CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc.: Strategic Comparison
Our analysts compile business strategy profiles from public financial filings, press releases, and analyst reports. Each profile is reviewed for accuracy before publication by our editorial desk and updated on a rolling basis.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Field | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | Okta, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $2.6B |
| Founded | 2011 | 2009 |
| Employees | 7,900 | 6,000 |
| Market Cap | $78.2B | $12.5B |
| Headquarters | United States | United States |
| Revenue / Employee | $481k / employee | $433k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 20.6x P/S | 4.8x P/S |
Current Strategic Alignment & Momentum
Executive Catalyst & Theme Analysis (September 2026)
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. Strategic Vector
FY2026 Baseline*Strategic Analysis (September 2026 Update):* As CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. navigates the Cybersecurity / Cloud-Native Endpoint Protection market from its headquarters in Austin, Texas (founded in 2011), a pivotal strategic theme is **Workflow Automation**. With reported annual revenue of $3.8B (FY2026) and a global workforce of 7,900 employees, the company's execution on workflow automation will directly influence its market share against peers such as Microsoft, Palo alto, Zscaler.
Okta, Inc. Strategic Vector
FY2026 Baseline*Strategic Analysis (September 2026 Update):* As Okta, Inc. navigates the Cybersecurity, Enterprise Identity & Access Management (IAM), Cloud Security, Customer Identity (CIAM) & Zero Trust Architecture market from its headquarters in San Francisco, California, United States (founded in 2009), a pivotal strategic theme is **Workflow Automation**. With reported annual revenue of $2.6B (FY2026) and a global workforce of 6,000 employees, the company's execution on workflow automation will directly influence its market share against peers such as Microsoft, Cisco systems, Cloudflare.
Quick Stats Comparison
| Metric | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | Okta, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $2.6B |
| Founded | 2011 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Market Cap | $78.2B | $12.5B |
| Employees | 7,900 | 6,000 |
| Revenue / Employee | $481k / employee | $433k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 20.6x P/S | 4.8x P/S |
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. Revenue vs Okta, Inc. Revenue — Year by Year
| Year | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | Okta, Inc. | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $4.8B | $2.6B | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. |
| 2025 | $3.9B | N/A | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. |
| 2024 | $3.1B | $2.5B | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. |
| 2023 | $2.2B | N/A | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. |
| 2022 | N/A | $1.9B | Okta, Inc. |
Business Model Breakdown
Overview: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc.
This in-depth comparison examines CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. on its own, evaluating Okta, Inc., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. is widest.
On the headline numbers, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reports annual revenue of $3.8B against $2.6B for Okta, Inc., while their respective market capitalizations stand at $78.2B and $12.5B. CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. is headquartered in United States and Okta, Inc. operates from United States, and those different home markets shape how each company competes.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.: CrowdStrike sells the Falcon cybersecurity platform, a cloud-native security architecture with a single lightweight sensor and modules covering endpoint, cloud workload, identity, exposure management, managed detection, threat intelligence, Next-Gen SIEM, log management, automation, and AI-related security.
Okta, Inc.: Okta, Inc. is an American multinational cybersecurity and identity cloud software corporation headquartered in San Francisco, California. Founded in 2009 by Todd McKinnon and Frederic Kerrest, Okta is listed on the NASDAQ (ticker: OKTA) with a $12.5 billion market capitalization. Generating over $2.6 billion in annual revenue with $500M+ in free cash flow under Co-Founder and CEO Todd McKinnon, Okta powers secure digital authentication for over 18,800 enterprise organizations and millions of consumer application users worldwide.
Business Models: How CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. Make Money
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc..
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. business model: CrowdStrike operates a lucrative SaaS business model. Customers install a lightweight software "sensor" (the Falcon agent) on every laptop and server in their organization, paying a recurring monthly subscription fee for continuous monitoring. Because the software is deployed instantly via the cloud and requires virtually no on-site hardware, CrowdStrike boasts astronomical gross margins and rapid deployment times. CrowdStrike operates a disruptive, cloud-native cybersecurity model, generating revenue entirely through lucrative, recurring SaaS subscriptions for its proprietary Falcon platform. Unlike legacy antivirus companies that rely on heavy, on-premise hardware and constantly updated signature files, CrowdStrike utilizes a single, lightweight software agent deployed across millions of corporate endpoints (laptops, servers, mobile devices). This architecture allows the company to crowdsource amounts of real-time threat telemetry globally, instantly analyzing trillions of data points using advanced artificial intelligence to detect and block sophisticated cyberattacks before they execute. This creates a powerful network effect: as more enterprises adopt the platform, the AI becomes exponentially smarter, benefiting all customers simultaneously. the company utilizes an aggressive 'land and expand' strategy; once the initial lightweight agent is installed, CrowdStrike seamlessly cross-sells additional, high-margin software modules (like identity protection or cloud security posture management) without requiring any additional physical deployment, driving net revenue retention rates.
Okta, Inc. business model: Okta operates a multi-tiered, cloud-native Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) subscription and developer API licensing business model characterized by high net revenue retention (>105%) and enterprise gross margins above 75%. Its commercial revenue engine spans four primary pillars: First, Workforce Identity Cloud (~62% of revenue), monetizing per-user, per-month enterprise licenses for Single Sign-On (SSO), Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), Universal Directory, and Lifecycle Management across 18,800+ corporate clients. Second, Customer Identity Cloud (Auth0) (~26% of revenue), charging usage-based API and monthly active user (MAU) subscription tiers to software developers embedding login, authentication, and user management into consumer applications. Third, Identity Governance & Privileged Access (OIG & PAM) (~8% of revenue), selling high-tier governance compliance and privileged administrator session management tools. Fourth, Professional Services & Advanced Security Training (~4% of revenue), providing identity architecture consulting and deployment certifications.
Competitive Advantage: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc.
The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. stack up against those of Okta, Inc..
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. competitive advantage: The overall business model is a masterclass in modern SaaS economics: acquire the customer through a high-efficacy endpoint product, expand revenue through frictionless module toggles, retain the customer through high switching costs and data network effects, and defend the margin through channel-led distribution and cloud infrastructure scalability. CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. Processes exactly 2 trillion security events every single week, a data throughput volume that exceeds the transaction processing capacity of the global credit card network by a factor of ten, establishing an insurmountable data moat in the cybersecurity sector. The customer acquisition cost (CAC) for CrowdStrike is heavily subsidized by its channel partner ecosystem, which comprises over 10,000 global resellers, managed security service providers (MSSPs), and system integrators. The subscription model also benefits from high switching costs; once the Falcon agent is deployed across 50,000 endpoints and integrated with the customer's identity provider and cloud infrastructure, ripping out the platform requires a multi-month remediation project, creating a structural lock-in that results in a gross retention rate exceeding 98%. The economic moat is widened by the data network effect: every new customer that deploys the Falcon agent contributes telemetry to the Threat Graph, improving the machine learning models' accuracy for all existing customers, which in turn increases the product's efficacy and justifies price increases of 5-7% annually during contract renewals. The company's competitive moat is anchored by the Threat Graph's data scale, the single-agent architecture's performance efficiency, and the Counter Adversary Operations team's proprietary threat intelligence. The competitive moat is also defended through the channel partner ecosystem; CrowdStrike's 10,000 partners are incentivized by higher margin structures and a simpler sales process, leading them to recommend the Falcon platform over more complex, multi-component alternatives from Palo Alto and Microsoft. The second pillar of the competitive advantage is the single lightweight agent architecture, which consolidates 18 distinct security functions — ranging from endpoint detection and response to vulnerability management, IT hygiene, and identity protection — into a single 20-megabyte sensor that consumes less than 1% of the host machine's CPU and memory resources. The competitive moat is not merely technological but operational; CrowdStrike's ability to process 2 trillion events weekly requires a cloud infrastructure architecture that is optimized for parallel processing and low-latency data retrieval, a technical hurdle that requires billions of dollars in cumulative R&D investment and a decade of iterative optimization, effectively barring new entrants from replicating the Threat Graph's scale and efficacy. The acquisition of Humio, rebranded as LogScale, is the cornerstone of this strategy; LogScale is a next-generation SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) platform capable of ingesting petabytes of log data at a fraction of the cost of legacy SIEMs like Splunk, allowing CrowdStrike to displace incumbent log management vendors and consolidate security telemetry into a single data lake. These early adopters provided the critical telemetry data that allowed the Threat Graph to begin learning and improving, establishing the data network effect that would become the company's primary competitive advantage.
Okta, Inc. competitive advantage: Okta's competitive advantage is fortified by four formidable ecosystem, neutrality, and switching cost moats: First, absolute cloud-neutrality: unlike Microsoft (which prioritizes Azure and Office 365) or Google, Okta connects seamlessly across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow without vendor lock-in. Second, the Okta Integration Network (OIN): maintaining over 7,500 pre-built, certified cloud software integrations, allowing enterprise IT teams to connect new SaaS tools in minutes rather than weeks. Third, developer dominance via Auth0: empowering millions of software engineers with friction-free authentication SDKs and APIs for custom web and mobile apps. Fourth, massive switching costs and mission-critical deployment: once an enterprise orchestrates all employee credentials, single sign-on, and directory lifecycles through Okta, ripping and replacing the identity layer poses catastrophic operational downtime risks.
Growth Strategy: Where CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. Are Headed
Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. each plan to expand from here.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. growth strategy: The land-and-expand strategy is quantified by the net dollar retention rate of 115%, meaning that for every $100 of annual recurring revenue (ARR) acquired in a given year, that same cohort generates $115 in the following year purely through upsells and cross-sells, independent of new customer acquisition. The growth strategy also includes the development of industry-specific Falcon modules for healthcare, financial services, and critical infrastructure, which incorporate pre-built compliance templates and threat intelligence feeds tailored to the specific regulatory and adversary landscape of each vertical. This module attachment rate drives a net dollar retention rate of 115%, meaning that even without acquiring a single new customer, the existing customer base expands its annual contract value by 15% annually through the addition of new cloud security workloads. This expansion is driven by the '5-4-3-2-1' growth framework: securing 5 clouds (AWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle, IBM), 4 identity providers (Active Directory, Okta, Ping, Azure AD), 3 log management instances, 2 automation workflows, and 1 Charlotte AI deployment. The '2' refers to implementing two automation workflows using the Falcon Fusion module, which allows security analysts to build no-code automated response playbooks that isolate infected endpoints and reset compromised passwords without human intervention. The company's operating use is further demonstrated by the divergence between revenue growth (36%) and operating expense growth (22%), allowing non-GAAP operating margins to expand to 24% in FY2024. The revenue concentration is well-diversified, with no single customer accounting for more than 3% of total revenue, and the geographic mix is expanding, with international revenue growing at 42% year-over-year to reach $1.13 billion, reducing the company's reliance on the mature North American market. The channel partner strategy is also evolving to support this framework; CrowdStrike is training its 10,000 partners to sell the 5-4-3-2-1 bundle as a comprehensive 'Security Operations Transformation' package, offering partners a 20% margin uplift for deals that include three or more modules. The financial target of this growth strategy is to increase the average selling price (ASP) per customer from $45,000 to $75,000 by fiscal year 2027, a 66% increase that will be driven entirely by the 5-4-3-2-1 module attachment rate, without requiring a proportional increase in the sales headcount. The company's long-term financial model targets $10 billion in annual recurring revenue by fiscal year 2030, a goal that requires maintaining a 25% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) while expanding non-GAAP operating margins to 35% through the operating use of the cloud-native architecture. The team operated in stealth mode for 18 months, focusing entirely on building the Falcon platform's core architecture: a lightweight agent that could hook into the Windows kernel without causing system crashes, and a cloud backend capable of ingesting and analyzing millions of events per second. He partnered with Gregg Marston, a seasoned enterprise software executive who had previously built and sold two security companies, and Dmitri Alperovitch, a brilliant Russian-born threat intelligence researcher who had deep connections in the global intelligence community. The economic engine of the company relies on a land-and-expand strategy that has resulted in 49% of its customer base deploying six or more distinct security modules, ranging from endpoint detection and response (EDR) to identity threat protection and cloud security posture management (CSPM). The business model relies on a land-and-expand strategy, achieving a 115% net dollar retention rate with 49% of customers using six or more modules. CrowdStrike's growth strategy is explicitly defined by the '5-4-3-2-1' framework, a systematic initiative to capture specific market segments by deploying targeted modules that expand the customer's annual contract value without requiring a new sales cycle. This growth strategy is executed through a land-and-expand motion that relies on the existing customer base; rather than acquiring new customers, the sales team focuses on upselling the 6,500 existing subscription customers to adopt the 5-4-3-2-1 modules, a strategy that is significantly more capital efficient than new customer acquisition. The international growth strategy involves establishing regional headquarters in London, Frankfurt, and Singapore, and hiring 500 local sales and support personnel to penetrate the European and Asia-Pacific markets, where the adoption of cloud-native security is accelerating due to the rapid digitization of legacy industries. CrowdStrike's strategic bet for the next three years is the transformation of the Falcon platform from an endpoint security tool into the central nervous system for enterprise security operations, a transition anchored by the '5-4-3-2-1' growth framework and the integration of generative AI via Charlotte AI. The international expansion strategy is a critical component of the future outlook, with the company targeting 40% of total revenue from international markets by fiscal year 2027, driven by the adoption of cloud-native security in Europe and Asia-Pacific, where data sovereignty regulations require localized cloud infrastructure that CrowdStrike is actively building through regional AWS availability zones.
Okta, Inc. growth strategy: Okta's multi-year corporate expansion strategy centers on four core operational growth pillars: First, 'Identity Threat Protection with Okta AI', analyzing cross-SaaS behavioral signals to autonomously revoke tokens when anomalous session hijacking is detected. Second, scaling Okta Identity Governance (OIG) and Privileged Access (PAM), taking market share from legacy compliance and PAM vendors (SailPoint, CyberArk). Third, accelerating Auth0 developer adoption, embedding identity into next-generation generative AI applications and microservices. Fourth, international enterprise penetration, expanding sales across Europe, Japan, Australia, and Latin America.
Financial Picture: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc.
A closer look at the financial trajectory of CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. rounds out the comparison.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.: CrowdStrike operates as the undisputed, leader in endpoint cybersecurity and threat intelligence. Under CEO George Kurtz, the company generated exactly $3.8 billion in revenue and maintains a $78.2 billion market cap with a specialized workforce of exactly 7900 employees. The financial narrative in 2026 is defined by its relentless consolidation of enterprise security budgets; CrowdStrike's AI-native Falcon platform is rapidly expanding far beyond simple endpoint protection. The company is scaling into cloud security (CNAPP), identity threat detection, and log management (LogScale), stealing market share from legacy vendors and directly challenging Microsoft's security dominance.
Okta, Inc.: Okta completed its IPO on the NASDAQ (ticker: OKTA) in April 2017 at $17 per share, raising $187 million. Founded in 2009 by Todd McKinnon and Frederic Kerrest, Okta compounded subscription revenues at over 35% CAGR over the next decade. In May 2021, Okta completed the landmark $6.5 billion all-stock acquisition of developer authentication leader Auth0, uniting workforce and customer identity. In 2026, Okta generated over $2.6 billion in annual subscription revenue, producing over $500 million in free cash flow with a $12.5 billion market capitalization.
Company-Specific SWOT Notes
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
The Threat Graph processes 2 trillion security events and 50 trillion data points weekly, creating a machine learning training dataset three orders of magnitude larger than any competitor, enabling the detection of novel zero-day behaviors with 99% accuracy.
The overall business model is a masterclass in modern SaaS economics: acquire the customer through a high-efficacy endpoint product, expand revenue through frictionless module toggles, retain the customer through high switching costs and data network effects,
The Falcon agent’s kernel-level access to Windows endpoints creates a single point of failure, as demonstrated by the July 2024 outage that affected 8.
The integration of Charlotte AI and LogScale positions CrowdStrike to capture the $40 billion security operations market by automating the triage and investigation of the 10,000 daily alerts that overwhelm enterprise SOCs.
Microsoft offers Defender XDR as part of the M365 E5 license at zero marginal cost, capturing 25% market share and forcing CrowdStrike to justify its per-endpoint fee through superior cross-platform coverage and threat intelligence.
Okta, Inc.
Absolute independence from major cloud monopolies, integrating seamlessly across AWS, Azure, Google, and Salesforce.
Owns the standard for both corporate employee security and consumer web application developer authentication.
Microsoft bundling identity tools into Microsoft 365 E5 enterprise software agreements at discounted pricing.
As the primary identity gateway, Okta is a perpetual prime target for sophisticated state-sponsored threat actors.
Displacing complex legacy point solutions (SailPoint, CyberArk) with a unified, cloud-native identity platform.
Enterprise CIOs seeking to reduce software vendor counts by consolidating security tools under broad platform suites.
Head-to-Head Scorecard
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Scale | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reports the larger revenue base ($3.8B), which serves as a core operational scale signal. |
| Employee Productivity | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. generates higher revenue per employee ($481k / employee vs $433k / employee), signaling greater operational leverage. |
| Valuation Multiple | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. commands a higher valuation multiple (20.6x P/S vs 4.8x P/S), indicating greater investor premium on future growth. |
| Profitability Potential | Comparable | Both organizations prioritize market penetration or are at equivalent reporting tiers. |
| Company Age | Okta, Inc. | Founded in 2011 vs 2009. The earlier pioneer typically commands longer historical institutional legacy. |
| Innovation Moat | Tied | Higher aggregate count of major acquisitions and key R&D releases indicates a more active technology absorption velocity. |
| Scale (Employees) | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | A significantly larger reported workforce supports enhanced global distribution capability. |
| Market Cap | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | Higher public valuation denotes greater forward-looking investor conviction in earnings potential. |
| Future Outlook | Tied | Strategic auditing assesses that both maintain defensive leadership vectors within their core market clusters. |
Who Wins Each Category?
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reports the larger revenue base ($3.8B), which serves as a core operational scale signal.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. generates higher revenue per employee ($481k / employee vs $433k / employee), signaling greater operational leverage.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. commands a higher valuation multiple (20.6x P/S vs 4.8x P/S), indicating greater investor premium on future growth.
Both organizations prioritize market penetration or are at equivalent reporting tiers.
Founded in 2011 vs 2009. The earlier pioneer typically commands longer historical institutional legacy.
Who Wins: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. or Okta, Inc.?
Reviewed by Swet Parvadiya, September 2026 - Author Profile
Our analysts compile business strategy profiles from public financial filings, press releases, and analyst reports. Each profile is reviewed for accuracy before publication by our editorial desk and updated on a rolling basis.
Frequently Asked Questions: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc.
Is CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. better than Okta, Inc.?
Verdict: Between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc., CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. is the stronger overall option based on higher annual revenue. The decision still depends on which factors matter most for your needs, but on the weight of the evidence above, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. comes out ahead in this CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc. comparison.
Who earns more — CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. or Okta, Inc.?
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. earns more with $3.8B in annual revenue versus Okta, Inc.'s $2.6B. CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. leads on total revenue based on latest verified figures.
Which company has higher revenue — CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. or Okta, Inc.?
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported $3.8B, while Okta, Inc. reported $2.6B. The revenue leader is CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. based on latest verified figures.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. revenue vs Okta, Inc. revenue — which is higher?
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. revenue: $3.8B. Okta, Inc. revenue: $2.6B. CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. has the larger revenue base of the two companies.
Which company generates more revenue per employee — CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. or Okta, Inc.?
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. leads in workforce productivity, generating $481k / employee per employee compared to $433k / employee for Okta, Inc.. CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. operates with a team of 7,900 employees while Okta, Inc. employs 6,000.
What are the current strategic priorities for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc. in 2026?
In 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. is prioritizing *Strategic Analysis (September 2026 Update):* As CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., while Okta, Inc. is focusing on *Strategic Analysis (September 2026 Update):* As Okta, Inc.. These strategic vectors determine how each company allocates capital and defends its moat in Cybersecurity / Cloud-Native Endpoint Protection.
How do the valuation multiples of CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Okta, Inc. compare?
On a price-to-sales basis, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. trades at 20.6x P/S with a market capitalization of $78.2B on $3.8B in revenue, compared to 4.8x P/S for Okta, Inc. with a market capitalization of $12.5B on $2.6B in revenue.
Sources & References
- SEC EDGAR: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. Annual Filings (10-K, 8-K)
- CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. Corporate Website
- CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. Annual Report 2026 - Revenue and Financial Data
- sec.gov
- sec.gov
- investors.crowdstrike.com
- SEC EDGAR: Okta, Inc. Annual Filings (10-K, 8-K)
- Okta, Inc. Corporate Website
- Okta, Inc. Annual Report 2026 - Revenue and Financial Data
- sec.gov
- investor.okta.com
- gartner.com
Cite This Page
Automatically generated citations for researchers.
CorpDigest. (2026). CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc. Comparison. Retrieved , from
CorpDigest. "CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, . Accessed .
CorpDigest. "CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs Okta, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. Accessed . .