Skip to main content

Bunge vs Samsung: Revenue, Profit and Business Model

Bunge reported $70.3B of revenue in FY2025 and $816M of net income. Samsung reported ~$236.9B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$31.4B of net income.

Latest financial snapshot

Bunge

Latest revenue
$70.3B (FY2025)
Net income
$816M
Net margin
1.2%
Revenue growth
+4.4% a year, FY2021–FY2025

Samsung

Latest revenue
~$236.9B (FY2025)
Net income
~$31.4B
Net margin
13.3%
Revenue growth
+4.5% a year, FY2021–FY2025

Financial summary

Bunge

Bunge reports enormous sales and thin profits. Net sales rose 32 percent to $70.3 billion in 2025 as Viterra was consolidated from July, but net income attributable to Bunge fell 28 percent to $816 million, or $4.93 per diluted share, after acquisition charges and mark-to-market timing effects. On the adjusted basis management uses, EPS was $7.57 against $9.19 in 2024, and adjusted total EBIT was flat at $2.03 billion. The year 2026 started weak and then improved: first-quarter net income was $68 million on $21.9 billion of sales, and the second quarter delivered $678 million, or $3.47 per share, on $24.0 billion. Bunge completed the $2 billion buyback tied to the Viterra deal in the second quarter, authorized a further $3 billion programme at its March 2026 Investor Day, and shareholders approved an annual dividend of $2.88 per share in May 2026. Guidance for 2026 adjusted EPS rose from $7.50 to $8.00 in February to $9.25 to $9.75 in July.

Samsung

Samsung's earnings follow the memory cycle. Revenue fell from ~$215 billion (KRW 302.2 trillion) in 2022 to ~$184 billion (KRW 258.9 trillion) in 2023 during a chip downturn, then recovered to ~$214 billion (KRW 300.9 trillion) in 2024 and ~$237 billion (KRW 333.6 trillion) in 2025, when net income reached about $31.5 billion (KRW 44.3 trillion). In 2026, AI server demand created a memory shortage. Q1 operating profit of ~$40.6 billion (KRW 57.2 trillion) exceeded the full-year 2025 total, and Q2 reached ~$63.5 billion (KRW 89.5 trillion) on ~$122 billion (KRW 171.5 trillion) revenue. Higher memory costs also squeezed Samsung's own devices: the MX and Networks unit lost ~$497 million (KRW 0.7 trillion) in Q2 2026 on ~$23.6 billion (KRW 33.2 trillion) revenue.

Revenue and profit by year

Bunge

Bunge revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025$70.3B$816M1.2%+32.4%Source
FY2024$53.1B$1.1B2.1%-10.8%Source
FY2023$59.5B$2.2B3.8%-11.4%Source
FY2022$67.2B$1.6B2.4%+13.7%Source
FY2021$59.2B$2.1B3.5%—Source
Full Bunge financials

Samsung

Samsung revenue, net income, margin and growth by fiscal year
YearRevenueNet incomeMarginGrowthSource
FY2025~$236.9B~$31.4B13.3%+10.9%Source
FY2024~$213.6B~$23.9B11.2%+16.2%Source
FY2023~$183.8B~$10.3B5.6%-14.3%Source
FY2022~$214.6B~$38.9B18.1%+8.1%Source
FY2021~$198.5B~$27.9B14.0%—Source
Full Samsung financials

Where the revenue comes from

Bunge

  • Soybean Processing and Refining51.6%

    $36.3 billion of 2025 net sales from crushing soybeans into meal and oil, merchandising soybeans and refining soy oil. Bunge processed 41.0 million metric tons and merchandised 20.5 million tons, and adjusted segment EBIT rose 8 percent to $1.33 billion.

  • Grain Merchandising and Milling25.8%

    $18.1 billion of 2025 net sales from originating, storing and trading wheat, corn, barley and other grains, plus wheat milling. Volumes rose to 67.2 million metric tons from 36.7 million as Viterra joined, and adjusted segment EBIT was $386 million.

  • Softseed Processing and Refining16.0%

    $11.3 billion of 2025 net sales from crushing canola, rapeseed and sunflower seed. Processed volumes rose to 10.8 million metric tons, helped by Viterra plants in Argentina, Canada and Europe, and adjusted segment EBIT was $580 million.

  • Other Oilseeds (Tropical Oils and Specialty Ingredients)6.6%

    $4.6 billion of 2025 net sales from palm and other tropical oils and specialty fats, with adjusted segment EBIT of $168 million. Bunge renamed the segment Tropical Oils and Specialty Ingredients in 2026.

Samsung

  • Memory semiconductors
  • Foundry and system LSI
  • Galaxy smartphones and mobile devices
  • Display panels
  • TVs and appliances
  • Network equipment
  • Harman automotive and audio

Business model and strategy

Bunge

How it makes money

Bunge earns a spread, not a price. It buys oilseeds and grain from farmers and country elevators, moves them by truck, barge, rail and ship, and either sells them on to customers in other regions or crushes them.

Growth strategy

Bunge's growth plan has three parts. First, extract value from Viterra by connecting its grain handling in Canada, Australia, Argentina and Europe to Bunge's crushing, refining and destination sales; cost synergies passed $70 million by the end of 2025.

Competitive advantage

Bunge's edge is physical reach at both ends of the chain. It owns origination, storage and export capacity in the largest surplus regions, including Brazil, Argentina, the US, Canada and Australia, and crushing and refining plants close to demand in Europe, Asia and North America.

Bunge business model in full

Samsung

How it makes money

Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses. Device Solutions (DS) makes and sells memory (DRAM, HBM, NAND), System LSI chips such as Exynos processors and ISOCELL image sensors, and contract foundry manufacturing.

Growth strategy

Samsung's growth plan centers on AI memory: ramping HBM4 for Nvidia and AMD accelerators, developing HBM4E, and adding DRAM capacity at Pyeongtaek. In foundry it is pursuing 2nm gate-all-around production and building its Taylor, Texas fab to win customers from TSMC. On the device side it relies on Galaxy AI features, foldables and premium TVs to defend share against Apple and Chinese brands.

Competitive advantage

Samsung's edge is manufacturing scale and breadth. It is the largest memory producer and one of only three major DRAM makers, alongside SK hynix and Micron. That lets it capture pricing upswings like the 2026 AI-driven shortage.

Samsung business model in full

Questions about Bunge vs Samsung

Which company has higher revenue — Bunge Global SA or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?

Bunge Global SA reported $70.3B (FY2025), while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. reported ~$236.9B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the larger business, with Bunge Global SA reporting a smaller revenue base.

What is the market cap of Bunge Global SA vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?

Bunge Global SA's market capitalisation stands at $21.2B, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s is $1.33T. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Bunge Global SA.

Which is more financially efficient — Bunge Global SA or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?

Bunge Global SA generates $2.07M / employee in revenue per employee, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generates $914k / employee. Bunge Global SA shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.

How do Bunge Global SA and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. make money?

Bunge Global SA and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Bunge Global SA: Bunge earns a spread, not a price. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses.

Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Bunge Global SA or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Bunge Global SA trades at 0.3x P/S and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. at 5.6x P/S. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Bunge Global SA. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.

Is Bunge Global SA bigger than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?

By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (~$236.9B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Bunge Global SA ($70.3B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.

Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Bunge vs Samsung overview

Content is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data sourced from SEC filings, annual reports, and public records. See our full disclaimer and methodology.