Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Samsung: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Bristol-Myers Squibb reported $48.2B of revenue in FY2025 and $7.1B of net income. Samsung reported ~$236.9B of revenue in FY2025 and ~$31.4B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Latest revenue
- $48.2B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $7.1B
- Net margin
- 14.6%
- Revenue growth
- +10.6% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Samsung
- Latest revenue
- ~$236.9B (FY2025)
- Net income
- ~$31.4B
- Net margin
- 13.3%
- Revenue growth
- +4.5% a year, FY2021–FY2025
Financial summary
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Revenue grew from $19.4 billion in 2016 to $42.5 billion in 2020 as Celgene's sales were added, and has stayed between $45.0 billion and $48.3 billion since 2021. Net earnings are far less stable because BMS expenses acquired in-process R&D: the $11.4 billion MyoKardia charge produced a $9.0 billion net loss in 2020, and the Karuna charge produced an $8.9 billion loss in 2024. Cash generation is steadier, with free cash flow of about $12.8 billion in 2025. That cash funds a dividend raised for a 17th straight year in February 2026, to $0.63 a quarter, and debt reduction, from $51.2 billion at the end of 2024 to $47.2 billion a year later. On July 30, 2026 BMS raised its 2026 revenue guidance to $49.0 to $50.0 billion, from $46.0 to $47.5 billion, after second-quarter revenue rose 6 percent to $12.97 billion.
Samsung
Samsung's earnings follow the memory cycle. Revenue fell from ~$215 billion (KRW 302.2 trillion) in 2022 to ~$184 billion (KRW 258.9 trillion) in 2023 during a chip downturn, then recovered to ~$214 billion (KRW 300.9 trillion) in 2024 and ~$237 billion (KRW 333.6 trillion) in 2025, when net income reached about $31.5 billion (KRW 44.3 trillion). In 2026, AI server demand created a memory shortage. Q1 operating profit of ~$40.6 billion (KRW 57.2 trillion) exceeded the full-year 2025 total, and Q2 reached ~$63.5 billion (KRW 89.5 trillion) on ~$122 billion (KRW 171.5 trillion) revenue. Higher memory costs also squeezed Samsung's own devices: the MX and Networks unit lost ~$497 million (KRW 0.7 trillion) in Q2 2026 on ~$23.6 billion (KRW 33.2 trillion) revenue.
Revenue and profit by year
Bristol-Myers Squibb
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $48.2B | $7.1B | 14.6% | -0.2% | Source |
| FY2024 | $48.3B | -$8.9B | -18.5% | +7.3% | Source |
| FY2023 | $45B | $8B | 17.8% | -2.5% | Source |
| FY2022 | $46.2B | $6.3B | 13.7% | -0.5% | Source |
| FY2021 | $46.4B | $7B | 15.1% | +9.1% | Source |
| FY2020 | $42.5B | -$9B | -21.2% | +62.6% | Source |
| FY2019 | $26.1B | $3.4B | 13.2% | +15.9% | Source |
| FY2018 | $22.6B | $4.9B | 21.8% | +8.6% | Source |
| FY2017 | $20.8B | $1B | 4.8% | +6.9% | Source |
| FY2016 | $19.4B | $4.5B | 22.9% | — | Source |
Samsung
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | ~$236.9B | ~$31.4B | 13.3% | +10.9% | Source |
| FY2024 | ~$213.6B | ~$23.9B | 11.2% | +16.2% | Source |
| FY2023 | ~$183.8B | ~$10.3B | 5.6% | -14.3% | Source |
| FY2022 | ~$214.6B | ~$38.9B | 18.1% | +8.1% | Source |
| FY2021 | ~$198.5B | ~$27.9B | 14.0% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Growth Portfolio~55%
$26.4 billion in 2025, up 17%: Opdivo, Opdivo Qvantig, Orencia, Yervoy, Reblozyl, Breyanzi, Opdualag, Camzyos, Sotyktu, Cobenfy, Krazati and other newer brands. It grew another 15% to $7.56 billion in the second quarter of 2026.
- Legacy Portfolio~45%
$21.8 billion in 2025: Eliquis ($14.4 billion), Revlimid ($3.0 billion), Pomalyst/Imnovid ($2.7 billion), Sprycel, Abraxane and other mature brands facing generic competition. Legacy revenue fell 4% in the second quarter of 2026.
Samsung
- Memory semiconductors
- Foundry and system LSI
- Galaxy smartphones and mobile devices
- Display panels
- TVs and appliances
- Network equipment
- Harman automotive and audio
Business model and strategy
Bristol-Myers Squibb
How it makes money
BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals. Net product sales were $46.8 billion of the $48.2 billion total in 2025; alliance, royalty and other revenues made up the remaining $1.4 billion, including royalties from Merck on Winrevair.
Growth strategy
BMS is pursuing growth on three fronts. First, scaling the Growth Portfolio (Opdivo Qvantig, Reblozyl, Camzyos, Breyanzi, Opdualag, Cobenfy and others), which rose 17 percent to $26.4 billion in 2025 and 15 percent to $7.56 billion in the second quarter of 2026.
Competitive advantage
BMS's advantage is its expertise in oncology and its large commercial and regulatory organization. Developing a cancer immunotherapy is complex, and winning approval from regulators and getting doctors to prescribe it requires an established global sales and regulatory team.
Samsung
How it makes money
Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses. Device Solutions (DS) makes and sells memory (DRAM, HBM, NAND), System LSI chips such as Exynos processors and ISOCELL image sensors, and contract foundry manufacturing.
Growth strategy
Samsung's growth plan centers on AI memory: ramping HBM4 for Nvidia and AMD accelerators, developing HBM4E, and adding DRAM capacity at Pyeongtaek. In foundry it is pursuing 2nm gate-all-around production and building its Taylor, Texas fab to win customers from TSMC. On the device side it relies on Galaxy AI features, foldables and premium TVs to defend share against Apple and Chinese brands.
Competitive advantage
Samsung's edge is manufacturing scale and breadth. It is the largest memory producer and one of only three major DRAM makers, alongside SK hynix and Micron. That lets it capture pricing upswings like the 2026 AI-driven shortage.
Questions about Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Samsung
Which company has higher revenue — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported $48.2B (FY2025), while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. reported ~$236.9B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the larger business, with Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reporting a smaller revenue base.
What is the market cap of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company's market capitalisation stands at $127.5B, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s is $1.33T. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
Which is more financially efficient — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company generates $1.48M / employee in revenue per employee, while Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generates $914k / employee. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. make money?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Samsung earns money from two groups of businesses.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company trades at 2.6x P/S and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. at 5.6x P/S. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Bristol-Myers Squibb Company bigger than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.?
By last reported revenue, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (~$236.9B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company ($48.2B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Samsung overview