Marvell vs Micron: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Marvell had $8.2B of annual revenue in FY2026 and $2.7B of net income. Micron had $133.2B of annual revenue in FY2026 and $85B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Financial summary
Marvell
Marvell's revenue was $2.70 billion in fiscal 2020 and $5.77 billion in fiscal 2025, then jumped 42% to $8.195 billion in fiscal 2026 as AI data-center demand ramped. GAAP results were losses from fiscal 2021 through fiscal 2025, mainly due to amortization from the Inphi and Cavium deals and restructuring charges. Fiscal 2026 GAAP net income was $2.67 billion, helped by a pre-tax gain of about $1.8 billion on the $2.5 billion sale of the automotive Ethernet unit to Infineon. In Q2 fiscal 2027 (quarter ended August 1, 2026) revenue was $2.739 billion, GAAP net income $308.0 million ($0.33 per share), non-GAAP EPS $0.94 and operating cash flow $605.5 million. Marvell guided Q3 fiscal 2027 revenue to $3.15 billion, plus or minus 5%. Marvell Technology, Inc. is a major American fabless semiconductor company heavily focused on data center infrastructure, commanding a market valuation typically exceeding $65 billion.
Micron
Micron's results swing with memory pricing. Revenue fell from $30.76B in fiscal 2022 to $15.54B in fiscal 2023, with a $5.83B net loss, then recovered to $25.11B in fiscal 2024 and $37.38B in fiscal 2025. Fiscal 2026 was a step change: revenue reached $133.19B, GAAP gross margin rose to 80.7% from 39.8%, and GAAP net income hit $84.97B. Fiscal Q4 2026 alone produced $54.23B of revenue and $37.70B of net income. Operating cash flow was $89.68B for the year, and Micron ended it with $73.48B of cash, marketable investments and restricted cash. Micron Technology, Inc. is a massive American producer of computer memory and computer data storage, commanding a market valuation generally exceeding $130 billion.
Revenue and profit by year
Marvell
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $8.2B | $2.7B | 32.6% | +42.1% | Source |
| FY2025 | $5.8B | -$885M | -15.3% | +4.7% | Source |
| FY2024 | $5.5B | -$933.4M | -16.9% | -7.0% | Source |
| FY2023 | $5.9B | -$163.5M | -2.8% | +32.7% | Source |
| FY2022 | $4.5B | -$421M | -9.4% | +50.3% | Source |
| FY2021 | $3B | -$277.3M | -9.3% | +10.0% | Source |
| FY2020 | $2.7B | $1.6B | 58.7% | — | Source |
Micron
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | $133.2B | $85B | 63.8% | +256.3% | Source |
| FY2025 | $37.4B | $8.5B | 22.8% | +48.9% | Source |
| FY2024 | $25.1B | $778M | 3.1% | +61.6% | Source |
| FY2023 | $15.5B | -$5.8B | -37.5% | -49.5% | Source |
| FY2022 | $30.8B | $8.7B | 28.2% | +11.0% | Source |
| FY2021 | $27.7B | $5.9B | 21.2% | +29.3% | Source |
| FY2020 | $21.4B | $2.7B | 12.5% | -8.4% | Source |
| FY2019 | $23.4B | $6.3B | 27.0% | -23.0% | Source |
| FY2018 | $30.4B | $14.1B | 46.5% | +49.5% | Source |
| FY2017 | $20.3B | $5.1B | 25.0% | +63.9% | Source |
| FY2016 | $12.4B | -$276M | -2.2% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Marvell
- Data Center
74% of FY2026 revenue
Generated $6.1003 billion in fiscal 2026 revenue from custom silicon, networking, optical connectivity, storage, and data-center infrastructure products.
- Communications and Other
26% of FY2026 revenue
Generated $2.0943 billion in fiscal 2026 revenue from carrier, enterprise, automotive legacy, and other communications-related products.
- Direct Customers
57% of FY2026 revenue
Direct customer sales accounted for $4.6304 billion of fiscal 2026 revenue.
- Distributors
43% of FY2026 revenue
Distributor sales accounted for $3.5642 billion of fiscal 2026 revenue.
Micron
- Compute And NetworkingMajor
Data-center, graphics, networking, and client-related memory and storage demand.
- MobileMaterial
Low-power DRAM, NAND, and managed memory used in smartphones and mobile devices.
- EmbeddedMaterial
Automotive, industrial, and embedded-market memory and storage products.
- StorageMaterial
SSDs and NAND-based storage products for enterprise, client, and consumer markets.
- Consumer Channels
Complementary
Crucial-branded memory and storage upgrades sold through retail and ecommerce channels.
Business model and strategy
Marvell
How it makes money
Marvell runs a fabless model: it designs chips and licenses-in or builds IP (SerDes, PAM4 and coherent DSPs, Arm compute subsystems, packaging), while foundries such as TSMC manufacture them. It makes money in two ways. First, it sells standard products, including electro-optics DSPs and drivers for optical modules, Teralynx Ethernet switches, PCIe/CXL retimers, storage controllers and OCTEON processors.
Growth strategy
Marvell's growth plan centers on AI infrastructure. It is expanding custom XPU and XPU-attach programs with large cloud providers, upgrading optical DSPs from 800G to 1.6T and beyond, growing Teralynx switches and retimers, and adding optical scale-up interconnect through Celestial AI.
Competitive advantage
Marvell's edge is breadth of data-center IP. It combines high-speed SerDes, PAM4 and coherent optical DSPs (largely from the 2021 Inphi deal), Ethernet switching, custom ASIC design services and, since 2026, Celestial AI's photonic interconnect technology. That lets it sell several components into the same AI cluster and offer hyperscalers a full custom-chip design and packaging service on advanced TSMC nodes.
Micron
How it makes money
Micron runs a capital-intensive B2B memory manufacturing model: it designs DRAM and NAND process technology, fabricates wafers in its own fabs in the US, Japan, Taiwan and Singapore, and sells chips, modules, HBM stacks and SSDs to hyperscalers, server makers, AI accelerator vendors, PC and phone OEMs, and auto suppliers.
Growth strategy
Micron's growth strategy centres on high-bandwidth memory (HBM) for artificial intelligence. AI accelerators such as Nvidia's need large amounts of fast memory alongside them, so Micron is investing heavily in HBM3E and competing with Samsung and SK Hynix for contracts to supply the AI data centers built by companies such as Microsoft and Google. The aim is to reduce its dependence on the volatile smartphone market.
Competitive advantage
Micron's advantage rests on the cost of entry and its place in US policy. A modern memory fabrication plant costs more than $15 billion, which keeps new entrants out, and the industry has consolidated into three companies: Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron. As the only American memory maker, Micron also receives US government support through the CHIPS Act, which treats domestic memory supply as a national security matter.
Questions about Marvell vs Micron
Which company has higher revenue — Marvell Technology, Inc. or Micron Technology, Inc.?
Marvell Technology, Inc. had $8.2B (FY2026), while Micron Technology, Inc. had $133.2B (FY2026). By latest annual revenue, Micron Technology, Inc. is the larger business, with Marvell Technology, Inc. showing a smaller revenue base.
What is the market cap of Marvell Technology, Inc. vs Micron Technology, Inc.?
Marvell Technology, Inc.'s market capitalisation stands at $225.7B, while Micron Technology, Inc.'s is $1.15T. Micron Technology, Inc. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Marvell Technology, Inc..
How does revenue per employee compare for Marvell Technology, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.?
Marvell Technology, Inc. has $1.11M / employee in revenue per employee, while Micron Technology, Inc. has $2.51M / employee. Headcounts may use different dates, so the ratio alone does not establish which business operates more efficiently.
How do Marvell Technology, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. make money?
Marvell Technology, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Marvell Technology, Inc.: Marvell runs a fabless model: it designs chips and licenses-in or builds IP (SerDes, PAM4 and coherent DSPs, Arm compute subsystems, packaging), while foundries such as TSMC manufacture them. Micron Technology, Inc.: Micron runs a capital-intensive B2B memory manufacturing model: it designs DRAM and NAND process technology, fabricates wafers in its own fabs in the US, Japan, Taiwan and Singapore, and sells chips, modules, HBM stacks and SSDs to hyperscalers, server makers, AI accelerator vendors, PC and phone OEMs, and auto suppliers.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Marvell Technology, Inc. or Micron Technology, Inc.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Marvell Technology, Inc. trades at 27.5x P/S and Micron Technology, Inc. at 8.6x P/S. Marvell Technology, Inc. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Micron Technology, Inc.. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Marvell Technology, Inc. bigger than Micron Technology, Inc.?
By last reported revenue, Micron Technology, Inc. ($133.2B (FY2026)) is the larger company compared to Marvell Technology, Inc. ($8.2B (FY2026)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Marvell vs Micron overview