotive sales and leasing~73%

    Model 3, Model Y, Cybertruck and remaining other models, plus regulatory credits. $20.52B in Q2 2026.

  • Services and other~16%

    Supercharging, FSD and connectivity software, service, used cars, insurance and parts. $4.58B in Q2 2026, up 50%.

  • Energy generation and storage~11%

    Megapack, Powerwall and solar. $3.14B in Q2 2026, up 13%.

Business model and strategy

Meta

How it makes money

Meta makes money by selling ads. Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, WhatsApp and Threads are free to use, and advertisers pay to reach people in feeds, Stories, Reels and click-to-message formats. Advertising produced $196.175B of Meta's $200.966B FY2025 revenue, about 97.6%. Q2 2026 growth came from 14% more ad impressions and a 12% higher average price per ad.

Growth strategy

Meta's growth plan runs through AI. Better ranking and ad-delivery models raise engagement on Reels and feeds and lift ad prices, which drove the 28% revenue growth in Q2 2026. Meta Superintelligence Labs, led by former Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, released the first Muse Spark model in April 2026, followed by a paid API and the Muse consumer AI agent in September 2026.

Competitive advantage

Meta's moat is distribution plus data. Its apps reach 3.60 billion people every day, so new products such as Threads, Meta AI and Muse can launch to a huge audience at once. Advertisers stay because Meta's AI ad tools such as Advantage+ convert across that audience at a scale only Google matches. Meta also owns its compute, custom MTIA chips and frontier models, which reduces its dependence on outside AI suppliers.

Meta business model in full

Tesla

How it makes money

Tesla operates a vertically integrated electric vehicle, clean energy generation, and software ecosystem model. The company generates revenue across four primary pillars: First, Automotive Sales and Leasing, selling mass-market electric vehicles (Model Y, Model 3) and premium models (Model S, Model X, Cybertruck) directly to consumers without franchised dealers.

Growth strategy

Tesla's growth plan rests on four bets. First, regain vehicle volume: deliveries fell 8.6% to 1.64 million in 2025, then rebounded to a record 480,126 in Q2 2026, up 25% year over year. Second, autonomy: Tesla runs a paid robotaxi service in several U.S. cities and is building the steering-wheel-free Cybercab, though the Q2 2026 shareholder letter dropped the target of volume production in 2026.

Competitive advantage

Tesla's advantage comes from brand strength, direct sales, software updates, charging infrastructure, battery and powertrain know-how, manufacturing scale, data, and energy-storage growth.

Tesla business model in full

Questions about Meta vs Tesla

Which company has higher revenue — Meta Platforms, Inc. or Tesla, Inc.?

Meta Platforms, Inc. reported $201.0B (FY2025), while Tesla, Inc. reported $94.8B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Meta Platforms, Inc. is the larger business, with Tesla, Inc. reporting a smaller revenue base.

What is the market cap of Meta Platforms, Inc. vs Tesla, Inc.?

Meta Platforms, Inc.'s market capitalisation stands at $1.90T, while Tesla, Inc.'s is $1.49T. Meta Platforms, Inc. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Tesla, Inc..

Which is more financially efficient — Meta Platforms, Inc. or Tesla, Inc.?

Meta Platforms, Inc. generates $2.66M / employee in revenue per employee, while Tesla, Inc. generates $704k / employee. Meta Platforms, Inc. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.

How do Meta Platforms, Inc. and Tesla, Inc. make money?

Meta Platforms, Inc. and Tesla, Inc. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Meta Platforms, Inc.: Meta makes money by selling ads. Tesla, Inc.: Tesla operates a vertically integrated electric vehicle, clean energy generation, and software ecosystem model.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Meta Platforms, Inc. or Tesla, Inc.?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Meta Platforms, Inc. trades at 9.5x P/S and Tesla, Inc. at 15.7x P/S. Tesla, Inc. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Meta Platforms, Inc.. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is Meta Platforms, Inc. bigger than Tesla, Inc.?

By last reported revenue, Meta Platforms, Inc. ($201.0B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Tesla, Inc. ($94.8B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Meta vs Tesla overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.