Marvell vs Samsung: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Marvell reported $8.2B of revenue in FY2026 and $2.7B of net income. Samsung reported ~$236.9B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$31.4B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Financial summary
Marvell
Marvell's revenue was $2.70 billion in fiscal 2020 and $5.77 billion in fiscal 2025, then jumped 42% to $8.195 billion in fiscal 2026 as AI data-center demand ramped. GAAP results were losses from fiscal 2021 through fiscal 2025, mainly due to amortization from the Inphi and Cavium deals and restructuring charges. Fiscal 2026 GAAP net income was $2.67 billion, helped by a pre-tax gain of about $1.8 billion on the $2.5 billion sale of the automotive Ethernet unit to Infineon. In Q2 fiscal 2027 (quarter ended August 1, 2026) revenue was $2.739 billion, GAAP net income $308.0 million ($0.33 per share), non-GAAP EPS $0.94 and operating cash flow $605.5 million. Marvell guided Q3 fiscal 2027 revenue to $3.15 billion, plus or minus 5%.
Samsung
Samsung's earnings follow the memory cycle. Revenue fell from ~$215 billion (KRW 302.2 trillion) in 2022 to ~$184 billion (KRW 258.9 trillion) in 2023 during a chip downturn, then recovered to ~$214 billion (KRW 300.9 trillion) in 2024 and ~$237 billion (KRW 333.6 trillion) in 2025, when net income reached about $31.5 billion (KRW 44.3 trillion). In 2026, AI server demand created a memory shortage. Q1 operating profit of ~$40.6 billion (KRW 57.2 trillion) exceeded the full-year 2025 total, and Q2 reached ~$63.5 billion (KRW 89.5 trillion) on ~$122 billion (KRW 171.5 trillion) revenue. Higher memory costs also squeezed Samsung's own devices: the MX and Networks unit lost ~$497 million (KRW 0.7 trillion) in Q2 2026 on ~$23.6 billion (KRW 33.2 trillion) revenue.
Revenue and profit by year
Marvell
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $8.2B | $2.7B | 32.6% | +42.1% | Source |
| FY2025 | $5.8B | -$885M | -15.3% | +4.7% | Source |
| FY2024 | $5.5B | -$933.4M | -16.9% | -7.0% | Source |
| FY2023 | $5.9B | -$163.5M | -2.8% | +32.7% | Source |
| FY2022 | $4.5B | -$421M | -9.4% | +50.3% | Source |
| FY2021 | $3B | -$277.3M | -9.3% | +10.0% | Source |
| FY2020 | $2.7B | $1.6B | 58.7% | — | Source |
Samsung
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | ~$236.9B | ~$31.4B | 13.3% | +10.9% | Source |
| FY2024 | ~$213.6B | ~$23.9B | 11.2% | +16.2% | Source |
| FY2023 | ~$183.8B | ~$10.3B | 5.6% | -14.3% | Source |
| FY2022 | ~$214.6B | ~$38.9B | 18.1% | +8.1% | Source |
| FY2021 | ~$198.5B | ~$27.9B | 14.0% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Marvell
- Data Center
74% of FY2026 revenue
Generated $6.1003 billion in fiscal 2026 revenue from custom silicon, networking, optical connectivity, storage, and data-center infrastructure products.
- Communications and Other
26% of FY2026 revenue
Generated $2.0943 billion in fiscal 2026 revenue from carrier, enterprise, automotive legacy, and other communications-related products.
- Direct Customers
57% of FY2026 revenue
Direct customer sales accounted for $4.6304 billion of fiscal 2026 revenue.
- Distributors
43% of FY2026 revenue
Distributor sales accounted for $3.5642 billion of fiscal 2026 revenue.
Samsung
- Memory semiconductors
- Foundry and system LSI
- Galaxy smartphones and mobile devices
- Display panels
- TVs and appliances
- Network equipment
- Harman automotive and audio
Business model and strategy
Marvell
How it makes money
Marvell runs a fabless model: it designs chips and licenses-in or builds IP (SerDes, PAM4 and coherent DSPs, Arm compute subsystems, packaging), while foundries such as TSMC manufacture them. It makes money in two ways. First, it sells standard products, including electro-optics DSPs and drivers for optical modules, Teralynx Ethernet switches, PCIe/CXL retimers, storage controllers and OCTEON processors.
Growth strategy
Marvell's growth plan centers on AI infrastructure. It is expanding custom XPU and XPU-attach programs with large cloud providers, upgrading optical DSPs from 800G to 1.6T and beyond, growing Teralynx switches and retimers, and adding optical scale-up interconnect through Celestial AI.
Competitive advantage
Marvell's edge is breadth of data-center IP. It combines high-speed SerDes, PAM4 and coherent optical DSPs (largely from the 2021 Inphi deal), Ethernet switching, custom ASIC design services and, since 2026, Celestial AI's photonic interconnect technology. That lets it sell several components into the same AI cluster and offer hyperscalers a full custom-chip design and packaging service on advanced TSMC nodes.
Samsung
How it makes money
Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses. Device Solutions (DS) makes and sells memory (DRAM, HBM, NAND), System LSI chips such as Exynos processors and ISOCELL image sensors, and contract foundry manufacturing.
Growth strategy
Samsung's growth plan centers on AI memory: ramping HBM4 for Nvidia and AMD accelerators, developing HBM4E, and adding DRAM capacity at Pyeongtaek. In foundry it is pursuing 2nm gate-all-around production and building its Taylor, Texas fab to win customers from TSMC. On the device side it relies on Galaxy AI features, foldables and premium TVs to defend share against Apple and Chinese brands.
Competitive advantage
Samsung's edge is manufacturing scale and breadth. It is the largest memory producer and one of only three major DRAM makers, alongside SK hynix and Micron. That lets it capture pricing upswings like the 2026 AI-driven shortage.
Questions about Marvell vs Samsung
Which company has higher revenue — Marvell Technology, Inc. or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Marvell Technology, Inc. reported $8.2B (FY2026), while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. reported ~$236.9B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the larger business, with Marvell Technology, Inc. reporting a smaller revenue base. Note: these are from different fiscal years and are not a direct like-for-like comparison.
What is the market cap of Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Marvell Technology, Inc.'s market capitalisation stands at $225.7B, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s is $1.33T. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Marvell Technology, Inc..
Which is more financially efficient — Marvell Technology, Inc. or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Marvell Technology, Inc. generates $1.11M / employee in revenue per employee, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generates $914k / employee. Marvell Technology, Inc. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Marvell Technology, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. make money?
Marvell Technology, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Marvell Technology, Inc.: Marvell runs a fabless model: it designs chips and licenses-in or builds IP (SerDes, PAM4 and coherent DSPs, Arm compute subsystems, packaging), while foundries such as TSMC manufacture them. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Marvell Technology, Inc. or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Marvell Technology, Inc. trades at 27.5x P/S and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. at 5.6x P/S. Marvell Technology, Inc. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Marvell Technology, Inc. bigger than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (~$236.9B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Marvell Technology, Inc. ($8.2B (FY2026)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Marvell vs Samsung overview