Lattice Semiconductor Corporation vs NVIDIA Corporation: Strategic Comparison
Direct Answer
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation had $523.3M (FY2025), while NVIDIA Corporation had $215.9B (FY2026). Their fiscal years differ, so the figures are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.
Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Field | Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | NVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Latest annual revenue | $523.3M (FY2025) | $215.9B (FY2026) |
| Founded | 1983 | 1993 |
| Employees | 1,800 | 42,000 |
| Market Cap | $18.2B | $5.45T |
| Headquarters | United States | United States |
| Revenue / Employee | $291k / employee | $5.14M / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 34.8x P/S | 25.2x P/S |
Strategic Positioning
Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation Strategic Vector
FY2025 Revenue BaselineThe AMI deal changes Lattice from a pure chip vendor into a combined silicon and firmware supplier for servers. Lattice paid $1.65 billion while its own FY2025 revenue was $523 million, which shows how much it is betting on AI data center infrastructure.
NVIDIA Corporation Strategic Vector
FY2026 Revenue BaselineNVIDIA wants to sell the whole AI factory, not just accelerators.
Quick Stats Comparison
| Metric | Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | NVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $523.3M (FY2025) | $215.9B (FY2026) |
| Founded | 1983 | 1993 |
| Headquarters | Hillsboro, Oregon, United States | Santa Clara, California, United States |
| Market Cap | $18.2B | $5.45T |
| Employees | 1,800 | 42,000 |
| Revenue / Employee | $291k / employee | $5.14M / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 34.8x P/S | 25.2x P/S |
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation Revenue vs NVIDIA Corporation Revenue — Year by Year
| Year | Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | NVIDIA Corporation | Higher reported revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | N/A | $215.9B | Only one figure available |
| 2025 | $523.3M | $130.5B | NVIDIA Corporation (approx. USD) |
| 2024 | $509.4M | $60.9B | NVIDIA Corporation (approx. USD) |
| 2023 | $737.2M | $27.0B | NVIDIA Corporation (approx. USD) |
| 2022 | $660.4M | $26.9B | NVIDIA Corporation (approx. USD) |
Business Model Breakdown
Overview: Lattice Semiconductor Corporation vs NVIDIA Corporation
This in-depth comparison examines Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Lattice Semiconductor Corporation on its own, evaluating NVIDIA Corporation, or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation is widest.
On the headline numbers, annual revenue is $523.3M (FY2025) for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and $215.9B (FY2026) for NVIDIA Corporation, while their respective market capitalizations stand at $18.2B and $5.45T. Both Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation are headquartered in United States. Their local markets and applicable rules may still differ.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation: Lattice Semiconductor (Nasdaq: LSCC) is a Hillsboro, Oregon chip company that designs low-power FPGAs and related software. It does not build large compute processors; its chips sit beside them, sequencing power, bridging interfaces, checking firmware, and running small AI models at the edge. Compute and communications customers, especially data center and AI system makers, became its largest market in 2025. In 2026 the company added AMI's server firmware business.
NVIDIA Corporation: NVIDIA Corporation, based in Santa Clara, California, started in 1993 as a PC graphics chip company and is now the largest supplier of AI computing infrastructure. Its GPUs, NVLink and InfiniBand/Ethernet networking, and CUDA software sit inside most large AI training and inference clusters at Microsoft, Meta, Google Cloud, Amazon, Oracle and AI labs such as OpenAI. In fiscal 2026 it had about 42,000 employees and $215.9B in revenue. In September 2026 it was the world's most valuable listed company, worth roughly $5.45 trillion. NVIDIA was founded in April 1993 at a Denny's diner in San Jose/Sunnyvale, California, by Jensen Huang, Chris Malachowsky, and Curtis Priem to pioneer 3D graphics acceleration, inventing the GPU in 1999 and building the CUDA accelerated computing architecture that powers the modern artificial intelligence revolution from Santa Clara.
Business Models: How Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation Make Money
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation business model: Lattice makes money by designing FPGAs and selling the chips, mostly through distributors, to equipment makers. It is fabless: foundry partners manufacture the silicon, while Lattice owns the architecture, the Radiant and Propel design software, and application 'solution stacks' such as sensAI and Sentry. Customers program the chips themselves, so one Lattice part can serve many designs and stay in production for years. Since July 2026 Lattice also earns software and licensing revenue from AMI's Aptio BIOS firmware and MegaRAC server-management products, which management expected to exceed a $200 million annual run rate by the end of 2026.
NVIDIA Corporation business model: NVIDIA is a fabless chip and systems company: it designs GPUs, CPUs, networking and software, and outsources manufacturing mainly to TSMC. Data Center is the core business, at $193.7B of FY2026 revenue (about 90%) and $89.0B of the $96.2B earned in Q2 FY2027. Customers are cloud providers, AI labs, enterprises and governments that buy Blackwell and Vera Rubin rack-scale systems together with NVLink, InfiniBand and Spectrum-X networking. The rest of revenue comes from GeForce gaming GPUs, professional visualization, and automotive and robotics platforms. CUDA and NVIDIA AI Enterprise software keep developers and customers on NVIDIA hardware.
Competitive Advantage: Lattice Semiconductor Corporation vs NVIDIA Corporation
The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation stack up against those of NVIDIA Corporation.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation competitive advantage: Lattice's edge comes from years spent optimizing small FPGAs for low power and board space, plus a software toolchain and IP library that make those chips easier to deploy. Its control and security FPGAs are designed into server and AI-system boards that run for multiple product generations, which makes them hard to displace. Adding AMI gives Lattice firmware that already sits on many hyperscaler and OEM servers, so it can sell hardware root-of-trust and management software together.
NVIDIA Corporation competitive advantage: NVIDIA's lead comes from three things working together. CUDA has been in use since 2006 and much of the AI software stack is tuned for it. NVIDIA sells full systems that tie compute, NVLink and networking into one rack. Its scale also gets it priority access to TSMC wafers and high-bandwidth memory. Rivals such as AMD can match individual chips, but replacing the software, networking and supply chain together is much harder. That is why NVIDIA kept gross margins around 75% in Q2 FY2027 even as Google TPUs and Amazon Trainium won large customers.
Growth Strategy: Where Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation Are Headed
Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation each plan to expand from here.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation growth strategy: Lattice is pursuing three main lines of growth: more FPGA content per AI server for board control and hardware root of trust, the newer mid-range Avant family that widens its market beyond small devices, and cross-selling AMI firmware and management software with Lattice silicon to hyperscalers and server makers.
NVIDIA Corporation growth strategy: NVIDIA wants to sell the whole AI factory, not just accelerators. It ships a new architecture roughly every year: Blackwell, then Blackwell Ultra, then Vera Rubin, which reached full production in mid-2026. Each rack combines GPUs, Vera CPUs, NVLink, Spectrum-6 switches and BlueField DPUs. Inference is a key push: in December 2025 NVIDIA licensed Groq's inference chip technology and hired its leadership, and Groq 3 LPX accelerators were in full production by August 2026. Other growth bets include sovereign AI deals with national governments, physical AI and robotics, and automotive computing.
Financial Picture: Lattice Semiconductor Corporation vs NVIDIA Corporation
A closer look at the financial trajectory of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation rounds out the comparison.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation: Revenue climbed from $404.1 million in 2019 to a record $737.2 million in 2023 under former CEO Jim Anderson, then fell 30.9% to $509.4 million in 2024 as industrial and automotive customers worked down inventory. FY2025 revenue edged up 2.7% to $523.3 million, with net income of only $3.1 million. Growth returned in 2026 on data center and AI demand: Q1 revenue reached $170.9 million and Q2 a record $201.1 million at a 71.7% non-GAAP gross margin. Lattice guided Q3 2026 to about $255 million at the midpoint, including two months of AMI, which management said put it on a $1 billion annual revenue run rate. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation is a major American designer of high-performance programmable logic devices, commanding a market valuation typically over $8 billion.
NVIDIA Corporation: NVIDIA's revenue rose from $27.0B in fiscal 2023 to $60.9B in FY2024, $130.5B in FY2025 and $215.9B in FY2026, which ended January 25, 2026. FY2026 GAAP net income was $120.1B, operating cash flow was $102.7B and company-defined free cash flow was $96.6B. Growth continued into fiscal 2027: Q2 (ended July 26, 2026) revenue was $96.2B, including $89.0B of Data Center revenue, with a 75.0% GAAP gross margin and $59.7B GAAP net income. The $108.0B Q3 FY2027 revenue figure, plus or minus 2%, was management guidance, not a reported result; the outlook assumed no Data Center compute revenue from China. NVIDIA returned about $26.0B to shareholders in Q2, and reported about $99.0B remaining under its repurchase authorization at quarter-end. Its May 2026 dividend increase to $0.25 per share is separate from the repurchase authorization.
Company-Specific SWOT Notes
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
Small, efficient FPGAs designed into server control, industrial, and automotive boards with long product lifecycles.
Communications and Computing grew 28.3% in FY2025 to 55.9% of revenue, and 2026 quarterly revenue grew 42% and 62%.
FY2025 GAAP net income was only $3.1 million on $523.3 million of revenue, with heavy stock-based compensation.
Unlike AMD (Xilinx) and Intel (Altera), Lattice cannot produce massive, ultra-high-performance FPGAs required for data center AI training, completely locking them out of the most lucrative market.
AMI's BIOS and BMC software lets Lattice sell security and management solutions across server platforms.
A data center slowdown, renewed inventory corrections, or AMI integration problems could hit results after a debt-funded deal.
NVIDIA Corporation
NVIDIA combines chips, systems, networking, CUDA, libraries, and developer adoption into one AI infrastructure platform.
Large cloud customers and advanced manufacturing partners create concentration and supply-chain risk.
A large share of NVIDIA's data center revenue is concentrated among a handful of hyperscalers like Microsoft, Meta, Google, and Amazon.
Training, inference, enterprise AI, robotics, sovereign AI, and accelerated computing can expand the addressable market.
Cloud ASICs, rival accelerators, regulation, export restrictions, and capex digestion can slow growth or compress margins.
Factual Scorecard
| Category | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Same-period Revenue Scale | Not comparable | Lattice Semiconductor Corporation: $523.3M (FY2025). NVIDIA Corporation: $215.9B (FY2026). Different or missing fiscal periods prevent a like-for-like ranking. |
| Founded Earlier | Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | Lattice Semiconductor Corporation was founded in 1983; NVIDIA Corporation was founded in 1993. |
Comparison Takeaway: Lattice Semiconductor Corporation vs NVIDIA Corporation
Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.
Frequently Asked Questions: Lattice Semiconductor Corporation vs NVIDIA Corporation
Which company was founded first, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation or NVIDIA Corporation?
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation was founded in 1983; NVIDIA Corporation was founded in 1993.
What revenue did Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation report?
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation had $523.3M (FY2025), while NVIDIA Corporation had $215.9B (FY2026). The fiscal years differ, so these are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.
How do Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation make money?
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation: Lattice makes money by designing FPGAs and selling the chips, mostly through distributors, to equipment makers. NVIDIA Corporation: NVIDIA is a fabless chip and systems company: it designs GPUs, CPUs, networking and software, and outsources manufacturing mainly to TSMC.
Which is better, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation or NVIDIA Corporation?
There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.
Sources & References
- SEC EDGAR: Lattice Semiconductor Corporation filings search (10-K, 8-K)
- Lattice Semiconductor Corporation Corporate Website
- Lattice Semiconductor Corporation 2025 revenue figure: Lattice Semiconductor Corp annual report (Form 10-K, SEC EDGAR, filed 2026-02-13)
- sec.gov
- data.sec.gov
- sec.gov
- nasdaq.com
- businesswire.com
- businesswire.com
- SEC EDGAR: NVIDIA Corporation filings search (10-K, 8-K)
- NVIDIA Corporation Corporate Website
- NVIDIA Corporation 2026 revenue figure: NVIDIA CORP annual report (Form 10-K, SEC EDGAR, filed 2026-02-25)
- sec.gov
- investor.nvidia.com
- nvidia.com
- sec.gov
- sec.gov
Cite This Page
Automatically generated citations for researchers.
CorpDigest. (2026). Lattice Semiconductor Corporation vs NVIDIA Corporation Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/lattice-semiconductor-vs-nvidia
CorpDigest. "Lattice Semiconductor Corporation vs NVIDIA Corporation Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/lattice-semiconductor-vs-nvidia.
CorpDigest. "Lattice Semiconductor Corporation vs NVIDIA Corporation Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/lattice-semiconductor-vs-nvidia.