Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Cisco Systems, Inc.: Strategic Comparison
Direct Answer
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported $48.2B (FY2025), while Cisco Systems, Inc. reported $63.3B (FY2026). Their fiscal years differ, so the figures are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.
Editorial research by Swet Parvadiya. Figures keep each company's fiscal year; amounts reported in another currency are shown in US dollars at an approximate rate and marked with ~. Sources are listed below.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Field | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Latest reported revenue | $48.2B (FY2025) | $63.3B (FY2026) |
| Founded | 1887 | 1984 |
| Employees | 32,500 | 82,400 |
| Market Cap | $127.5B | $420.7B |
| Headquarters | United States | United States |
| Revenue / Employee | $1.48M / employee | $769k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 2.6x P/S | 6.6x P/S |
Strategic Positioning
Business model and competitive context from the cited profiles
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Strategic Vector
FY2025 Revenue BaselineThe Celgene deal bought time rather than a permanent fix. Revlimid's slide from $12.8 billion in 2021 to $3.0 billion in 2025 consumed much of what the deal added, yet Celgene also brought Reblozyl, Breyanzi, Zeposia and Abecma, which together sold about $4.7 billion in 2025. The same pattern repeats in 2028, so BMS's value rests on whether medicines launched since 2022 can grow faster than Eliquis and Opdivo decline.
Cisco Systems, Inc. Strategic Vector
FY2026 Revenue BaselineCisco's growth plan rests on three areas.
Quick Stats Comparison
| Metric | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $48.2B (FY2025) | $63.3B (FY2026) |
| Founded | 1887 | 1984 |
| Headquarters | Princeton, New Jersey | San Jose, California |
| Market Cap | $127.5B | $420.7B |
| Employees | 32,500 | 82,400 |
| Revenue / Employee | $1.48M / employee | $769k / employee |
| Valuation Multiple | 2.6x P/S | 6.6x P/S |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Revenue vs Cisco Systems, Inc. Revenue — Year by Year
| Year | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Cisco Systems, Inc. | Higher reported revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | N/A | $63.3B | Only one figure available |
| 2025 | $48.2B | $56.7B | Cisco Systems, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2024 | $48.3B | $53.8B | Cisco Systems, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2023 | $45.0B | $57.0B | Cisco Systems, Inc. (approx. USD) |
| 2022 | $46.2B | $51.6B | Cisco Systems, Inc. (approx. USD) |
Business Model Breakdown
Overview: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Cisco Systems, Inc.
This in-depth comparison examines Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Cisco Systems, Inc. across revenue, market value, business model, competitive positioning, and long-term growth strategy. Whether you are researching Bristol-Myers Squibb Company on its own, evaluating Cisco Systems, Inc., or weighing the two companies side by side, the breakdown below highlights where each company leads and where the gap between Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Cisco Systems, Inc. is widest.
On the headline numbers, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reports annual revenue of $48.2B against $63.3B for Cisco Systems, Inc., while their respective market capitalizations stand at $127.5B and $420.7B. Both Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Cisco Systems, Inc. are headquartered in United States, so they compete in a shared home market and regulatory environment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) is a U.S. biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Princeton, New Jersey, and listed on the New York Stock Exchange as BMY. It develops and sells prescription medicines for cancer, blood disorders, immune diseases, heart disease and schizophrenia. Its best-known products are Eliquis, the anticoagulant it sells with Pfizer, and Opdivo, a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor. With $48.2 billion of 2025 revenue and a market value of about $127 billion at the end of September 2026, it is one of the largest U.S. drugmakers by sales.
Cisco Systems, Inc.: Cisco Systems built much of the routing and switching hardware that connected the early commercial internet, and in March 2000 it briefly became the world's most valuable public company. Founded in 1984 and based in San Jose, California, it now sells networking, security, observability (Splunk and ThousandEyes), and Webex collaboration products to enterprises, governments, service providers, and cloud companies. After several flat years, AI data center demand pushed Cisco to record FY2026 revenue of $63.3 billion and lifted its market capitalization to about $421 billion by late September 2026.
Business Models: How Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Cisco Systems, Inc. Make Money
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Cisco Systems, Inc. pursue distinct approaches to generating revenue, and understanding how each company operates is the foundation of any fair comparison between Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Cisco Systems, Inc..
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company business model: BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals. Net product sales were $46.8 billion of the $48.2 billion total in 2025; alliance, royalty and other revenues made up the remaining $1.4 billion, including royalties from Merck on Winrevair. Eliquis is developed and sold with Pfizer, which shares its costs and profits. About 69 percent of 2025 revenue came from the United States, so U.S. pricing policy matters more to BMS than to most European rivals. Because every patent runs out, the model depends on replacing revenue: BMS paid $74 billion for Celgene in 2019, $13.1 billion for MyoKardia in 2020 and about $23 billion for Karuna, Mirati and RayzeBio in early 2024.
Cisco Systems, Inc. business model: Cisco makes money in two ways: product sales and services. Products (switches, routers, wireless, Silicon One-based data center and AI networking gear, firewalls, Splunk and other security and observability software, and Webex) made up about $13.5 billion of the $17.3 billion Q4 FY2026 revenue, while services (technical support, advisory, and maintenance contracts) contributed about $3.8 billion. Hardware is increasingly sold with software subscriptions attached, so a growing share of revenue recurs. Most sales go through channel partners and resellers, and large cloud providers now buy Cisco AI networking equipment directly.
Competitive Advantage: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Cisco Systems, Inc.
The durability of a company's moat often decides long-term winners. Here is how the competitive advantages of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company stack up against those of Cisco Systems, Inc..
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company competitive advantage: BMS's advantage is its expertise in oncology and its large commercial and regulatory organization. Developing a cancer immunotherapy is complex, and winning approval from regulators and getting doctors to prescribe it requires an established global sales and regulatory team. Smaller biotech companies often lack that infrastructure, so they partner with or sell to a company like BMS to bring their discoveries to market.
Cisco Systems, Inc. competitive advantage: Cisco's advantage is how deeply its equipment is built into corporate networks. The saying in IT is that 'nobody ever got fired for buying Cisco': large banks and other enterprises choose it for reliability. Replacing an integrated Cisco network with cheaper hardware is a multi-year project with real risk, so most CIOs stay, which gives Cisco a durable installed base.
Growth Strategy: Where Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Cisco Systems, Inc. Are Headed
Future prospects matter as much as current results. The growth strategies below explain how Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Cisco Systems, Inc. each plan to expand from here.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company growth strategy: BMS is pursuing growth on three fronts. First, scaling the Growth Portfolio (Opdivo Qvantig, Reblozyl, Camzyos, Breyanzi, Opdualag, Cobenfy and others), which rose 17 percent to $26.4 billion in 2025 and 15 percent to $7.56 billion in the second quarter of 2026. Second, buying and licensing late-stage science: Mirati ($4.8 billion plus a contingent value right of up to $1 billion), RayzeBio ($4.1 billion) and Karuna ($14 billion) closed in early 2024; a June 2025 deal with BioNTech for the bispecific BNT327 carried $1.5 billion upfront and up to $11.1 billion in total; and Orbital Therapeutics was bought for $1.5 billion in October 2025 for in vivo CAR-T in autoimmune disease. Third, cost cuts: a $1.5 billion savings program announced in 2024 was extended in 2025 with a further $2 billion targeted by the end of 2027.
Cisco Systems, Inc. growth strategy: Cisco's growth plan rests on three areas. First, AI infrastructure: Silicon One chips, Nexus and Cisco 8000 systems, and optics sold to hyperscalers and, increasingly, to neoclouds, sovereign AI projects, and enterprises building their own AI clusters. Second, campus and branch refresh, as enterprises upgrade switching and Wi-Fi for AI workloads. Third, security and observability, built around the $28 billion Splunk acquisition completed in March 2024 and Cisco's broader security cloud. Cisco funds this partly through restructuring, including about 4,000 job cuts announced in May 2026 to move spending toward AI.
Financial Picture: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Cisco Systems, Inc.
A closer look at the financial trajectory of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Cisco Systems, Inc. rounds out the comparison.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Revenue grew from $19.4 billion in 2016 to $42.5 billion in 2020 as Celgene's sales were added, and has stayed between $45.0 billion and $48.3 billion since 2021. Net earnings are far less stable because BMS expenses acquired in-process R&D: the $11.4 billion MyoKardia charge produced a $9.0 billion net loss in 2020, and the Karuna charge produced an $8.9 billion loss in 2024. Cash generation is steadier, with free cash flow of about $12.8 billion in 2025. That cash funds a dividend raised for a 17th straight year in February 2026, to $0.63 a quarter, and debt reduction, from $51.2 billion at the end of 2024 to $47.2 billion a year later. On July 30, 2026 BMS raised its 2026 revenue guidance to $49.0 to $50.0 billion, from $46.0 to $47.5 billion, after second-quarter revenue rose 6 percent to $12.97 billion.
Cisco Systems, Inc.: Cisco's revenue fell 5.6% to $53.8 billion in FY2024 as customers worked through excess inventory, then recovered to $56.7 billion in FY2025 and a record $63.3 billion in FY2026 (up 12%). FY2026 GAAP net income was about $13.3 billion, GAAP EPS was $3.33 (up 31%), and non-GAAP EPS was $4.33. Growth accelerated through the year: Q4 FY2026 revenue was $17.3 billion, up 18%, with product revenue up 24% and total product orders up 35%. Cisco said it recognized about $4 billion of AI infrastructure revenue from hyperscalers in FY2026 and expects about $7.5 billion in FY2027, within total FY2027 revenue guidance of $72.2-73.4 billion. The company also pays a quarterly dividend and buys back stock.
Company-Specific SWOT Notes
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Eliquis ($14.4 billion) and Opdivo ($10.0 billion) produced about half of 2025 revenue and help fund roughly $12.8 billion of annual free cash flow, a dividend raised 17 years running and continued deal-making.
Newer brands such as Opdivo Qvantig, Reblozyl, Camzyos, Breyanzi, Opdualag and Cobenfy grew 17 percent to $26.4 billion in 2025 and were nearly 60 percent of revenue by the second quarter of 2026.
Eliquis and Opdivo both lose U.S. exclusivity in 2028, and Revlimid, Pomalyst and Sprycel are already losing sales to generics.
The Celgene, MyoKardia, Karuna, Mirati and RayzeBio deals left about $47.2 billion of debt at the end of 2025 and produced GAAP net losses in 2020 and 2024 from in-process R&D charges.
Cobenfy could add Alzheimer's disease psychosis if the ADEPT trials succeed, and BMS has positions in radiopharmaceuticals (RayzeBio), in vivo CAR-T for autoimmune disease (Orbital) and PD-(L)1 x VEGF bispecifics (BNT327 with BioNTech).
About 69 percent of revenue is from the United States.
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cisco's 15+ million active networking devices deployed globally create notable switching costs that protect its market position.
Revenue reached a record $63.3 billion in FY2026, up 12%, with GAAP net income of about $13.3 billion and GAAP EPS of $3.33, up 31%.
Despite significant progress in software and subscriptions, Cisco's growth rate remains constrained by the mature, cyclical nature of its core networking hardware business.
Security is about 11% of Cisco's revenue, and Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and CrowdStrike are growing faster than Cisco's security segment.
The global AI infrastructure buildout, with hyperscalers guiding to $200+ billion in combined capital expenditure for 2025, creates a large new addressable market for high-performance networking.
The rise of open-source network operating systems like SONiC (backed by Microsoft and adopted by major hyperscalers) combined with white-box switches from ODMs threatens Cisco's premium pricing model.
Factual Scorecard
| Category | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Same-period Revenue Scale | Not comparable | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: $48.2B (FY2025). Cisco Systems, Inc.: $63.3B (FY2026). Different or missing fiscal periods prevent a like-for-like ranking. |
| Founded Earlier | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company was founded in 1887; Cisco Systems, Inc. was founded in 1984. |
Comparison Takeaway: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Cisco Systems, Inc.
Methodology and sourcing reviewed by Swet Parvadiya. No date is shown unless this comparison has its own editorial review date.
Frequently Asked Questions: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Cisco Systems, Inc.
Which company was founded first, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Cisco Systems, Inc.?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company was founded in 1887; Cisco Systems, Inc. was founded in 1984.
What revenue did Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Cisco Systems, Inc. report?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported $48.2B (FY2025), while Cisco Systems, Inc. reported $63.3B (FY2026). The fiscal years differ, so these are not a like-for-like same-period comparison.
How do Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Cisco Systems, Inc. make money?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: BMS discovers, licenses or buys drug candidates, takes them through clinical trials, and sells approved medicines under patent protection to wholesalers, specialty pharmacies and hospitals. Cisco Systems, Inc.: Cisco makes money in two ways: product sales and services.
Which is better, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Cisco Systems, Inc.?
There is no evidence-based single winner. Compare Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Cisco Systems, Inc. on the same fiscal period and the metric relevant to the question, such as revenue, profitability, growth, product fit, or market value.
Sources & References
- SEC EDGAR: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company filings search (10-K, 8-K)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Corporate Website
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company 2025 revenue figure: sec.gov
- sec.gov
- bms.com
- morningstar.com
- data.sec.gov
- stockanalysis.com
- stockanalysis.com
- fda.gov
- finance.yahoo.com
- en.wikipedia.org
- SEC EDGAR: Cisco Systems, Inc. filings search (10-K, 8-K)
- Cisco Systems, Inc. Corporate Website
- Cisco Systems, Inc. 2026 revenue figure: CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. annual report (Form 10-K, SEC EDGAR, filed 2026-09-02)
- sec.gov
- data.sec.gov
- en.wikipedia.org
- sec.gov
- sec.gov
Cite This Page
Automatically generated citations for researchers.
CorpDigest. (2026). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Cisco Systems, Inc. Comparison. from https://corpdigest.com/compare/bristol-myers-squibb-vs-cisco
CorpDigest. "Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Cisco Systems, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest, 2026, https://corpdigest.com/compare/bristol-myers-squibb-vs-cisco.
CorpDigest. "Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Cisco Systems, Inc. Comparison." CorpDigest. 2026. https://corpdigest.com/compare/bristol-myers-squibb-vs-cisco.