Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Meta: Revenue, Profit and Business Model
Bristol-Myers Squibb reported $48.2B of revenue in FY2025 and $7.1B of net income. Meta reported $201B of revenue in FY2025 and $60.5B of net income.
Latest financial snapshot
Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Latest revenue
- $48.2B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $7.1B
- Net margin
- 14.6%
- Revenue growth
- +10.6% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Meta
- Latest revenue
- $201B (FY2025)
- Net income
- $60.5B
- Net margin
- 30.1%
- Revenue growth
- +24.7% a year, FY2016–FY2025
Financial summary
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Revenue grew from $19.4 billion in 2016 to $42.5 billion in 2020 as Celgene's sales were added, and has stayed between $45.0 billion and $48.3 billion since 2021. Net earnings are far less stable because BMS expenses acquired in-process R&D: the $11.4 billion MyoKardia charge produced a $9.0 billion net loss in 2020, and the Karuna charge produced an $8.9 billion loss in 2024. Cash generation is steadier, with free cash flow of about $12.8 billion in 2025. That cash funds a dividend raised for a 17th straight year in February 2026, to $0.63 a quarter, and debt reduction, from $51.2 billion at the end of 2024 to $47.2 billion a year later. On July 30, 2026 BMS raised its 2026 revenue guidance to $49.0 to $50.0 billion, from $46.0 to $47.5 billion, after second-quarter revenue rose 6 percent to $12.97 billion.
Meta
Meta's revenue grew from $116.609B in 2022 to $200.966B in 2025, and net income rose from $23.2B to $60.458B. FY2025 income from operations was $83.276B. In 2026 the story is spending: Q2 2026 costs rose 55% to $42.03B, the operating margin fell to 31% from 43%, and quarterly capex of $31.08B left free cash flow at $784M. Meta had $90.26B of cash and marketable securities and $83.66B of long-term debt at June 30, 2026. It expects 2026 total expenses of $165-169B and still expects 2026 operating income to exceed 2025.
Revenue and profit by year
Bristol-Myers Squibb
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $48.2B | $7.1B | 14.6% | -0.2% | Source |
| FY2024 | $48.3B | -$8.9B | -18.5% | +7.3% | Source |
| FY2023 | $45B | $8B | 17.8% | -2.5% | Source |
| FY2022 | $46.2B | $6.3B | 13.7% | -0.5% | Source |
| FY2021 | $46.4B | $7B | 15.1% | +9.1% | Source |
| FY2020 | $42.5B | -$9B | -21.2% | +62.6% | Source |
| FY2019 | $26.1B | $3.4B | 13.2% | +15.9% | Source |
| FY2018 | $22.6B | $4.9B | 21.8% | +8.6% | Source |
| FY2017 | $20.8B | $1B | 4.8% | +6.9% | Source |
| FY2016 | $19.4B | $4.5B | 22.9% | — | Source |
Meta
| Year | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Growth | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $201B | $60.5B | 30.1% | +22.2% | Source |
| FY2024 | $164.5B | $62.4B | 37.9% | +21.9% | Source |
| FY2023 | $134.9B | $39.1B | 29.0% | +15.7% | Source |
| FY2022 | $116.6B | $23.2B | 19.9% | -1.1% | Source |
| FY2021 | $117.9B | $39.4B | 33.4% | +37.2% | Source |
| FY2020 | $86B | $29.1B | 33.9% | +21.6% | Source |
| FY2019 | $70.7B | $18.5B | 26.1% | +26.6% | Source |
| FY2018 | $55.8B | $22.1B | 39.6% | +37.4% | Source |
| FY2017 | $40.7B | $15.9B | 39.2% | +47.1% | Source |
| FY2016 | $27.6B | $10.2B | 37.0% | — | Source |
Where the revenue comes from
Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Growth Portfolio~55%
$26.4 billion in 2025, up 17%: Opdivo, Opdivo Qvantig, Orencia, Yervoy, Reblozyl, Breyanzi, Opdualag, Camzyos, Sotyktu, Cobenfy, Krazati and other newer brands. It grew another 15% to $7.56 billion in the second quarter of 2026.
- Legacy Portfolio~45%
$21.8 billion in 2025: Eliquis ($14.4 billion), Revlimid ($3.0 billion), Pomalyst/Imnovid ($2.7 billion), Sprycel, Abraxane and other mature brands facing generic competition. Legacy revenue fell 4% in the second quarter of 2026.
Meta
- Advertising
~97.6% (FY2025)
Ads across Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, Threads and WhatsApp; $196.175B in FY2025.
- Other revenue and Reality Labs
~2.4% (FY2025)
WhatsApp Business messaging, Meta Verified subscriptions, Quest headsets and Ray-Ban Meta glasses.
Business model and strategy
Bristol-Myers Squibb
How it makes money
BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals. Net product sales were $46.8 billion of the $48.2 billion total in 2025; alliance, royalty and other revenues made up the remaining $1.4 billion, including royalties from Merck on Winrevair.
Growth strategy
BMS is pursuing growth on three fronts. First, scaling the Growth Portfolio (Opdivo Qvantig, Reblozyl, Camzyos, Breyanzi, Opdualag, Cobenfy and others), which rose 17 percent to $26.4 billion in 2025 and 15 percent to $7.56 billion in the second quarter of 2026.
Competitive advantage
BMS's advantage is its expertise in oncology and its large commercial and regulatory organization. Developing a cancer immunotherapy is complex, and winning approval from regulators and getting doctors to prescribe it requires an established global sales and regulatory team.
Meta
How it makes money
Meta makes money by selling ads. Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, WhatsApp and Threads are free to use, and advertisers pay to reach people in feeds, Stories, Reels and click-to-message formats. Advertising produced $196.175B of Meta's $200.966B FY2025 revenue, about 97.6%. Q2 2026 growth came from 14% more ad impressions and a 12% higher average price per ad.
Growth strategy
Meta's growth plan runs through AI. Better ranking and ad-delivery models raise engagement on Reels and feeds and lift ad prices, which drove the 28% revenue growth in Q2 2026. Meta Superintelligence Labs, led by former Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, released the first Muse Spark model in April 2026, followed by a paid API and the Muse consumer AI agent in September 2026.
Competitive advantage
Meta's moat is distribution plus data. Its apps reach 3.60 billion people every day, so new products such as Threads, Meta AI and Muse can launch to a huge audience at once. Advertisers stay because Meta's AI ad tools such as Advantage+ convert across that audience at a scale only Google matches. Meta also owns its compute, custom MTIA chips and frontier models, which reduces its dependence on outside AI suppliers.
Questions about Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Meta
Which company has higher revenue — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Meta Platforms, Inc.?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported $48.2B (FY2025), while Meta Platforms, Inc. reported $201.0B (FY2025). By last reported revenue, Meta Platforms, Inc. is the larger business, with Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reporting a smaller revenue base.
What is the market cap of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Meta Platforms, Inc.?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company's market capitalisation stands at $127.5B, while Meta Platforms, Inc.'s is $1.90T. Meta Platforms, Inc. carries the higher market valuation, reflecting investors' expectations of its future earnings power relative to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
Which is more financially efficient — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Meta Platforms, Inc.?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company generates $1.48M / employee in revenue per employee, while Meta Platforms, Inc. generates $2.66M / employee. Meta Platforms, Inc. shows higher revenue efficiency per headcount, though this reflects business model differences — capital-light software companies routinely outperform labour-intensive manufacturers on this metric.
How do Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Meta Platforms, Inc. make money?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Meta Platforms, Inc. generate revenue in fundamentally different ways. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals. Meta Platforms, Inc.: Meta makes money by selling ads.
Which company is valued higher relative to revenue — Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Meta Platforms, Inc.?
On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company trades at 2.6x P/S and Meta Platforms, Inc. at 9.5x P/S. Meta Platforms, Inc. commands a higher revenue multiple, typically indicating that investors expect faster growth or higher future margins compared to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. A higher multiple is not inherently better — it may also signal that the stock is priced for perfection.
Is Bristol-Myers Squibb Company bigger than Meta Platforms, Inc.?
By last reported revenue, Meta Platforms, Inc. ($201.0B (FY2025)) is the larger company compared to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company ($48.2B (FY2025)). Revenue scale is one dimension of size — market capitalisation, employee count, and geographic reach are also relevant depending on the context.
Figures come from each company's filings and the sources linked beside them. Amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Back to the Bristol-Myers Squibb vs Meta overview