CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc.: Strategic Comparison
Direct Answer
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. had $4.8B (FY2026), while Okta, Inc. had $2.9B (FY2026). Revenue describes scale, not an overall winner.
Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Field | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | Okta, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Latest annual revenue | $4.8B (FY2026) | $2.9B (FY2026) |
| Founded | 2011 | 2009 |
| Employees | 10,698 | 6,366 |
| Market Cap | $269.0B | $33.0B |
| Headquarters | United States | United States |
| Revenue / Employee | $450k / employee | $459k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 55.9x P/S | 11.3x P/S |
Strategic Positioning
Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. Strategic Vector
FY2026 Revenue BaselineCrowdStrike's growth strategy is to become the consolidation platform for the security operations center.
Okta, Inc. Strategic Vector
FY2026 Revenue BaselineOkta's growth strategy has three parts: sell newer products (Okta Identity Governance, Privileged Access, Identity Threat Protection, Identity Security Posture Management) into its existing base; move up-market, where customers above $1 million in ACV grew more than 20% to over 600 by mid-2026; and extend identity controls to AI agents and non-human identities through product launches and acquisitions such as Axiom Security (2025) and Permiso Security (announced July 2026).
Quick Stats Comparison
| Metric | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | Okta, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8B (FY2026) | $2.9B (FY2026) |
| Founded | 2011 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Market Cap | $269.0B | $33.0B |
| Employees | 10,698 | 6,366 |
| Revenue / Employee | $450k / employee | $459k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 55.9x P/S | 11.3x P/S |
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. Revenue vs Okta, Inc. Revenue — Year by Year
| Year | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | Okta, Inc. | Higher reported revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $4.8B | $2.9B | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2025 | $4.0B | $2.6B | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2024 | $3.1B | $2.3B | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2023 | $2.2B | $1.9B | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2022 | $1.5B | $1.3B | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (approx. USD) |
Business Model Breakdown
Overview: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc.
This in-depth comparison examines CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. on its own, evaluating Okta, Inc., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. is widest.
On the headline numbers, annual revenue is $4.8B (FY2026) for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and $2.9B (FY2026) for Okta, Inc., while their respective market capitalizations stand at $269.0B and $33.0B. Both CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. are headquartered in United States. Their local markets and applicable rules may still differ.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. is an American cybersecurity company founded in 2011 and headquartered in Austin, Texas since it moved from Sunnyvale, California in 2021. It popularized cloud-native endpoint detection and response with Falcon, which replaced signature-based antivirus with a lightweight sensor and cloud analytics. Today Falcon covers endpoint, identity, cloud, SIEM, threat intelligence, and managed services. CrowdStrike had 10,698 employees at the end of fiscal 2026 and joined the S&P 500 in June 2024.
Okta, Inc.: Okta runs the login and access layer for thousands of organizations. Its workforce products let employees and contractors sign in once and reach the apps they are allowed to use, with MFA, automated account provisioning and access reviews. Its Auth0 customer identity platform gives developers ready-made login, registration and authorization for consumer and business apps. More than 20,000 organizations used Okta as of January 31, 2026, including 5,255 customers paying over $100,000 a year as of July 31, 2026. About 79% of Q2 FY2027 revenue came from the United States. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California. Okta was founded in 2009 in San Francisco, California, by former Salesforce executives Todd McKinnon and Frederic Kerrest to pioneer cloud identity and access management (IAM), enabling enterprises to connect employees and customers securely to any application.
Business Models: How CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. Make Money
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc..
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. business model: CrowdStrike makes money mainly from subscriptions to its Falcon platform, which accounts for roughly 95% of revenue; the rest comes from professional services such as incident response. Customers deploy one sensor and pay per protected endpoint, workload, or identity, then add modules (EDR/XDR, identity protection, cloud security, Next-Gen SIEM, exposure management, Charlotte AI) without installing new software. Falcon Flex lets customers pre-commit spend and switch modules on as needed. Ending ARR from Flex accounts passed $2.29 billion in July 2026, up 101% year over year. Sales run through a direct field team, channel partners, MSSPs, and cloud marketplaces such as AWS Marketplace.
Okta, Inc. business model: Okta makes money by selling term subscriptions to its cloud identity services. Workforce identity products such as Single Sign-On, Adaptive MFA, Universal Directory, Lifecycle Management, Okta Identity Governance and Privileged Access are generally priced per user per month and sold on annual or multi-year contracts. Customer identity, sold under the Auth0 brand, is priced mainly by monthly active users and feature tier, from a free developer plan up to custom enterprise contracts. In fiscal 2026, subscription revenue was $2.855 billion of $2.919 billion total; the remainder was professional services, which Okta is deliberately shifting to partners. Growth comes from landing new customers and upselling additional products, with a dollar-based net retention rate of 107% reported for the quarter ended July 31, 2026.
Competitive Advantage: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc.
The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. stack up against those of Okta, Inc..
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. competitive advantage: CrowdStrike's advantage comes from its single-agent, cloud-native architecture and the volume of telemetry it collects. One sensor supports dozens of modules, so customers can add new products without new deployments, and data from its large installed base feeds detection models and the Counter Adversary Operations intelligence team. Brand recognition from high-profile breach investigations and a large partner ecosystem help it win enterprise and government deals.
Okta, Inc. competitive advantage: Okta's main advantage is neutrality. It does not sell a cloud, an operating system or a productivity suite, so customers running AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft and hundreds of SaaS tools can use one identity layer without favouring a single vendor. The Okta Integration Network offers more than 7,000 pre-built integrations, and identity systems are costly to replace once wired into HR, IT and security workflows. Auth0 adds a developer-led channel into customer-facing apps that most workforce IAM rivals lack.
Growth Strategy: Where CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. Are Headed
Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. each plan to expand from here.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. growth strategy: CrowdStrike's growth strategy is to become the consolidation platform for the security operations center. Beyond endpoint protection, it is pushing Next-Gen SIEM, cloud security, identity protection, exposure management, and Charlotte AI agentic security workflows. It uses Falcon Flex to lower friction for adding modules, and tuck-in acquisitions to enter new categories: Onum and Pangea in 2025, then SGNL ($740 million) and Seraphic in January 2026. It also sells to small businesses and MSSPs through partners and marketplaces.
Okta, Inc. growth strategy: Okta's growth strategy has three parts: sell newer products (Okta Identity Governance, Privileged Access, Identity Threat Protection, Identity Security Posture Management) into its existing base; move up-market, where customers above $1 million in ACV grew more than 20% to over 600 by mid-2026; and extend identity controls to AI agents and non-human identities through product launches and acquisitions such as Axiom Security (2025) and Permiso Security (announced July 2026). It is also handing more implementation work to partners to focus on software revenue.
Financial Picture: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc.
A closer look at the financial trajectory of CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. rounds out the comparison.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.: CrowdStrike is a high-growth subscription business with strong cash generation but thin GAAP profits. Fiscal 2026 revenue was $4.81 billion, up about 22% from $3.95 billion. Ending ARR rose 24% to $5.25 billion, with a record $1.01 billion of net new ARR. Free cash flow reached $1.24 billion (26% of revenue), yet the GAAP net loss widened to $162.5 million because of stock-based compensation and outage-related costs. Growth accelerated in fiscal 2027: Q2 revenue was $1.47 billion (+26%), ARR reached $5.84 billion (+25%), and Q2 free cash flow was a record $377 million. Management raised its fiscal 2027 net new ARR growth outlook to 34% at the midpoint and keeps a long-term target of $10 billion in ending ARR by fiscal 2031. CrowdStrike is a dominant force in modern cybersecurity, boasting a massive market valuation that generally exceeds $70 billion.
Okta, Inc.: Okta crossed into GAAP profitability in fiscal 2025 ($28 million net income on $2.610 billion revenue) and expanded it in fiscal 2026: revenue rose 12% to $2.919 billion, GAAP operating income reached $149 million, net income $235 million and free cash flow $863 million (30% margin). Momentum continued in fiscal 2027. Q2 FY2027 (ended July 31, 2026) revenue grew 11% to $805 million, GAAP net income was $116 million, free cash flow $227 million, and remaining performance obligations rose 17% to $4.858 billion. Okta held $2.299 billion of cash and short-term investments after repaying the last $350 million of its 2026 convertible notes in cash, and it has been buying back stock. Okta, Inc. is a massive American cloud-based identity and access management company, commanding a market valuation typically exceeding $15 billion.
Company-Specific SWOT Notes
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
One sensor supports dozens of Falcon modules.
Fiscal 2026 revenue was $4.81 billion, up about 22%.
The July 2024 outage showed how a single bad update can disrupt millions of machines.
The GAAP net loss widened to $162.5 million in fiscal 2026 because of stock-based compensation and outage-related costs, even as free cash flow reached $1.24 billion.
Next-Gen SIEM, identity (SGNL), browser security (Seraphic), and AI security (Pangea) open new categories as buyers consolidate tools and secure AI agents.
Microsoft bundles Defender into enterprise licenses, while Palo Alto Networks and others compete aggressively for the same platform consolidation deals.
Okta, Inc.
Works across AWS, Google, Microsoft and more than 7,000 integrated apps without tying customers to one platform.
Okta Platform and Auth0 cover employees and customers under one vendor.
Revenue growth has settled around 11-12%, down from 40%+ before fiscal 2023.
Breaches in 2022 and 2023 remain a reputational overhang for a security vendor.
Agent SSO, the runtime gateway and Permiso target a fast-growing security need.
Entra ID included with Microsoft 365 licences undercuts standalone pricing.
Factual Scorecard
| Category | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Same-period Revenue Scale | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | $4.8B (FY2026) versus $2.9B (FY2026); the higher figure is identified after approximate USD conversion. |
| Founded Earlier | Okta, Inc. | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. was founded in 2011; Okta, Inc. was founded in 2009. |
Comparison Takeaway: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc.
Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.
Frequently Asked Questions: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc.
Which company was founded first, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. or Okta, Inc.?
Okta, Inc. was founded in 2009; CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. was founded in 2011.
What revenue did CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. report?
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. had $4.8B (FY2026), while Okta, Inc. had $2.9B (FY2026). These figures describe revenue scale; they do not by themselves determine an overall winner.
How do CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. make money?
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.: CrowdStrike makes money mainly from subscriptions to its Falcon platform, which accounts for roughly 95% of revenue; the rest comes from professional services such as incident response. Okta, Inc.: Okta makes money by selling term subscriptions to its cloud identity services.
Which is better, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. or Okta, Inc.?
There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.
Sources & References
- SEC EDGAR: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. filings search (10-K, 8-K)
- CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. Corporate Website
- CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. 2026 revenue figure: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. annual report (SEC EDGAR, filed 2026-03-05)
- sec.gov
- ir.crowdstrike.com
- businesswire.com
- crowdstrike.com
- crowdstrike.com
- SEC EDGAR: Okta, Inc. filings search (10-K, 8-K)
- Okta, Inc. Corporate Website
- Okta, Inc. 2026 revenue figure: Okta fiscal 2026 earnings release (March 4, 2026)
- okta.com
- sec.gov
- okta.com
- techcrunch.com
- siliconangle.com
Cite This Page
Automatically generated citations for researchers.
CorpDigest. (2026). CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc. Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/crowdstrike-vs-okta
CorpDigest. "CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/crowdstrike-vs-okta.
CorpDigest. "CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/crowdstrike-vs-okta.